- Friday Aft - July 27, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 588 MP  Geomean: 197 MP
(based on 16 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Peter De Gregorio - R.Terry Handley 59.03 1st A 0.80
Elizabeth Nasr - Michel Nasr 55.56 2nd A 0.56
Janet Street - William Putnam 51.39 3rd A 0.40
Carolyn Taggart - Doris Jones 50.00 1st C 0.32
Anjalie Kulkarni - Jan Yaxtheimer 47.92 2nd C 0.22
EVENT>Steinbeck Friday         |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> FF
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>July 27, 2018      |CLUB NO.>136838    | 07/30/2018 12:01
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Janet Hedlund   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/2000/300  |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=7/C=4                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Barbara Callaway       Shelly Sweet             C    .     .     .     34.00  47.22
 2 Doris Jones            Carolyn Taggart          C    .     3     1     36.00  50.00  0.32(C)
 3 Janet Street           William Putnam           B    3     2     .     37.00  51.39  0.40(A)
 4 Peter De Gregorio      R.Terry Handley          B    1     1     .     42.50  59.03  0.80(A)
 5 Ginger Minor           Elizabeth Sebring        C    .     .     .     34.00  47.22
 6 Anjalie Kulkarni       Jan Yaxtheimer           C    .     .     2     34.50  47.92  0.22(C)
 7 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A    2     .     .     40.00  55.56  0.56(A)
 8 Joan Roberts           Keith Hedlund            B    .     .     .     30.00  41.67
                                          Totals                         288.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠KJ9872
T
8753
♣32
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠54
QJ5
AQT42
♣985
♠AQT6
A42
KJ9
♣AJ4
♠3
K98763
6
♣KQT76
4
919
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT2
EW: 2/-♣ 5 1 3♠ 5NT  ♣8/6
LoTT: 17 - 15 = +2
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  5 W -4   T  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF3-Street-Putnam
  100          2.00   1.00  5 W -2   T  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
        150    1.00   2.00  2N E +1   8  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        460    0.00   3.00  3N E +2   ♠3  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North preempts 2 on the light end, but not vulnerable and first seat, it might be within partnership expectations. East doubles, intending to later bid NT. South has a very interesting hand of her own, but shouldn't say anything. West now needs to respond to the double - with 9 points, it would be nice to be able to jump to show values, but she should be very careful not to go past 3NT, so just 3 has to be enough. (Playing Lebensohl , the debate would be between a direct 3 and a 2NT - 3 - 3 sequence.) Now East can rebid her 3NT, and that seems like a good idea to all.
With triple stoppers, this contract should not be a problem. South could make it a tiny bit more interesting by leading instead of , but since North never gets in, that doesn't hurt. Declarer can pretty easily come to 11 tricks with 3 (managing entries to finesse twice), 2, 5, and 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠QJ2
952
KT86
♣962
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T43
J74
Q9743
♣T3
♠AK9765
AQ
52
♣Q74
♠8
KT863
AJ
♣AKJ85
6
315
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 4 2NT  ♠6/5
EW: 1♠  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +500 4♠*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  2 S +3   ♠3  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
  150          2.00   1.00  4♠ E -3   ♠8  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
  100          1.00   2.00  3♠ E -2   ♣A  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF3-Street-Putnam
        500    0.00   3.00  5* S -2  ♠T  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and South overcalls 2 (or possibly 2, if this qualifies as a "max" Michaels Cue Bid hand.) West can raise to 2 if East knows that could be a very bad raise, but probably needs to just pass at most tables. North then raises to 3 (or passes - and then we would have a different auction), and even if East tries 3 all on her own, South will bid 4 (if North raised; if not, the are sure to get introduced.) Now East may question whether she can beat that (doesn't sound like she's going to get 2 tricks) or if she should take a sacrifice. If she knew partner had support, it would be a lot easier to sacrifice - but when she doesn't know that, she may just pass.
The sacrifice would have been better, as 4 is making. Declarer losses 1 and 2 - but does have to be careful about how she uses the one trip to the dummy to take the finesse instead of the , so it is very possible to lose another trick here. It's also possible this is just played in a partscore!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠A63
T4
J96
♣QJ542
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠82
AK9852
T32
♣K6
♠J95
J763
75
♣AT93
♠KQT74
Q
AKQ84
♣87
8
106
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 4♠  ♥4 NT5
EW: 3  ♣5 ♦3 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          3.00   0.00  4♠ S +1   K  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
  420          1.00   2.00  4♠ S      A  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF3-Street-Putnam
  420          1.00   2.00  4♠ S      A  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  420          1.00   2.00  4♠ S      A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Sebring

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1, and West has to decide if this hand is good enough for a vulnerable 2 overcall. It's probably not, and with such a flat hand, preempting with 3 is not a good idea either. North raises to 2, East passes, and South just goes ahead with 4, not wanting to give anything else away.
There's not much to do about the 3 top losers unless the defense doesn't take them right away, giving declarer a chance to pitch on . The defense could make things interesting by trying to get West a ruff, forcing South to ruff high and then finesse East for the J.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠T
QT32
AKQJ
♣AK86
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A74
984
T8752
♣73
♠KJ62
KJ765
43
♣52
♠Q9853
A
96
♣QJT94
19
48
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 3 1 3♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +1370 6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  660          2.50   0.50  3N N +2   6  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  660          2.50   0.50  3N N +2   5  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
  630          1.00   2.00  3N N +1   4  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF3-Street-Putnam
        200    0.00   3.00  6N N -2   6  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes and North opens 1. East should pass (or maybe bid 1), and South can bid 1. North reverses into 2, and South makes a 4th Suit Game Forcing bid of 3. North then probably just bids 3NT, being reluctant to go past that without knowing that South also has , and that is probably the end of that. (Funnily enough, if East had overcalled 1, North would have likely jump-shifted into 3 instead of reversing into 2, and then they might actually find the slam!)
3NT is a fine game to play - declarer has 10 top tricks with 5, 4, and 1. If NS do somehow find their way to a contract, the only loser necessary is the .



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠AKQ2
852
753
♣Q64
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠T63
J6
A8
♣K98752
♠875
A974
K62
♣JT3
♠J94
KQT3
QJT94
♣A
11
88
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2 3♠ 2NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  2N S +1   ♣7  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
  140          1.50   1.50  3♠ N      ♣J  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  140          1.50   1.50  2♠ N +1   ♣J  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
        300    0.00   3.00  3 S -3   A  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes, East passes, and South opens 1. West passes and North answers 1. South raises to 2, and North could ask what kind of hand South has for the raise. South has a tricky determination - it is only 3-card, but whether to consider it a minimum or a maximum is up to a bit of interpretation. Calling it a minimum probably gets NS to a 3 contract, while calling it a maximum gets them to 3NT.
3 is pretty straightforward on the play as long as the defense leads and doesn't let declarer ruff on the dummy. But 3NT is likely to come down to the opening lead - East needs to lead so the defense can get those tricks set up before declarer has a chance to make his good.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠964
7
983
♣Q86432
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠T85
KJT96
72
♣AJ9
♠AKJ7
AQ8
QJ5
♣KT7
♠Q32
5432
AKT64
♣5
2
920
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT2
EW: 1♣ 1/- 5 4♠ 5NT  ♦7/6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  4 W -1   9  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        630    2.00   1.00  3N E +1   A  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
        650    1.00   2.00  4 E +1   A  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
        660    0.00   3.00  3N E +2   4  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 2NT, so South passes. West transfers to and then bids 3NT, which East may or may not correct to 4.
In either contract, 11 tricks are available as long as declarer gets the finesse right and doesn't try the finesse.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠87653
93
93
♣A632
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠QJ2
AQ65
Q8752
♣7
♠AT
JT74
T
♣KJT984
♠K94
K82
AKJ64
♣Q5
4
119
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4/5
EW: 2♣ 1 4/3 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -620 4-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    3.00   0.00  2♠ N -1   T  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        200    2.00   1.00  3♠ N -2   T  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
        300    0.50   2.50  3N S -3   8  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
        300    0.50   2.50  2♠ S -3   ♣7  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Jones-Taggart

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1NT, so West could get in there with a 2-suited bid for the red suits. Let's have it be a 2 DONT bid here. North may just let that go (rather than introduce her ), and so East will show a preference for the other suit by bidding 2, pass-or-correct. South is sufficiently warned off of her , so she passes, and West indeed has , so here we are. (It is also possible North did show , in which case NS probably buy this in 2.)
With South on lead, there's one more trick available because a lead isn't profitable for the defense. If East can get the right (which may be hard early in the hand before South shows many of her points), then she can just lose 1, 1, and 1 - but does need to be very careful about maintaining control of the hand. (In NS's 2, things can go very poorly on a lead - the defense can get 2, 2, 1, and 1, and then declarer also has to deal with a bunch of little .)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠Q5
T4
T432
♣86542
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AJ74
Q862
KQ95
♣3
♠93
AK753
J87
♣AK7
♠KT862
J9
A6
♣QJT9
2
1215
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2 ♥1 ♠5 NT2
EW: 5 5 2♠ 5NT  ♣6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        450    2.00   1.00  4 E +1   ♣Q  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        450    2.00   1.00  4 E +1   ♣Q  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
        450    2.00   1.00  4 E +1   ♣9  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
        480    0.00   3.00  4 E +2   A  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West opens 1 and North passes. East responds 1 and South overcalls 1. West shows real 4-card support and a minimum-ish hand with a 2 bid, and East probably just calls it a day at 4 (rather than try for slam.)
It's a good stop as there are 2 losers in 1 and 1 as long as the defense goes after the early before declarer gets to set up the (which does require finessing for the T, but can be done.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠J72
AK82
K6
♣9843
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q96
J43
AQ53
♣A75
♠T3
T975
972
♣KQJT
♠AK854
Q6
JT84
♣62
11
136
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1 3♠ 1NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  2 W -2   ♠J  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
  170          2.00   1.00  2♠ S +2   3  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Street-Putnam
  110          1.00   2.00  2♠ S      3  FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
         50    0.00   3.00  3♠ S -1   A  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
10 ♠9876
A
AT97654
♣2
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T3
KT32
KJ83
♣985
♠AKQ54
7
Q2
♣AQJT4
♠J2
QJ98654
-
♣K763
8
718
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT3
EW: 3/2♣ 1 3/2♠ 3NT  ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  4♠ E -2   Q  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
        100    2.00   1.00  4 S -1   2  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Street-Putnam
        140    1.00   2.00  3♠ E      ♣3  FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
        730    0.00   3.00  3♠* E     Q  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
11 ♠J952
AQ862
7
♣J75
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠KQT64
K3
K86
♣Q32
♠7
J95
QT9543
♣K96
♠A83
T74
AJ2
♣AT84
8
136
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/3♣ 3 2♠ 2/3NT  ♦5
EW: 1  ♣4 ♥3 ♠4/5 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +400 3NT-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          3.00   0.00  4 N      ♠7  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
  140          2.00   1.00  2 N +1   ♠7  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
  110          1.00   2.00  2 N      ♠7  FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
        150    0.00   3.00  4 N -3   ♠7  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Street-Putnam
12 ♠43
863
T6
♣AT8765
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠QJT875
QJ7
A2
♣K4
♠K
5
KQ987543
♣QJ3
♠A962
AKT942
J
♣92
4
1311
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2/3  ♦3 ♠4 NT4
EW: 4 2♠ 3NT  ♣5 ♥4
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -200 4*-N-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  5* W -1  A  FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
   50          2.00   1.00  4♠ W -1   8  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        170    1.00   2.00  3♠ W +1   8  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Street-Putnam
        800    0.00   3.00  5* S -3  A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
13 ♠Q9
KJ874
Q874
♣K3
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AJ8742
A9
K9
♣T96
♠653
6
AT3
♣AQJ854
♠KT
QT532
J652
♣72
11
1211
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦6 ♥6 ♠1 NT1
EW: 6♣ 1 1 6♠ 4NT
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -1430 6♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        650    3.00   0.00  4♠ W +1   K  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        680    1.50   1.50  4♠ W +2   7  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        680    1.50   1.50  4♠ W +2   4  FF1-Callaway-Sweet vs FF3-Street-Putnam
        690    0.00   3.00  3N W +3   ♠Q  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
14 ♠74
KQT84
97
♣Q643
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AT962
653
AJ84
♣T
♠J3
AJ9
K52
♣AK987
♠KQ85
72
QT63
♣J52
7
916
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3
EW: 3♣ 4 3 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   1.00  3N E -1   3  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
   50          2.00   1.00  4♠ E -1   2  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
   50          2.00   1.00  3 W -1   K  FF1-Callaway-Sweet vs FF3-Street-Putnam
        400    0.00   3.00  3N E      7  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
15 ♠K86532
-
QJ4
♣QT98
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠9
AJT3
T65
♣AJ652
♠QJT4
K9754
K7
♣43
♠A7
Q862
A9832
♣K7
8
109
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 4♠ 1/2NT  ♥5
EW: 2  ♣6 ♦4 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +500 5*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  2♣ W -4   Q  FF1-Callaway-Sweet vs FF3-Street-Putnam
  130          2.00   1.00  3 S +1   J  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        300    1.00   2.00  5♠ N -3   7  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        800    0.00   3.00  4♠* N -3  K  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
16 ♠A7
AK874
Q9
♣A832
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠K
QT65
75
♣KQJ764
♠QJT864
32
T843
♣T
♠9532
J9
AKJ62
♣95
17
113
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 4 3♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥2/3 ♠4 NT2
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  2N N +1   ♣T  FF5-Minor-Sebring vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  140          2.00   1.00  3 N      ♣T  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        100    1.00   2.00  4* N -1  ♣T  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
        630    0.00   3.00  3N W +1   ♠8  FF1-Callaway-Sweet vs FF3-Street-Putnam
17 ♠QJ52
J65
964
♣KT6
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠K9
KT
75
♣QJ98743
♠T8764
Q94
AKQ
♣A2
♠A3
A8732
JT832
♣5
7
915
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 1 1 3♠ 2NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  3N E -3   3  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
   50          2.00   1.00  3N E -1   3  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
        130    1.00   2.00  3♣ W +1   5  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        430    0.00   3.00  3N E +1   J  FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
18 ♠K8752
Q5
JT42
♣73
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠6
AKJ876
K98
♣KQT
♠Q
9432
Q5
♣AJ9862
♠AJT943
T
A763
♣54
6
169
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠  ♣1 ♥1 NT1
EW: 5♣ 5  ♦4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 20 - 21 = -1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  3♠ S      A  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        170    2.00   1.00  3 W +1   ♠K  FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
        450    1.00   2.00  4 W +1   ♠K  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        480    0.00   3.00  5 W +1   ♣7  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
19 ♠A9653
AKQ
J864
♣K
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J
JT852
Q3
♣QJT87
♠Q842
-
KT975
♣9653
♠KT7
97643
A2
♣A42
17
75
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3 4♠ 4NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  790          3.00   0.00  4♠* N +2  ♣9  FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
  170          2.00   1.00  1♠ N +3   ♣9  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  140          1.00   2.00  2♠ N +1   7  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
        100    0.00   3.00  4♠ N -2   ♣6  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
20 ♠72
J32
842
♣A7532
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠8653
T74
A97
♣K94
♠AKQT
Q865
653
♣Q8
♠J94
AK9
KQJT
♣JT6
5
713
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♥6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1/- 1♠  ♣4 ♦6 ♥7/6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +90 2♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  2♠ E -1   8  FF2-Jones-Taggart vs FF4-De Gregorio-Handley
         90    2.00   1.00  1N W      ♣2  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        100    1.00   2.00  1N S -1   A  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        140    0.00   3.00  2♠ W +1   J  FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF1-Callaway-Sweet
21 ♠QJT8
KT42
85
♣Q76
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠75432
93
AKJ74
♣9
♠K96
A8
QT96
♣K853
♠A
QJ765
32
♣AJT42
8
812
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3  ♦4 ♠5 NT6
EW: 3 2♠  ♣4/3 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +100 3♠*-EW/4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  3N E -3   ♣4  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  140          2.00   1.00  3 S      A  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
   50          1.00   2.00  3 W -1   T  FF1-Callaway-Sweet vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
        170    0.00   3.00  3 S +1   A  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
22 ♠QT873
K64
843
♣73
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K96
A3
QJT97
♣KT2
♠42
QJT9
K2
♣AQJ94
♠AJ5
8752
A65
♣865
5
1313
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4 3 1♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    3.00   0.00  3♣ E +1   ♠5  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        150    2.00   1.00  2♣ E +3   ♠5  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        170    1.00   2.00  3N W -2   ♠7  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        600    0.00   3.00  5♣ E      2  FF1-Callaway-Sweet vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
23 ♠763
JT
965
♣QJT54
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AQ5
Q762
AQ82
♣32
♠T
9843
J743
♣9876
♠KJ9842
AK5
KT
♣AK
4
141
21
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3/4♠ -/2NT
       ♦4/5 ♥4 NT5/8
EW: 2 3  ♣6 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +500 5*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  2♠ S +1   2  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
        100    2.00   1.00  4♠ S -1   ♣2  FF1-Callaway-Sweet vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
        200    0.50   2.50  6♠ S -2   ♣2  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        200    0.50   2.50  4♠* S     ♣3  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
24 ♠KJ
AT98654
A
♣Q84
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T3
J3
K975
♣AK952
♠Q98
KQ2
QJ63
♣J76
♠A76542
7
T842
♣T3
14
1111
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2♠  ♣5 ♦6 NT5
EW: 1 1NT  ♣6 ♥4/5 ♠3
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +100 2NT*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  4 E -3   7  FF3-Street-Putnam vs FF5-Minor-Sebring
  140          2.00   1.00  1 N +2   ♣J  FF1-Callaway-Sweet vs FF2-Jones-Taggart
        100    1.00   2.00  4* N -1  ♠8  FF4-De Gregorio-Handley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        790    0.00   3.00  4 N -1   ♠8  FF8-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF6-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer