- Friday Aft - September 21, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 635 MP  Geomean: 194 MP
(based on 14 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Alan Hedegard - Peter De Gregorio 71.25 1st OA 2.63
Elizabeth Nasr - Michel Nasr 51.25 2/3rd OA 1.73
Elizabeth Sebring - Janet Hedlund 51.25 2/3rd OA 1.73
Barbara Callaway - Mary Quenette 45.00 2nd OB 1.01
Doris Jones - Ginger Minor 44.79 2nd SC 0.41
EVENT>Steinbeck Friday         |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> FF
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 21, 2018 |CLUB NO.>136838    | 09/21/2018 16:08
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Janet Hedlund   |RATING>Club ACBL Membership         |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   24.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/300  |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=7/B=5/C=4                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Anjalie Kulkarni       Jan Yaxtheimer           C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     21.00  43.75
 2 Doris Jones            Ginger Minor             C   .     .     .   |   .     .     2     21.50  44.79  0.41(SC)
 3 Janet Hedlund          Elizabeth Sebring        B  2/3    1     .   |  2/3    1     .     24.60  51.25  1.73(OA)
 4 Alan Hedegard          Peter De Gregorio        A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     34.20  71.25  2.63(OA)
 6 Mary Quenette          Barbara Callaway         C   .     2     .   |   .     2     1     21.60  45.00  1.01(OB)
 7 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A  2/3    .     .   |  2/3    .     .     24.60  51.25  1.73(OA)
 8 Sam Callaway           David Ow                 C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     21.00  43.75
                                          Totals                                            168.50

Hands and Results
1 ♠K97
AJ8
Q743
♣Q97
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J8543
97
T
♣AKJ64
♠T6
QT42
KJ9852
♣2
♠AQ2
K653
A6
♣T853
12
96
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1/- 2 1♠ 2NT  ♦7/6
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1100          2.00   0.00  4♠* W -5  8  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  430          1.00   1.00  3N N +1   8  FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
  100          0.00   2.00  2♠ W -2   3  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North opens 1, which East quietly passes. South bids 1 and West either passes or makes a 2 Michaels Cue Bid cuebid (or double, or 2NT). If he does cuebid, North can make a Support Double(s) , East chooses 2, and so South probably just opts for 3NT (or bids 2 if he has room, whereupon North bids 2NT, and South goes to 3NT, or South bids 3 and North bids 3NT.)
But there just aren't enough tricks here. Declarer does have and stopped, but then just has no real source anywhere. He can get 3, 2, 1, and 1, and then will have to be creative to even get to 8 tricks by finagling one more out of the suit, or throw East in with to hopefully lead to the .



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠AJT984
Q2
T9865
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠Q7
JT543
A7
♣AT82
♠5
K97
KQ32
♣KJ973
♠K632
A86
J4
♣Q654
7
1112
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♠  ♣2 ♦5/6 ♥3 NT5
EW: 5♣ 3/4  ♦6 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 21 - 19 = +2
Par: -200 5♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  3♠ N +2   K  FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
   50          1.00   1.00  4 W -1   6  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        130    0.00   2.00  3♣ E +1   4  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1, setting himself up for a good 2 rebid when partner picks , and South passes. West somewhat surprisingly bids 1, and North now tries 2. East passes that with a minimum and only 3-card support, but South likely bumps to 3. West might want to say something with his 11 points, and could double, so East has little choice but to correct to 4 (or 4, which West might also take to game, but also might rebid 4 and get to it that way). Funnily enough, that might be enough for South to take the "sacrifice" to 4 if the colors were different, but as they are, he probably just passes.
4 would have made today (on careful play)! That's especially galling today as West makes his 4, losing 1, 1, and 1 ruff if NS can get that figured out, although that might not be the easiest.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠4
AKT87
A65
♣AKJ4
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠A
QJ5432
KQJ72
♣3
♠KQJ9762
-
94
♣T976
♠T853
96
T83
♣Q852
19
136
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1/- 1 2NT  ♦7/6 ♠4
EW: 2♠  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          1.50   0.50  4♠* E -1  9  FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
  200          1.50   0.50  4♠ E -2   3  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        790    0.00   2.00  4♠* E     4  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South passes and West opens 1, so North is really in a bind. He has an awfully good hand, but the opponents are vulnerable, so he passes and hopes to defend this for something like +200. East bids 1, West rebids 2, and now North has to say something and doubles. East rebids 2, and when that passes back to North, he doubles again. South is forced to pick 3, and now we might come to a bunch of different endpoints - West might bid again with his 6-5, East might bid again with his 7-card , or they might both pass.
