- Friday Aft - September 28, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 558 MP  Geomean: 209 MP
(based on 16 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
R.Terry Handley - Steve Green 64.39 1st A 0.80
David Ow - Glenn Chee 60.19 2nd A 0.56
Alan Hedegard - Elizabeth Sebring 56.71 3rd A 0.40
Barbara Callaway - Shelly Sweet 50.26 2nd C 0.22
EVENT>Steinbeck Friday         |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> FF
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 28, 2018 |CLUB NO.>136838    | 09/28/2018 15:54
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Janet Hedlund   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/300  |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=7/C=4                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Shelly Sweet           Barbara Callaway         C    .     .     2     36.19  50.26  0.22(C)
 2 Anjalie Kulkarni       Barbara Moxley           C    .     .     .     27.50  38.19
 3 Doris Jones            Ginger Minor             C    .     .     .     24.73  34.35
 4 Joan Roberts           Peter De Gregorio        B    .     .     .     30.00  41.67
 5 Alan Hedegard          Elizabeth Sebring        B    3     3     .     40.83  56.71  0.40(A)
 6 Glenn Chee             David Ow                 C    2     2     1     43.34  60.19  0.56(A)
 7 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A    .     .     .     38.99  54.15
 8 R.Terry Handley        Steve Green              B    1     1     .     46.36  64.39  0.80(A)
                                          Totals                         287.94

Hands and Results
1 ♠QT
KQ7642
A65
♣AK
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠K952
A53
J984
♣76
♠AJ87
J8
T2
♣98432
♠643
T9
KQ73
♣QJT5
18
86
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 4 2NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          3.00   0.00  4 N +1   ♣3  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
  420          1.50   1.50  4 N      ♠7  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF3-Jones-Minor
  420          1.50   1.50  4 N      J  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
  120          0.00   3.00  2N S      ♠2  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF6-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North opens 1 and East passes, so South starts with a (semi-)forcing 1NT. West passes and North needs a forcing bid, so he probably jump-shifts into 3 (at least at teams - at matchpoints, maybe just 3, but South probably goes to game with that too). South doesn't have the perfect hand, but could choose either 3 (almost just as a waiting bid) or a 3 raise on a pretty good doubleton, and either path should get them to 4. (North might do some cuebidding on the way, but South won't cooperate.)
Indeed, NS have the minors under control, but the 3 losers in the Majors (getting right) means that only game makes here.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠AT42
JT85
K653
♣T
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠85
76
QJT82
♣QJ94
♠KQJ963
Q94
9
♣732
♠7
AK32
A74
♣AK865
8
68
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 6 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥1 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +1430 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          3.00   0.00  4 N      ♠2  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF3-Jones-Minor
  500          2.00   1.00  4♠* E -3  ♣K  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
  150          1.00   2.00  3♠ E -3   ♣A  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF6-Chee-Ow
  130          0.00   3.00  3♣ S +1   ♠6  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 2, so South starts with a double. West passes, and North bids some number of - if they play Lebensohl here, then he starts with 2NT, asking South to bid 3. Assuming South does so, then North bids 3, showing less than normally invitational values, but South goes ahead and raises to game with such a prime hand. North could also just bid 3 (even with lebensohl), and then South might cuebid 3, North bid 3NT, and so South likely to sign off in 4 with what sounds like wasted values in North.
Indeed, this hand works out so well that there's only one loser! It's probably a little surprising to declarer that the Q is onside with the preemptor, but declarer can actually set up the dummy/South to only lose 1 or 1 trick if he carefully manages his trump.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠6
JT8632
T542
♣52
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠953
AK974
K76
♣Q3
♠AQ872
5
AJ83
♣A97
♠KJT4
Q
Q9
♣KJT864
1
1215
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 1♣ 4/3 4 4/3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1000          3.00   0.00  3N** W -2 2  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF6-Chee-Ow
  400          2.00   1.00  4 W -4   ♠6  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
  200          1.00   2.00  4♠ E -2   Q  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
        140    0.00   3.00  2♠ E +1   Q  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF3-Jones-Minor

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1 and West overcalls 1. North passes, but East tries 1. South might try 2, but with such a minimum hand, he might also just pass. West raises to 2, and East takes that to game with 4 (splintering into his singleton is both unhelpful and fraught with danger!)
