- Wednesday Aft - March 28, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Field strength:  Mean: 761 MP  Geomean: 576 MP
(based on 20 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Brad Dow - Marianne Van Gelder 60.94 1st OA 4.23
Andrea Carr - Laura Gherman 57.99 2nd OA 3.17
Lauren Upson - Tim Gillott 57.76 3rd OA 2.38
Leonard Chriss - Ronald Loiacono 55.73 4th OA 1.78
Annemarie Von Adelung - Barbara Hake 44.92 2/3rd SC 0.19
Donna Jett - Glenn Chee 44.92 2/3rd SC 0.19
EVENT>Wednesday Open Pairs     |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>March 28, 2018     |CLUB NO.>273557    | 03/28/2018 16:08
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Marianne Van Gel|RATING>Club Championship (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   54.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/1200/500  |CLUB>Wednesday Open
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=10/B=8/C=4                      ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Tim Gillott            Lauren Upson             B   3     2     .   |   3     2     .     62.38  57.76  2.38(OA)
 2 Ronald Loiacono        Leonard Chriss           B   4     3     .   |   4     3     .     60.19  55.73  1.78(OA)
 3 Dinah Irino            Patricia Heller          C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     40.13  37.16
 4  Maja                  Nancy Borucki            A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     55.51  51.40
 5 Marianne Van Gelder    Brad Dow                 A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     65.81  60.94  4.23(OA)
 6 Arlene Seckel          Jerome Weiss             B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     59.38  54.98
 7 Laura Gherman          Andrea Carr              C   2     1     .   |   2     1     1     62.63  57.99  3.17(OA)
 8 Annemarie Von Adelung  Barbara Hake             C   .     .     .   |   .     .    2/3    48.51  44.92  0.19(SC)
 9 Glenn Chee             Donna Jett               C   .     .     .   |   .     .    2/3    48.51  44.92  0.19(SC)
10 Anthony Muller         Joyce Newell             B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     39.01  36.12
                                          Totals                                            542.06

Hands and Results
1 ♠AK8754
8
9876
♣97
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠T
QJ974
K4
♣AKJ65
♠Q
AKT3
AQT52
♣T43
♠J9632
652
J3
♣Q82
7
1415
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣0 ♦0 ♥0 NT0
EW: 6♣ 6 6 1NT  ♠5
LoTT: 20 - 20 = 0
Par: -800 6♠*-NS-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        450    4.00   0.00  4 W +1   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A3-Irino-Heller
        480    2.00   2.00  5♠ W +1   A4-Maja-Borucki vs A1-Gillott-Upson
        480    2.00   2.00  4 W +2   A10-Muller-Newell vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
        480    2.00   2.00  4 E +2   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
        980    0.00   4.00  6 W      A9-Chee-Jett vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 2Dbl4
6All pass  

N/S interference will make it difficult for E/W to get to slam on this hand. North has a normal 2 opening, and in fact, some aggressive bidders might even open 3. East has an easy takeout double and South will need to decide what to do. Given the vulnerability, South will suspect that E/W quite possibly have a slam on the hand, perhaps even a grand if one of the opponents has a void. It seems unlikely that South can steal the hand with 4, but this might make it hard for the opponents to determine if they have a slam. Notice on the actual hand how much pressure a 4 bid puts on West. Other possible approaches by South might be to bid 3 followed by 4 if the opponents only bid 4, and passing 4 or 4, or bidding 5 right away. The latter approach might push the opponents into slam, and the former approach looks unlikely to work on this hand, as South is so weak. Most players won't be considering tactics like these anyway, and a jump to 4 is likely to be a common bid.

What should West do over 4? Most expert pairs will have an agreement on what 4NT by West would mean. For sure, I don't know any expert or pro pairs who would use it either naturally or as Blackwood. For most it would mean that West has two places to play. Playing IMPS, it isn't so bad to include hands with s and a minor, as you don't care if you play in a minor instead of s. At matchpoints, another possible meaning for 4NT is that West has either both minors, or a slam try in s. This is a rare agreement, but would probably be a good choice on this hand if available. If West does have a way to make a slam try, East should accept. There is a good principle at work here, that if your partner is making slam tries and you have good trump, then you should bid slam, since your partner will have everything else. For most pairs, though, West will just be forced to make a guess. West basically needs East to have AK and A, or an unlikely A, or possibly a void. Usually it is wrong to play partner for a specific three cards, but what else could East have for their takeout double? There are only 16 HCP missing outside of the suit, and East should have 14-15 at a minimum. If East has the King and a minimum, that would be unfortunate. I think odds favor East having the top two honors, the Ace and one other card on this auction, and 6 is a good shot by West. I certainly have sympathy for only bidding 5.

With the suit coming in, the finesse will not even be needed to make 12 tricks. N/S have a sacrifice in 6, but this will not be found at very many tables. The sacrifice would be too expensive if South had a third or North had a third . In any case, getting to 6 will be an excellent score for E/W.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

2 ♠KQJ6
82
76
♣AT752
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠-
AQT
QJT843
♣KQ94
♠A52
KJ9543
A2
♣83
♠T98743
76
K95
♣J6
10
1412
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT2
EW: 1♣ 5 5 2NT  ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          3.50   0.50  6 E -1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
   50          3.50   0.50  5 E -1   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A3-Irino-Heller
        450    1.00   3.00  4 E +1   A4-Maja-Borucki vs A1-Gillott-Upson
        450    1.00   3.00  4 E +1   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
        450    1.00   3.00  4 E +1   A9-Chee-Jett vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
2Pass2Pass
31Pass3NT2Pass
4All pass  
  1. shortness, 3 card support
  2. No serious slam interest

E/W will have the opposite problem on this hand that they did on Board 1, and that is, staying out of slam. After East opens 1 and rebids 2, West can make a delayed Splinter bid of 3. Jump bids when your side is in a game forcing auction are rare, and should show a fairly specific hand. In this case, West is showing shortness, three card support and some slam interest. With four card support, West would have bid 2NT first. With no slam interest, West would just bid 3. As discussed recently in my analysis, most expert pairs will use 3NT when they have found a nine card or longer major suit fit to either confirm or deny slam interest (known respectively as Serious 3NT or Non-serious 3NT.) Here, East is not a minimum, so shouldn't just bid 4, but the Ace opposite shortness isn't a great holding, so the East hand isn't as good as it looks. Notice how much better the E/W hands are if the Ace were the Ace instead. Should East make one more slam try over 3NT? Perhaps, as East would not likely show slam interest by cue bidding if their hand were the KJ, K and A. However, even if West does bid 4 and East bids 4, both players are likely to sign off at that point. If West decides to go on to slam on this hand, it will not work out. Unless South leads a , declarer has no play for 12 tricks, and even on a lead, declarer isn't home as they have to worry about a 4-1 break. Making 11 tricks will be a very common result and I suspect that most pairs will stay out of slam, for an average score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

3 ♠AKJ97
AK9
KJ
♣K42
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠53
Q76
8632
♣QJ83
♠8
T8532
T94
♣AT75
♠QT642
J4
AQ75
♣96
22
54
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4/3 2 6/5♠ 6/3NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +990 6NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  980          3.00   1.00  6♠ S      A7-Gherman-Carr vs A3-Irino-Heller
  980          3.00   1.00  6♠ N      A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
  980          3.00   1.00  6♠ N      A10-Muller-Newell vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
  480          1.00   3.00  4♠ N +2   A9-Chee-Jett vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
         50    0.00   4.00  6N N -1   A4-Maja-Borucki vs A1-Gillott-Upson

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
Pass2Pass21
Pass2NTPass32
Pass4Pass4
Pass6All pass 
  1. Positive, game forcing
  2. Transfer to

For the third hand in a row, one of the pairs will have a slam decision to make. With 22 HCP and a good five card suit, North is too strong to open either 1 or 2NT. Methods vary after a 2 opening and South might show controls, HCP, bid their suit despite the suit quality, or just bid 2 as either a waiting bid or immediately showing positive hand. In most cases, North will bid 2NT next. When South then transfers into s, North has adequate support to say the least and should immediately confirm a fit and slam interest. Normally after a 2NT or stronger bid, a cue bid should show a concentration of values and not just a control, as the strong hand is expected to have a lot of controls. On this hand, bidding 4 from the North hand looks like an unnecessary bid, taking up a lot of room, and since it doesn't pinpoint a source of tricks, making the cheapest cue bid looks best. South is likely to make a slam try themselves, even if North doesn't on this hand. Certainly, once South cooperates in a slam try, North should press on. Opposite a South hand that passed originally, it is reasonable for North to just bid 6 once South shows slam interest. Could South have a hand where a grand is reasonable? As little as xxxxx xx Axxx Ax, but the problem is that North will not be able to find out that South has this, instead of xxxxx xxx Axx Ax. It is also hard to construct a South hand where South can bid a grand with confidence. Perhaps North should just keep cue bidding, hoping that South will use Blackwood. If South has xxxxx x AQxxx Ax then South can probably bid a grand if N/S are using "# of Kings".

As it happens, this discussion is moot as an Ace is missing. Jumping to 6 instead of hoping for an unlikely grand slam has one other HUGE advantage. North doesn't want to have South be the first one to bid s and end up as the declarer, given North's holding. (Note that North could avoid this problem by just bidding 3 over 3 and then later making a slam try.) The actual hand illustrates the importance of this, as a likely lead from West will doom a 6 contract by South, but 6 is unstoppable when bid by North. Although 6NT happens to make double dummy, it will rarely if ever be bid, and is most likely to go down unless the Ace is led. Bidding to 6 should be fairly common, but will still be above average for N/S.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

4 ♠A94
75
652
♣QT842
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠J7
KJ83
AKT84
♣J5
♠KQ632
A4
Q73
♣976
♠T85
QT962
J9
♣AK3
6
1311
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1♣ 4 2 3♠ 1NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          3.88   0.13  2N W -1   A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A4-Maja-Borucki
        130    2.63   1.38  4 W      A7-Gherman-Carr vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
        170    1.38   2.63  2♠ E +2   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A3-Irino-Heller
        630    0.13   3.88  3N E +1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A9-Chee-Jett

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1Pass1Pass
1NTPass21Pass
2Pass2All pass
  1. New minor forcing, checking back for majors, at least invitational

Despite the bidding shown, it will be difficult for E/W to find the optimal contract on this hand and many will be getting too high in NT. The first three bids look pretty normal, and East will have to decide what to do over 1NT. With an 11 HCP hand, East has a marginal game invitation, and for pairs who open all 11 HCP, East should not even consider game and should choose between passing 1NT and bidding 2. I think 2 is better than passing 1NT given the fitting card and the lack of an honor in s. If East decides to invite, starting with 2, some pairs will be able to bid 2 over 2 showing a minimal invite and a five card suit, but others will require a six card suit for this and will be forced to bid 2NT. This bidding sequence is shown in the bidding diagram, but all in all, given the modern trend on opening bids, it feels at matchpoints like East should just bid 2 over 1NT. Certainly a contract will play better than a NT contract. The defense will take six tricks in a NT contract, and getting even as high as 2NT will be too much for E/W. In s, the defense must lead four rounds of s to promote an extra trump trick or hold up the Ace for one round, and end up with four tricks. On any other defense, declarer can take advantage of the nice break and finish with 10 tricks and a very good score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

5 ♠QT72
KT
KQ873
♣QT
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠96
AQ983
42
♣AKJ9
♠K8
J7652
AT6
♣654
♠AJ543
4
J95
♣8732
12
148
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT6
EW: 2♣ 3  ♦4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: +100 4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          3.25   0.75  4 W -2   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A3-Irino-Heller
  100          3.25   0.75  4 W -2   A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A4-Maja-Borucki
   50          0.75   3.25  4 W -1   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
   50          0.75   3.25  4 W -1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A9-Chee-Jett
6 ♠A743
AK42
AK63
♣K
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠85
T765
J54
♣A752
♠QT92
83
Q987
♣Q86
♠KJ6
QJ9
T2
♣JT943
21
56
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 4 4♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  460          3.25   0.75  3N S +2   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A3-Irino-Heller
  460          3.25   0.75  3N S +2   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
  420          1.38   2.63  4 N      A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A4-Maja-Borucki
  200          0.13   3.88  2 N +3   A10-Muller-Newell vs A9-Chee-Jett
7 ♠K2
K843
AQJ8
♣653
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠JT8743
A
T754
♣92
♠-
J752
K9632
♣K874
♠AQ965
QT96
-
♣AQJT
13
57
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 5/4 3♠ 5NT
       ♣7/6 ♦5
EW: 1  ♣3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  650          4.00   0.00  4 S +1   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A3-Irino-Heller
  620          3.00   1.00  4 S      A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A4-Maja-Borucki
  600          2.00   2.00  3N N      A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        100    0.50   3.50  3N S -1   A9-Chee-Jett vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
        100    0.50   3.50  4 S -1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A1-Gillott-Upson
8 ♠4
AJT62
QJT9
♣QJ6
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KT872
K74
74
♣KT8
♠6
Q98
A86
♣A97432
♠AQJ953
53
K532
♣5
11
910
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1 1♠  ♣4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 1NT  ♦4 ♥5 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +100 4♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          4.00   0.00  3 N      A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A4-Maja-Borucki
        100    3.00   1.00  3♠ S -2   A10-Muller-Newell vs A1-Gillott-Upson
        110    2.00   2.00  3♣ E      A9-Chee-Jett vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
        150    0.50   3.50  4♠ S -3   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A3-Irino-Heller
        150    0.50   3.50  3♠ S -3   A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A7-Gherman-Carr
9 ♠Q5
J9
AJ62
♣KQ653
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KT32
A
KQT3
♣T974
♠AJ764
KQ752
75
♣2
♠98
T8643
984
♣AJ8
13
1210
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT5
EW: -/1 2 5♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦6/7
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        200    3.50   0.50  3♠ E +2   A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        200    3.50   0.50  2♠ E +3   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A3-Irino-Heller
        650    1.00   3.00  4♠ W +1   A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A4-Maja-Borucki
        650    1.00   3.00  4♠ W +1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A1-Gillott-Upson
        650    1.00   3.00  4♠ E +1   A9-Chee-Jett vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
10 ♠AKT54
K42
AQ62
♣J
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠83
J7
K9853
♣T965
♠97
Q863
JT
♣K8743
♠QJ62
AT95
74
♣AQ2
17
46
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 6 7♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠0 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +2210 7♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
 1460          3.50   0.50  6♠ N +1   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
 1460          3.50   0.50  6♠ N +1   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A4-Maja-Borucki
 1430          2.00   2.00  6♠ N      A3-Irino-Heller vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
  710          1.00   3.00  4♠ N +3   A10-Muller-Newell vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
        100    0.00   4.00  7♠ N -1   A9-Chee-Jett vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
11 ♠862
JT642
KQ3
♣93
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠T5
A53
T742
♣AQ87
♠AQJ94
9
865
♣KJT6
♠K73
KQ87
AJ9
♣542
6
1011
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3♣ 1 3♠  ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          4.00   0.00  2 N      A7-Gherman-Carr vs A4-Maja-Borucki
         50    3.00   1.00  5♣ S -1   A3-Irino-Heller vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
        100    2.00   2.00  3 N -2   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
        140    1.00   3.00  2♠ E +1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
        150    0.00   4.00  1N W +2   A9-Chee-Jett vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
12 ♠AKQ53
4
853
♣Q872
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠97642
AQ97
KJ
♣93
♠T
T8
AQT972
♣KJ54
♠J8
KJ6532
64
♣AT6
11
1010
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3/2 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
EW: 1♣ 4 1 1/-♠ 2NT  ♠7/6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          3.50   0.50  3 E -1   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A4-Maja-Borucki
   50          3.50   0.50  3 E -1   A9-Chee-Jett vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
