- Saturday Morn - March 31, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Field strength:  Mean: 926 MP  Geomean: 522 MP
(based on 11 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Carol Maggipinto - Mark Maggipinto 60.00 1st A 0.60
Jan Winham - Judith Murdock 58.00 2nd A 0.42
EVENT>Sat Morning Open Game    |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>March 31, 2018     |CLUB NO.>150680    | 03/31/2018 14:29
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   25.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/500/300   |CLUB>H & H  Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=2/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Richard Vreeland       Elizabeth Sebring        C    .     .     .     24.00  48.00
 2 Janet Street           William Putnam           A    .     .     .     21.50  43.00
 3 Terry Handley          Evelyn Almeleh           A    .     .     .     25.00  50.00
 4 Doris Jones            Carolyn Taggert          C    .     .     .     20.50  41.00
 5 Jan Winham             Judith Murdock           A    2     .     .     29.00  58.00  0.42(A)
 6 Carol Maggipinto       Mark Maggipinto          A    1     .     .     30.00  60.00  0.60(A)
                                          Totals                         150.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠AQJ95
QJ7
QJ9
♣76
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠43
T8532
74
♣T853
♠62
A94
T632
♣AJ42
♠KT87
K6
AK85
♣KQ9
13
09
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 5 2 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +460 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          1.50   0.50  5♠ N +1   ♣6  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
  480          1.50   0.50  4♠ N +2   ♣A  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O2-Street-Putnam
  450          0.00   2.00  5♠ N      2  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O3-Handley-Almeleh

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1♠Pass2NT
Pass4♠All pass

Using Jacoby 2NT as a forcing to game raise of partner's major, South is not surprised to hear that North views his hand as minimum and signs off in 4♠, but with a five loser hand, 18 HCP, it is hard to resist wheeling out 4NT to double check. Most will do so, and resignedly sign off in 5♠ when partner confirms the absence of aces.

Some play the 4♠ ("weak, partner!") as specifically fewer than three or four controls (A=2, K=1), so South would not be tempted to the five level. Playing the "updated" version of 2NT as a forcing game raise in partner's major (Swedish origin or Martel-Stansby), 3♣ is an artificial bid showing any minimum, with 4♠ reserved for really, really awful opening bids, and that system would be able to stop in four.

No matter, eleven tricks across the field, no doubt a flattish board.


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


2 ♠QJ43
QJ2
KT5
♣AK6
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T96
K97
AJ82
♣Q84
♠K875
643
Q64
♣532
♠A2
AT85
973
♣JT97
16
105
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 4 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3/4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          1.50   0.50  3N N +1   ♠5  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
  630          1.50   0.50  3N N +1   ♣6  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
        200    0.00   2.00  3N N -2   ♠5  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O2-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
Pass1NTPass2♣
Pass2♠Pass3NT
All pass

Routine 1NT opening bid, Stayman, wrong major, game.

East has a problematic opening lead, not wanting to lead into North's spades with a poor suit, and not a heart, the implied suit in dummy, the choice seems to be between diamonds and clubs, and diamonds is "feast or famine," leading to a good result when partner has good diamonds, but a horror show when the lead simply blows a trick. A club might seem "safe," and in fact it gives nothing that declarer could not do himself.

It turns out that a spade lead is not so horrible, for West's spot cards allow West to force an honor the first go around and unblock the second time, so that the defenders might actually be in a position to take two spade tricks late in the day, with the ♠K8 poised over the ♠Q4! But the club finesse saves declarer's bacon.

Nevertheless, North can win the spade lead, lose a heart finesse, win the spade return, and take the winning club finesse to secure nine tricks and then lead a diamond toward the king for number 10.

The only lead to assure the defense its allotted four defensive tricks turns out to be the risky-appearing diamond. Odd how often it pays to lead from something you have, rather than from weakness!


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


3 ♠JT84
T7
QJT7
♣T92
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KQ532
Q43
K82
♣A7
♠-
AJ6
943
♣KQJ6543
♠A976
K9852
A65
♣8
4
1411
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♠  ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠7/6 NT3
EW: 4♣ 1/- 1/- 3NT
       ♦7/6 ♥7/6 ♠6/5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -500 4♠*-S-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  2♠ W -3   T  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O2-Street-Putnam
        150    1.00   1.00  2♣ E +3   5  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
        600    0.00   2.00  3N W      Q  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O3-Handley-Almeleh

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   2!
Pass2♠3♣Pass
3NTAll pass

A Flannery opening 2 bid may create more problems for the opponents than presented in the diagram. West should take his partner's vulnerable 3♣ overcall seriously, however, and that should solve the puzzle.