The most interesting contract to play might be 3 in East - if the defense doesn't lead trump (or lead and shift to trump), declarer could get away with losing just 1 and 3!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠AT5
AJ542
3
♣J962
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠943
KT9873
T52
♣3
♠Q862
Q
AK96
♣AKQT
♠KJ7
6
QJ874
♣8754
10
320
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6/5 ♦6/5 ♥4/3 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1 2 1♠ 1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -110 2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  4♠ E -3   6  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
  200          1.00   1.00  3N E -2   7  FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
   90          0.00   2.00  1N S      T  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes, North passes, and East opens 1. South passes, and West makes a weak jump shift to 2. East should heed that weak bid and just pass, but it is possible he gets optimistic and bids 3NT. (Also possible he optimistically opened 2NT and got transferred to .) In any case, West probably doesn't let East play NT and corrects to at as low a level as he can.
In , North's holding will be a real pain. Declarer winds up with 3 and at least 2 to lose, although the defense might let him pitch a loser if they don't lead them right off.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠K83
QT
KT972
♣T98
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A4
KJ
AQ8
♣KQ7632
♠Q9765
653
53
♣AJ4
♠JT2
A98742
J64
♣5
8
197
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1  ♣2 ♠2 NT2
EW: 4♣ 2♠ 3NT  ♦6 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.00   1.00  5♣ W -1   Q  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
   50          1.00   1.00  5♣ W -1   T  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF2-Jones-Minor
   50          1.00   1.00  4♣ E -1   A  FF3-Hedlund-Sebring vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes, East passes, and South could open 2 but probably passes. Instead, West opens 2NT, giving himself credit for the long , and East transfers to . West completes the transfer, and when East offers 3NT, West is fine with that.
A lead is uncomfortable, but declarer can get through it. He's got 6, 1, 1, and 1. If he doesn't get a lead, though, he's got a chance for a whole bunch more tricks by setting up the .



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠T2
KT5
QJ94
♣9643
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠J965
QJ3
-
♣AQJ752
♠A73
764
KT863
♣T8
♠KQ84
A982
A752
♣K
6
117
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2  ♣4/5 ♠6 NT5
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 1/-NT
       ♦5/4 ♥5 NT7/6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  3♣ W -2   Q  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
         50    1.00   1.00  3 S -1   ♣A  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF2-Jones-Minor
        100    0.00   2.00  3* S -1  ♣A  FF3-Hedlund-Sebring vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East passes and South opens 1 probably (players who can open 1NT with this hand may prefer that.) Over 1, West probably bids 2 (this is the auction where that action can be taken a little bit light because it often forces the opponents in to a Negative Double auction, which is much less precise than if West passes and North can just bid at the 1-level.) But that lets North now just raise to 2, and now that South has the warning that his K is really not useful and partner doesn't have a Major, he can just let it go. (If South opened 1NT, West probably still interferes with his , maybe also introducing his , and plays it at the 2-level.)
It's a good stop in 2 - South loses quite a few tricks from the nasty split but still can make this with just 1, 2, 1, and 1 to lose.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠AT96
A
AQJT92
♣87
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠J7
Q9732
87654
♣6
♠843
JT54
K3
♣JT43
♠KQ52
K86
-
♣AKQ952
15
35
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 7♣ 5 2 7♠ 7NT
EW:  ♣0 ♦1 ♥5 ♠0 NT0
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +2220 7NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1460          2.00   0.00  6♠ S +1   3  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF2-Jones-Minor
 1370          1.00   1.00  6 N      J  FF3-Hedlund-Sebring vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
  690          0.00   2.00  3N N +3   4  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1 and North has enough values and shape to start with 1. South rebids 1 (or possibly 2 if he judges this good enough to Game Force with a jump shift), and North makes a 4th Suit Game Forcing bid of 2. Now South can rebid the , North can show support, and South can bid 4 to show the A. North likely then bids Keycard (he has all the other Aces, so cuebidding isn't very useful anymore), finds out South has 2, asks for Kings, finds out South has the K but probably not the K, and may well sign off in just 6 when he has a hard time counting to 13 tricks, but some players will go ahead to the 7-level, but guessing whether to play 7 or 7NT may come down to a gut feeling about the split.
As it happens, he does have 13 tricks if he chooses to double finesse the right away in NT or ruffs out the K in .



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠A654
T764
Q9
♣964
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠K97
KQ
K8754
♣753
♠8
J32
AJ62
♣AKJT8
♠QJT32
A985
T3
♣Q2
6
1114
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣1 ♦1 NT3
EW: 5♣ 5 1/2NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -400 5-EW/5♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   0.00  2♠ S -2   5  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF2-Jones-Minor
        150    1.00   1.00  4 W +1   ♠A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
        400    0.00   2.00  5 E      A  FF3-Hedlund-Sebring vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes, North passes, and East opens 1. South overcalls 1 and West bids 2 to show his limit raise in . North bids 3, which East doubles to show max values, and so West probably tries 3NT since he has the stopper.
Now if North leads , he'll give declarer this contract with 1, 5, and 5 on the Q drop. But if North intuits to get South in with a first and then push a through, they can beat the contract even though the suit blocks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠KQJ32
QJ
AT7
♣K76
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠876
AT65
Q2
♣QT32
♠A54
92
KJ93
♣J854
♠T9
K8743
8654
♣A9
16
89
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1 3♠ 2NT  ♣5
EW: 1♣  ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          2.00   0.00  3N N +1   9  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  140          1.00   1.00  3♠ N      9  FF6-Quenette-Callaway vs FF2-Jones-Minor
  120          0.00   2.00  1N S +1   ♣Q  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
10 ♠Q76
JT9
KQ874
♣32
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AT84
6
J2
♣AKQ874
♠J532
Q7
AT963
♣J5
♠K9
AK85432
5
♣T96
8
148
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♦4 ♠2 NT5
EW: 4♣ 2 4♠ 2/-NT
       ♥4 NT8/6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          1.50   0.50  5♣ W -1   J  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  100          1.50   0.50  5♣ W -1   J  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
        100    0.00   2.00  3 S -1   ♣A  FF6-Quenette-Callaway vs FF2-Jones-Minor
11 ♠743
AQ98
T5
♣KQJ5
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠QT8
K654
AJ8
♣987
♠A52
32
K9732
♣AT6
♠KJ96
JT7
Q64
♣432
12
1011
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 1  ♣6/7 ♦5 ♠6 NT5
EW: 2 1NT  ♣6 ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  260          2.00   0.00  1♠* S +1  A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
   90          1.00   1.00  1N N      3  FF6-Quenette-Callaway vs FF2-Jones-Minor
        150    0.00   2.00  1N E +2   ♠6  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
12 ♠AKT74
AJT72
KT3
♣-
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠9653
K83
9
♣KT642
♠2
64
AQ87
♣AJ8753
♠QJ8
Q95
J6542
♣Q9
15
611
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 4 4♠  ♣3 NT5
EW: 4♣  ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: +100 5♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.00   0.00  4♠ N      ♣A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        130    1.00   1.00  4♣ E      Q  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
        200    0.00   2.00  4 N -2   ♠2  FF6-Quenette-Callaway vs FF2-Jones-Minor
13 ♠Q
AKQ654
AJ62
♣T7
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠J865
J732
K
♣K643
♠K73
98
9854
♣AQ82
♠AT942
T
QT73
♣J95
16
89
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 4 2♠ 2NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.00   0.00  3 N +1   4  FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
  140          1.00   1.00  2 N +1   9  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        200    0.00   2.00  4 N -2   9  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
14 ♠K5
AQ72
A754
♣765
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AT87
J85
J32
♣KQ8
♠43
964
K98
♣AJ942
♠QJ962
KT3
QT6
♣T3
13
118
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2 2♠  ♣6 NT6
EW: 1♣  ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS/2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  1♠ S +1   ♣K  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
         90    1.00   1.00  2♣ W      Q  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
        100    0.00   2.00  4♠ S -2   ♣K  FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
15 ♠9865
KQT8
Q9873
♣-
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠K
A43
KJT62
♣6542
♠QJ42
97
A4
♣AJT93
♠AT73
J652
5
♣KQ87
7
1112
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♦4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 2 1NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -110 3♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  3N W -2   ♠5  FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
         90    1.00   1.00  2 W      T  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        110    0.00   2.00  3 W      K  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
16 ♠976
AKQ9
AT2
♣KT2
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠QJ5
JT
943
♣98754
♠T8432
8653
K85
♣6
♠AK
742
QJ76
♣AQJ3
16
43
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 6 6 3♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  990          2.00   0.00  6N S      ♠5  FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedlund-Sebring
  490          1.00   1.00  3N S +3   ♣9  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
  480          0.00   2.00  4 N +2   ♠3  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
17 ♠65
863
AK643
♣KJ7
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q9872
AKQ7
Q5
♣Q9
♠AJ4
J542
J7
♣A842
♠KT3
T9
T982
♣T653
11
1511
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3  ♥3 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3 3♠  ♣6 ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -100 4*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  4 E -1   4  FF3-Hedlund-Sebring vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        170    0.50   1.50  3♠ W +1   A  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
        170    0.50   1.50  3♠ W +1   A  FF6-Quenette-Callaway vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
18 ♠KQ832
8
K9
♣JT982
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠5
KJ9543
AT8
♣AK3
♠A4
A62
J65432
♣Q7
♠JT976
QT7
Q7
♣654
9
1511
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 NT1
EW: 1♣ 6 6 5NT  ♠6
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -980 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.50   0.50  3N W -1   ♠3  FF6-Quenette-Callaway vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
   50          1.50   0.50  6 W -1   ♠Q  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
        450    0.00   2.00  5 W      ♠K  FF3-Hedlund-Sebring vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
19 ♠A62
AJ83
AK54
♣76
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KT985
52
32
♣9853
♠3
T7
QJT9876
♣JT4
♠QJ74
KQ964
-
♣AKQ2
16
34
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 2 7 4♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦5 ♥0 ♠3 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +1510 7-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  980          2.00   0.00  6 S      ♠T  FF6-Quenette-Callaway vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  510          1.00   1.00  4 S +3   ♣5  FF3-Hedlund-Sebring vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  480          0.00   2.00  4 S +2   3  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
20 ♠KT6
75
A42
♣AJ986
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠52
KJ96
T97653
♣5
♠843
AQT32
KJ
♣KQ7
♠AQJ97
84
Q8
♣T432
12
415
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦5 ♥4
EW: 2 3  ♣4 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  5 E -2   ♠K  FF3-Hedlund-Sebring vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  100          1.00   1.00  4 E -1   ♠A  FF2-Jones-Minor vs FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio
        140    0.00   2.00  3 E      ♣2  FF6-Quenette-Callaway vs FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
21 ♠A98
7652
K9
♣AJ98
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KQ3
43
87532
♣KQ4
♠J76
KQ
AQJ64
♣753
♠T542
AJT98
T
♣T62
12
1013
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 1♠  ♦4 NT5
EW: 3 1NT  ♣5 ♥5 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: -110 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.00   0.00  3 E      ♣T  FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        130    1.00   1.00  3 E +1   A  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
        200    0.00   2.00  4 S -2   3  FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Jones-Minor
22 ♠96
KT872
J42
♣Q32
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠3
A64
KQ873
♣A854
♠AKQ75
95
A95
♣J96
♠JT842
QJ3
T6
♣KT7
6
1314
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 5 1 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    2.00   0.00  2♠ E +1   Q  FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Jones-Minor
        630    0.50   1.50  3N W +1   8  FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        630    0.50   1.50  3N W +1   7  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
23 ♠KJ986
A5
Q3
♣A643
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠QT74
84
T9642
♣J2
♠A32
T9632
K87
♣Q8
♠5
KQJ7
AJ5
♣KT975
14
39
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 3 5 5♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT1
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +1440 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  720          1.50   0.50  3N S +4   T  FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Jones-Minor
  720          1.50   0.50  3N S +4   4  FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  690          0.00   2.00  3N S +3   4  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
24 ♠AK3
A95
J
♣KT9874
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠QJT65
KQ6
Q43
♣32
♠9874
732
KT9
♣AJ5
♠2
JT84
A87652
♣Q6
15
108
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 4 1♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.00   0.00  3N N      ♠9  FF4-Hedegard-De Gregorio vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  110          1.00   1.00  2♣ N +1   ♠9  FF8-Callaway-Ow vs FF6-Quenette-Callaway
         50    0.00   2.00  3N N -1   ♠9  FF1-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Jones-Minor