        110    2.00   2.00  3 E      A10-Muller-Newell vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
        200    1.00   3.00  3♠ N -2   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
        400    0.00   4.00  3N W      A3-Irino-Heller vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
13 ♠AK7
8632
Q6
♣J974
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠J632
5
9842
♣AQT6
♠T5
AQ94
AKJT3
♣82
♠Q984
KJT7
75
♣K53
10
714
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1♣ 5 1♠ 2NT  ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -600 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        130    3.50   0.50  3 E +1   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A9-Chee-Jett
        130    3.50   0.50  3 E +1   A4-Maja-Borucki vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
        150    1.00   3.00  4 E +1   A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        150    1.00   3.00  3 E +2   A10-Muller-Newell vs A3-Irino-Heller
        150    1.00   3.00  2 E +3   A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
14 ♠-
T983
AKQJ654
♣96
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠Q5
A542
98
♣K8743
♠AJT983
QJ7
T2
♣T5
♠K7642
K6
73
♣AQJ2
10
98
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 3/4 1 3NT
       ♣6/7 ♠5
EW: 2♠  ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +300 4♠*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  430          3.50   0.50  3N S +1   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A9-Chee-Jett
  430          3.50   0.50  3N S +1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A3-Irino-Heller
  130          1.50   2.50  4 N      A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
  130          1.50   2.50  3 N +1   A4-Maja-Borucki vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
        470    0.00   4.00  2♠* E     A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A7-Gherman-Carr
15 ♠QT4
9842
82
♣K865
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠KJ9
KT6
Q54
♣QT74
♠72
A73
KJ9763
♣A2
♠A8653
QJ5
AT
♣J93
5
1112
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3
EW: 1♣ 4 2 2/3NT  ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -400 3NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    4.00   0.00  3 E      A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        130    2.00   2.00  3 E +1   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A9-Chee-Jett
        130    2.00   2.00  3 E +1   A4-Maja-Borucki vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
        130    2.00   2.00  3 E +1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A3-Irino-Heller
        800    0.00   4.00  3♠* S -3  A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
16 ♠T8
AT54
AJT62
♣95
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠QJ96432
K
73
♣874
♠A5
J9876
KQ84
♣A2
♠K7
Q32
95
♣KQJT63
9
614
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 1 4NT  ♠4
EW: 3♠  ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          4.00   0.00  4♠ W -2   A3-Irino-Heller vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
  100          2.50   1.50  4♠ W -1   A9-Chee-Jett vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
  100          2.50   1.50  3♠ W -1   A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A1-Gillott-Upson
        100    1.00   3.00  4♣ S -2   A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        140    0.00   4.00  3♠ W      A10-Muller-Newell vs A4-Maja-Borucki
17 ♠6
Q5
JT987653
♣84
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A9
A87432
Q
♣A765
♠Q52
KT96
42
♣QJ92
♠KJT8743
J
AK
♣KT3
3
148
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3
EW: 5/4♣ 5/4 4NT  ♦4 ♠6
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: -450 5-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        100    4.00   0.00  5* N -1  A3-Irino-Heller vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
        150    2.50   1.50  4♠ S -3   A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        150    2.50   1.50  4♠ S -3   A10-Muller-Newell vs A4-Maja-Borucki
        300    1.00   3.00  5* N -2  A9-Chee-Jett vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
        450    0.00   4.00  4 W +1   A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A1-Gillott-Upson
18 ♠AKT984
A65
K83
♣K
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J
Q843
Q764
♣AT72
♠Q32
K9
AT9
♣98643
♠765
JT72
J52
♣QJ5
17
99
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠ 2/1NT  ♣5 ♦6
EW: 2♣ 1  ♥6 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: +100 3♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  170          4.00   0.00  2♠ N +2   A9-Chee-Jett vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
  140          2.50   1.50  2♠ N +1   A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A1-Gillott-Upson
  140          2.50   1.50  2♠ N +1   A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A7-Gherman-Carr
  110          1.00   3.00  2♠ N      A3-Irino-Heller vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
        100    0.00   4.00  3♠ N -1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A4-Maja-Borucki
19 ♠KQ
Q86532
K8
♣A84
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠643
K94
QT976
♣97
♠AJ2
A7
A532
♣KT63
♠T9875
JT
J4
♣QJ52
14
516
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6/5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT5/4
EW: 4 1 1♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  470          4.00   0.00  2* N     A4-Maja-Borucki vs A9-Chee-Jett
  110          3.00   1.00  2 N      A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
         50    2.00   2.00  3 N -1   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        120    1.00   3.00  1N E +1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
        130    0.00   4.00  3 W +1   A3-Irino-Heller vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
20 ♠4
Q73
KT65
♣KT965
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A76
A82
Q743
♣AQ7
♠KJT52
T94
J9
♣843
♠Q983
KJ65
A82
♣J2
8
165
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2/1 2 1NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣4 ♦4/5 ♥4/5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: +110 2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          3.50   0.50  3♠ W -2   A1-Gillott-Upson vs A7-Gherman-Carr
  200          3.50   0.50  2♠ W -2   A4-Maja-Borucki vs A9-Chee-Jett
  100          1.00   3.00  2♠ W -1   A3-Irino-Heller vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
  100          1.00   3.00  2♠ W -1   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
  100          1.00   3.00  2♠ W -1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
21 ♠KQ5
74
AT93
♣QJ86
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠J943
KQT83
Q52
♣K
♠8
6
J876
♣AT95432
♠AT762
AJ952
K4
♣7
12
115
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 2 3♠ 2/3NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3/4 NT3/4
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +600 3NT-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  500          4.00   0.00  3♣* E -3  A4-Maja-Borucki vs A9-Chee-Jett
  300          3.00   1.00  3♣* E -2  A3-Irino-Heller vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
        100    2.00   2.00  4♠ S -1   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
        200    1.00   3.00  4♠ S -2   A10-Muller-Newell vs A5-Van Gelder-Dow
        500    0.00   4.00  5N* N -2  A1-Gillott-Upson vs A7-Gherman-Carr
22 ♠965
K8652
AKQ2
♣5
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KJ4
AT3
63
♣KQ632
♠AT
97
JT9874
♣A94
♠Q8732
QJ4
5
♣JT87
12
139
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♦3 ♠6 NT5
EW: 4♣ 3 1NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          4.00   0.00  3 N      A4-Maja-Borucki vs A3-Irino-Heller
         50    3.00   1.00  3 N -1   A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
        110    2.00   2.00  2 E +1   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A9-Chee-Jett
        130    1.00   3.00  3 E +1   A10-Muller-Newell vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
        600    0.00   4.00  3N W      A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A1-Gillott-Upson
23 ♠Q9
A9
AQT94
♣T942
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AT76532
Q8
75
♣Q7
♠J4
J72
J863
♣K865
♠K8
KT6543
K2
♣AJ3
12
86
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 4 3NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣3 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT3/2
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  650          4.00   0.00  4 S +1   A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A1-Gillott-Upson
  620          2.00   2.00  4 S      A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
  620          2.00   2.00  4 S      A4-Maja-Borucki vs A3-Irino-Heller
  620          2.00   2.00  4 S      A10-Muller-Newell vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
  170          0.00   4.00  3 S +1   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A9-Chee-Jett
24 ♠9
KQ954
T973
♣K98
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KQT62
2
AKJ84
♣Q2
♠A8543
76
5
♣JT753
♠J7
AJT83
Q62
♣A64
8
155
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♦4 ♠2 NT5
EW: 3♣ 3 4♠  ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          4.00   0.00  5♠* W -1  A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A1-Gillott-Upson
   50          2.50   1.50  5♠ W -1   A2-Loiacono-Chriss vs A8-Von Adelung-Hake
   50          2.50   1.50  5♠ W -1   A4-Maja-Borucki vs A3-Irino-Heller
        100    1.00   3.00  5 N -2   A7-Gherman-Carr vs A9-Chee-Jett
        420    0.00   4.00  4♠ W      A10-Muller-Newell vs A6-Seckel-Weiss
25 ♠KQJ
QJ97
KJT4
♣AJ
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A87632
AT3
93
♣65
♠-
64
AQ765
♣KQT987
♠T954
K852
82
♣432
18
811
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-  ♣1 ♦3 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT4
EW: 4♣ 4 2NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW/4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        150    2.50   1.50  3♣ E +2   A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A4-Maja-Borucki
        150    2.50   1.50  3♣ E +2   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
        150    2.50   1.50  3♣ E +2   A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A1-Gillott-Upson
        150    2.50   1.50  3♣ E +2   A10-Muller-Newell vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        200    0.00   4.00  3 S -4   A3-Irino-Heller vs A9-Chee-Jett
26 ♠QJ5
T54
9742
♣KJ8
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠A9862
A9
AQJT
♣73
♠T73
K732
K53
♣AT4
♠K4
QJ86
86
♣Q9652
7
1510
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 1♣ 3 1 4♠ 2NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        170    3.50   0.50  3♠ W +1   A3-Irino-Heller vs A9-Chee-Jett
        170    3.50   0.50  2♠ W +2   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
        620    1.50   2.50  4♠ W      A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A1-Gillott-Upson
        620    1.50   2.50  4♠ W      A10-Muller-Newell vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        630    0.00   4.00  3N W +1   A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A4-Maja-Borucki
27 ♠A983
Q7
T85
♣JT95
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠42
KJ43
A742
♣764
♠KJ
AT82
KQ6
♣AQ82
♠QT765
965
J93
♣K3
7
819
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2
EW: 4♣ 5 5 1♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          4.00   0.00  4 W -1   A6-Seckel-Weiss vs A2-Loiacono-Chriss
        420    2.00   2.00  4 W      A8-Von Adelung-Hake vs A1-Gillott-Upson
        420    2.00   2.00  4 W      A10-Muller-Newell vs A7-Gherman-Carr
        420    2.00   2.00  4 E      A5-Van Gelder-Dow vs A4-Maja-Borucki
        450    0.00   4.00  4 W +1   A3-Irino-Heller vs A9-Chee-Jett