- Saturday Morn - April 29, 2017

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Field strength:  Mean: 932 MP  Geomean: 394 MP
(based on 12 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Glenn Chee - Richard Papst 62.00 1st A 0.60
Debeliah Anthony - Janet Hedlund 58.00 2/3rd A 0.36
Elizabeth Nasr - Michel Nasr 58.00 2/3rd A 0.36
EVENT>Sat Morning Open Game    |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>April 29, 2017     |CLUB NO.>150680    | 04/29/2017 14:15
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   25.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/500       |CLUB>H & H  Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=5                           ,---,-------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Section      |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Janet Hedlund          Debeliah Anthony         B   2/3    2     29.00  58.00  0.36(A)
 2 Janet Street           William Putnam           B    .     .     19.00  38.00
 3 Marianne Van Gelder    Marcia Phelps            B    .     .     24.50  49.00
 4 Terry Handley          Keith Hedlund            B    .     .     17.50  35.00
 5 Glenn Chee             Richard Papst            B    1     1     31.00  62.00  0.60(A)
 6 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A   2/3    .     29.00  58.00  0.36(A)
                                          Totals                   150.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠T943
J742
QJ6
♣K5
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J75
Q6
972
♣AQJT3
♠AKQ6
AK
T8543
♣72
♠82
T9853
AK
♣9864
7
1016
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♦4 ♠3 NT3
EW: 2♣ 3 3♠ 3NT  ♥5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
    PASS       2.00   0.00  Pass Out      O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O2-Street-Putnam
        430    0.50   1.50  3N E +1   T  O5-Chee-Papst vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
        430    0.50   1.50  3N E +1   T  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1NTPass
3NTAll pass  

Zero Souths will lead the AK, unblocking the suit for partner to take the fourth defensive trick, so plus 430 to East will be the norm. Furthermore, there are no additional tricks for EW to take, so a flat board may be predicted. Of course, there is no such thing, but this should be as close as possible across the Common Game.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠T
984
AQ4
♣AQT752
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AK874
QJ5
T865
♣K
♠53
K732
J7
♣98643
♠QJ962
AT6
K932
♣J
12
134
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1 2♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          2.00   0.00  3N S +1   5  O5-Chee-Papst vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
        100    0.50   1.50  3N S -1   Q  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O2-Street-Putnam
        100    0.50   1.50  3N N -1   J  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
12Pass2NT
All pass   

An invitational 2NT by the passed-hand South should not quite get an acceptance from North, and the ideal contract is reached rather easily.

On a heart lead, South must duck twice to prevent East from gathering the fourth round of hearts. After that, spades will provide the eighth trick, along with one heart, three diamonds, and three clubs.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠KT986
T92
AT92
♣Q
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠75
AK864
4
♣87653
♠AQJ3
Q5
Q7
♣AKJT9
♠42
J73
KJ8653
♣42
9
719
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣0 ♥1/0 ♠4 NT1/0
EW: 6♣ 6 3♠ 1NT  ♦6
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: -1400 7*-NS-6
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  3N E -2   6  O5-Chee-Papst vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
        190    1.00   1.00  3♣ E +4   ♠4  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O2-Street-Putnam
        640    0.00   2.00  5♣ E +2   ♠5  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
Pass1DblPass
4PassPassPass

Although "third seat is not forcing," ownership of the spade suit and the potential for spades being a good lead should be a factor determining North's action in third seat. Pass does seem a bit feeble, so the consideration is between 1 and 2. At favorable vulnerability and third seat, 2 by North actually has some merit. But most will bid 1, and that will create some discomfort for East. Should East overcall 2? With 19 HCP that seems lame, so double comes to mind, not worrying too much about two level responses in a red suit -- 3 or a notrump bid would seem to be available. West has a rather nice hand facing the double. 2 would be feeble, 3 could be on a lesser suit -- 4 suggests the hand's potential and the triple leap should qualm any fears East might have regarding the suitability of the Qx for trump support.

