- Saturday Morn - September 29, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 760 MP  Geomean: 401 MP
(based on 15 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Alan Hedegard - Keith Hedlund 59.26 1st OA 3.75
Barbara Alexander - Jean Lesieutre 57.49 2nd OA 2.81
Carol Maggipinto - Mark Maggipinto 57.17 3rd OA 2.11
Barbara Callaway - Ellen Lux 54.35 1st OB 1.24
Jeannette Stern - Leon Heller 50.46 2nd OB 0.93
Annemarie Von Adelung - James Pond 45.14 2nd SC 0.46
EVENT>Saturday Morning Pairs (None/600/500)   |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 29, 2018 |CLUB NO.>150680    | 09/29/2018 13:17
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club ACBL Membership         |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/600/500   |CLUB>H & H Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=5/C=4                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Jeannette Stern        Leon Heller              B   .     2     .   |   .     2     .     36.33  50.46  0.93(OB)
 2 Cord Hedegard          Jie Bai                  C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     28.35  39.38
 3 Barbara Alexander      Jean Lesieutre           A   2     .     .   |   2     .     .     41.39  57.49  2.81(OA)
 4 James Pond             Annemarie Von Adelung    C   .     .     .   |   .     .     2     32.50  45.14  0.46(SC)
 5 Barbara Callaway       Ellen Lux                C   .     1     .   |   .     1     1     39.13  54.35  1.24(OB)
 6 Keith Hedlund          Alan Hedegard            A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     42.67  59.26  3.75(OA)
 7 Carol Maggipinto       Mark Maggipinto          A   3     .     .   |   3     .     .     41.16  57.17  2.11(OA)
 8 Elizabeth Sebring      Doris Jones              C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     26.09  36.24
                                          Totals                                            287.62

Hands and Results
1 ♠AJ5
AKT842
5
♣954
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q872
J
AJT92
♣Q72
♠T96
Q9653
Q74
♣JT
♠K43
7
K863
♣AK863
12
105
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 4 2♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          3.00   0.00  4 N      4  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O1-Stern-Heller
  400          1.50   1.50  3N S      9  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Callaway-Lux
  400          1.50   1.50  3N N      ♠2  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
         50    0.00   3.00  3N S -1   ♠2  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass2
Pass2Pass2NT
Pass4All pass 

With a singleton and a six card major in need of work, North will override any suggestion to play game in notrump, and the sooner the statement is made, the less convincing South needs.

When the J falls, North should reconsider the straightforward line of drawing trumps. Instead, try to ruff diamonds in the North hand, take the spade finesse, hope that spades are 2-2, and cash two clubs. Despite the fact that the A is offside, this plan, eloping with the small trumps by ruffing diamonds while East helplessly follows suit, succeeds.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠KQT92
AKT5
AT86
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J754
Q3
J54
♣A632
♠A6
876
K32
♣KJT94
♠83
J942
Q97
♣Q875
16
811
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2 4 2♠  ♣6 NT6
EW: 1♣  ♦4 ♥2 ♠4/5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  3 N +2   ♣A  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Callaway-Lux
  140          2.00   1.00  3♠ N      ♣K  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O1-Stern-Heller
  100          1.00   2.00  3♣ E -2   ♠8  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        100    0.00   3.00  2♠ N -1   8  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
Pass12?Pass
3DblPass3
Pass4All pass 

East made a rather poor overcall, letting South off the hook, but when West raised, North still had enough oomph to double for takeout, and then, optimistically, raise to game.

Optimistic, sir North! Many things are favorably poised for NS, such as the doubleton trump queen, and in some variations it might be necessary to finesse for the spade jack, rather than playing to drop the suit or hope for the ace to be onside.

But it can be made, as you can see from an examination of the hand record. Did you, without that aid? However, plus 170 might be almost as good at matchpoints. Remember, close games that take luck or great skill to fulfill, while paying off in tops, will achieve near tops just by playing your cards well and just being in the right part score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠763
KQ754
7
♣9643
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QT98
92
K95
♣AJ87
♠AJ5
T63
AT8
♣KQ52
♠K42
AJ8
QJ6432
♣T
5
1014
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    3.00   0.00  3 N -1   ♣K  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O1-Stern-Heller
        100    2.00   1.00  2 S -2   ♠8  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        140    1.00   2.00  3♠ W      7  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Callaway-Lux
        150    0.00   3.00  3 N -3   ♣K  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1Pass2
DblPassPass3
All pass   

East has the best hand at the table in terms of HCP, but has no good bid after 1 P 1. The pattern is just awful. West to the rescue! The East hand should not get the scent of game from West's competitive double, especially in light of the awful heart holding and the 4333 pattern. Enough to find a good part score.

Spades luckily make 110, trumps compliantly breaking 3-3, but clubs should score 110 in some comfort., so long as diamonds are played first by winning the K. After that, leading a diamond toward the ace cannot be hurt by North's ruffing, for that would be a loser ruffed with a dangerous trump holding.

So 110 is a likely EW score in either spades or clubs. Beating 2 a couple of tricks just isn't quite as good.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠AK874
QT8
J
♣A842
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q96
A96
T832
♣KQT
♠T3
K53
AK964
♣J96
♠J52
J742
Q75
♣753
14
1111
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT6
EW: 1♣ 2 1 1NT  ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.50   0.50  3 E      ♠J  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre
        110    2.50   0.50  3 E      ♠2  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        300    0.50   2.50  3♠ N -3   A  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Callaway-Lux
        300    0.50   2.50  3♠ N -3   A  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O1-Stern-Heller

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1PassPass
1NTPassPassPass

Balancing notrumps resemble weak notrumps, both being in the 12-14 HCP range for balanced hands. West will balance 1NT when North opens 1 and no one can bid, and South might have a wary eye on the red stripe (dangerous vulnerability, minus 100 for each undoubled trick, 200/500 for doubled undertricks).

1NT is relatively safe, offering East a variety of contracts, but today the 1NT spot seems just about right.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠QJT9762
QJ
J
♣A98
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AK53
K76
K
♣KJ642
♠84
5432
Q9765
♣T5
♠-
AT98
AT8432
♣Q73
11
172
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2/3 1 2/4♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: +620 4♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    3.00   0.00  3♠ N -1   4  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
        200    2.00   1.00  4 S -2   ♠A  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
        300    0.50   2.50  3N S -3   ♣4  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        300    0.50   2.50  4♠ N -3   ♣T  O5-Callaway-Lux vs O1-Stern-Heller

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 3All pass 

The only reason this hand can possibly take ten tricks is the lucky layout of the club suit, allowing the "intra-finesse" to garner two club tricks for declarer. Here's how it works: In the absence of a terribly unlucky lead such as the T, declarer can lead and pass the 8, losing to the J, but then later, by leading the Q, pins the T and scores two club tricks. Of course, the T lead gives two club tricks on the get-go.

The reason the computer gives South making 4, but North just 2 lies partly on the club situation, but also because West cannot lead a heart with the same effect that a heart lead from East would have. South can thus make ten tricks, North just eight, based on the lead potential.

Of course, South will NEVER play spades, so all of the above is completely academic.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

6 ♠K
KT95
985
♣JT853
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠QT62
64
AQT42
♣A2
♠98754
AQJ87
76
♣7
♠AJ3
32
KJ3
♣KQ964
7
127
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2/3 ♥2 ♠2 NT4
EW: 3 4 5♠ 3NT  ♣6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.83   0.17  3♣ S      6  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        110    1.50   1.50  1 W +2   ♠K  O5-Callaway-Lux vs O1-Stern-Heller
        200    0.17   2.83  3N S -4   8  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
1112
233Pass
3All pass  

For eight consecutive turns following East's initial pass, everybody bids for eight consecutive turns.

East did a yeoman's job after passing, introducing a nine-high suit and cue-bidding to make a game try, but West cannot quite get there from this beginning. Perhaps his mind should consider that the hearts are probably well-placed on the auction, and that the diamonds might be as well, to justify South's opening bid. That gets West close to bidding game, but it is the spade honors vs. heart honors that are elusive.

Kudos to those EW pairs who do bid game constructively, luck is with those who get pushed.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

7 ♠53
52
AJ52
♣KQJ84
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠4
KQT87
K63
♣7652
♠QJ872
64
Q974
♣T9
♠AKT96
AJ93
T8
♣A3
11
85
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 3 2 3♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  660          2.50   0.50  3N S +2   ♣7  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
  660          2.50   0.50  3N N +2   4  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
  630          1.00   2.00  3N S +1   K  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
  180          0.00   3.00  2N S +2   K  O5-Callaway-Lux vs O1-Stern-Heller

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1NTPass2
Pass2NTPass3NT
All pass   

South needs some value bid from North to bid this game, and North's sequence provides just that, 1NT forcing followed by 2NT showing right at 11 HCP. North has a bit extra in the form of an excellent club suit, but it is not enough to force game after a 1 bid by today's standards.

Making the eleven tricks available as shown by Deep Finesse will require delicate handling and a Deep Finesse, indeed, playing a spade to the nine on the first round of that suit. Perhaps the prior play will suggest that somehow, but normally it would appear that playing spades from the top is the better method, winning against Qx, Jx, QJ, or any singleton honor in the West hand, breaking even against all 3-3 splits.

Nine top tricks may be all some declarers manage.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

8 ♠J9652
7
AQ73
♣975
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠87
984
J9842
♣AJ6
♠AT4
QT6532
5
♣KQ3
♠KQ3
AKJ
KT6
♣T842
7
611
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 3♠ 3NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          3.00   0.00  4* E -3  ♠K  O5-Callaway-Lux vs O1-Stern-Heller
  450          2.00   1.00  4♠ S +1   9  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
  170          1.00   2.00  2♠ S +2   9  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
  140          0.00   3.00  3♠ N      5  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O2-Hedegard-Bai

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPass11NT
Pass2Pass2
All pass   

The number of tricks taken by declarer will depend precisely on the opening lead.

A trump will result in nine -- A followed by three clubs seems easy for the defense.

A heart lead will allow two club discards, after which declarer will lose one club, one spade, and one diamond.

A diamond lead will threaten eleven tricks unless the diamond ruff can be found -- declarer will play a heart at trick 2, finessing the J, then the AK, discarding clubs, and then a spade. East will lead the K, which West must overtake to give a diamond ruff. Otherwise, eleven tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠76
A432
AQT4
♣JT3
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠98543
J6
J753
♣A5
♠QJT
T9875
K86
♣98
♠AK2
KQ
92
♣KQ7642
11
66
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6/5♣ 3 3 2♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +920 6♣-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          3.00   0.00  3N S +3   ♠4  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Stern-Heller
  460          1.50   1.50  3N S +2   ♠3  O6-Hedlund-Hedegard vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
  460          1.50   1.50  3N N +2   T  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre
  400          0.00   3.00  5♣ S      ♠4  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O5-Callaway-Lux

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass2
Pass3Pass4
Pass4NTPass6
All pass   

North has 2 1/2 quick tricks and a halfway decent four card diamond suit, suitable for lead purposes, if the opponents gain the lead. Accordingly, an opening bid is not out of line. South bids 2, game forcing, and North is stuck. 3 seems the least of evils, and South is encouraged to bid 4, Minorwood. After North owns up to two key cards, South bids the club slam.

Will South find the only opening bid that beats the contract? A diamond does the trick, but only on trick one.

If that's what it takes, I'd say that the slam should be bid. Otherwise, South knocks out the trump ace, unblocks hearts, ruffs a spade, draws a second trump and discards a diamond on the A. Then get to hand and draw the last trump. Claim time.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

10 ♠2
AT2
852
♣KQ6532
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠QT64
QJ865
J43
♣4
♠AKJ53
73
AQ
♣AJ98
♠987
K94
KT976
♣T7
9
619
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3
EW: 3 4♠ 3NT  ♣6 ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    3.00   0.00  4♠ E      ♠8  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Stern-Heller
        650    1.00   2.00  4♠ E +1   ♠9  O6-Hedlund-Hedegard vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
        650    1.00   2.00  4♠ E +1   T  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O5-Callaway-Lux
        650    1.00   2.00  4♠ E +1   ♣T  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
2Pass3Pass
3Pass4Pass
4All pass  

The first bid after the raise was ostensibly a game try, declined. However, 4 was clearly a slam try, for game has now been forced, and that fact relates back to the club bid (the cards have not changed).

But West cannot help at all, and East should be happy (well, not really. Let's say East is resigned) to passing 4.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

11 ♠A8752
-
Q3
♣A96543
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠J
KJ97
K52
♣KQT87
♠Q9
AT86543
AJ94
♣-
♠KT643
Q2
T876
♣J2
10
1311
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3♠  ♦3 ♥0 NT3
EW: 3/4 6 1NT  ♣6 ♠4
LoTT: 21 - 21 = 0
Par: -500 6♠*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        480    2.50   0.50  5 E +1   ♠4  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O5-Callaway-Lux
        480    2.50   0.50  4 E +2   ♠K  O6-Hedlund-Hedegard vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
        510    1.00   2.00  5 E +2   ♣J  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Stern-Heller
       1210    0.00   3.00  6* E     ♠K  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
1124
PassPass? 

East will probably bid 5, not really having an alternative. Double is probably the alternative, not 5, for the club void is a drag on the offensive prospects, and with two aces and club shortness, it would appear that the defense would be profitable.

Wrong!

In fact, if West leads a heart, the defense fails and the result will be minus 590. Only a club honor lead beats 4.

5 seems unilateral by East, and unjustified by West, but if anyone can muster that bid, playing hearts is the winner. Slam??? Well, that is a bit much to foresee.

East might expect some support for hearts from West, who is marked with spade shortness, so might well bid 5. That is at least some inference beyond just looking at East's own cards.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

