- Friday Aft - August 31, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 632 MP  Geomean: 168 MP
(based on 18 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Amy Pofcher - Barbara Callaway 59.00 1st A 0.90
Elizabeth Sebring - Ginger Minor 54.76 2nd A 0.63
Alan Hedegard - Janet Hedlund 51.86 3rd A 0.45
Anjalie Kulkarni - Jan Yaxtheimer 51.85 4th A 0.32
EVENT>Steinbeck Friday         |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> FF
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 31, 2018    |CLUB NO.>136838    | 08/31/2018 16:03
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Janet Hedlund   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 70% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/200  |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=5                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Amy Pofcher            Barbara Callaway         C    1     1     1     42.48  59.00  0.90(A)
 2 David Ow               Yoshie Wong              C    .     .     .     35.81  49.74
 3 Alan Hedegard          Janet Hedlund            A    3     .     .     37.34  51.86  0.45(A)
 5 Ginger Minor           Elizabeth Sebring        C    2     2     2     39.43  54.76  0.63(A)
 6 Janet Street           William Putnam           A    .     .     .     30.00  41.67
 7 Doris Jones            Carolyn Taggart          C    .     .     .     35.81  49.74
 8 Anjalie Kulkarni       Jan Yaxtheimer           C    4     .     .     37.33  51.85  0.32(A)
 9 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A    .     .     .     36.77  51.07
10 Joan Roberts           Steve Green              B    .     .     .     28.20  39.17
                                          Totals                         323.17

Hands and Results
1 ♠7
KT
AQT98
♣A7543
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KJT84
J953
J72
♣Q
♠A3
A874
6543
♣K96
♠Q9652
Q62
K
♣JT82
13
811
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 2NT  ♥5 ♠6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♦3 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.00   1.00  1N N +2   3  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
  150          2.00   1.00  2♣ N +3   7  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  150          2.00   1.00  2♣ N +3   4  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF6-Street-Putnam
  130          0.00   3.00  2♣ N +2   A  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North opens 1 and East passes, so South starts with 1. West also now passes, and North rebids 2. South bumps to 3, so North might entertain ideas of 3NT, but he really needed partner to make a game-forcing bid for that to be a legitimately good idea, so he passes.
That works, as partner's suit would not have been terribly useful in 3NT. But here in , declarer loses just 1, 1, and 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠973
JT
J63
♣KJT75
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠QT86
K52
94
♣AQ32
♠AJ54
9743
AKT
♣94
♠K2
AQ86
Q8752
♣86
6
1112
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT6
EW: 1♣ 2 3♠ 1NT  ♦5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   J  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
   50          2.50   0.50  3♠ W -1   J  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway
        140    0.50   2.50  3♠ W      J  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        140    0.50   2.50  3♠ W      3  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF6-Street-Putnam

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and South passes. West bids 1, North passes, and East raises to 2. West may try a help suit game try, but nothing is really all that appealing to East, and they should be able to stop short of game.
Good call when there are 4 losers - 1, 2, and 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠5
JT8762
A
♣QT764
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AQT73
3
KT5
♣AKJ9
♠KJ98
AK4
Q97432
♣-
♠642
Q95
J86
♣8532
7
1713
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1
EW: 1♣ 6 1 6♠ 6NT
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        680    1.50   1.50  4♠ W +2   J  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF6-Street-Putnam
        680    1.50   1.50  4♠ W +2   A  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        680    1.50   1.50  4♠ W +2   A  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        680    1.50   1.50  4♠ W +2   A  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South passes and West opens 1. North could try a 2 Michaels Cue Bid bid since he's not vulnerable, and while that takes away East's Jacoby 2NT bid, it does give him the 3 cuebid to show a good support hand. (He also has a 4 Splinter available.) South stays out of this, and West cuebids the A. That's not that exciting to East, but he does have a serious concentration of values in , so he bids 4. Now West can go to Keycard and East shows his 2 Keycards but not the void since it's not necessarily useful. That should be enough to get West to 6.