Is the leap to 4 justified on value? Suppose East had only twelve or thirteen points for the double. I answer that East should then assuredly have four hearts, for the weaker the hand for a takeout double, the more precisely it should resemble the perfect pattern (1444), and the length of the other major should be a concern when choosing to double. 19 HCP override that concern here.

Yep, missed a slam, but got to the right strain, avoiding the notrump trap.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠82
KJ3
K8732
♣K93
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q7654
96
AQ95
♣82
♠A3
AQ8752
T6
♣T76
♠KJT9
T4
J4
♣AQJ54
10
810
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1 1♠  ♣5 ♦6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +90 2♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  3 E -1   T  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
        100    1.00   1.00  3 N -1   ♠A  O5-Chee-Papst vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
        200    0.00   2.00  3♣ S -2   9  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O2-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPass1Pass
1Pass2All pass

A 2 overcall would be a bit frisky, vulnerable with only five clubs and there should be qualms about burying the spade suit, so the diagram shows a disciplined pass, awaiting developments. If West passes, North might be able to balance, after all, and it is not at all clear what a 2 overcall might achieve on the first round of bidding.

The pass will likely achieve a plus score as West suggests spades, worsening South's hand, while East rebids and sets 2 as the contract. South will likely eliminate black suits from opening lead considerations, and a trump is not generally advocated against a misfit auction, so that leaves the diamond suit, perforce -- and that turns out to be the only way to defeat 2! Not only does it attach a potential entry to dummy in the event that declarer might set up the Q as a trick, but it provides a potential defensive trick for the defense by North's leading a diamond for South to ruff or to achieve an elopement/en passant trick. Should declarer cover the J with the queen, North must win and continue diamonds to continue the dual purpose.

There is plenty of time to prevent a club ruff later, should declarer exit with a club (in that event, the defense wins and plays.

A rather difficult hand, during which South exercises discipline and judgment in the bidding and opening lead choice, while North and South together understand the goals of the defense. If all goes as advertised, NS should achieve a well deserved plus score and many matchpoints.