But after 1 1♠ P 2♣, there should be fewer problems, for West will continue 2NT and East should carry on, with so many potential tricks.


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


4 ♠J86
K9
AKT7
♣9842
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KT753
Q53
542
♣75
♠Q4
AT2
J983
♣KQJT
♠A92
J8764
Q6
♣A63
11
513
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 2 1NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +110 2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.00   0.00  1N N +2   ♣K  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
  100          1.00   1.00  1♠ W -1   2  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O2-Street-Putnam
        120    0.00   2.00  1N E +1   6  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O3-Handley-Almeleh

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPass1♣Pass
1♠Pass1NTPass
PassPass

The "correct" bid with East's hand continues to be debated. With 4-4 in the minors, one school of thought is always to open 1, almost surely guaranteeing four diamonds, rather than three, and reserving clubs for some contested auctions, and the other school just as adamantly bids 1♣, suggesting that "up-the-line" bidding will get to the right spot. While in general I prefer to open 1 with 4-4 minors, some flexibility and an eye on partner's opening lead problems, 1♣ is a reasonable choice.

South does not have a 1 overcall with that ratty suit and highly questionable Qx, whether vulnerable or not, but the vulnerability is the last nail for that bid to be considered.

A heart lead from South looks normal, but rather unfortunate unless the defense is quick on its feet: North must plays the K "on air" the first round of the suit, but then the defense must not again lead the suit from the South hand, rather must find a shift to the Q when South wins the ♣A, and after a second diamond to North's king, THEN the 9 will provide the appropriate remedy. East may duck that trick entirely, but then a club exit from North will present East with insurmountable difficulties, and not enough tricks.


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


5 ♠Q84
85
AQ542
♣J54
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KJ975
AKJ
K6
♣987
♠T63
T96432
JT93
♣-
♠A2
Q7
87
♣AKQT632
9
151
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2/1 4NT  ♥4 ♠5
EW: 3 2♠  ♣2 ♦5 NT2
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +300 5*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          2.00   0.00  3N S +1   ♠J  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
  130          0.50   1.50  3N N +1   ♠T  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
  130          0.50   1.50  3♣ S +1   A  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O2-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1♣
1♠1NT2♠3♣
PassPassPass

If NS "stumble" into 3NT, the reward will be quite unjustified, due to the blocked heart suit.. Getting to 3NT is actually quite an attractive idea for South, with seven club tricks and the spade ace. North might have red suit stoppers. . .


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


6 ♠9753
K54
7
♣AT952
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KQJ2
QJ86
AQT9
♣8
♠A86
73
86543
♣KJ3
♠T4
AT92
KJ2
♣Q764
7
158
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦2/3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3 1 2♠ 3NT  ♣5
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -300 4♣*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  5 W -3   ♠9  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O2-Street-Putnam
        110    0.50   1.50  3 W      ♣A  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O5-Winham-Murdock
        110    0.50   1.50  2 W +1   4  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Handley-Almeleh

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
1Pass2Pass
PassPass

A safe auction for East is to raise to 2, provided that call falls within the definition of the bid. Some will continue the idea that a single raise of a minor suit should show approximately an invitational hand.

For those who are either more adventurous or who see the hand in a more adventurous way, East might well bid 1NT, holding a balanced hand and 8 HCP.

If NS put clubs on the table in short order, there is a way for East's view to be rewarded -- double hook the diamonds for nine tricks!

Playing in diamonds, that play will also be rewarded.


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


7 ♠A4
K2
J74
♣AT9653
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K865
AQ98
96
♣Q82
♠T9
T63
KQT532
♣J7
♠QJ732
J754
A8
♣K4
12
116
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 1 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          2.00   0.00  3♣ N +1   K  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O2-Street-Putnam
   90          1.00   1.00  2♣ N      K  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O5-Winham-Murdock
        100    0.00   2.00  2♠ S -1   9  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Handley-Almeleh

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
Pass1♣22♠
PassPassPass

South cannot force North to pass with a mere new suit call, being a passed hand, And North hopes his decision to open did not backfire.

The correct way to play the spade suit (when getting around to that part of the play), is to play first the ace, then low toward the QJxx, not to lead and run the queen.


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


8 ♠AK8642
T
T5
♣J853
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠5
KQJ
KJ4
♣AKT976
♠Q9
86532
98632
♣4
♠JT73
A974
AQ7
♣Q2
8
172
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♠ 3NT  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4
EW: 1♣ 1 1  ♠2 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  4♣* W -2  ♠A  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O2-Street-Putnam
  200          1.00   1.00  5♣ W -4   ♠A  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
         50    0.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   ♣4  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O5-Winham-Murdock

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1♣2♠PassPass
Pass

Perhaps a 1♠ overcall would work better than the preempt, but it would still be difficult to convince North to bid game, or South to envision the perfection that exists.