North probably just leads his since there's not much chance at all of getting partner in for a ruff if he led his stiff Ace. He'll get it anyways, and if he doesn't lead it, he does give declarer a chance to guess wrong and end up with 2 losers (but he should get this right just by leading up to the Q.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠T984
J8
JT
♣AK973
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠62
AT74
K854
♣862
♠K
K532
AQ962
♣QT4
♠AQJ753
Q96
73
♣J5
9
714
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3♠  ♦4 ♥4 NT6
EW: 2 3  ♣5 ♠2 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  2♠ S +2   K  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Street-Putnam
  140          2.00   1.00  2♠ S +1   4  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway
  100          1.00   2.00  4 E -1   3  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        100    0.00   3.00  4♠ S -1   K  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF2-Ow-Wong

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes, North passes, and East opens 1. South overcalls 2, getting his whole hand in one bid, and that makes West's bid a little harder, but he can either double to keep in the picture or just raise to 3. In either case, North bids 3 (or might sneak in a 3 if he can as a lead director), and that feels like it's enough to buy the contract.
As long as the defense takes their 4 red tricks before declarer sets up the , this should be the limit of the hand.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠AQ6
95
A874
♣T962
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠K9
QJ72
KT5
♣AQJ5
♠T8542
AKT
Q2
♣843
♠J73
8643
J963
♣K7
10
169
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
EW: 3♣ 1 3/4 3♠ 3/4NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -430 4NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    3.00   0.00  2 W +1   ♣T  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Street-Putnam
        150    2.00   1.00  2N W +1   4  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        180    1.00   2.00  1N E +3   3  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF2-Ow-Wong
        400    0.00   3.00  3N W      4  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes, East passes, South passes, and West opens 1NT. East transfers to and then probably invites with 2NT (if his were better, he might Game Force with just 9 points, but these need help!) West probably likes his texture and goes ahead to game in 3NT.
When North can't profitably lead and stay on lead and South can't get in, this shouldn't be a problem for West as declarer. He's got 4, 2, and 3 on the finesse, and then throw North in with the last for an endplay to his K (as long as he guesses North has the A.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠875
Q3
A84
♣Q9753
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠J642
T92
Q632
♣K6
♠QT3
AKJ65
JT5
♣T4
♠AK9
874
K97
♣AJ82
8
611
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1NT  ♦5 ♥5 ♠5
EW: 1 2 1♠  ♣5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -100 2NT*-NS/3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.50   0.50  2N S      ♠2  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
  120          2.50   0.50  2N S      2  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF2-Ow-Wong
  100          1.00   2.00  2 E -1   ♠A  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Street-Putnam
         50    0.00   3.00  3♣ N -1   A  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

It may depend on partnership agreements, but it wouldn't be a surprise to see East open 1 with such a nice suit. South then doubles, and West bumps to 2. North bids 3 and South might be tempted to ask for a stopper, but should realize that if North had one and enough values to make 3NT a good idea, he probably would have bid 2NT. So South lets this go and there's our contract.
This may not quite make, but that's OK as EW were fine in 2. Here in , North loses 1, 1, 2, and 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠QJ985
8
532
♣AQ82
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KT64
AQJ4
JT7
♣64
♠3
KT3
Q4
♣KJT9753
♠A72
97652
AK986
♣-
9
119
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠ 1/-NT
       ♣5 ♥6 NT7/6
EW: 1♣ 1  ♦4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    3.00   0.00  4♠ N -1   ♣J  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        200    2.00   1.00  5♠ N -2   ♣K  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF2-Ow-Wong
        300    0.50   2.50  3N N -3   ♣J  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
        300    0.50   2.50  3N N -3   ♣9  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF7-Jones-Taggart

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1 (would very much prefer to have values in , but can't have everything!), and West passes. North bids 1 and East probably hops in there with 3, so South has a tough decision of whether to bid at all - he could bid 3, or just bite the bullet and raise to 3, hoping his void will make his only 3-card support more valuable, or double if it's takeout, or just pass. Whichever he chooses looks like the end of the auction. (It's also very possible that if South doubled for takeout, North would just leave it in.)
Let's say NS get to play 3. The nasty split is a serious inconvenience, but declarer should be able to navigate, especially with the warning from the preempt. Declarer takes a safety play in , and then can pull trump, losing just one if he guesses the 4-1 split and finesses right away, coming to 1, 1, 1, and 1 as losers (or some variation if the defense leads and forces ruffs.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠AQJ94
Q95
J
♣KT32
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T5
AJ843
AQ873
♣7
♠832
T62
962
♣AQ65
♠K76
K7
KT54
♣J984
13
116
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2♠  ♦4/5 ♥4 NT6
EW: 2 2 1NT  ♣4 ♠4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +100 3*-EW/3*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  4 W -2   J  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
         50    2.00   1.00  4♠ N -1   T  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        100    0.50   2.50  4♠ N -2   ♠2  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
        100    0.50   2.50  4♠ N -2   2  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF2-Ow-Wong

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West opens 1 and North overcalls 1. East raises to 2 and South raises to 2 (probably not a limit raise since partner is just an overcall and he only has 3-card support and a flat hand.) West tries 3, but North goes ahead with 3, which no one else really wants to quibble with.
When all the missing minor honors are in the wrong place for declarer, this doesn't quite work. He loses 2, 1 ruff, 1, and 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠83
Q74
9743
♣AQJ5
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q964
J53
QJ82
♣K4
♠AT2
T962
K6
♣T763
♠KJ75
AK8
AT5
♣982
9
97
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 2 2♠ 2/3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.00   1.00  2N S      2  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF2-Ow-Wong
  120          2.00   1.00  2N S      2  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
  120          2.00   1.00  1N N +1   2  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
  110          0.00   3.00  2♣ S +1   Q  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
10 ♠AJ72
T92
42
♣AT62
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠K
KJ8543
J6
♣Q953
♠T954
7
AK983
♣K84
♠Q863
AQ6
QT75
♣J7
9
1010
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1 2♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦6/7 ♥5
EW: 2  ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  2♠ S +1   K  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway
  100          2.00   1.00  2 W -1   4  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
        100    1.00   2.00  2♠ N -1   7  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
        110    0.00   3.00  2 W      4  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
11 ♠QJ654
KT974
87
♣9
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠KT3
QJ2
AJ94
♣A64
♠982
A8
KT53
♣Q832
♠A7
653
Q62
♣KJT75
6
159
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT5
EW: 3♣ 4 1♠ 2NT  ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  3N W -2   ♠Q  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
        120    1.50   1.50  2N W      ♠Q  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
        120    1.50   1.50  2N W      7  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        150    0.00   3.00  3♣ S -3   Q  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway
12 ♠J953
A9873
AJ6
♣2
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠KT8
65
QT97
♣KJ43
♠AQ72
JT2
K3
♣QT85
♠64
KQ4
8542
♣A976
10
912
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2 1NT  ♣4 ♠6
EW: 2♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 3♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  2 N +1   ♣T  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
        130    2.00   1.00  3♣ W +1   ♠6  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway
        200    1.00   2.00  4 S -2   7  FF9-Nasr-Nasr vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        380    0.00   3.00  1N* E +2  ♣6  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
13 ♠JT92
QT654
J5
♣T9
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AK3
A98
T84
♣A532
♠Q84
K7
AK9732
♣K6
♠765
J32
Q6
♣QJ874
4
1515
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦0 ♥3 ♠1 NT0
EW: 4♣ 7 4 6♠ 7NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -2220 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        720    2.50   0.50  3N W +4   ♠J  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        720    2.50   0.50  3N W +4   5  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF2-Ow-Wong
       1440    1.00   2.00  6N E      ♣7  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
       1470    0.00   3.00  6N W +1   ♣7  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
14 ♠AJ95
Q84
J874
♣J8
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠QT43
AK75
T6
♣T95
♠K7
JT2
KQ32
♣AKQ3
♠862
963
A95
♣7642
9
918
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3
EW: 3♣ 2/3 3/4 2♠ 3/4NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -430 4NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  3N E -1   ♣2  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
   50          2.50   0.50  3N E -1   ♣2  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        400    0.50   2.50  3N E      ♣7  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
        400    0.50   2.50  3N E      ♣2  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF2-Ow-Wong
15 ♠J98
K2
AQT5
♣AJT8
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠T5
Q9765
832
♣953
♠KQ62
AT84
J
♣Q764
♠A743
J3
K9764
♣K2
15
212
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/3♣ 5 4♠ 4NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♦2 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.00   0.00  3N N      4  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
  130          1.50   1.50  3 S +1   7  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
  130          1.50   1.50  3 N +1   J  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF2-Ow-Wong
        200    0.00   3.00  3N S -2   9  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
16 ♠J6
KQ7632
T86
♣74
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠A93
A9
K943
♣QJT8
♠KQT5
JT
QJ7
♣K653
♠8742
854
A52
♣A92
6
1412
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣2 ♦2 ♠3 NT5
EW: 4♣ 4 4♠  ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  3N W -3   K  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF6-Street-Putnam
  100          2.00   1.00  4♠ E -1   ♣9  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
        130    1.00   2.00  2 W +2   K  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