Unless, of course, they overbid to 3 and East provides a gift by bidding again.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠72
KJT5
A98753
♣A
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AKT
97632
Q
♣J763
♠QJ653
A8
JT2
♣842
♠984
Q4
K64
♣KQT95
12
108
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 1  ♠6 NT6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          2.00   0.00  5 N      A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
  110          1.00   1.00  3 N      A  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O2-Street-Putnam
        100    0.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♠Q  O5-Chee-Papst vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
6 ♠Q32
QJ6
AT953
♣K9
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KJT
A843
KJ
♣Q643
♠A8765
2
842
♣JT72
♠94
KT975
Q76
♣A85
12
145
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2 1NT  ♣4 ♠4
EW: 3♣ 3♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    1.50   0.50  2 S -1   ♣3  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O5-Chee-Papst
         50    1.50   0.50  3 N -1   ♠A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Street-Putnam
        130    0.00   2.00  3♣ W +1   Q  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
7 ♠QJ9654
75
5
♣KT54
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠A8
AJ63
AJ987
♣J9
♠KT3
Q94
QT42
♣Q76
♠72
KT82
K63
♣A832
6
159
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 1♠
       ♣6/7 ♦3 ♥4 NT3/4
EW: 4 3 3/4NT  ♣6 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -630 4NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    2.00   0.00  3 W +1   ♠Q  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Street-Putnam
        180    1.00   1.00  1N E +3   2  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
        600    0.00   2.00  3N W      ♠Q  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O5-Chee-Papst
8 ♠T52
J76
9874
♣Q74
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠763
A54
J52
♣J983
♠AK98
Q932
AQ3
♣A6
♠QJ4
KT8
KT6
♣KT52
3
619
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2/1♣ 1 2 2♠ 2NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          2.00   0.00  4♠* E -3  6  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O5-Chee-Papst
   50          1.00   1.00  2N W -1   9  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
        120    0.00   2.00  1N E +1   ♣2  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Street-Putnam
9 ♠AKT85
52
K72
♣876
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q6
AT973
T3
♣Q543
♠J9742
KQ4
QJ4
♣T2
♠3
J86
A9865
♣AKJ9
10
89
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1/2♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-N/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  3 W -2   ♠A  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O5-Chee-Papst
         50    1.00   1.00  3N S -1   7  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Street-Putnam
        150    0.00   2.00  3N S -3   7  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
10 ♠T9875
QT7
9
♣K763
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠3
A6543
T32
♣JT94
♠KJ42
J8
QJ8754
♣Q
♠AQ6
K92
AK6
♣A852
5
510
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2 4♠ 3NT  ♦6
EW:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4/3
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          2.00   0.00  3N S +1   6  O4-Handley-Hedlund vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
  110          1.00   1.00  2♠ S      4  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Street-Putnam
        300    0.00   2.00  4 N -3   ♣Q  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O5-Chee-Papst
11 ♠JT42
Q6
T6542
♣KT
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠A6
AT9752
K93
♣86
♠9753
KJ
AQJ
♣J954
♠KQ8
843
87
♣AQ732
6
1112
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3
EW: 1♣ 2 4 1♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  4 W -1   ♣K  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
        140    1.00   1.00  3 W      ♣K  O5-Chee-Papst vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        170    0.00   2.00  2 W +2   ♠J  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
12 ♠42
AQ7652
QJ8
♣84
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠8765
KT843
A7
♣QT
♠AKT3
J
K542
♣K963
♠QJ9
9
T963
♣AJ752
9
914
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 2 4♠ 2NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.00   0.00  2♠ W      Q  O5-Chee-Papst vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        140    1.00   1.00  2♠ W +1   ♣8  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
        300    0.00   2.00  3 S -3   J  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
13 ♠J52
JT8765
Q2
♣Q9
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠A964
93
T3
♣KJ632
♠KT73
Q42
J9654
♣4
♠Q8
AK
AK87
♣AT875
6
86
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/3♣ 1 3 2NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          1.50   0.50  4 N      ♠3  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
  620          1.50   0.50  4 N      ♣4  O5-Chee-Papst vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        100    0.00   2.00  3N N -1   ♣3  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
14 ♠QJ5
T87
KT5
♣J632
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠94
KQ93
Q87
♣K874
♠AK872
A52
J64
♣Q5
♠T63
J64
A932
♣AT9
7
1014
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 2♣ 2 3 3♠ 2/1NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW/3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  3N W -2   ♣2  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
   50          1.00   1.00  3N E -1   2  O5-Chee-Papst vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        140    0.00   2.00  1♠ E +2   ♣A  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
15 ♠AT
QJ5
QJT53
♣865
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠KJ973
A9
872
♣KT7
♠2
K64
AK96
♣AJ432
♠Q8654
T8732
4
♣Q9
10
1115
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT2
EW: 5♣ 4 1 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.50   0.50  3N E -1   2  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Van Gelder-Phelps
   50          1.50   0.50  2♠ W -1   Q  O5-Chee-Papst vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        150    0.00   2.00  2N E +1   3  O2-Street-Putnam vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
16 ♠Q642
974
KQ943
♣6
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠J87
KQT532
T
♣A98
♠KT5
A6
J7652
♣J42
♠A93
J8
A8
♣KQT753
7
109
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1♠  ♥4 NT5
EW: 3/2 1NT  ♣5/4 ♦6/5 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -140 3-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.00   0.00  2♣ S -1   7  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        100    1.00   1.00  3 N -2   A  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
        140    0.00   2.00  2 W +1   ♣6  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Chee-Papst
17 ♠Q8432
986
843
♣J8
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠76
Q5
AQT2
♣AT975
♠AT5
T42
975
♣KQ62
♠KJ9
AKJ73
KJ6
♣43
3
129
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4 2NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -130 4-EW/4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.00   0.00  2♠ S +2   2  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
        110    1.00   1.00  3♣ W      9  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        150    0.00   2.00  3 S -3   ♣A  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Chee-Papst
18 ♠5
A765
KJ9
♣KJT85
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AJ
KQJT2
A83
♣964
♠T97
94
7642
♣AQ32
♠KQ86432
83
QT5
♣7
12
156
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 NT4
EW: 1♣ 1 1 2NT  ♠5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.50   0.50  4 W -1   ♠5  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Chee-Papst
   50          1.50   0.50  3 W -1   ♠5  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        100    0.00   2.00  3♠ S -1   T  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
19 ♠43
AK84
QT
♣AQ962
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠T82
T97632
K8
♣T8
♠J75
QJ5
A62
♣J754
♠AKQ96
-
J97543
♣K3
15
39
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 1 4♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          2.00   0.00  3N N +2   ♣4  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
  430          1.00   1.00  3N N +1   Q  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
  150          0.00   2.00  4 S +1   ♣T  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Chee-Papst
20 ♠Q
KJ962
KJ874
♣74
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AK65
874
AT2
♣K83
♠JT983
AQ53
6
♣Q96
♠742
T
Q953
♣AJT52
10
149
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 1♣ 2 4♠ 2NT  ♦4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -500 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    1.50   0.50  4♠ E      T  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O1-Hedlund-Anthony
        620    1.50   0.50  4♠ E      T  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        650    0.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   6  O2-Street-Putnam vs O5-Chee-Papst
21 ♠A84
63
KQJ73
♣J82
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJ6532
K98
-
♣T654
♠K
QJT42
T984
♣AK7
♠T97
A75
A652
♣Q93
11
613
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1NT  ♣4 ♥3 ♠2
EW: 2♣ 2 4♠  ♦5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  3 N      ♣A  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
   50          1.00   1.00  2 E -1   ♣3  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O2-Street-Putnam
        590    0.00   2.00  4* E     A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Chee-Papst
22 ♠432
64
Q93
♣KT963
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K95
AQT873
JT5
♣A
♠QJ76
KJ2
A762
♣42
♠AT8
95
K84
♣QJ875
5
1411
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠1 NT2
EW: 4 5 5♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: -650 5♠-EW/5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    2.00   0.00  4 W      3  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        650    0.50   1.50  4 W +1   ♠4  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Chee-Papst
        650    0.50   1.50  4 W +1   6  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O2-Street-Putnam
23 ♠T
T93
QJ876
♣AQ84
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠87432
KJ54
94
♣KJ
♠AKQJ95
AQ8
AT
♣92
♠6
762
K532
♣T7653
9
820
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♥2 ♠2 NT2
EW: 5 5♠ 2/5NT  ♣5 ♦5
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: -660 5NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        200    2.00   0.00  3♠ E +2   7  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O2-Street-Putnam
        650    1.00   1.00  4♠ E +1   3  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Chee-Papst
       1100    0.00   2.00  7♣* S -4  ♠8  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
24 ♠Q63
Q92
JT85
♣654
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T92
K8543
A
♣K973
♠AJ75
AT
KQ974
♣T2
♠K84
J76
632
♣AQJ8
5
1014
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT4
EW: 3♣ 4 4 5♠ 3NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    2.00   0.00  2♠ E +1   2  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O4-Handley-Hedlund
        150    1.00   1.00  2N W +1   ♣6  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Chee-Papst
        430    0.00   2.00  3N W +1   J  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O2-Street-Putnam
25 ♠A2
AKJ62
T8763
♣9
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠JT953
QT75
KQ
♣T8
♠K64
98
542
♣AKQ54
♠Q87
43
AJ9
♣J7632
12
812
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 3 2NT  ♠6
EW: -/1♠  ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6/7 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  3♠ W -2   A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Chee-Papst
  100          1.00   1.00  3♠ W -1   A  O3-Van Gelder-Phelps vs O2-Street-Putnam
         50    0.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♣A  O1-Hedlund-Anthony vs O4-Handley-Hedlund