- Saturday Morn - September 29, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 90 MP  Geomean: 27 MP
(based on 24 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Paula Cole - Suzanne Haley 60.63 1st OA 1.50
Larry Mazzei - Susan Mazzei 56.25 2/3rd OA 0.99
Barbara Moxley - John Kneisl 56.25 2/3rd OA 0.99
Ginger Minor - Norma Riggs 55.00 4th OA 0.63
Deane Satow - Ellie Satow 50.63 1st OC 0.85
Albert Low - Sam Callaway 48.75 2/3rd OC 0.56
Jean Scholefield - Mary Seiersen 48.75 2/3rd OC 0.56
Debeliah Anthony - Rita Sturgeon 45.00 2nd SC 0.32
EVENT>Saturday Morning Pairs   |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> B N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 29, 2018 |CLUB NO.>150680    | 09/29/2018 13:17
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club ACBL Membership         |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   40.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>500/200/50     |CLUB>H & H Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=4/C=2                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Mary Block             Kathy Pfitzer            A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     36.50  45.63
 2 Albert Low             Sam Callaway             C   .     .    2/3  |   .     .    1/2    39.00  48.75  0.56(OC)
 3 Norma Riggs            Ginger Minor             B   4     4     .   |   2     2     .     44.00  55.00  0.63(OA)
 4 Julie Garvin           Joseph Garvin            A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     36.50  45.63
 5 Susan Mazzei           Larry Mazzei             B  2/3   2/3    .   |   1     1     .     45.00  56.25  0.99(OA)
 6 Mary Seiersen          Jean Scholefield         C   .     .    2/3  |   .     .    1/2    39.00  48.75  0.56(OC)
                                          Totals                                            240.00

EVENT>Saturday Morning Pairs   |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> B E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   40.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>500/200/50     |CLUB>H & H Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=6/C=4                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Marcy Klein            Mark Klein               C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     35.50  44.38
 2 Suzanne Haley          Paula Cole               B   1     1     .   |   1     1     .     48.50  60.63  1.50(OA)
 3 Rita Sturgeon          Debeliah Anthony         C   .     .     .   |   .     .     2     36.00  45.00  0.32(SC)
 4 Martha Barry           Roger Barry              C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     34.50  43.13
 5 John Kneisl            Barbara Moxley           B  2/3   2/3    .   |   2     2     .     45.00  56.25  0.99(OA)
 6 Deane Satow            Ellie Satow              C   .     .     1   |   .     .     1     40.50  50.63  0.85(OC)
                                          Totals                                            240.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠AJ5
AKT842
5
♣954
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q872
J
AJT92
♣Q72
♠T96
Q9653
Q74
♣JT
♠K43
7
K863
♣AK863
12
105
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 4 2♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.50   0.50  2 N      4  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B6-Satow-Satow
  110          3.50   0.50  2 N      ♣J  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
         50    2.00   2.00  2N S -1   J  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B4-Barry-Barry
        100    1.00   3.00  4 N -2   ♣J  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B1-Klein-Klein
        300    0.00   4.00  4* N -2  Q  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass2
Pass2Pass2NT
Pass4All pass 

With a singleton and a six card major in need of work, North will override any suggestion to play game in notrump, and the sooner the statement is made, the less convincing South needs.

When the J falls, North should reconsider the straightforward line of drawing trumps. Instead, try to ruff diamonds in the North hand, take the spade finesse, hope that spades are 2-2, and cash two clubs. Despite the fact that the A is offside, this plan, eloping with the small trumps by ruffing diamonds while East helplessly follows suit, succeeds.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠KQT92
AKT5
AT86
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J754
Q3
J54
♣A632
♠A6
876
K32
♣KJT94
♠83
J942
Q97
♣Q875
16
811
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2 4 2♠  ♣6 NT6
EW: 1♣  ♦4 ♥2 ♠4/5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          4.00   0.00  4 S      ♣A  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
  140          2.00   2.00  2♠ N +1   ♣9  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
  140          2.00   2.00  1♠ N +2   8  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B6-Satow-Satow
  140          2.00   2.00  2 N +1   ♣J  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B4-Barry-Barry
  110          0.00   4.00  2♠ N      ♣J  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B1-Klein-Klein

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
Pass12?Pass
3DblPass3
Pass4All pass 

East made a rather poor overcall, letting South off the hook, but when West raised, North still had enough oomph to double for takeout, and then, optimistically, raise to game.