        630    0.00   3.00  3N W +1   7  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway
17 ♠QJT974
QJ
Q642
♣7
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠K652
96
AKT9
♣K52
♠-
AT7432
J7
♣AJ983
♠A83
K85
853
♣QT64
8
1310
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT5
EW: 4♣ 2 4 2NT  ♠5/6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.83   0.17  4 E -2   ♣6  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway
        450    0.83   2.17  4 E +1   ♠A  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
        450    0.83   2.17  4 E +1   ♣6  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
18 ♠43
KT764
AT6
♣QJ5
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AT76
J2
932
♣A842
♠J95
A5
J8754
♣K97
♠KQ82
Q983
KQ
♣T63
10
99
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♠6
EW: 1 1♠  ♣6 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  3 N      A  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
        100    1.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♠J  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
        100    1.00   2.00  4 N -1   5  FF7-Jones-Taggart vs FF1-Pofcher-Callaway
        100    1.00   2.00  4 N -1   4  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF6-Street-Putnam
19 ♠AQ96
A7
763
♣KJT3
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J7543
JT5
T
♣Q964
♠KT82
8632
QJ4
♣75
♠-
KQ94
AK9852
♣A82
14
46
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6 6 3♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          3.00   0.00  3N N +3   ♣7  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
  420          1.00   2.00  5 S +1   ♠5  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
  420          1.00   2.00  5 S +1   ♣9  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Ow-Wong
  420          1.00   2.00  5 S +1   ♣4  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF6-Street-Putnam
20 ♠63
KQ
QJ7653
♣J82
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠J4
963
84
♣AQT763
♠KT975
J42
A9
♣K54
♠AQ82
AT875
KT2
♣9
9
711
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 5 2♠  ♣6 NT6
EW: 1♣  ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +650 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.50   0.50  4♣ W -3   Q  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF6-Street-Putnam
  300          2.50   0.50  3♣ W -3   K  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
        200    0.50   2.50  2N S -2   ♣7  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Ow-Wong
        200    0.50   2.50  5 N -2   ♠9  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
21 ♠Q95
A9
AQ652
♣Q94
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A732
J3
873
♣A863
♠J84
KQT2
T4
♣T752
♠KT6
87654
KJ9
♣KJ
14
96
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 2 3♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          3.00   0.00  1 N +3   2  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF6-Street-Putnam
  110          2.00   1.00  3 N      K  FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Ow-Wong
        200    1.00   2.00  4 S -2   ♠A  FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund vs FF9-Nasr-Nasr
        300    0.00   3.00  3N N -3   2  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
22 ♠T82
Q94
J94
♣8752
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠J94
JT8532
T82
♣4
♠753
A76
KQ7
♣AQJT
♠AKQ6
K
A653
♣K963
3
216
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1NT  ♦6 ♥3 ♠6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 17 = -3
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  3 E -2   ♠A  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
  100          2.00   1.00  3 W -1   ♠2  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
         50    1.00   2.00  2♠ S -1   ♣4  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        150    0.00   3.00  3♠ S -3   T  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
23 ♠5
AKT94
A54
♣JT42
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AK72
J873
J6
♣KQ5
♠QJ86
Q52
8732
♣A7
♠T943
6
KQT9
♣9863
12
149
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1 2♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.00   1.00  2♠ E      6  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        110    2.00   1.00  2♠ E      6  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
        110    2.00   1.00  1♠ W +1   A  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
        800    0.00   3.00  4* N -3  ♠Q  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
24 ♠K6
KQ6
AQJ985
♣KJ
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠A972
T743
T3
♣Q97
♠543
J982
K42
♣T83
♠QJT8
A5
76
♣A6542
19
64
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 5 3 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1/2 NT1/2
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +920 6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          3.00   0.00  3N N +3   2  FF1-Pofcher-Callaway vs FF3-Hedegard-Hedlund
  460          2.00   1.00  3N N +2   2  FF2-Ow-Wong vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
  180          1.00   2.00  2N N +2   2  FF6-Street-Putnam vs FF7-Jones-Taggart
        300    0.00   3.00  6* N -2  8  FF10-Roberts-Green vs FF8-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer