- Monday Aft - September 23, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 1244 MP  Geomean: 877 MP
(based on 32 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Maja - Bill Cohen 61.90 1st A 0.80
Anthony Muller - Joyce Newell 59.52 1st A 0.80
Bozidar Boncich - Ed Lange 58.63 2nd A 0.56
Betty Jackson - Ray Boehne 55.36 3rd A 0.40
Joan Little - Steven Little 52.68 2nd A 0.56
Jim Lauderdale - Sarah Stern 51.49 3rd A 0.40
EVENT>Monday Afternoon Pairs   |SESSION>Monday Aft   |SECTION> E N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 23, 2019 |CLUB NO.>217133    | 09/23/2019 15:39
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Larry Slayton   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   7 |MP LIMITS>None/1250/500  |CLUB>Monday Duplicate Pairs
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=5/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Mary Block             Hetty Eddy               C    .     .     .     64.50  38.39
 2 Bill Cohen              Maja                    B    1     1     .    104.00  61.90  0.80(A)
 3 Judy Lesieutre         Nancy Borucki            A    .     .     .     77.50  46.13
 4 Thomas Eby             Ewan Eby                 B    .     .     .     86.00  51.19
 5 Jim Lauderdale         Sarah Stern              A    3     .     .     86.50  51.49  0.40(A)
 6 Kate Lach              Dennis Vanmiddlesworth   B    .     .     .     79.50  47.32
 7 Joan Little            Steven Little            C    2     2     1     88.50  52.68  0.56(A)
 8 Brad Dow               Larry Slayton            A    .     .     .     85.50  50.89
                                          Totals                         672.00

EVENT>Monday Afternoon Pairs   |SESSION>Monday Aft   |SECTION> E E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   7 |MP LIMITS>None/1250/500  |CLUB>Monday Duplicate Pairs
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Freya Charney          Stan Charney             A    .     .     .     76.50  45.54
 2 Ray Boehne             Betty Jackson            A    3     .     .     93.00  55.36  0.40(A)
 3 William Shellooe       David Maddox             C    .     .     .     85.50  50.89
 4 Ed Lange               Bozidar Boncich          C    2     2     1     98.50  58.63  0.56(A)
 5 Lauren Upson           Jerome Weiss             B    .     .     .     71.50  42.56
 6 Frances Baca           Arlene Seckel            C    .     .     .     77.50  46.13
 7 Trulee Ricketts        Martha Hawley            A    .     .     .     69.50  41.37
 8 Anthony Muller         Joyce Newell             B    1     1     .    100.00  59.52  0.80(A)
                                          Totals                         672.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠7
AJT7
KJT854
♣K2
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AT4
Q8
A976
♣JT98
♠K863
K6542
Q32
♣5
♠QJ952
93
-
♣AQ7643
12
118
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥6
EW: 1/- 1/-
       ♣4 ♦7/6 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  400          7.00   0.00  3N N      E7-Little-Little vs E5-Upson-Weiss
   90          6.00   1.00  2 N      E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
         50    4.50   2.50  3N N -1   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
         50    4.50   2.50  3 N -1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        100    2.00   5.00  3N N -2   E1-Block-Eddy vs E1-Charney-Charney
        100    2.00   5.00  3N N -2   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        100    2.00   5.00  3N N -2   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E8-Muller-Newell
        150    0.00   7.00  4♠ S -3   E4-Eby-Eby vs E6-Baca-Seckel

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

North opens 1. South isn't strong enough to bid clubs, so bids 1. All North can do is repeat the diamonds, which puts South on an awful spot. He still isn't strong enough to bid those clubs, and 2NT seems like a terrible idea, as does rebidding a five card (and not great) spade suit. Pass might be the best choice--North should have a six card suit, and it's important not to dig the hole any deeper.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass1
Pass2Pass3
All pass   

Lynn Berg typically provides analysis for 299ers on boards 1-18. Additionally, analysis for more advanced players is available for boards 1-2, 4. 7 and 11.

The Bidding: North's hand meets the Rule of 20 and the Suggestion of 22 for a 1st or 2nd seat opener. North doesn't have a rebid problem. Opening 1 is clear. East has a choice between passing and overcalling 1. East's poor texture and unsupported honors make passing attractive. If South had a game forcing hand, they might try to show their shape. Grant Baze advised "6-5 come alive" , saying a 6-5 hand is worth an extra Ace. South's void in partner's suit suggests caution. Treating South's hand as invitational seems best. So South responds 1. North rebids 2 as planned, showing a minimum opener with 6+ diamonds. South must now decide whether to try to improve the contract. See my "Third Suit Forcing" article for a discussion of continuations after opener rebids their minor. A simple and effective agreement is to use the cheapest unbid suit as an artificial Game Force , similar to 4th Suit Forcing , With that agreement, a 2 rebid by South would be natural and constructive. A 3 rebid would be natural and invitational. There is little reason use a 3 rebid to show constructive values. South invites with 3.