East can make this, losing just the 3 tricks to South, but it requires getting the suit just right - not impossible if declarer is counting missing points and realizes South needs to have it, but still tricky to also then finesse North for the 8 for a pitch for West's losing , BEFORE pulling trump. More likely is that quite a few declarers just can't squeak this one out, although South being constantly endplayed is helpful.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠KQ9632
-
7642
♣QJ6
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠87
Q5
J93
♣AK8752
♠T4
K8732
AQT8
♣T9
♠AJ5
AJT964
K5
♣43
8
109
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 4♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♦6
EW: 2♣ 1  ♥5 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.83   0.17  4♠ N      ♣T  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
        100    0.83   2.17  5♠ N -1   A  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF3-Jones-Minor
        100    0.83   2.17  4♠ N -1   ♣T  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF6-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West probably just passes, although 3 is not totally ridiculous. Instead, North opens 2, and East passes too. South could ask what kind of preempt partner has with something like Ogust, but 2nd seat red, partner should have a decent hand and suit, so it's reasonable for South to just bid 4.
Unfortunately, South's values are almost totally useless (the A is at least good for a pitch), but fortunately, the A is onside and so declarer just has the 3 losers of the 2 and 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠J5
AKQJ
T6
♣A8653
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A98643
T93
7
♣K97
♠KQT
72
AKJ98
♣JT4
♠72
8654
Q5432
♣Q2
15
714
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♦6 ♠1 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 4♠ 2NT  ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  3 E -2   ♠7  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
        170    1.00   2.00  3♠ W +1   A  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
        170    1.00   2.00  3♠ W +1   A  FF5-Hedegard-Sebring vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
        170    1.00   2.00  2♠ W +2   A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North opens 1 (1NT also possible, but with both doubletons being so weak, possibly not the best idea, although it does get you of the rebid problem when partner bids 1), and East overcalls 1. South passes and West bids 1. North doubles that to try to get partner into the game, but that lets East make a support redouble if allowed, or just raises to 2. South bids 2, and West freely rebids 2. North passes, needing South to do any more competing, and so it's up to East to take this any further. He might try one more push with 3, but it's unlikely that West will accept, so this looks like it winds up in a partscore.
East and West were probably both worried about their suits, but as it happens, there's only one loser there. With the two losers, that means game would have made!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠Q9
KQ
AJ97654
♣98
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠T8742
82
2
♣KT753
♠A53
JT753
83
♣QJ6
♠KJ6
A964
KQT
♣A42
12
38
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6 2 5NT  ♣6 ♠6
EW:  ♣6 ♦1 ♥5 ♠5 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +920 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          3.00   0.00  3N S +3   ♣3  FF5-Hedegard-Sebring vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
  460          2.00   1.00  3N S +2   ♣3  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
  430          1.00   2.00  3N S +1   ♣5  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
  420          0.00   3.00  5 N +1   ♣Q  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East passes, South opens 1NT, and West passes (lots of shape but vulnerable with so few values, not a good idea to bid.) North then can go two ways - the less optimistic road is to just bid 3NT. The more optimistic road is to show the and then bid 3NT, indicating some slam interest. South won't do anything over a direct 3NT, of course, but can show a super accept of a preempt, and that will be very interesting to North. This is a great place for minorwood (or just 4NT quantitative), as North bids 4, and finds out that South has 3 Keycards and the Q, so even though he won't know for sure that there aren't 2 quick losers in a black suit, he probably bids 6 anyways.
Fortunately both black suits are under control, and declarer just loses the A (pitching the losing on either a or a .) 3NT would have been fine too with 11 tricks if the defense leads .



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠54
K62
A5432
♣QJ9
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KQ
AJ97
KJ
♣AK865
♠A72
Q43
T986
♣T74
♠JT9863
T85
Q7
♣32
10
216
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2/3 ♦3/4 ♥3 ♠5 NT2/3
EW: 4♣ 3 4 1/2♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    3.00   0.00  3♣ W +1   ♠5  FF5-Hedegard-Sebring vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
        600    2.00   1.00  3N W      3  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
        630    1.00   2.00  3N E +1   ♠J  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
        660    0.00   3.00  3N W +2   3  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South passes and West opens 2NT. North passes and East has an easy bump to 3NT.
A lead isn't pleasant particularly, but East's and South's holdings mean declarer actually has a few stoppers here. It's not hard to come to 10 tricks with 3, 3, up to 2, and 4, but giving up 3 tricks on the way.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠5
AQ32
KJ865
♣J52
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AK42
5
Q432
♣8764
♠QJ9873
K7
97
♣AT3
♠T6
JT9864
AT
♣KQ9
11
910
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 2 4  ♣7/6 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦5 ♥3
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: +300 4♠*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          3.00   0.00  4♠* E -3  J  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
  150          2.00   1.00  5♠ E -3   A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Chee-Ow
  100          1.00   2.00  4♠ E -2   A  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
        100    0.00   3.00  5* S -1  ♠A  FF5-Hedegard-Sebring vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes and North opens 1 (or passes). East overcalls (opens) 2 to make life difficult on the opponents, but South can still double (pass). West can pretty easily jump to 4, and so North has a tough call, but is almost certain to go with 5, which probably goes undoubled. If NS haven't bid, West probably just bids 3 and ends the auction there.
