- Friday Aft - March 22, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 733 MP  Geomean: 292 MP
(based on 15 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Alan Hedegard - Richard Papst 65.04 1st OA 2.04
Elizabeth Nasr - Michel Nasr 56.49 2nd OA 1.53
Glenn Chee - Jie Bai 54.17 3rd OA 1.15
Anjalie Kulkarni - Shelly Sweet 48.85 1st OB 1.04
Bob Gore - Ginger Minor 47.82 2nd OB 0.78
EVENT>Steinbeck Friday         |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> FF
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>March 22, 2019     |CLUB NO.>136838    | 03/22/2019 16:06
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Janet Hedlund   |RATING>Club Championship (100%, 80%, 70% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/200  |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Barbara Callaway       Amy Pofcher              C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     33.83  46.99
 2 Glenn Chee             Jie Bai                  A   3     .     .   |   3     .     .     39.00  54.17  1.15(OA)
 3 Anjalie Kulkarni       Shelly Sweet             C   .     1     .   |   .     1     1     35.17  48.85  1.04(OB)
 4 Joan Roberts           R.Terry Handley          B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     29.74  41.31
 5 Ginger Minor           Bob Gore                 C   .     2     .   |   .     2     .     34.43  47.82  0.78(OB)
 6 Janet Hedlund          Sam Callaway             B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     28.00  38.89
 7 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A   2     .     .   |   2     .     .     40.67  56.49  1.53(OA)
 8 Richard Papst          Alan Hedegard            A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     46.83  65.04  2.04(OA)
                                          Totals                                            287.67

Hands and Results
1 ♠A9
QJ765
QT
♣KT64
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q762
AT983
6
♣J98
♠KT83
K4
A9542
♣Q7
♠J54
2
KJ873
♣A532
12
712
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♥6/5 ♠5/4 NT6
EW: 1 2♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -100 3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  2* E -2  2  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
  150          2.00   1.00  3♠ W -3   Q  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Gore
   50          1.00   2.00  3♠ W -1   Q  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
        150    0.00   3.00  3 S -3   T  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass1NT
Pass2All pass 

North opens 1 in 1st seat and none of the other players at the table are happy about it. East is unhappy because he can't open 1 and doesn't have the shape for a takeout double (unless you play Equal Level Conversion Doubles). Some might consider a 2 call, but the diamond suit is too weak to emphasize here so East should pass. South is unhappy because he has a singleton in partner's suit which takes a lot of the value out of his hand; if partner had opened 1 this hand would be almost game forcing. South bids 1NT (which I prefer to play as semi-forcing). West is unhappy because his five-card heart suit doesn't seem so good anymore so he passes. North, unaware of the misery around the table, rebids 2. East might consider an aggressive double, but doesn't know that the opponents have a fit which makes this risky. South passes, taking the low road at matchpoints, and West stays silent as well.

This type of auction calls for a trump lead, though I can't say I'm thrilled leading from Qx. Still, I'd probably lead the Q. The play could go a number of ways, but eight or nine tricks are likely for declarer. On this hand, it turns out that an aggressive double by East would have worked.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

2 ♠2
82
KQT97
♣AJ852
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠QJT5
KJ97
J642
♣Q
♠K76
AT643
A8
♣964
♠A9843
Q5
53
♣KT73
10
1011
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2  ♥3 ♠6 NT6
EW: 3 1♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +100 4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  3 E -1   5  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
    PASS       2.00   1.00  Pass Out      FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Gore
        100    1.00   2.00  4♣ N -1   A  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
        170    0.00   3.00  2 E +2   ♠A  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  11
2Pass3All pass

I sometimes worry that calling the East hand a normal opening will cause the ghost of Charles Goren to come after me. Still, with A A K and a five-card suit, not to mention favorable vulnerability, I will risk the haunting. South has a decision that's less clear, but I advise inserting a cheap overcall when you can, assuming your hand is not too catastrophic. Having two suits is a little insurance against a possible penalty situation. West now cuebids to show support and a limit raise or better (typically 11+ total points)--figuring out the exact worth of the West hand is difficult on this auction, but it has 10 highcard points, four-card support and a singleton so it's worth at least a cuebid, regardless of the fact that it's almost the worst hand I could draw up to fit those requirements. North would like to bid, but double would show a spade card (not shortness!), not the other two suits. East has a minimum and signs off in 3, ending the auction.