1♣ 1♠ P 2♣
Dbl ?

A rebid of 2♠ might get South to take a leap of faith in partner's perception of the hand. A small percentage of the field will bid this, most not.


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


9 ♠QJ86
AQJ43
72
♣65
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠75
5
KQ954
♣KT832
♠AT942
K982
J8
♣AJ
♠K3
T76
AT63
♣Q974
10
813
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4/3 ♦4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3♣ 3 1♠ 2NT  ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  1N W -1   4  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
        110    1.00   1.00  3♣ W      7  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O2-Street-Putnam
        120    0.00   2.00  2N W      Q  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O5-Winham-Murdock

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1♠Pass
1NTPass2Pass
2♠PassPassPass

West has too few HCP to suggest game, so 2NT is out of consideration, suggesting about 11 HCP, plus or minus. The shown auction is the "Standard" way of bidding after 1NT forcing.

Today the auction leads to an unmakeable contract -- in theory. For those declarers who get to lead a heart up to the king and still have time to ruff a heart may make this one.


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


10 ♠7
KQ98542
86
♣K54
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠KT962
AJ
AQ
♣QT32
♠A85
T76
JT74
♣J96
♠QJ43
3
K9532
♣A87
8
166
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 -/1NT
       ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT6/7
EW: 3♣ 2♠  ♦6 ♥5 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  3♠ W -1   8  O4-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
        140    1.00   1.00  3♠ W      K  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O5-Winham-Murdock
        200    0.00   2.00  3 N -2   ♠5  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O2-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
1♠22♠Pass
PassPass

Not much to the bidding, which should be fairly common. On the lead of the K, West should win and play a spade to the ace and then the ♠8, intending to run it. Whether South splits or not,West limits his spade losers to one and can later take the diamond finesse or simply discard the Q on the established T!