12 ♠9873
T84
A65
♣AJ2
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠QJT
9763
KQ972
♣Q
♠6542
KJ52
T8
♣K97
♠AK
AQ
J43
♣T86543
9
107
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 2♠ 4NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦6/5 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   1.00  2♣ S +1   ♠Q  O6-Hedlund-Hedegard vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
  110          2.00   1.00  2♣ S +1   K  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O5-Callaway-Lux
  110          2.00   1.00  2♣ S +1   K  O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Stern-Heller
        200    0.00   3.00  2♠ N -2   T  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre
13 ♠864
982
T53
♣KQ87
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠QJT932
643
Q62
♣9
♠A75
AT
A987
♣AT42
♠K
KQJ75
KJ4
♣J653
5
516
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2
EW: 1♣ 5 1 5♠ 3NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    2.50   0.50  3♠ E      K  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
        140    2.50   0.50  2♠ E +1   K  O1-Stern-Heller vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre
        170    0.50   2.50  2♠ E +2   K  O5-Callaway-Lux vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        170    0.50   2.50  2♠ E +2   2  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
14 ♠92
AQJ7
QT
♣JT543
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K6
632
J7642
♣AQ2
♠QJ83
9854
AK8
♣K9
♠AT754
KT
953
♣876
10
1013
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3 2 1♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    3.00   0.00  1N W      7  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        110    2.00   1.00  3 E      K  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
        150    0.50   2.50  3 E +2   ♠A  O5-Callaway-Lux vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        150    0.50   2.50  2 W +3   ♠9  O1-Stern-Heller vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre
15 ♠AQ3
87654
Q84
♣A3
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠T74
KJ92
AK62
♣96
♠J985
-
JT97
♣QJ875
♠K62
AQT3
53
♣KT42
12
115
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 3 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        200    1.50   1.50  3N N -2   3  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
        200    1.50   1.50  4 N -2   J  O1-Stern-Heller vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre
        200    1.50   1.50  4 N -2   J  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        200    1.50   1.50  4 N -2   J  O5-Callaway-Lux vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
16 ♠Q5
9852
KJ7
♣KQJ9
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AJT9743
4
83
♣A42
♠K62
AKQ7
QT62
♣85
♠8
JT63
A954
♣T763
12
914
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠1 NT2
EW: 1♣ 2 1 5♠ 5NT
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        650    2.50   0.50  4♠ W +1   ♣K  O1-Stern-Heller vs O3-Alexander-Lesieutre
        650    2.50   0.50  4♠ W +1   ♣9  O5-Callaway-Lux vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        680    0.50   2.50  4♠ W +2   ♣K  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        680    0.50   2.50  4♠ W +2   ♣K  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
17 ♠K72
K8753
Q
♣T764
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AJ6
J62
AKJT92
♣K
♠T9854
AT
863
♣J92
♠Q3
Q94
754
♣AQ853
8
175
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2  ♦2 ♠2/3 NT3
EW: 4 3♠ 3/2NT  ♣4 ♥5/4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  3♠ E -1   Q  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
        100    2.00   1.00  4♣ S -2   A  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O5-Callaway-Lux
        110    1.00   2.00  2♠ E      4  O6-Hedlund-Hedegard vs O1-Stern-Heller
        230    0.00   3.00  3♠ E +3   4  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
18 ♠KJ98
K4
T873
♣A86
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T
QJ96
J52
♣KQJT7
♠765
A8753
AK9
♣32
♠AQ432
T2
Q64
♣954
11
1011
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT6
EW: 5/4♣ 1/- 5 1NT
       ♦7/6 ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    3.00   0.00  3♠ S -1   Q  O6-Hedlund-Hedegard vs O1-Stern-Heller
        450    1.00   2.00  4 E +1   ♠A  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O5-Callaway-Lux
        450    1.00   2.00  4 E +1   ♣9  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        450    1.00   2.00  4 E +1   ♣5  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
19 ♠J7
AJ754
964
♣J43
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AKT986
QT8
T875
♣-
♠Q42
K962
Q3
♣AK52
♠53
3
AKJ2
♣QT9876
7
914
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 2 3♠ 3NT  ♣5 ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -300 4♣*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  5♠ W -1   ♣3  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
        140    2.00   1.00  3♠ W      2  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        300    1.00   2.00  5♣* S -2  ♠A  O6-Hedlund-Hedegard vs O1-Stern-Heller
        620    0.00   3.00  4♠ W      A  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O5-Callaway-Lux
20 ♠864
KT72
QJT8
♣J7
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KJ92
9543
AK9
♣42
♠53
A8
7654
♣AQT65
♠AQT7
QJ6
32
♣K983
7
1110
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 2 1♠  ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -90 2-EW/2♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  3 W -2   ♣J  O6-Hedlund-Hedegard vs O1-Stern-Heller
  100          2.00   1.00  2♣ E -1   ♣3  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        100    1.00   2.00  2 N -1   ♠5  O2-Hedegard-Bai vs O4-Pond-Von Adelung
        120    0.00   3.00  1N E +1   ♠Q  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O5-Callaway-Lux
21 ♠AT653
Q4
QJT8
♣64
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KJ8
AK9
K96
♣QJ82
♠97
T87653
54
♣753
♠Q42
J2
A732
♣AKT9
9
170
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 3 3♠  ♣6/7 ♥4 NT5
EW: 1 1NT  ♣6 ♦4 ♠4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  2♠ N      5  O1-Stern-Heller vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
  100          2.00   1.00  4 E -2   ♣A  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        200    1.00   2.00  3♠* N -1  ♣3  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O5-Callaway-Lux
       1100    0.00   3.00  4♠* S -4  A  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
22 ♠9
T42
T8754
♣QT84
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KQT82
Q763
93
♣J6
♠76543
A
AQ6
♣9752
♠AJ
KJ985
KJ2
♣AK3
2
810
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 3 1NT  ♠4
EW: 3♠  ♣5/4 ♦3 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  4♠* W -1  T  O1-Stern-Heller vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
         50    2.00   1.00  2N S -1   ♠K  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        140    1.00   2.00  3♠ W      ♣4  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O5-Callaway-Lux
        150    0.00   3.00  2N S -3   ♠K  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
23 ♠Q432
AKT2
K
♣AK42
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AJ
J
A9764
♣J9865
♠T96
8743
QJT5
♣Q7
♠K875
Q965
832
♣T3
19
115
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦4
EW: 3  ♣6 ♥3 ♠2 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +500 5*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          3.00   0.00  5* W -3  ♣A  O1-Stern-Heller vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
  170          2.00   1.00  3 S +1   ♣6  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        100    1.00   2.00  3 S -1   ♠A  O3-Alexander-Lesieutre vs O5-Callaway-Lux
        130    0.00   3.00  2 W +2   ♣A  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
24 ♠AJ52
KT962
42
♣J4
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠K84
Q743
93
♣AKT5
♠97
8
AJ8765
♣9872
♠QT63
AJ5
KQT
♣Q63
9
125
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 4NT  ♣6 ♦6
EW: 1♣ 1  ♥3 ♠2/3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.83   0.17  3 N      ♠9  O1-Stern-Heller vs O2-Hedegard-Bai
         50    1.50   1.50  3♠ S -1   9  O8-Sebring-Jones vs O6-Hedlund-Hedegard
        100    0.17   2.83  4 N -2   ♣9  O4-Pond-Von Adelung vs O7-Maggipinto-Maggipinto