Optimistic, sir North! Many things are favorably poised for NS, such as the doubleton trump queen, and in some variations it might be necessary to finesse for the spade jack, rather than playing to drop the suit or hope for the ace to be onside.

But it can be made, as you can see from an examination of the hand record. Did you, without that aid? However, plus 170 might be almost as good at matchpoints. Remember, close games that take luck or great skill to fulfill, while paying off in tops, will achieve near tops just by playing your cards well and just being in the right part score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠763
KQ754
7
♣9643
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QT98
92
K95
♣AJ87
♠AJ5
T63
AT8
♣KQ52
♠K42
AJ8
QJ6432
♣T
5
1014
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    4.00   0.00  2 N -1   ♣K  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B6-Satow-Satow
        100    2.50   1.50  2 S -2   ♠8  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B4-Barry-Barry
        100    2.50   1.50  2 S -2   ♣7  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B1-Klein-Klein
        110    0.50   3.50  2♠ W      7  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
        110    0.50   3.50  3♣ E      Q  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1Pass2
DblPassPass3
All pass   

East has the best hand at the table in terms of HCP, but has no good bid after 1 P 1. The pattern is just awful. West to the rescue! The East hand should not get the scent of game from West's competitive double, especially in light of the awful heart holding and the 4333 pattern. Enough to find a good part score.

Spades luckily make 110, trumps compliantly breaking 3-3, but clubs should score 110 in some comfort., so long as diamonds are played first by winning the K. After that, leading a diamond toward the ace cannot be hurt by North's ruffing, for that would be a loser ruffed with a dangerous trump holding.

So 110 is a likely EW score in either spades or clubs. Beating 2 a couple of tricks just isn't quite as good.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠AK874
QT8
J
♣A842
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q96
A96
T832
♣KQT
♠T3
K53
AK964
♣J96
♠J52
J742
Q75
♣753
14
1111
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT6
EW: 1♣ 2 1 1NT  ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.50   0.50  3 E -1   ♠J  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
  100          3.50   0.50  3 E -1   ♠2  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B4-Barry-Barry
   80          2.00   2.00  1♠ N      A  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
         90    1.00   3.00  2 E      ♠J  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B1-Klein-Klein
        200    0.00   4.00  3♠ N -2   ♣Q  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B6-Satow-Satow

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1PassPass
1NTPassPassPass

Balancing notrumps resemble weak notrumps, both being in the 12-14 HCP range for balanced hands. West will balance 1NT when North opens 1 and no one can bid, and South might have a wary eye on the red stripe (dangerous vulnerability, minus 100 for each undoubled trick, 200/500 for doubled undertricks).

1NT is relatively safe, offering East a variety of contracts, but today the 1NT spot seems just about right.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠QJT9762
QJ
J
♣A98
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AK53
K76
K
♣KJ642
♠84
5432
Q9765
♣T5
♠-
AT98
AT8432
♣Q73
11
172
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2/3 1 2/4♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: +620 4♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          4.00   0.00  3N S +1   ♣4  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B6-Satow-Satow
  170          3.00   1.00  3♠ N +1   5  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B1-Klein-Klein
  110          2.00   2.00  2♠ N      9  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
        100    1.00   3.00  3♠ N -1   ♣T  B2-Low-Callaway vs B2-Haley-Cole
        300    0.00   4.00  4♠ N -3   ♣5  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B4-Barry-Barry

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 3All pass 

The only reason this hand can possibly take ten tricks is the lucky layout of the club suit, allowing the "intra-finesse" to garner two club tricks for declarer. Here's how it works: In the absence of a terribly unlucky lead such as the T, declarer can lead and pass the 8, losing to the J, but then later, by leading the Q, pins the T and scores two club tricks. Of course, the T lead gives two club tricks on the get-go.

The reason the computer gives South making 4, but North just 2 lies partly on the club situation, but also because West cannot lead a heart with the same effect that a heart lead from East would have. South can thus make ten tricks, North just eight, based on the lead potential.

Of course, South will NEVER play spades, so all of the above is completely academic.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

6 ♠K
KT95
985
♣JT853
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠QT62
64
AQT42
♣A2
♠98754
AQJ87
76
♣7
♠AJ3
32
KJ3
♣KQ964
7
127
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2/3 ♥2 ♠2 NT4
EW: 3 4 5♠ 3NT  ♣6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          4.00   0.00  4♠* E -1  3  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B6-Satow-Satow
  110          2.50   1.50  3♣ S      6  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B4-Barry-Barry
  110          2.50   1.50  3♣ S      4  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
   90          1.00   3.00  2♣ S      4  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B1-Klein-Klein
        100    0.00   4.00  3♣ S -2   6  B2-Low-Callaway vs B2-Haley-Cole

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
1112
233Pass
3All pass  

For eight consecutive turns following East's initial pass, everybody bids for eight consecutive turns.

East did a yeoman's job after passing, introducing a nine-high suit and cue-bidding to make a game try, but West cannot quite get there from this beginning. Perhaps his mind should consider that the hearts are probably well-placed on the auction, and that the diamonds might be as well, to justify South's opening bid. That gets West close to bidding game, but it is the spade honors vs. heart honors that are elusive.

Kudos to those EW pairs who do bid game constructively, luck is with those who get pushed.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

7 ♠53
52
AJ52
♣KQJ84
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠4
KQT87
K63
♣7652
♠QJ872
64
Q974
♣T9
♠AKT96
AJ93
T8
♣A3
11
85
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 3 2 3♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          3.50   0.50  3N N +1   ♠Q  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B1-Klein-Klein
  630          3.50   0.50  3N N +1   ♠7  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B4-Barry-Barry
  600          1.50   2.50  3N N      4  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B6-Satow-Satow
  600          1.50   2.50  3N N      4  B2-Low-Callaway vs B2-Haley-Cole
        200    0.00   4.00  4♠ S -2   Q  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1NTPass2
Pass2NTPass3NT
All pass   

South needs some value bid from North to bid this game, and North's sequence provides just that, 1NT forcing followed by 2NT showing right at 11 HCP. North has a bit extra in the form of an excellent club suit, but it is not enough to force game after a 1 bid by today's standards.

Making the eleven tricks available as shown by Deep Finesse will require delicate handling and a Deep Finesse, indeed, playing a spade to the nine on the first round of that suit. Perhaps the prior play will suggest that somehow, but normally it would appear that playing spades from the top is the better method, winning against Qx, Jx, QJ, or any singleton honor in the West hand, breaking even against all 3-3 splits.

Nine top tricks may be all some declarers manage.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

8 ♠J9652
7
AQ73
♣975
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠87
984
J9842
♣AJ6
♠AT4
QT6532
5
♣KQ3
♠KQ3
AKJ
KT6
♣T842
7
611
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 3♠ 3NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.50   0.50  3♠ S +1   9  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B4-Barry-Barry
  170          3.50   0.50  3♠ N +1   5  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
  140          2.00   2.00  3♠ N      ♣K  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B1-Klein-Klein
         50    1.00   3.00  4♠ S -1   J  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B6-Satow-Satow
        110    0.00   4.00  2 E      A  B2-Low-Callaway vs B2-Haley-Cole

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPass11NT
Pass2Pass2
All pass   

The number of tricks taken by declarer will depend precisely on the opening lead.

A trump will result in nine -- A followed by three clubs seems easy for the defense.

A heart lead will allow two club discards, after which declarer will lose one club, one spade, and one diamond.

A diamond lead will threaten eleven tricks unless the diamond ruff can be found -- declarer will play a heart at trick 2, finessing the J, then the AK, discarding clubs, and then a spade. East will lead the K, which West must overtake to give a diamond ruff. Otherwise, eleven tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠76
A432
AQT4
♣JT3
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠98543
J6
J753
♣A5
♠QJT
T9875
K86
♣98
♠AK2
KQ
92
♣KQ7642
11
66
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6/5♣ 3 3 2♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +920 6♣-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.50   0.50  3♣ S +3   ♠3  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
  170          3.50   0.50  2♣ S +4   6  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
  150          2.00   2.00  2♣ S +3   J  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B6-Satow-Satow
  130          1.00   3.00  3♣ S +1   ♠8  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B2-Haley-Cole
  110          0.00   4.00  3 S      ♠4  B2-Low-Callaway vs B1-Klein-Klein

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass2
Pass3Pass4
Pass4NTPass6
All pass   

North has 2 1/2 quick tricks and a halfway decent four card diamond suit, suitable for lead purposes, if the opponents gain the lead. Accordingly, an opening bid is not out of line. South bids 2, game forcing, and North is stuck. 3 seems the least of evils, and South is encouraged to bid 4, Minorwood. After North owns up to two key cards, South bids the club slam.

Will South find the only opening bid that beats the contract? A diamond does the trick, but only on trick one.

If that's what it takes, I'd say that the slam should be bid. Otherwise, South knocks out the trump ace, unblocks hearts, ruffs a spade, draws a second trump and discards a diamond on the A. Then get to hand and draw the last trump. Claim time.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

10 ♠2
AT2
852
♣KQ6532
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠QT64
QJ865
J43
♣4
♠AKJ53
73
AQ
♣AJ98
♠987
K94
KT976
♣T7
9
619
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3
EW: 3 4♠ 3NT  ♣6 ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.50   0.50  4♠ E -1   7  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
  100          3.50   0.50  4♠ E -1   6  B2-Low-Callaway vs B1-Klein-Klein
        620    1.00   3.00  4♠ E      7  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B6-Satow-Satow
        620    1.00   3.00  4♠ E      ♣T  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
        620    1.00   3.00  4♠ E      ♣T  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B2-Haley-Cole

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
2Pass3Pass
3Pass4Pass
4All pass  

The first bid after the raise was ostensibly a game try, declined. However, 4 was clearly a slam try, for game has now been forced, and that fact relates back to the club bid (the cards have not changed).

But West cannot help at all, and East should be happy (well, not really. Let's say East is resigned) to passing 4.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

11 ♠A8752
-
Q3
♣A96543
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠J
KJ97
K52
♣KQT87
♠Q9
AT86543
AJ94
♣-
♠KT643
Q2
T876
♣J2
10
1311
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3♠  ♦3 ♥0 NT3
EW: 3/4 6 1NT  ♣6 ♠4
LoTT: 21 - 21 = 0
Par: -500 6♠*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          4.00   0.00  4♠ N +1   A  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B2-Haley-Cole
         50    2.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   A  B2-Low-Callaway vs B1-Klein-Klein
         50    2.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   A  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
        450    1.00   3.00  4 E +1   ♣J  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
        480    0.00   4.00  5 E +1   ♠4  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B6-Satow-Satow

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
1124
PassPass? 

East will probably bid 5, not really having an alternative. Double is probably the alternative, not 5, for the club void is a drag on the offensive prospects, and with two aces and club shortness, it would appear that the defense would be profitable.

Wrong!

In fact, if West leads a heart, the defense fails and the result will be minus 590. Only a club honor lead beats 4.

5 seems unilateral by East, and unjustified by West, but if anyone can muster that bid, playing hearts is the winner. Slam??? Well, that is a bit much to foresee.

East might expect some support for hearts from West, who is marked with spade shortness, so might well bid 5. That is at least some inference beyond just looking at East's own cards.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