The defense against 5 always has 3 tricks here - 1, 1, and 1 - so this shouldn't make, but it's a great example of the power of preempts! the other way doesn't make either, but is a good sacrifice against the making 4.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠AJ
8542
K32
♣AJ52
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠QT754
A63
A75
♣Q9
♠K9
QT7
JT9864
♣86
♠8632
KJ9
Q
♣KT743
13
126
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2 1/-♠ 2/1NT
       ♦6 ♠7/6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  3♠ W -3   ♣A  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
  200          2.00   1.00  3 E -2   ♣7  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF3-Jones-Minor
  130          0.50   2.50  3♣ N +1   7  FF6-Chee-Ow vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
  130          0.50   2.50  2♣ N +2   J  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
10 ♠J862
KJ32
J86
♣86
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠KT974
A87
943
♣T3
♠A5
T
AKQ75
♣AKJ95
♠Q3
Q9654
T2
♣Q742
6
721
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1
EW: 6♣ 6 1 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -1370 6-EW/6♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    3.00   0.00  3 E +1   4  FF6-Chee-Ow vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
        170    2.00   1.00  2♠ W +2   ♣8  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF3-Jones-Minor
        620    1.00   2.00  5 W +1   ♣8  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
        690    0.00   3.00  3N W +3   2  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
11 ♠J9763
K87
J
♣8643
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠QT42
AJ62
T6
♣AK5
♠85
QT95
K972
♣QT7
♠AK
43
AQ8543
♣J92
5
147
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣6 ♥5 NT5
EW: 2 2NT  ♣6/5 ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  3 W -1   A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
   50          2.50   0.50  3 E -1   ♠K  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF3-Jones-Minor
        100    0.50   2.50  2♠ N -2   ♣7  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
        100    0.50   2.50  3 S -2   ♣A  FF6-Chee-Ow vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
12 ♠KQ62
AKQJ32
983
♣-
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠-
9754
A742
♣AQJT2
♠JT983
6
KQJT
♣953
♠A754
T8
65
♣K8764
15
117
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/3 2♠  ♣4 ♦3/4 NT5
EW: 2/3♣ 3  ♥4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +100 4*-EW/4♣*-W-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.83   0.17  4 N      ♣9  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
  200          1.50   1.50  3 N +2   K  FF6-Chee-Ow vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
  150          0.17   2.83  4 W -3   A  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
13 ♠Q3
T7652
AQ97
♣K6
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AK4
AK94
J32
♣T95
♠T762
8
KT65
♣AQ74
♠J985
QJ3
84
♣J832
11
159
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 2 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  3N E -1   5  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
         90    2.00   1.00  1N W      5  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        150    1.00   2.00  1N W +2   5  FF1-Sweet-Callaway vs FF3-Jones-Minor
        180    0.00   3.00  2N W +2   5  FF5-Hedegard-Sebring vs FF6-Chee-Ow
14 ♠AKQ63
A76
T82
♣53
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠-
KJT92
AK3
♣KQ984
♠J97
85
QJ96
♣AJ62
♠T8542
Q43
754
♣T7
13
169
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT4
EW: 6♣ 6 6 1♠ 1NT
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -980 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        150    2.50   0.50  4♣ W +1   ♠A  FF1-Sweet-Callaway vs FF3-Jones-Minor
        150    2.50   0.50  3♣ W +2   ♠A  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
        480    1.00   2.00  4 W +2   ♠A  FF5-Hedegard-Sebring vs FF6-Chee-Ow
        790    0.00   3.00  4* W +2  ♠A  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
15 ♠2
3
874
♣AKQJ8543
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠97
86
QJ6532
♣T92
♠AKJT65
KT94
AT
♣6
♠Q843
AQJ752
K9
♣7
10
315
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 1 4NT  ♦6 ♠5
EW: 1/- 2/1♠
       ♣2 ♦7/6 ♥6/5 NT2
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +500 5♠*-E-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.00   0.00  5♣ N      A  FF1-Sweet-Callaway vs FF3-Jones-Minor
  200          2.00   1.00  5♠ E -4   ♣7  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
        100    1.00   2.00  6♣ N -1   A  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        200    0.00   3.00  6♣* N -1  ♠A  FF5-Hedegard-Sebring vs FF6-Chee-Ow
16 ♠J64
QJ54
AQ96
♣A6
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AQ
AT72
K874
♣T53
♠KT987
83
T
♣QJ874
♠532
K96
J532
♣K92
14
136
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2 1NT  ♣4 ♠5
EW: 3♣ 2♠  ♦4 ♥5 NT5/6
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.83   0.17  1N W -2   4  FF5-Hedegard-Sebring vs FF6-Chee-Ow
  100          1.50   1.50  3N W -1   Q  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
        300    0.17   2.83  3N* N -2  ♣Q  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
17 ♠QT
T643
QT52
♣986
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AKJ4
AJ2
AK96
♣42
♠9753
K7
J
♣AKQJT7
♠862
Q985
8743
♣53
4
2014
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣0 ♦2 ♥2 ♠0 NT0
EW: 7♣ 5 4/5 7♠ 7NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -1520 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        520    3.00   0.00  3N W +4   2  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
        990    2.00   1.00  6N W      2  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
       1020    0.50   2.50  6N W +1   3  FF6-Chee-Ow vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
       1020    0.50   2.50  6N W +1   T  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
18 ♠Q64
AT82
KQJ8
♣73
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠A3
KJ976
AT42
♣Q4
♠K75
Q43
5
♣AJ9652
♠JT982
5
9763
♣KT8
12
1410
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♥3 NT4
EW: 4♣ 4 2NT  ♦5 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  4 W -2   K  FF6-Chee-Ow vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
        200    2.00   1.00  3 N -2   Q  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        420    0.50   2.50  4 W      K  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
        420    0.50   2.50  4 W      K  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
19 ♠QT754
J5
Q843
♣A5
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J932
KT862
7
♣J42
♠AK
974
KT92
♣KQ93
♠86
AQ3
AJ65
♣T876
9
515
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠  ♣6 ♥5 NT6
EW: 1♣ 2 1NT  ♦5 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -100 2♠*-NS/3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  3 W -2   ♣A  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
  120          2.00   1.00  2N S      7  FF6-Chee-Ow vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
        140    0.50   2.50  3 W      ♣A  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
        140    0.50   2.50  1 W +2   ♣A  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
20 ♠A9842
K6
984
♣T73
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q76
QJT9542
5
♣A9
♠JT5
A7
AQT76
♣Q84
♠K3
83
KJ32
♣KJ652
7
913
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠5 NT5/3
EW: 1 3 1NT  ♣6/5 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  4 W -1   9  FF6-Chee-Ow vs FF1-Sweet-Callaway
        620    1.00   2.00  4 W      ♠A  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        620    1.00   2.00  4 W      9  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
        620    1.00   2.00  4 W      ♣3  FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley vs FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio
21 ♠-
AQT5
AJ763
♣KQ97
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KT87432
K9
Q9
♣42
♠J65
J872
KT8
♣A86
♠AQ9
643
542
♣JT53
16
89
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/3♣ 3 1/2 2NT  ♠5
EW: 2♠  ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +130 4♣-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.00   0.00  3N S      ♠2  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF6-Chee-Ow
  500          2.00   1.00  4♠* W -3  ♣K  FF1-Sweet-Callaway vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
   50          1.00   2.00  3♠ W -1   ♣K  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        100    0.00   3.00  4 N -1   ♠5  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
22 ♠Q97
AK932
JT
♣QT7
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠A5
J8
K4
♣KJ86543
♠K6432
T7
Q9762
♣9
♠JT8
Q654
A853
♣A2
12
125
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2NT  ♣5 ♦6 ♠6
EW: 2♣ 1 1♠  ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  4♣ W -2   A  FF1-Sweet-Callaway vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
         50    1.50   1.50  4 N -1   ♣9  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
         50    1.50   1.50  3 N -1   ♣9  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        150    0.00   3.00  4 N -3   ♣9  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF6-Chee-Ow
23 ♠K9852
7
A72
♣Q642
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠J74
J432
986
♣T98
♠QT
KQ965
KT
♣AK75
♠A63
AT8
QJ543
♣J3
9
217
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠  ♣6 ♥5 NT6
EW: 2  ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.50   0.50  3♠ N      ♣A  FF1-Sweet-Callaway vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley
  140          2.50   0.50  3♠ N      ♣A  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF6-Chee-Ow
        100    1.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   ♣A  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        150    0.00   3.00  1N E +2   Q  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
24 ♠JT8
KT985
KQ96
♣6
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠Q942
QJ4
AJ
♣QT87
♠AK653
3
843
♣K932
♠7
A762
T752
♣AJ54
9
1210
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 4  ♣4 ♠3 NT4
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦4 ♥3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +300 4♠*-EW/5♣*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.50   1.50  4♠ E -1   A  FF3-Jones-Minor vs FF5-Hedegard-Sebring
   50          1.50   1.50  4♠ E -1   A  FF4-Roberts-De Gregorio vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
   50          1.50   1.50  4♠ E -1   7  FF8-Handley-Green vs FF6-Chee-Ow
   50          1.50   1.50  4♠ E -1   2  FF1-Sweet-Callaway vs FF2-Kulkarni-Moxley