Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠QT985
♥5
♦QJ32
♣K76
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
♠2
♥Q87432
♦76
♣T952
|
♠AK73
♥AK6
♦KT85
♣A3
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4N E -2 ♣4 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A3-Barry-Riehl
50 5.00 1.00 5♥ E -1 ♦A A3-Conley-Smith vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
150 3.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♣8 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A2-Low-Callaway
150 3.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♣4 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A4-Derr-Derr
150 3.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♣4 A7-Mok-Mok vs A6-Gore-Truskot
170 1.00 5.00 3♥ E +1 ♣4 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A7-Satow-Satow
430 0.00 6.00 3N E +1 ♥J A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
|
| Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis | West | North | East | South | | | Pass | 2NT | Pass | | 3♦ | Pass | 4♥ | All pass | When you do not want to play short of game, bid game! West might have been toying with transferring and passing 3♥. East, with NINE controls (A=2 K=1) has a monster hand, just about good enough to upgrade to 2♣. Bearing that potential upgrade in mind and having found a fit, East should not allow the auction to die in a part score. With four trumps and similar thoughts, an advance, implied, "out-of-the-blue," control/cue bid of 3♠ would have been appropriate. Then your partnership must decide how responder can sign off. Re-transfer or not? Having played both ways, the first thing to say is that "any agreement is better than no agreement." The second observation is that retransfers are not as important as having every control bid toward slam available. I no longer like the retransfer idea. Note that 4♥ makes from either side, although luckily. When North is on lead and plays the ♦Q, the proper play of the suit will enable one diamond winner to discard one club loser, and another club loser on the ♠K. So the lead, although effective in one sense, helps promote a trick in return. Fair is fair.
****************************************
Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the  BridgeWinners.com board discussion.
CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com |
| 2 |
♠85
♥J876
♦AQ63
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
♠A96
♥AKQT5
♦K7
♣872
|
♠K7
♥9432
♦JT95
♣T63
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♥A A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
150 5.00 1.00 3♥ W -3 ♠8 A7-Mok-Mok vs A6-Gore-Truskot
140 4.00 2.00 3♠ S ♥A A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A4-Derr-Derr
110 3.00 3.00 2♣ S +1 ♥A A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A2-Low-Callaway
100 2.00 4.00 4♥* E -1 ♠T A3-Conley-Smith vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
140 1.00 5.00 3♥ W ♠8 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A3-Barry-Riehl
400 0.00 6.00 3♦ N -4 ♥4 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A7-Satow-Satow
|
| Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis | West | North | East | South | | | | Pass | 2♠ | | 3♥ | Pass | Pass | 3♠ | | Pass | Pass | Pass | | An awkward hand. South's 2♠ is not classical -- in fact, it violates related negative principles of not having a void and not having good support for a second suit. Also, the spade suit is topless, although it does have very good texture (intermediates). North might well double. That turns out to be oh, so right here, picking up a tidy 300 points. But many North's, not sure, will pass. The efficiency of the double is heavily dependent on the three tricks available in clubs, not at all clear from the NS defensive point of view. So when the 3♥ overcall is passed back to South, a fair picture of North's hand (fairly good values, but not a clear defense to 3♥) surfaces in bright spotlight to South, who infers some playing values in the North hand, else East would have acted. Right! Too bad North cannot see as well as South, for game will still be missed. Nevertheless, plus 100 defending 3♥ undoubled is unsatisfactory and 3♠ will score better than that dismal return on equity. If West steps out of line a second time, surely North will punish.
****************************************
Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.
CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com |
| 3 |
♠QT97
♥AKT8
♦743
♣A5
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
♠J
♥953
♦KT98
♣KT632
|
♠K864
♥762
♦J2
♣J987
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 4♠ 3/4NT
♣6/7 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ S ♠J A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A4-Derr-Derr
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥3 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ N ♦J A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A7-Satow-Satow
400 3.00 3.00 3N S ♥3 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A2-Low-Callaway
140 2.00 4.00 2♥ N +1 ♠4 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A3-Barry-Riehl
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 ♦T A7-Mok-Mok vs A6-Gore-Truskot
100 0.00 6.00 6N S -2 ♦8 A3-Conley-Smith vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
|
| Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis | West | North | East | South | | | | | 1NT | | Pass | 2♣ | Pass | 2♠ | | Pass | 4♠ | All pass | | A straightforward auction, leading to ten tricks unless West leads a club. Then it's eleven.
****************************************
Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.
CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com |
| 4 |
♠KQT97
♥K5
♦932
♣965
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
♠6
♥AQT83
♦AKQ8
♣Q74
|
♠42
♥642
♦T5
♣AJT832
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥1/2 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 5♥ W -2 ♠7 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A2-Low-Callaway
200 5.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♥K A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A6-Gore-Truskot
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ W -1 ♠K A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ W -1 ♠K A7-Mok-Mok vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
100 2.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♦A A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A7-Satow-Satow
140 1.00 5.00 1♥ W +2 ♦9 A3-Conley-Smith vs A4-Derr-Derr
200 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -2 ♣A A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A3-Barry-Riehl
|
| Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis | West | North | East | South | | 1♥ | 1♠ | 2♥ | 4♠ | | Dbl | Pass | Pass | Pass | The LAW of Total Tricks tells South to bid to the level of trumps held by his side when both sides have a fit. Assuming that North has five spades, that would be ten trumps, hence 4♠ is the right call. The LAW works out this time when compared with hearts, but the double fit in clubs and hearts never came to light, so EW missed the club slam. No biggee, for no one will drop the singleton ♣K offside -- in fact, all inferences are to the contrary. Minus 500 should be a good score for NS, but might not be in practice. (I hate it when that happens).
****************************************
Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.
CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com |
| 5 |
♠K9
♥AKQT943
♦93
♣76
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q765
♥6
♦T8764
♣K53
|
♠AJT
♥752
♦J52
♣QT92
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♥ 5/4NT ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 6.00 0.00 4♥ N +3 ♠T A7-Mok-Mok vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
680 5.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♠A A2-Riggs-Minor vs A2-Low-Callaway
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♦2 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♣T A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A7-Satow-Satow
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♣T A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A6-Gore-Truskot
650 2.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♣5 A3-Conley-Smith vs A4-Derr-Derr
200 0.00 6.00 2♥ N +3 ♣2 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A3-Barry-Riehl
|
| Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis | West | North | East | South | | | 1♥ | Pass | 1♠ | | Pass | 2♥ | Pass | 4♥ | | All pass | | | | Some Norths might rebid 3♥, and some might open 4♥. No matter. South will force to game and in hearts, the rebid major, never notrump. . . Oh, dear, it makes 5NT. Who'd a thunk it?
****************************************
Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.
CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com |
| 6 |
♠AQT9865
♥K7
♦3
♣K84
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
♠K72
♥QJT84
♦J2
♣QJ9
|
♠J
♥96
♦AQ8765
♣AT62
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♠ 1NT ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠3/4 NT3/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1400 6.00 0.00 3N* W -5 ♠T A7-Mok-Mok vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
300 5.00 1.00 5♦ E -3 ♥2 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A2-Low-Callaway
140 3.50 2.50 2♠ N +1 ♥9 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A3-Barry-Riehl
140 3.50 2.50 3♥ N ♠J A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ N ♥9 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A7-Satow-Satow
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ N -1 ♣A A3-Conley-Smith vs A4-Derr-Derr
100 0.00 6.00 4♠* N -1 ♥9 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A6-Gore-Truskot
|
| Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis | West | North | East | South | | | | 1♦ | Pass | | 1♥ | 1♠ | Pass | 1NT | | Pass | 2♠ | Pass | Pass | | Pass | | | | South's role is to inform North of some useful values and not to sit on his hands. In that way, having bid 1NT to show values, most likely both a heart and a diamond stop (yes!), North can utilize the possession of the Boss Suit to corral the declaration. Plus 140 when declarer wins the heart lead, finesses the ♠Q, dropping the jack, cashes the second heart, and tosses a diamond on the table. East is endplayed and must yield a trick or two.
****************************************
Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.
CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com |
| 7 |
♠QJT763
♥T6
♦92
♣872
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
♠5
♥Q97
♦AKQ865
♣T96
|
♠A984
♥8542
♦74
♣AKQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♣ E -1 ♥A A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A2-Low-Callaway
110 5.00 1.00 2♦ W +1 ♣8 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A7-Satow-Satow
150 4.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♣8 A3-Conley-Smith vs A3-Barry-Riehl
300 2.50 3.50 3♠ N -3 ♣A A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
300 2.50 3.50 3♠ N -3 ♣A A7-Mok-Mok vs A4-Derr-Derr
630 0.50 5.50 3N E +1 ♥A A2-Riggs-Minor vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
630 0.50 5.50 3N E +1 ♥3 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A6-Gore-Truskot
|
| Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis | West | North | East | South | | | | | 1♣ | | 1♦ | Dbl | Rdbl | Pass | | 2♦ | Pass | 2♠ | Pass | | 2NT | Pass | 3NT | All pass | If East is so determined to bid game as to redouble and cue bid spades (SHOWING spades, since North implied both majors -- when two suits have been shown, you SHOW, not ask), then clubs must not be a problem, so West upgrades the running diamonds into an acceptance of the game invitation. If East's clubs and hearts were reversed, a different try would have been made.
****************************************
Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.
CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com |
| 8 |
♠K85
♥653
♦A742
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
♠QJ62
♥J74
♦QJ96
♣T7
|
♠T3
♥AT8
♦853
♣AJ862
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW:
♣5/4 ♦6/5 ♥5/4 ♠5/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 6.00 0.00 2N S ♠2 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A6-Gore-Truskot
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣7 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A7-Satow-Satow
110 4.00 2.00 2♥ S ♠2 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A2-Low-Callaway
110 4.00 2.00 1♥ S +1 ♣T A2-Riggs-Minor vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
50 2.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♣6 A7-Mok-Mok vs A4-Derr-Derr
100 0.50 5.50 3N N -2 ♣6 A3-Conley-Smith vs A3-Barry-Riehl
100 0.50 5.50 3♠ S -2 ♣A A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
|
| Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis | West | North | East | South | | Pass | 1♦ | Pass | 1♥ | | Pass | 1NT | Pass | 2NT | | All pass | | | | 12 HCP isn't enough to ensure game these days opposite an opening bid. Be sure to give partner some leeway to encourage opening the bidding. It does pay to get in the first stab at the contract, so giving some rope will usually get good results. Partner will also appreciate the confidence you show by sharing the decision making.
****************************************
Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.
CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com |
| 9 |
♠J52
♥KQT862
♦KQT4
♣-
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQ
♥A953
♦832
♣AT73
|
♠A98743
♥7
♦J95
♣852
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 3NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥2/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 6.00 0.00 4♥* N ♣6 A3-Conley-Smith vs A3-Barry-Riehl
420 5.00 1.00 4♥ N ♣A A7-Mok-Mok vs A4-Derr-Derr
400 4.00 2.00 3N N ♠A A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
170 2.50 3.50 2♥ N +2 ♠A A2-Riggs-Minor vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
170 2.50 3.50 2♥ N +2 ♠A A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A2-Low-Callaway
50 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -1 ♦5 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A6-Gore-Truskot
50 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -1 ♣5 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A7-Satow-Satow
|
| |
| 10 |
♠K6532
♥53
♦A
♣J8652
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both |
|
♠JT4
♥82
♦KQT64
♣T97
|
♠Q98
♥AQ6
♦J8532
♣Q3
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2/1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦K A2-Riggs-Minor vs A7-Satow-Satow
620 4.50 1.50 4♥ S ♦K A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A4-Derr-Derr
620 4.50 1.50 4♥ S ♦K A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A6-Gore-Truskot
200 3.00 3.00 2♥ S +3 ♦K A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
170 1.00 5.00 2♥ S +2 ♦K A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
170 1.00 5.00 2♥ S +2 ♦K A7-Mok-Mok vs A3-Barry-Riehl
170 1.00 5.00 2♥ S +2 ♦Q A3-Conley-Smith vs A2-Low-Callaway
|
| |
| 11 |
♠AQ9
♥K8
♦T42
♣Q8742
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None |
|
♠JT752
♥Q964
♦6
♣953
|
♠K64
♥A753
♦AJ87
♣J6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4/3♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 6.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥3 A3-Conley-Smith vs A2-Low-Callaway
430 5.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠4 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
240 4.00 2.00 2N N +4 ♥3 A7-Mok-Mok vs A3-Barry-Riehl
150 3.00 3.00 3♣ N +2 ♠4 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A4-Derr-Derr
110 2.00 4.00 2♣ N +1 ♥A A2-Riggs-Minor vs A7-Satow-Satow
90 1.00 5.00 2♦ S ♠T A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
50 0.00 6.00 3♣ N -1 ♦A A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A6-Gore-Truskot
|
| |
| 12 |
♠AK
♥KT763
♦62
♣A654
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S |
|
♠QJT87
♥J5
♦AQ3
♣QJ8
|
♠954
♥AQ942
♦KJT
♣T3
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 ♥3 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
50 5.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♥7 A7-Mok-Mok vs A3-Barry-Riehl
110 3.00 3.00 2♠ W ♦2 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A7-Satow-Satow
110 3.00 3.00 2♠ W ♣A A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
110 3.00 3.00 2♠ W ♣A A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A4-Derr-Derr
140 1.00 5.00 3♠ W ♣A A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A6-Gore-Truskot
300 0.00 6.00 2♥ N -3 ♣3 A3-Conley-Smith vs A2-Low-Callaway
|
| |
| 13 |
♠Q
♥AQJ9
♦J5432
♣A95
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both |
|
♠KJ832
♥T
♦97
♣K8764
|
♠A764
♥K74
♦KT8
♣JT2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♥2 A3-Conley-Smith vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
200 4.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♣5 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A6-Gore-Truskot
200 4.50 1.50 3♥ S +2 ♣6 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
170 3.00 3.00 2♥ S +2 ♣4 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A4-Derr-Derr
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ S ♠3 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A3-Barry-Riehl
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ S ♦7 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A7-Satow-Satow
110 1.00 5.00 1♦ N +2 ♠6 A7-Mok-Mok vs A2-Low-Callaway
|
| |
| 14 |
♠A965
♥T5
♦AT64
♣875
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None |
|
♠Q43
♥AK72
♦85
♣QT43
|
♠K2
♥QJ863
♦93
♣K962
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥6 A7-Mok-Mok vs A2-Low-Callaway
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ N ♣2 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A4-Derr-Derr
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ N ♣2 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A3-Barry-Riehl
110 4.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♥A A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
90 2.00 4.00 2♦ S ♥A A2-Riggs-Minor vs A6-Gore-Truskot
100 1.00 5.00 3N N -2 ♣2 A3-Conley-Smith vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
140 0.00 6.00 3♥ E ♦J A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A7-Satow-Satow
|
| |
| 15 |
♠J83
♥87
♦QT953
♣K75
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q654
♥AT52
♦K6
♣632
|
♠A97
♥KQ943
♦J7
♣AJ4
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4/3♥ 4/3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦A A2-Riggs-Minor vs A6-Gore-Truskot
50 5.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦A A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A7-Satow-Satow
140 4.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♦2 A7-Mok-Mok vs A2-Low-Callaway
170 2.00 4.00 3♥ E +1 ♠2 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A3-Barry-Riehl
170 2.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 ♣8 A3-Conley-Smith vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
170 2.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 ♣8 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
420 0.00 6.00 4♥ E ♠2 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A4-Derr-Derr
|
| |
| 16 |
♠872
♥K87
♦72
♣K6432
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT4
♥Q
♦AKJ985
♣Q95
|
♠KJ53
♥96543
♦T
♣JT7
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♣A A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A2-Low-Callaway
100 4.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♣4 A7-Mok-Mok vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
100 4.50 1.50 2♦ W -1 ♣2 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A6-Gore-Truskot
50 3.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♦A A3-Conley-Smith vs A7-Satow-Satow
90 2.00 4.00 2♦ W ♣3 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
110 1.00 5.00 2♦ W +1 ♠8 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A3-Barry-Riehl
150 0.00 6.00 2N W +1 ♣3 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A4-Derr-Derr
|
| |
| 17 |
♠KQ9
♥AJ3
♦T7
♣KQ864
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
♠A532
♥975
♦KQJ9
♣T2
|
♠J84
♥8642
♦85
♣J953
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦8 A7-Mok-Mok vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♥8 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A3-Barry-Riehl
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♥2 A3-Conley-Smith vs A7-Satow-Satow
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♣3 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A2-Low-Callaway
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♣3 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A4-Derr-Derr
150 1.00 5.00 2N N +1 ♣5 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A6-Gore-Truskot
100 0.00 6.00 3N N -2 ♣3 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
|
| |
| 18 |
♠AT
♥AJ743
♦KQ95
♣65
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
♠J82
♥T5
♦4
♣QJT9872
|
♠K9743
♥-
♦AT7632
♣43
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♦ 5♥ 6/5NT ♣4 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
850 6.00 0.00 5♥* S ♦4 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A2-Low-Callaway
690 5.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♦6 A7-Mok-Mok vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
650 3.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♦4 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
650 3.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♣Q A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A3-Barry-Riehl
620 2.00 4.00 4♥ S ♦4 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A6-Gore-Truskot
100 0.50 5.50 6♥ S -1 ♦4 A3-Conley-Smith vs A7-Satow-Satow
100 0.50 5.50 6♥ S -1 ♦4 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A4-Derr-Derr
|
| |
| 19 |
♠J962
♥984
♦KT4
♣Q74
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
♠KT84
♥T
♦AQJ752
♣J6
|
♠AQ53
♥Q7632
♦83
♣32
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♦6 A3-Conley-Smith vs A6-Gore-Truskot
150 4.50 1.50 4♣ S +1 ♥T A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A2-Low-Callaway
150 4.50 1.50 3♣ S +2 ♦A A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
130 3.00 3.00 3♣ S +1 ♥T A7-Mok-Mok vs A7-Satow-Satow
100 2.00 4.00 2♠ W -1 ♣4 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A3-Barry-Riehl
50 1.00 5.00 2♥ S -1 ♣J A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
140 0.00 6.00 3♠ W ♣4 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A4-Derr-Derr
|
| |
| 20 |
♠J852
♥8
♦A62
♣T8652
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
♠43
♥J52
♦KT9843
♣KQ
|
♠QT9
♥KQT96
♦7
♣J974
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♠5 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A3-Barry-Riehl
170 5.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♣K A3-Conley-Smith vs A6-Gore-Truskot
140 4.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♥6 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A4-Derr-Derr
90 3.00 3.00 1N S ♦8 A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A2-Low-Callaway
200 2.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♦8 A7-Mok-Mok vs A7-Satow-Satow
300 0.50 5.50 3N N -3 ♦9 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
300 0.50 5.50 2N S -3 ♦8 A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
|
| |
| 21 |
♠T
♥T53
♦QJT732
♣Q52
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
♠8
♥Q962
♦K986
♣AJ86
|
♠AKJ94
♥AKJ
♦5
♣KT74
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 2♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 4N W -3 ♦2 A2-Riggs-Minor vs A4-Derr-Derr
50 5.00 1.00 6♥ W -1 ♦Q A3-Conley-Smith vs A6-Gore-Truskot
140 4.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦A A6-Garvin-Garvin vs A5-Kneisl-Moxley
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♣9 A7-Mok-Mok vs A7-Satow-Satow
400 2.00 4.00 3N W ♦7 A4-Seiersen-Scholefield vs A1-Mehra-Castagna
420 1.00 5.00 4♥ W ♠T A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A2-Low-Callaway
460 0.00 6.00 3N W +2 ♦7 A5-Altavilla-Krecki vs A3-Barry-Riehl
|
| |