South has to find a lead--a club is possible but a diamond seems safer. Some Norths might regret not doubling 2 to get the lead of ace and another spade, but that is a fantasy and a double-dummy postmortem. East might guess trump wrong since he knows that North has a singleton spade. Playing for the drop is slightly better without information, but the knowledge of the 5-1 spade break changes the odds. The contract is likely to make either nine or ten tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

3 ♠K832
96
Q85
♣K654
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QJ54
AKJ2
T7
♣T82
♠AT6
T83
J93
♣Q973
♠97
Q754
AK642
♣AJ
8
117
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1NT  ♣6 ♥6 ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 NT6/5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          3.00   0.00  2N N +2   ♣3  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
  150          2.00   1.00  1N S +2   ♠4  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
  120          1.00   2.00  1N S +1   A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Gore
   90          0.00   3.00  2 S      A  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1Pass1NT
All pass   

South opens 1 although if the hand had a few tens in it, I would open 1NT. This hand will not cause us headaches if we open 1, however, since we will be more than happy to bid notrump later. West could consider a light takeout double or a "four good = five bad" 1 bid, but I prefer to pass at these colors. North bids 1, East passes, and South rebids 1NT. This is where I mention the dreaded "r" word: "reverse." South would like to show his hearts, but bidding 2 would promises a much stronger hand. Additionally if North has hearts, he will show them later. After 1NT, everyone passes.

West will lead either the A or K depending on the agreement. Players spend too much time agreeing to bidding topics, "What do you bid if they interfere over our king-asking 5NT?" and too little time coming to good carding agreements. Against NT, it's important to know which lead asks partner for attitude and which for count (or unblock). I like to play ace is for attitude and king for count since alliteration/consonance helps me remember. Which do you want here? Attitude. You would like to know if partner has Qxx or xxx. Declarer will probably end up with five diamond tricks and two clubs, but it's possible that a misplay by a defender allows for extra tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

4 ♠75
Q3
AKT53
♣AQ73
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KQ86
AJ64
J6
♣J82
♠4
KT972
9742
♣K65
♠AJT932
85
Q8
♣T94
15
126
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 2♠ 1NT  ♥4
EW: 2  ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.50   0.50  3♠ S -1   A  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
        100    2.50   0.50  2♠ N -1   7  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
        140    1.00   2.00  3 E      Q  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        200    0.00   3.00  4♠ S -2   6  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Minor-Gore

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1Pass1
Pass2Pass2
All pass   

I open most balanced 12's but jacks are overrated and I have no good spots, vulnerable, so I'm showing a pass for West. True, there are two four-card majors, but maybe I'm getting more conservative--or disciplined. North might open 1NT but bidding diamonds and then clubs is a better description of this hand. After 1 East might consider a 1 call, but to make a vulnerable overcall, you should have either a good suit or a good hand and this is neither. South is too good to make a weak jump-shift so starts with 1. North now bids 2 and South bids 2. The opponents remain out of the later rounds for the same reasons they stayed quiet early.

West has no happy leads, and might choose a club. Lots of different things could happen. It feels like most paths will lead to making 2 or more, but declarer might get tangled up along the way.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

5 ♠KJ43
AJ764
AK8
♣J
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AQT62
85
J965
♣T2
♠9875
QT92
T43
♣KQ
♠-
K3
Q72
♣A9876543
17
77
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 4/3 4 3♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: +1370 6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  690          3.00   0.00  3N N +3   T  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
  660          2.00   1.00  3N N +2   ♣K  FF5-Minor-Gore vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
        100    1.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♠9  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        200    0.00   3.00  4 N -2   ♣K  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF2-Chee-Bai

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass3
Pass3NTAll pass 

I've shown an auction using my preferred method of a jump-response in a lower-ranking 3-level suit as natural and invitational. Without this treatment, South's hand is hard to bid (2 GF ? 1NT then clubs? Yuk and Yuk). Please don't tell Marty Bergen that I eschew Bergen raises, or if you do, tell him David Berkowitz made me. With clubs 2-2 6 makes and would also have made with a singleton 10 in West so it's not a terrible contract, but needs a bit of luck. It's possible that after North bids 3NT South might retreat to 4 which may result in 5 which is probably the best game. That said, 3NT at matchpoints is never a terrible guess.

In 3NT, East will lead a spade and North should try to set up the clubs. Life is easy when East is the hand that has to lead spades. If the E-W hands were reversed, 3NT would go down with 6 still making.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

6 ♠53
T98642
J95
♣32
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠JT86
53
Q84
♣J764
♠AKQ72
KQ
T7632
♣8
♠94
AJ7
AK
♣AKQT95
1
414
21
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 1NT  ♦5 ♠4
EW: 2 3♠  ♣4 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +200 4♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          3.00   0.00  4 N      ♠A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        100    2.00   1.00  5* N -1  ♠A  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF2-Chee-Bai
        150    1.00   2.00  6♣ S -3   ♠J  FF5-Minor-Gore vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
        300    0.00   3.00  5♣* S -2  ♠J  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
7 ♠QT863
Q43
4
♣9753
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K94
95
K9763
♣AT4
♠J7
AJ6
J852
♣KJ82
♠A52
KT872
AQT
♣Q6
4
1011
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2♠  ♣5 ♦4 NT6
EW: 2♣ 3 1/-NT
       ♥5 ♠5 NT7/6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -110 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  1 S +3   6  FF5-Minor-Gore vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
  140          1.50   1.50  2♠ S +1   9  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF2-Chee-Bai
  140          1.50   1.50  1 S +2   ♠4  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        110    0.00   3.00  3 W      ♠6  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
8 ♠A9
AJ942
A842
♣Q5
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T72
53
J653
♣A842
♠KQ864
KT
QT7
♣KJT
♠J53
Q876
K9
♣9763
15
514
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣6 ♦6/5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 2♠  ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +100 3♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  4♠* E -2  Q  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
  170          2.00   1.00  2 N +2   ♠K  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
  100          1.00   2.00  3♠ E -2   K  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF2-Chee-Bai
        150    0.00   3.00  5 N -3   ♣J  FF5-Minor-Gore vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
9 ♠A9
AQJ985
QT3
♣Q2
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠QJT743
7
J762
♣J6
♠85
K63
A54
♣AK984
♠K62
T42
K98
♣T753
15
514
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 3 1NT  ♣7/6 ♦6 ♠5
EW: 1 2♠  ♣6 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  3 N      ♠8  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF5-Minor-Gore
         50    1.50   1.50  4 N -1   ♣A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
         50    1.50   1.50  3 N -1   ♣A  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
        100    0.00   3.00  4* N -1  ♣A  FF6-Hedlund-Callaway vs FF2-Chee-Bai
10 ♠AT75
T4
AQ43
♣AJ2
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠986
AJ73
KT7
♣987
♠K43
Q95
9862
♣T65
♠QJ2
K862
J5
♣KQ43
15
85
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 3 4♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          3.00   0.00  3N S +1   3  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
  600          1.00   2.00  3N S      7  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF5-Minor-Gore
  600          1.00   2.00  3N N      5  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
  600          1.00   2.00  3N N      9  FF6-Hedlund-Callaway vs FF2-Chee-Bai
11 ♠QT863
JT
QJ
♣KQ72
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AJ7
AK87
K8
♣9654
♠4
Q932
A763
♣AT83
♠K952
654
T9542
♣J
11
1510
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 NT4
EW: 4♣ 3 5 2/3NT  ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  2N W -1   ♠6  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
        130    2.00   1.00  2♣ W +2   Q  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF5-Minor-Gore
        420    0.50   2.50  4 W      J  FF6-Hedlund-Callaway vs FF2-Chee-Bai
        420    0.50   2.50  4 W      J  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
12 ♠AT83
T97
K65
♣QJ4
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠52
4
Q74
♣AKT8765
♠KQJ64
QJ8
AJT
♣92
♠97
AK6532
9832
♣3
10
914
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 4♣ 2 3♠ 1NT  ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          2.83   0.17  3N* E -4  5  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
  150          1.50   1.50  3N E -3   9  FF6-Hedlund-Callaway vs FF2-Chee-Bai
        130    0.17   2.83  4♣ W      T  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
13 ♠K43
QJ2
KQT76
♣62
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠985
K73
A982
♣AK4
♠AQJT76
T98
-
♣QJ75
♠2
A654
J543
♣T983
11
1410
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1
EW: 5♣ 2 6♠ 5NT  ♦5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -1430 6♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  230          3.00   0.00  3♠ N +3   J  FF5-Minor-Gore vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        620    2.00   1.00  4♠ E      3  FF1-Callaway-Pofcher vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
        680    0.50   2.50  4♠ E +2   3  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
        680    0.50   2.50  4♠ E +2   ♣T  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
14 ♠J9873
AJ4
642
♣62
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠KT2
Q9
KQT75
♣Q95
♠A654
KT62
J3
♣A87
♠Q
8753
A98
♣KJT43
6
1212
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3
EW: 2♣ 3 2 2♠ 4NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        400    3.00   0.00  3N W      ♠7  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
        430    1.00   2.00  3N E +1   8  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        430    1.00   2.00  3N E +1   8  FF5-Minor-Gore vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        430    1.00   2.00  3N E +1   ♣J  FF1-Callaway-Pofcher vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
15 ♠AJ6
75
98543
♣JT2
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠KQ9752
T8
A762
♣8
♠-
AKJ9632
Q
♣A9754
♠T843
Q4
KJT
♣KQ63
6
914
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥1/0 ♠5 NT4/3
EW: 2♣ 1 5 2♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        480    2.50   0.50  5 E +1   T  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
        480    2.50   0.50  4 E +2   ♣6  FF5-Minor-Gore vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        510    0.50   2.50  4 E +3   ♣K  FF1-Callaway-Pofcher vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
        510    0.50   2.50  4 E +3   ♣K  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
16 ♠KQ
97
QT975
♣JT97
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠T754
AKQT64
3
♣82
♠AJ
J82
AK84
♣K543
♠98632
53
J62
♣AQ6
8
916
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♥2 ♠5 NT4
EW: 2♣ 5/4 2♠ 3NT  ♦6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -650 5-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  4 E -1   ♠9  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
        620    2.00   1.00  4 W      ♠K  FF1-Callaway-Pofcher vs FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet
        650    0.50   2.50  4 W +1   7  FF5-Minor-Gore vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        650    0.50   2.50  4 E +1   ♠9  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
17 ♠Q7
7
AT8752
♣KQ42
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠T98643
KQ3
943
♣J
♠AJ5
JT52
QJ
♣T853
♠K2
A9864
K6
♣A976
11
69
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6 2 5NT  ♠5
EW:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠6 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +920 6-NS/6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          3.00   0.00  3N S +3   ♠T  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
  400          2.00   1.00  5 N      ♠A  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  150          1.00   2.00  3 N +2   J  FF6-Hedlund-Callaway vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
        100    0.00   3.00  3N S -2   ♠T  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF5-Minor-Gore
18 ♠KJ76
T83
KJ
♣QT84
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠32
AQ64
T43
♣J976
♠54
K952
A975
♣A52
♠AQT98
J7
Q862
♣K3
10
711
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 3♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          3.00   0.00  4♠ S      ♣9  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
  200          2.00   1.00  3♠ S +2   4  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF5-Minor-Gore
  140          1.00   2.00  3♠ S      A  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        100    0.00   3.00  4♠ S -1   ♣6  FF6-Hedlund-Callaway vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
19 ♠KQT7
AK7
Q7
♣T542
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J63
Q9863
K4
♣A97
♠4
JT5
AT965
♣K863
♠A9852
42
J832
♣QJ
14
108
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♥4
EW: 1♣ 1 2  ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  2♠ S +1   6  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF5-Minor-Gore
  110          1.50   1.50  2♠ S      T  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
  110          1.50   1.50  2♠ S      6  FF6-Hedlund-Callaway vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
        110    0.00   3.00  2 W      ♠K  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
20 ♠J754
65
KQJ9
♣873
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A62
K82
T86
♣J965
♠K
AT94
A532
♣AKQ2
♠QT983
QJ73
74
♣T4
7
820
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3
EW: 5♣ 3 4 1♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    3.00   0.00  2 E +1   7  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF5-Minor-Gore
        150    2.00   1.00  1N W +2   ♠8  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        600    1.00   2.00  3N E      ♠T  FF2-Chee-Bai vs FF4-Roberts-Handley
        630    0.00   3.00  3N W +1   ♠4  FF6-Hedlund-Callaway vs FF1-Callaway-Pofcher
21 ♠KT974
76
QJ76
♣AQ
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠Q5
9543
A3
♣87542
♠AJ8
AT2
8542
♣JT9
♠632
KQJ8
KT9
♣K63
12
610
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1 2♠ 3NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.00   0.00  3N N      ♣9  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF5-Minor-Gore
        100    2.00   1.00  4♠ N -1   ♣J  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        200    0.50   2.50  4♠ N -2   ♣J  FF1-Callaway-Pofcher vs FF2-Chee-Bai
        200    0.50   2.50  4♠ N -2   ♣J  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
22 ♠AT86532
T6
Q4
♣A3
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K7
J7432
JT
♣Q754
♠J9
A
K98653
♣KT86
♠Q4
KQ985
A72
♣J92
10
711
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1 4/3♠ 3/-NT
       ♣5/4 ♦5/4 NT9/6
EW: 2♣ 2  ♥5 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          3.00   0.00  4♠ N +2   A  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
         50    2.00   1.00  4♠ N -1   A  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF5-Minor-Gore
        100    1.00   2.00  4♠ N -2   A  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        110    0.00   3.00  2 E +1   K  FF1-Callaway-Pofcher vs FF2-Chee-Bai
23 ♠K752
K54
8
♣AKQ42
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠QJT9
J2
JT96542
♣-
♠-
A9873
73
♣J87653
♠A8643
QT6
AKQ
♣T9
15
55
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2/1 4♠ 5NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♥4 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.50   0.50  4♠ S      J  FF1-Callaway-Pofcher vs FF2-Chee-Bai
  620          2.50   0.50  4♠ S      J  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        500    0.50   2.50  6N S -5   6  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
        500    0.50   2.50  6♠* S -2  J  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF5-Minor-Gore
24 ♠K3
KQ742
A8
♣9863
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AQJ94
J3
Q6
♣AKT5
♠875
986
975
♣QJ42
♠T62
AT5
KJT432
♣7
12
173
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 5 2NT  ♣5 ♠5
EW: 1♣ 1♠  ♦1 ♥1 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  2 N +3   ♠7  FF8-Papst-Hedegard vs FF6-Hedlund-Callaway
  150          2.00   1.00  4♠ W -3   A  FF1-Callaway-Pofcher vs FF2-Chee-Bai
   50          0.50   2.50  3♠ W -1   K  FF4-Roberts-Handley vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
   50          0.50   2.50  3♠ W -1   A  FF3-Kulkarni-Sweet vs FF5-Minor-Gore