North expects South to have 4+ spades and 5+ clubs. North has hearts well stopped, but shouldn't be confident 3NT is making. The hand is a misfit. Communication will be a problem. If South had Qx or Ax they might have forced to game or invited with a diamond raise. It isn't clear that North can benefit from their long diamond suit. On a misfit hand, it is often best to be conservative. Passing is reasonable.

The Play in 3NT: With a heart lead and a 3-2 club break, declarer might be able to scramble 9 tricks. Even then, there is risk North or South will be end played to beat 3NT. Here, clubs break 4-1, and 3NT can be beaten 3 tricks. Although down 2 will be a common result.

The Play in 3: The auction suggests North and South are unbalanced or semi-balanced. West has an easy trump lead. After winning the King, a spade is led from dummy. East must duck. Finessing against the 10 offers a 39% chance of scoring 2 spade tricks. Here, finessing against the 10 allows the defense to beat 3 by 2 tricks. The defense to do so isn't easy. A 1 trick set is more likely. Suit combinations are not played in isolation. East-West will not have an easy time when on lead. Declarer is better off playing a low spade to the Queen or Jack. West wins their Ace and leads a second round of clubs. When East shows out declarer has a club loser. Declarer cashes their high clubs and throws West on lead with a club. Now West must switch to a heart to beat 3. A heart switch isn't appealing, but the other options seem worse.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

2 ♠96
Q94
T32
♣A9765
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T72
KJ
AKQ9654
♣K
♠AJ83
AT3
8
♣QJT84
♠KQ54
87652
J7
♣32
6
1612
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦1 ♥5 ♠3 NT1
EW: 5♣ 5 2 4♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        400    7.00   0.00  3N E      E4-Eby-Eby vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        430    6.00   1.00  3N W +1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        490    2.50   4.50  4N E +2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        490    2.50   4.50  3N W +3   E1-Block-Eddy vs E1-Charney-Charney
        490    2.50   4.50  3N W +3   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        490    2.50   4.50  3N W +3   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E8-Muller-Newell
        490    2.50   4.50  3N W +3   E7-Little-Little vs E5-Upson-Weiss
        490    2.50   4.50  3N W +3   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and bids 1 over the diamond response. What now for West? This begins to sound like a misfit for suit play, but with a heart stopper and that K, West can bid 3NT and be pretty optimistic. Even if North gets "creative" and leads dummy's second suit, all West has to do is play low and he'll be just fine. 11 tricks should be easy.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
1Pass1Pass
21Pass3Pass
3Pass3NTPass
4Pass4NTAll pass
  1. artficiial. game forcing

The Bidding: After East opens 1, West is a bit short of the strength for a strong jump shift. West prefers to begin with a 1 response. If playing Walsh style , East could bypass their majors if they had a balanced hand. Here, East has an unbalanced hand and prefers to respond 1 whether or not they play Walsh . Now West uses an artificial 2 bid, 4th Suit Forcing , to establish a Game Force . If a heart is led, East is happy to declare a notrump contract. East isn't aware that West's diamonds are so long and strong. It might be better for West to declare a potential diamond contract. Rebidding 3 seems best. West is too strong to bid 3NT. So they temporize with 3. Now East offers 3NT as the final contract. West's 4 bid a slam try. Methods vary by partnership agreement. It is common to cue bid to cooperate with a slam try and use a 4NT bid as a negative. Some prefer to treat the 4 bid as optional Roman Keycard . East, with just one diamond and a minimum opener, uses the partnership's negative response. The auction ends at 4NT.

The Play: A spade lead is needed to hold declarer to 11 tricks. Without a spade lead, declarer has the tempo to establish club winners and score 12 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

3 ♠AJ52
AJ95
Q
♣Q984
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KT96
86
K93
♣AKJ6
♠84
KQT7
JT8764
♣2
♠Q73
432
A52
♣T753
14
146
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT4
EW: 3 2 1♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          7.00   0.00  1N E -1   E1-Block-Eddy vs E1-Charney-Charney
         90    5.50   1.50  1N E      E8-Dow-Slayton vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
         90    5.50   1.50  2 E      E7-Little-Little vs E5-Upson-Weiss
        110    4.00   3.00  3 E      E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        120    2.50   4.50  1N E +1   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        120    2.50   4.50  1N E +1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        130    1.00   6.00  2 E +2   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        150    0.00   7.00  1N E +2   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E8-Muller-Newell

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

West opens 1. Many "modern" players will double even with shortness in diamonds because they have the majors. Now East chooses--bid the long diamonds or the shorter but better--and more preemptive--hearts. Either way, West now bids the spades and East must bid again. He can certainly justify repeating his six card diamond suit, but a few may (mentally) cross their fingers and bid 1NT. Diamonds are safer. In the real world at the table, most will lose a finesse to the diamond Queen. Not being clairvoyant, they don't know it's singleton.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

4 ♠A92
AJT9
AJ32
♣Q6
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q53
643
KQ854
♣J4
♠KJT6
Q2
T9
♣AKT85
♠874
K875
76
♣9732
16
813
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1 1♠ -/1NT
       ♥4/5 NT6/7
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +110 2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  120          7.00   0.00  1N N +1   E1-Block-Eddy vs E8-Muller-Newell
  100          5.50   1.50  2♠ E -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
  100          5.50   1.50  2♣ E -1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
   90          3.00   4.00  1N N      E2-Cohen-Maja vs E1-Charney-Charney
   90          3.00   4.00  1N N      E4-Eby-Eby vs E5-Upson-Weiss
   90          3.00   4.00  1N N      E7-Little-Little vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        100    0.50   6.50  1N N -1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        100    0.50   6.50  2 S -1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E6-Baca-Seckel

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

North opens 1NT, but it won't fare well. Maybe East will show a two-suited hand and get too high. That's best case for N-S. If North gets a low club lead and then guesses the Q right, he'll actually get seven tricks. Otherwise? On to the next hand, please!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1NTAll pass 

The Bidding: After North opens a strong notrump, East must decide whether to act. As Andrew Gumperz discusses in his "The Race to 1NT" article, a non-vulnerable 1NT contract tends to score well whether it makes or goes down. Defensive agreements vary. Meckwell , Woolsey , and DONT make it easy to compete with East's shape. If playing Cappelletti or Hello , it is more difficult for East to compete because advancer must compete to the 3-level if they wish to play in clubs.

Here, everyone is vulnerable. So there is more upside to defending a 1NT contract. Competing opposite a passed hand has substantial risk. If 2 is making, 1NT may be going down. 1NT down 1 scores better than 2 making. East prefers to pass. South doesn't have the strength or shape for a Stayman response. West doesn't have the shape to balance. The auction ends at 1NT.

The Play in 1NT: East's standard lead is the their 4th best club. Leading the 8 risks giving declarer a trick, but may improve communication. In their "Winning Notrump Leads" book, David Bird and Taf Anthias advise "when your suit is headed by touching honors, it is usually best to lead a top card -- even from such as K-Q-7-5-2, where your third-best card gives you nowhere near a broken sequence." Bird and Anthias use simulations to assess leads. So the lead of an Ace has the unrealistic advantage of a Double Dummy continuation. Here, the lead of East's 4th best club allows declarer to make 1NT if they guess the Queen. South doesn't have the entries to pickup Qxxx with West. So declarer will likely finesse against East. The lead of a high club gives East the opportunity to find the spade switch needed to beat 1NT.

The Play in 2: Declarer has a 2-way finesse for the Queen, but declarer isn't eager to draw trump. Declarer has 2 quick tricks in the side suits. Declarer hopes to score 6 trump tricks. So declarer delays drawing trump so they can score 2 ruffs. If clubs are led, declarer can score 2 club ruffs and will finesse against East for the Queen. When the finesse wins, declarer has 8 tricks.

At tables where West leads the King, top of an honor sequence. Declarer can win the Ace and later attempt a lobbing finesse towards the Jack. A Double Dummy line is available to score 9 tricks, but most declarers will attempt to draw trump, happy they will likely score 1 3rd trick in the side suits. If declarer finesses against East for the Queen, they will score 8 tricks: 1 + 4 + 2 + 1 ruff (or 1 ruff).



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

5 ♠K5
AT987
J875
♣J8
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠Q9632
KQ43
T
♣Q65
♠AJ4
2
A96432
♣743
♠T87
J65
KQ
♣AKT92
9
99
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♦6 ♠4 NT6
EW: 1 2♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♥5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          7.00   0.00  2 N      E2-Cohen-Maja vs E1-Charney-Charney
  100          6.00   1.00  3 E -2   E4-Eby-Eby vs E5-Upson-Weiss
   50          4.00   3.00  3♠ W -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
   50          4.00   3.00  3♠ W -1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
   50          4.00   3.00  3♠ W -1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        140    1.50   5.50  3♠ W      E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        140    1.50   5.50  3♠ E      E7-Little-Little vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        200    0.00   7.00  3♣ S -2   E1-Block-Eddy vs E8-Muller-Newell

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

South opens 1. West probably passes, and North bids 1. Will East bid diamonds now? It still seems risky with such a paltry suit. If East passes, South rebids 1NT with his balanced hand, and they are likely to end up in 2. Careful play limits West to one trump trick, but then there's spades and the diamond break. This is a tough ending for reasonable bidding.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