12 ♠9873
T84
A65
♣AJ2
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠QJT
9763
KQ972
♣Q
♠6542
KJ52
T8
♣K97
♠AK
AQ
J43
♣T86543
9
107
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 2♠ 4NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦6/5 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          4.00   0.00  3♣ S +2   7  B2-Low-Callaway vs B1-Klein-Klein
  130          3.00   1.00  2♣ S +2   K  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B6-Satow-Satow
   50          1.50   2.50  2 W -1   ♣A  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B2-Haley-Cole
   50          1.50   2.50  2 E -1   ♠A  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
        100    0.00   4.00  3♣ S -1   ♠T  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
13 ♠864
982
T53
♣KQ87
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠QJT932
643
Q62
♣9
♠A75
AT
A987
♣AT42
♠K
KQJ75
KJ4
♣J653
5
516
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2
EW: 1♣ 5 1 5♠ 3NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          4.00   0.00  4♠* W -1  2  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
        100    3.00   1.00  3 S -1   ♣9  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B1-Klein-Klein
        140    2.00   2.00  2♠ W +1   ♣7  B2-Low-Callaway vs B6-Satow-Satow
        170    1.00   3.00  2♠ E +2   K  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B2-Haley-Cole
        620    0.00   4.00  4♠ W      9  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B4-Barry-Barry
14 ♠92
AQJ7
QT
♣JT543
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K6
632
J7642
♣AQ2
♠QJ83
9854
AK8
♣K9
♠AT754
KT
953
♣876
10
1013
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3 2 1♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          4.00   0.00  5 E -3   ♠A  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B4-Barry-Barry
   50          3.00   1.00  2 E -1   ♣6  B2-Low-Callaway vs B6-Satow-Satow
        110    2.00   2.00  2 E +1   ♠A  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B1-Klein-Klein
        130    1.00   3.00  2 E +2   ♠5  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B2-Haley-Cole
        400    0.00   4.00  5 E      ♠A  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
15 ♠AQ3
87654
Q84
♣A3
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠T74
KJ92
AK62
♣96
♠J985
-
JT97
♣QJ875
♠K62
AQT3
53
♣KT42
12
115
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 3 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          4.00   0.00  2 N +2   J  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B1-Klein-Klein
  140          2.00   2.00  3 N      J  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B2-Haley-Cole
  140          2.00   2.00  2 N +1   7  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
  140          2.00   2.00  2 N +1   ♣Q  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B4-Barry-Barry
        100    0.00   4.00  4 N -1   J  B2-Low-Callaway vs B6-Satow-Satow
16 ♠Q5
9852
KJ7
♣KQJ9
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AJT9743
4
83
♣A42
♠K62
AKQ7
QT62
♣85
♠8
JT63
A954
♣T763
12
914
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠1 NT2
EW: 1♣ 2 1 5♠ 5NT
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        650    2.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   5  B2-Low-Callaway vs B6-Satow-Satow
        650    2.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   ♣K  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
        650    2.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   ♣K  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B2-Haley-Cole
        650    2.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   ♣K  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B4-Barry-Barry
        650    2.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   ♣K  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B1-Klein-Klein
17 ♠K72
K8753
Q
♣T764
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AJ6
J62
AKJT92
♣K
♠T9854
AT
863
♣J92
♠Q3
Q94
754
♣AQ853
8
175
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2  ♦2 ♠2/3 NT3
EW: 4 3♠ 3/2NT  ♣4 ♥5/4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          4.00   0.00  5 W -2   5  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
        110    3.00   1.00  2 W +1   3  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B2-Haley-Cole
        130    1.50   2.50  3 W +1   3  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B1-Klein-Klein
        130    1.50   2.50  1 W +3   5  B2-Low-Callaway vs B4-Barry-Barry
        200    0.00   4.00  3 N -4   8  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
18 ♠KJ98
K4
T873
♣A86
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T
QJ96
J52
♣KQJT7
♠765
A8753
AK9
♣32
♠AQ432
T2
Q64
♣954
11
1011
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT6
EW: 5/4♣ 1/- 5 1NT
       ♦7/6 ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    4.00   0.00  4♠ S -1   6  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B2-Haley-Cole
        110    3.00   1.00  2 E      ♠A  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B1-Klein-Klein
        170    2.00   2.00  2 E +2   ♠3  B2-Low-Callaway vs B4-Barry-Barry
        200    1.00   3.00  3 E +2   ♠A  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
        230    0.00   4.00  3 E +3   6  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
19 ♠J7
AJ754
964
♣J43
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AKT986
QT8
T875
♣-
♠Q42
K962
Q3
♣AK52
♠53
3
AKJ2
♣QT9876
7
914
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 2 3♠ 3NT  ♣5 ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -300 4♣*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          4.00   0.00  4♠ W -2   ♣3  B2-Low-Callaway vs B4-Barry-Barry
  100          2.50   1.50  4♠ W -1   A  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
  100          2.50   1.50  4♠ W -1   9  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
        140    1.00   3.00  3♠ W      9  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B1-Klein-Klein
        620    0.00   4.00  4♠ W      A  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B2-Haley-Cole
20 ♠864
KT72
QJT8
♣J7
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KJ92
9543
AK9
♣42
♠53
A8
7654
♣AQT65
♠AQT7
QJ6
32
♣K983
7
1110
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 2 1♠  ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -90 2-EW/2♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          4.00   0.00  2 N      ♣6  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B1-Klein-Klein
  100          3.00   1.00  2♠ W -1   5  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
         80    2.00   2.00  1 W      ♣7  B2-Low-Callaway vs B4-Barry-Barry
         90    1.00   3.00  1N E      ♠7  B1-Block-Pfitzer vs B2-Haley-Cole
        300    0.00   4.00  2♠ N -3   A  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
21 ♠AT653
Q4
QJT8
♣64
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KJ8
AK9
K96
♣QJ82
♠97
T87653
54
♣753
♠Q42
J2
A732
♣AKT9
9
170
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 3 3♠  ♣6/7 ♥4 NT5
EW: 1 1NT  ♣6 ♦4 ♠4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          4.00   0.00  3♠ N      5  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B6-Satow-Satow
  100          3.00   1.00  3 E -2   ♣A  B2-Low-Callaway vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
        100    2.00   2.00  3♠ N -1   5  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B2-Haley-Cole
        200    0.50   3.50  4♠ N -2   T  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
        200    0.50   3.50  3♠ N -2   5  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B4-Barry-Barry
22 ♠9
T42
T8754
♣QT84
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KQT82
Q763
93
♣J6
♠76543
A
AQ6
♣9752
♠AJ
KJ985
KJ2
♣AK3
2
810
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 3 1NT  ♠4
EW: 3♠  ♣5/4 ♦3 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  210          4.00   0.00  2N S +3   ♠8  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B4-Barry-Barry
         50    3.00   1.00  4 S -1   ♠K  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
        100    1.00   3.00  3N S -2   ♠8  B2-Low-Callaway vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
        100    1.00   3.00  2N S -2   ♠8  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B2-Haley-Cole
        100    1.00   3.00  5 N -2   A  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B6-Satow-Satow
23 ♠Q432
AKT2
K
♣AK42
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AJ
J
A9764
♣J9865
♠T96
8743
QJT5
♣Q7
♠K875
Q965
832
♣T3
19
115
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦4
EW: 3  ♣6 ♥3 ♠2 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +500 5*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          4.00   0.00  4♠ N +1   Q  B2-Low-Callaway vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
  200          3.00   1.00  2 W -2   ♣A  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
  140          1.50   2.50  2♠ S +1   J  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B2-Haley-Cole
  140          1.50   2.50  3 S      ♣J  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B6-Satow-Satow
        100    0.00   4.00  4 S -1   A  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B4-Barry-Barry
24 ♠AJ52
KT962
42
♣J4
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠K84
Q743
93
♣AKT5
♠97
8
AJ8765
♣9872
♠QT63
AJ5
KQT
♣Q63
9
125
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 4NT  ♣6 ♦6
EW: 1♣ 1  ♥3 ♠2/3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          4.00   0.00  4 N      ♣A  B5-Mazzei-Mazzei vs B4-Barry-Barry
  140          3.00   1.00  3 N      ♣9  B4-Garvin-Garvin vs B2-Haley-Cole
  100          2.00   2.00  3 E -2   ♠3  B2-Low-Callaway vs B3-Sturgeon-Anthony
         50    1.00   3.00  3 N -1   ♣9  B3-Riggs-Minor vs B5-Kneisl-Moxley
         90    0.00   4.00  2 E      A  B6-Seiersen-Scholefield vs B6-Satow-Satow