****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com


11 ♠Q3
J4
AJ764
♣Q974
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠A96
AQ8762
T
♣K32
♠J42
T9
Q9852
♣J65
♠KT875
K53
K3
♣AT8
10
134
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/3♣ 1/2 1/3♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          2.00   0.00  2N S +2   8  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
         50    1.00   1.00  3♠ S -1   T  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O4-Jones-Taggert
        150    0.00   2.00  3N S -3   6  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
12 ♠J953
A73
2
♣KQT75
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠K87
JT985
J743
♣2
♠42
KQ642
A986
♣J4
♠AQT6
-
KQT5
♣A9863
10
510
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 4♠ 2NT  ♦6 ♥5/6
EW: 1 1  ♣2 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          2.00   0.00  5* E -4  K  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
  650          1.00   1.00  4♠ N +1   K  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O4-Jones-Taggert
  600          0.00   2.00  5♣ S      J  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
13 ♠Q87
KQ85
8
♣JT873
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AKJ2
JT942
Q94
♣6
♠964
3
AJ52
♣KQ952
♠T53
A76
KT763
♣A4
8
1110
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1/- 1/2♠ 1NT
       ♦7/6 ♥6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -110 2♠-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  3♠ W -3   8  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O4-Jones-Taggert
  200          1.00   1.00  3♣ E -2   6  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
        100    0.00   2.00  2 N -1   A  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
14 ♠JT842
6
A64
♣KT97
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠Q953
KJ5
J52
♣A32
♠76
A974
KT97
♣864
♠AK
QT832
Q83
♣QJ5
8
117
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1/- 1 2♠ 1NT  ♦7/6
EW:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          2.00   0.00  1N S +3   ♣2  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
   90          0.50   1.50  1N S      ♠3  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O4-Jones-Taggert
   90          0.50   1.50  1N S      ♠3  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
15 ♠J974
T
AKT842
♣K9
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AQ652
Q6
J5
♣T652
♠3
AK873
63
♣AJ874
♠KT8
J9542
Q97
♣Q3
11
912
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1NT  ♣2 ♥5 ♠5
EW: 4♣ 2 1♠  ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.50   0.50  3 E -1   7  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O3-Handley-Almeleh
   50          1.50   0.50  2 E -1   Q  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
        110    0.00   2.00  3♣ E      7  O5-Winham-Murdock vs O4-Jones-Taggert
16 ♠KJ
532
QJ9
♣QT854
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠A843
KQ84
A87
♣97
♠T97
AT
6532
♣AJ62
♠Q652
J976
KT4
♣K3
9
139
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 1 2♠ 2/1NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  2♣ W -2   Q  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
  100          1.00   1.00  1N E -1   6  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Winham-Murdock
         90    0.00   2.00  1N E      ♠2  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O4-Jones-Taggert
17 ♠63
K752
KT5
♣K874
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J82
Q
A9842
♣T932
♠5
JT93
Q763
♣AQJ5
♠AKQT974
A864
J
♣6
9
710
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 5/4♠ 3/2NT  ♣5 ♦3
EW: 2♣ 3  ♥4 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +450 5♠-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          1.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   Q  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Winham-Murdock
  450          1.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   A  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O4-Jones-Taggert
  420          0.00   2.00  4♠ S      A  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
18 ♠A7643
-
KT853
♣976
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠KJT8
AKT43
AQ2
♣Q
♠Q52
Q976
J7
♣JT32
♠9
J852
964
♣AK854
7
196
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2  ♥3 ♠5 NT4
EW: 3 1♠ 2NT  ♣4 ♦4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  4 W -1   ♠A  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
        170    1.00   1.00  3 W +1   5  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O4-Jones-Taggert
        420    0.00   2.00  4 W      ♣6  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Winham-Murdock
19 ♠K
QJT963
Q94
♣J95
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠742
K7542
AT
♣K43
♠AQJT3
A
J652
♣T72
♠9865
8
K873
♣AQ86
9
1012
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♦6 ♠3 NT4
EW: 1♣ 1 3♠ 3NT  ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -500 4*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  3♠ E -2   8  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
        140    1.00   1.00  3♠ E      8  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O4-Jones-Taggert
        600    0.00   2.00  3N W      9  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Winham-Murdock
20 ♠T9
AKQ5
92
♣97543
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AKQ7543
942
J
♣K8
♠862
J76
T8654
♣AQ
♠J
T83
AKQ73
♣JT62
9
137
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 3  ♠4 NT4
EW: 3♠  ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   A  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O4-Jones-Taggert
        140    1.00   1.00  2♠ W +1   A  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O1-Vreeland-Sebring
        200    0.00   2.00  3* S -1  ♠A  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Winham-Murdock
21 ♠AQJ8
AQJT
32
♣KQ2
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠9752
96
JT754
♣T5
♠K
K74
A96
♣A98763
♠T643
8532
KQ8
♣J4
19
114
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/-♣ 4 3♠ 3NT  ♣8/6 ♦6
EW:  ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.00   0.00  2 S +2   ♣A  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O4-Jones-Taggert
        100    0.50   1.50  4 S -1   J  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O2-Street-Putnam
        100    0.50   1.50  4 S -1   J  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Winham-Murdock
22 ♠864
5
9864
♣KJ976
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AKQT
Q92
AQT32
♣8
♠75
JT743
KJ7
♣A42
♠J932
AK86
5
♣QT53
4
179
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4 5 4♠ 4NT  ♣5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    2.00   0.00  3 W +1   5  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O4-Jones-Taggert
        150    1.00   1.00  2♠ N -3   K  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O2-Street-Putnam
        620    0.00   2.00  4 E      ♣3  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Winham-Murdock
23 ♠Q754
A2
A9864
♣A7
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AJ3
J965
JT7
♣KQ6
♠T2
K83
Q5
♣T98543
♠K986
QT74
K32
♣J2
14
125
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1 2♠  ♣5 NT6
EW: 1♣  ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  2 N +1   ♠T  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O4-Jones-Taggert
  100          1.00   1.00  3♣ W -1   ♠4  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Winham-Murdock
        300    0.00   2.00  5 N -3   ♣T  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O2-Street-Putnam
24 ♠96542
32
JT53
♣86
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠8
AT865
A96
♣KQ94
♠JT73
J94
Q74
♣JT5
♠AKQ
KQ7
K82
♣A732
1
135
21
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣5 ♥5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 1NT  ♦6 ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 2NT*-EW/3*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.00   0.00  2N S      6  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O4-Jones-Taggert
   90          1.00   1.00  1N S      ♣K  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O2-Street-Putnam
        100    0.00   2.00  4 N -2   9  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Winham-Murdock
25 ♠K4
JT
842
♣AK8754
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠QT98
A8432
T3
♣T9
♠762
K5
AKJ9765
♣3
♠AJ53
Q976
Q
♣QJ62
11
611
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1  ♦3 ♠5 NT4
EW: 3 1♠  ♣3 ♥6 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.00   0.00  4♣ N +1   A  O1-Vreeland-Sebring vs O4-Jones-Taggert
  130          1.00   1.00  3♣ N +1   A  O6-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Winham-Murdock
        870    0.00   2.00  3* E +1  ♣Q  O3-Handley-Almeleh vs O2-Street-Putnam