6 ♠KT82
K9
KJ954
♣62
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠65
Q832
Q86
♣AJ98
♠QJ943
54
T2
♣KQ75
♠A7
AJT76
A73
♣T43
10
98
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 4 2♠ 3NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦1 ♥3 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  180          7.00   0.00  2N S +2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E1-Charney-Charney
  150          5.50   1.50  2N S +1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
  150          5.50   1.50  1N S +2   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E6-Baca-Seckel
  120          3.50   3.50  2N S      E4-Eby-Eby vs E5-Upson-Weiss
  120          3.50   3.50  2N N      E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
   90          2.00   5.00  1N S      E7-Little-Little vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        100    0.50   6.50  3N N -2   E1-Block-Eddy vs E8-Muller-Newell
        100    0.50   6.50  2N N -2   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E2-Boehne-Jackson

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

With only a combined 23 HCP, N-S are unlikely to bid game. 3NT will even make with the clubs 4-4 and the Q onside. There's no way to pick up the Q, as well guarded as it is. Anyway, the more natural way to finesse is towards the South hand. Even the unlucky will surely get 8 tricks in play, and +150 should not be unheard of.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

7 ♠Q4
T9654
964
♣Q83
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AT5
AQJ7
KQ32
♣T4
♠J92
8
T7
♣AKJ9652
♠K8763
K32
AJ85
♣7
4
169
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦4/5 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT1
EW: 5♣ 2 2 2♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          7.00   0.00  3N W -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        150    6.00   1.00  3♣ W +2   E4-Eby-Eby vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        630    4.50   2.50  3N W +1   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E8-Muller-Newell
        630    4.50   2.50  3N W +1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        660    2.50   4.50  3N W +2   E1-Block-Eddy vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        660    2.50   4.50  3N E +2   E7-Little-Little vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        690    0.50   6.50  3N W +3   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E1-Charney-Charney
        690    0.50   6.50  3N W +3   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E5-Upson-Weiss

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

West opens 1NT. With those great clubs, East just closes her eyes and jumps to the NT game. Even the Q cooperates to make this bid seem brilliant. It's what any declarer would call a friendly hand. knock out the A before you run clubs. It will be easier to decide what to sluff.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
1NTPass21Pass
32Pass33Pass
3NTAll pass  
  1. artificial, range ask or clubs
  2. maximum
  3. game forcing with long clubs and heart shortness

The Bidding: South's hand meets the Rule of 20 and the Suggestion of 22 for a 1st or 2nd seat opener. After South opens 1, West overcalls 1NT. North has nothing to say. It is common to use your 1NT opening structure after a 1NT overcall . Many partnerships play Four-suit transfers . The problem with using an advance to 2NT as a transfer to diamonds is that it gives up bidding 2NT as a natural invitation. If responder bids Stayman without a 4-card major, they needlessly disclose information about the 1NT bidder's distribution. Since you don't want to help the defense count declarer's distribution and don't want to help the defense find the right lead, it is important to have a way to invite game without a 4-card major. One solution would be to use an artificial 3 bid as a transfer to diamonds and keep a 2NT response as a natural invitation. That would cause difficulties when advancer has an invitational hand with diamonds. In his "4 Way Transfers with Range Ask" article, Gavin Wolpert advises using an artificial 2 response to show either clubs or a hand interested in opener's range. With that agreement East's 2 bid asks opener's range.

A 1NT overcall typically has a 15-18 HCP range. So West's 16 HCPs are near the bottom of the range. Even so, West should bid an artificial 3 to show a maximum because of their Tens and their honor combinations. Since 3NT and 5 are possible contracts, East offers a choice of game with an artificial 3 rebid showing a game forcing hand with long clubs and heart shortness. West, with hearts well stopped, places the contract in 3NT.

The Play: North, with a lack of entries, is likely to lead the Queen, top of a doubleton in partner's suit. Declarer's spade texture provides 2 stoppers. There isn't much benefit to holding up. So declarer wins their Ace. The "8 Ever, 9 Never" adage suggests playing to drop the Queen with a 9-card club fit. This line would normally offer a 53% chance for 7 club tricks. The Queen lead provides dummy with a spade entry. So dummy will not be cut off if the Queen doesn't drop. However, playing for the drop isn't the percentage play. The Vacant Spaces principle suggests North is an 11-8 favorite to hold the Queen. This gives finessing a 58% chance to provide 7 club tricks.

On the run of dummy's clubs, declarer reaches a 5-card ending. To hold declarer to 11 tricks, South must keep K K32 A.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

8 ♠A743
AKT75
765
♣J
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠K9
92
84
♣AKT7642
♠QT65
QJ
AQ9
♣Q853
♠J82
8643
KJT32
♣9
12
1013
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/3 3/4 -/1♠
       ♣3 ♠6/7 NT5
EW: 3♣ 1NT  ♦3 ♥3 ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +300 5♣*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  420          7.00   0.00  4 N      E2-Cohen-Maja vs E8-Muller-Newell
         50    5.00   2.00  4 S -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E6-Baca-Seckel
         50    5.00   2.00  4 N -1   E7-Little-Little vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
         50    5.00   2.00  5 S -1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        110    3.00   4.00  3♣ W      E1-Block-Eddy vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        130    1.50   5.50  4♣ W      E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        130    1.50   5.50  4♣ W      E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E1-Charney-Charney
        400    0.00   7.00  3N E      E8-Dow-Slayton vs E5-Upson-Weiss

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

West opens 3--mighty irritating to North. He takes a chance and doubles, but East raises the clubs. South has only four HCP and won't enter the fray. And North just isn't good enough to double again at the four level. Without great good luck, West will have a diamond loser. There's just a slim chance to set up the10 for a discard. Happily, there are lots of entries to the dummy in trump.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

9 ♠T732
AJ72
KJ64
♣5
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q98
KQT94
3
♣AK94
♠K64
63
QT9875
♣J2
♠AJ5
85
A2
♣QT8763
9
146
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠  ♦6 ♥6 NT6
EW: 1 1NT  ♣5 ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +90 2♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         50    6.50   0.50  2♠ N -1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E5-Upson-Weiss
         50    6.50   0.50  2♣ S -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E6-Baca-Seckel
         90    5.00   2.00  2 E      E1-Block-Eddy vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        100    4.00   3.00  2N N -2   E7-Little-Little vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        150    1.50   5.50  3N N -3   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E1-Charney-Charney
        150    1.50   5.50  2N N -3   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E8-Muller-Newell
        150    1.50   5.50  2N N -3   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        150    1.50   5.50  3♣ S -3   E4-Eby-Eby vs E4-Lange-Boncich

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East has an ugly light 1 opener, since he'll have to rebid the clubs if North answers in a red suit. Maybe he passes. Either way, West bids 1. If South has opened, North will use a Negative Double . Otherwise, he'll pass and East will eke out 1NT, then take a preference for hearts over West's 2 rebid. No one is going far with this one.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

10 ♠A72
K87
A972
♣Q64
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠Q986
QT32
T8
♣A82
♠J3
AJ5
J654
♣KT73
♠KT54
964
KQ3
♣J95
13
810
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1 2 1♠ 1NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -110 2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        100    6.00   1.00  1N N -1   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        100    6.00   1.00  1N N -1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        100    6.00   1.00  1N N -1   E7-Little-Little vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        120    4.00   3.00  1N E +1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E5-Upson-Weiss
        200    1.50   5.50  1N N -2   E1-Block-Eddy vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        200    1.50   5.50  1N N -2   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E8-Muller-Newell
        200    1.50   5.50  2♠ S -2   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E1-Charney-Charney
        200    1.50   5.50  2♠ S -2   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E4-Lange-Boncich

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

North opens 1 and rebids 1NT over the 1 response. That will buy the hand most of the time. Six tricks are all there are to be had when the A is in East's hand. At least they lead clubs and create a club trick for declarer.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

11 ♠K76
K863
AJ62
♣96
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AQ98
92
KQ87
♣873
♠T54
QT7
3
♣AKJT42
♠J32
AJ54
T954
♣Q5
11
1110
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2  ♣4 ♠4 NT5
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -100 3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
    PASS       6.50   0.50  Pass Out  E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E5-Upson-Weiss
    PASS       6.50   0.50  Pass Out  E7-Little-Little vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
         50    5.00   2.00  3 N -1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        100    4.00   3.00  3 S -2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        110    2.00   5.00  2♣ E +1   E1-Block-Eddy vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        110    2.00   5.00  2♣ E +1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E1-Charney-Charney
        110    2.00   5.00  2♣ E +1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E8-Muller-Newell
        130    0.00   7.00  3♣ E +1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

North has a handsome light-ish 1 opener, What will East do? Overcall 2 or 3? The latter is a lot more irritating, since it stops South from using a Negative Double . And 3 will buy the hand since North has opened light. The proponents of "eight ever, nine never" will make 3 this time.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
Pass13All pass

The Bidding: West falls short of the Rule of 20 and the Suggestion of 22 for a 1st or 2nd seat opener. North, in 3rd seat, opens 1. A 2 overcall by East would be obstructive and lead directional. Game isn't likely opposite a passed hand. An undisciplined jump to 3 seems best because it is far more obstructive. Here, a 3 overcall is likely to buy the contract.

At tables where East overcalls 2, South has a choice between passing, making Negative Double , and raising diamonds. South's 9 Support Points are inflated by their Queen-doubleton. Even so, South can reasonably make a Negative Double . The downside of doubling is that if West raises to 3, South will not know whether to compete to the 3-level opposite a potentially light 3rd seat opener. In Matchpoints , playing the wrong partscore can cost a lot of Matchpoints. Doubling seems best. West, with 12 Support Points for clubs, cue bids 2 to show an invitational club raise. North's 2 bid is natural and shows a reasonable 3rd seat opener. West's 2 cue bid forced East-West to 3. Many partnerships treat a 3 bid here as the weakest possible action. With that agreement, East can pass to show better than a minimum 2 overcall, but not enough strength to accept a game try. Here, East has less than expected for a constructive 2 overcall. So East bids 3. The Law of Total Tricks advises against competing to the 3-level, but South may reasonably do so given the double fit.

The Play in 3: The "8 Ever, 9 Never" adage advises declarer to play for the drop of the Queen. Declarer has 2 quick heart losers, but can ruff the 3rd round of hearts in the short hand. Declarer can establish a diamond trick by force. Declarer's finesse against the King loses. Declarer has 9 tricks: 1 + 1 ruff + 1 + 6.

The Play in 3: East is likely to cash their club honors and switch to their singleton diamond. West splits their honors and declarer wins their Ace. Declarer is fortunate the Qxx is onside. Declarer has 7 tricks in the red suits. A lobbing finesse towards the King provides declarer's 8th trick. 3 down 1 is a profitable sacrifice over 3.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

12 ♠A732
976
5
♣A9862
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠KT6
AT854
4
♣T754
♠J85
KJ2
AKQJ98
♣K
♠Q94
Q3
T7632
♣QJ3
8
718
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT4
EW: 1♣ 4 5 1♠ 3NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          7.00   0.00  3N E -1   E7-Little-Little vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        130    5.00   2.00  3 E +1   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        130    5.00   2.00  3 E +1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E8-Muller-Newell
        130    5.00   2.00  2 E +2   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E1-Charney-Charney
        400    3.00   4.00  3N W      E4-Eby-Eby vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        420    1.50   5.50  4 W      E1-Block-Eddy vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        420    1.50   5.50  4 W      E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E5-Upson-Weiss
        430    0.00   7.00  3N W +1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E4-Lange-Boncich

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and West replies 1. If North doubles, it would allow East to Redouble to show three card heart support. West will answer as cheaply as possible--only going to game if East makes him. I doubt that game will be reached often. If North passes and East rebids 3, West is unlikely to bid again with only seven HCP and what he fears is a nasty misfit.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

13 ♠AK42
74
Q8643
♣95
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠Q
KJ5
92
♣AK87643
♠9763
Q98632
AK
♣Q
♠JT85
AT
JT75
♣JT2
9
1311
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣2 ♥2 NT5
EW: 5♣ 5 2NT  ♦5 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        200    7.00   0.00  3 E +2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        620    5.50   1.50  4 E      E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E8-Muller-Newell
        620    5.50   1.50  4 E      E7-Little-Little vs E1-Charney-Charney
        650    2.00   5.00  4 E +1   E1-Block-Eddy vs E5-Upson-Weiss
        650    2.00   5.00  4 E +1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        650    2.00   5.00  4 E +1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        650    2.00   5.00  4 E +1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        650    2.00   5.00  4 E +1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

This may well pass around to West to open 1. Eat bids 1 and rebids her hearts. Then West will raise, but it's hard for East to imagine game and take the risk for +620--or even +650. East needs to deal with his spade losers ASAP. If South leads the J, North will win the K and shoot back a heart. South wins the A and leads another. Still, declarer can lead a club to her Queen, ruff a spade, and then pitch two spades on the AK.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

14 ♠QT53
Q9
A76
♣AJ98
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠8642
K754
K85
♣Q5
♠AK7
A6
QJT3
♣T743
♠J9
JT832
942
♣K62
13
814
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♥6
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         90    5.50   1.50  1N E      E1-Block-Eddy vs E5-Upson-Weiss
         90    5.50   1.50  1N E      E2-Cohen-Maja vs E6-Baca-Seckel
         90    5.50   1.50  1N E      E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
         90    5.50   1.50  2 E      E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        100    3.00   4.00  2♣ S -2   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        120    1.00   6.00  2N E      E4-Eby-Eby vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        120    1.00   6.00  1N E +1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E8-Muller-Newell
        120    1.00   6.00  1N E +1   E7-Little-Little vs E1-Charney-Charney

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and will probably play 1NT. What will South lead? West has bid hearts and no one has bid spades, so he can visualize his partner with some points (the opponents stopped at the one level) as well as spade length. I don't generally advocate doubleton leads against NT, but the J would work well this time.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

15 ♠A976
72
963
♣JT98
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠J842
J854
T2
♣743
♠QT3
AK9
A84
♣K652
♠K5
QT63
KQJ75
♣AQ
5
216
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 1 1♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥6/5 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          7.00   0.00  2 W -4   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
  150          5.00   2.00  1N S +2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E6-Baca-Seckel
  150          5.00   2.00  1N S +2   E4-Eby-Eby vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
  150          5.00   2.00  1N S +2   E7-Little-Little vs E1-Charney-Charney
  130          2.00   5.00  3 S +1   E1-Block-Eddy vs E5-Upson-Weiss
  130          2.00   5.00  3 S +1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E4-Lange-Boncich
  130          2.00   5.00  2 S +2   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
  120          0.00   7.00  1N S +1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E8-Muller-Newell

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

South is almost too good for 1NT, but it may be the best choice. This passes to East. Bid--or just be a nasty surprise for declarer? Since the bid hand is on my left, I'd pass with the East hand. East's caution is rewarded when the dummy's value shows him how broke West must be. Whichever major West chooses will help make East's defense easier, giving him an exit strategy.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

16 ♠K8
AKQ5
642
♣7532
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠QJT65
T873
J8
♣QT
♠973
J964
KQT9
♣A8
♠A42
2
A753
♣KJ964
12
610
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 2 1♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  400          6.50   0.50  3N S      E2-Cohen-Maja vs E5-Upson-Weiss
  400          6.50   0.50  5♣ N      E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
  300          5.00   2.00  3 E -3   E1-Block-Eddy vs E4-Lange-Boncich
  130          3.50   3.50  3♣ N +1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E1-Charney-Charney
  130          3.50   3.50  3♣ N +1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
         50    1.50   5.50  3N N -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
         50    1.50   5.50  3N N -1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        150    0.00   7.00  3N S -3   E7-Little-Little vs E8-Muller-Newell

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

North will be dismayed when he opens 1 and South raises clubs. But he gamely bids his heart stoppers and is delighted when South bids 3NT. Luckily, West is on lead and starts with the Q--diamonds would be a lot scarier. The game will founder on the normal play of low to the J.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

17 ♠J63
J643
QJ87
♣T6
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠974
KT75
A
♣AK952
♠52
A92
9432
♣QJ74
♠AKQT8
Q8
KT65
♣83
5
147
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 4♣ 3 2NT  ♦5 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         50    6.50   0.50  3♠ S -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
         50    6.50   0.50  3♠ N -1   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E5-Upson-Weiss
        130    2.50   4.50  4♣ W      E4-Eby-Eby vs E1-Charney-Charney
        130    2.50   4.50  4♣ W      E8-Dow-Slayton vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        130    2.50   4.50  3♣ W +1   E1-Block-Eddy vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        130    2.50   4.50  3♣ W +1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        130    2.50   4.50  3♣ W +1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        130    2.50   4.50  3♣ W +1   E7-Little-Little vs E8-Muller-Newell

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

South opens 1. West bids 2 and North squeaks out 2. East may well bid 3 with four card support, an Ace and a useful doubleton. That's getting rich for South and he passes--no pushing on equal vulnerability.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

18 ♠T64
2
AQJ4
♣QT943
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠K5
QJT87643
72
♣8
♠A9873
AK5
KT5
♣72
♠QJ2
9
9863
♣AKJ65
9
614
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♥1 ♠4 NT3
EW: 5 2♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♦4
LoTT: 19 - 21 = -2
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        420    7.00   0.00  4♠ E      E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        450    6.00   1.00  4 W +1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E1-Charney-Charney
        480    3.00   4.00  5 W +1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        480    3.00   4.00  5 W +1   E7-Little-Little vs E8-Muller-Newell
        480    3.00   4.00  5 W +1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        480    3.00   4.00  4 W +2   E1-Block-Eddy vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        480    3.00   4.00  4 W +2   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        500    0.00   7.00  5♣* S -2  E2-Cohen-Maja vs E5-Upson-Weiss

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East opens 1. West's bid will depend on their agreements. If 4 is a Splinter in support of spades, he'll have to go another route: perhaps a forcing NT followed by 4. What will North lead? It sounds like West has an eight card suit, so he may cash his diamond Ace. In that case, South should play the 3 and hope partner will shift to a club. Otherwise, declarer can set up the spades and get a sluff for that loser.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

19 ♠A854
Q42
AJ6
♣T92
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KQT7
9
T9754
♣AQ6
♠9
J763
K32
♣K8543
♠J632
AKT85
Q8
♣J7
11
117
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♦4
EW: 2♣ 3  ♥5 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          7.00   0.00  3 S      E8-Dow-Slayton vs E1-Charney-Charney
  100          6.00   1.00  1N E -1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E6-Baca-Seckel
    PASS       5.00   2.00  Pass Out  E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E5-Upson-Weiss
         50    2.50   4.50  4 S -1   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E4-Lange-Boncich
         50    2.50   4.50  3 S -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
         50    2.50   4.50  2 S -1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E8-Muller-Newell
         50    2.50   4.50  2 N -1   E7-Little-Little vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        100    0.00   7.00  4 S -2   E1-Block-Eddy vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
20 ♠A6
AKQ
Q876
♣AK93
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T875
97652
KT
♣Q5
♠Q43
T843
J43
♣T76
♠KJ92
J
A952
♣J842
22
53
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6 3 5♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2 NT1
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +1440 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
 1440          6.00   1.00  6N S      E4-Eby-Eby vs E8-Muller-Newell
 1440          6.00   1.00  6N N      E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E5-Upson-Weiss
 1440          6.00   1.00  6N N      E7-Little-Little vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
  690          4.00   3.00  3N N +3   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E1-Charney-Charney
        100    2.50   4.50  6N N -1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        100    2.50   4.50  6N N -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        200    1.00   6.00  6N S -2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        300    0.00   7.00  6N N -3   E1-Block-Eddy vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
21 ♠K965
J53
AQ763
♣T
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠J84
872
K982
♣A54
♠T7
Q9
JT4
♣KJ8763
♠AQ32
AKT64
5
♣Q92
10
87
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 6 6♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠0 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +1430 6♠-NS/6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  680          5.00   2.00  4♠ N +2   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E6-Baca-Seckel
  680          5.00   2.00  4♠ N +2   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E5-Upson-Weiss
  680          5.00   2.00  4♠ N +2   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E1-Charney-Charney
  680          5.00   2.00  4 S +2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E4-Lange-Boncich
  680          5.00   2.00  4 S +2   E7-Little-Little vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
  650          1.50   5.50  4 S +1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E8-Muller-Newell
  650          1.50   5.50  4 S +1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
  620          0.00   7.00  4 S      E1-Block-Eddy vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
22 ♠5
873
J93
♣KT8652
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠A8
KQT52
7652
♣A9
♠KQJT3
J9
K84
♣J74
♠97642
A64
AQT
♣Q3
4
1311
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 1 1 2♠ 2NT  ♣4
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -100 3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         50    7.00   0.00  3♣ N -1   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E1-Charney-Charney
        100    6.00   1.00  4♣ N -2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        110    5.00   2.00  2♠ E      E8-Dow-Slayton vs E8-Muller-Newell
        120    4.00   3.00  2N E      E7-Little-Little vs E6-Baca-Seckel
        180    2.50   4.50  2N E +2   E1-Block-Eddy vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        180    2.50   4.50  2N E +2   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        630    1.00   6.00  3N E +1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E5-Upson-Weiss
        660    0.00   7.00  3N E +2   E4-Eby-Eby vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
23 ♠7
J9
KT962
♣Q9876
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠Q963
K43
A5
♣JT52
♠JT8542
QT7
QJ7
♣4
♠AK
A8652
843
♣AK3
6
106
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 2 1NT  ♠5
EW: 2♠  ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +600 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  600          7.00   0.00  3N N      E8-Dow-Slayton vs E8-Muller-Newell
  120          6.00   1.00  2N S      E4-Eby-Eby vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
        100    4.00   3.00  3N N -1   E1-Block-Eddy vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
        100    4.00   3.00  3N N -1   E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E4-Lange-Boncich
        100    4.00   3.00  2N N -1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E5-Upson-Weiss
        200    1.00   6.00  3N N -2   E2-Cohen-Maja vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
        200    1.00   6.00  3N N -2   E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E1-Charney-Charney
        200    1.00   6.00  3N N -2   E7-Little-Little vs E6-Baca-Seckel
24 ♠T83
T4
K8765
♣AJ7
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠J76
975
QJ42
♣654
♠K952
QJ2
T3
♣QT98
♠AQ4
AK863
A9
♣K32
8
48
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 4 5/4♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +450 5♠-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  430          6.50   0.50  3N S +1   E3-Lesieutre-Borucki vs E5-Upson-Weiss
  430          6.50   0.50  3N S +1   E4-Eby-Eby vs E7-Ricketts-Hawley
  400          3.50   3.50  3N S      E1-Block-Eddy vs E2-Boehne-Jackson
  400          3.50   3.50  3N S      E2-Cohen-Maja vs E3-Shellooe-Maddox
  400          3.50   3.50  3N S      E5-Lauderdale-Stern vs E1-Charney-Charney
  400          3.50   3.50  3N N      E6-Lach-Vanmiddlesworth vs E4-Lange-Boncich
         50    0.50   6.50  3N S -1   E7-Little-Little vs E6-Baca-Seckel
         50    0.50   6.50  3N S -1   E8-Dow-Slayton vs E8-Muller-Newell