- Saturday Morn - February 17, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 1016 MP  Geomean: 349 MP
(based on 13 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
George Slemmons - Judy Slemmons 72.50 1st A 0.70
Carol Maggipinto - Mark Maggipinto 58.33 2nd A 0.49
Leon Heller - Patricia Heller 47.50 3rd A 0.35
Cord Hedegard - Elizabeth Sebring 46.25 1st B 0.24
EVENT>Sat Morning Open Game    |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>February 17, 2018  |CLUB NO.>150680    | 02/17/2018 14:38
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   24.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/2000/750  |CLUB>H & H  Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=7/B=3/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 2 Judy Slemmons          George Slemmons          A    1     .     .     34.80  72.50  0.70(A)
 3 Patricia Heller        Leon Heller              A    3     .     .     22.80  47.50  0.35(A)
 4 Carol Maggipinto       Mark Maggipinto          A    2     .     .     28.00  58.33  0.49(A)
 5 Ann Donaldson          Sharyn Siebert           C    .     .     .     21.00  43.75
 6 Elizabeth Sebring      Cord Hedegard            C    .     1     1     22.20  46.25  0.24(B)
 7 Doris Jones            Carolyn Taggert          C    .     .     .     21.60  45.00
 8 Joan Roberts           Janet Hedlund            A    .     .     .     16.80  35.00
                                          Totals                         167.20

Hands and Results
1 ♠KT965
QT8
AK32
♣3
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠74
963
87654
♣AKT
♠AJ82
AK72
QJ
♣Q98
♠Q3
J54
T9
♣J76542
12
717
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
EW: 1♣ 2 2 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  2♠ N      K  O7-Jones-Taggert vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
         90    1.00   1.00  1N E      ♠Q  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
        120    0.00   2.00  1N E +1   ♠Q  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O3-Heller-Heller

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 11NTPass
PassPass  

The diamond suit is remarkably situated -- the QJ doubleton and T9 doubleton combine nicely with the dummy's diamond spots to make that suit a source of three tricks for declarer. The only other source of tricks for declarer to develop would be hearts, but that suit will not generate an extra trick just 35.53% of the time -- when hearts are 3-3. Perhaps one would think not to play on diamonds because the odds are not much different, but the difference is that the defense can take diamonds at any time, so it won't hurt to take inevitable losers while trying simultaneously to set up long card winners.

How did we get to that point? South will undoubtedly lead the Q, won by East. Then a diamond can be lost. North will set up his spades, making use of the excellent spot cards, and South will play another diamond. North can cash his spades to add to the two diamond tricks, but that's it for the defense.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠K87543
J3
AJ7
♣T9
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠9
AT865
852
♣AQ72
♠T2
Q972
KQ
♣K8543
♠AQJ6
K4
T9643
♣J6
9
1010
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠  ♣3 ♥3 NT6
EW: 4♣ 4  ♦4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -200 4♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   0.00  3♠ N      2  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O3-Heller-Heller
        170    1.00   1.00  3 W +1   ♠8  O7-Jones-Taggert vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
        420    0.00   2.00  4 W      ♠5  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
1122
3Pass34
PassPassPass 

Everyone has reason to bid, but not with much gusto. East passed the aceless, trickless, 11-count, and learned much about the distribution of the hand through listening to the auction. East's cue bid of 2 showed a limit raise or better in hearts, so West, holding minimal values but an interesting singleton spade and useful club values, ventured forth with a 3 "values here" bid, and THAT induced East to bid the game. Couple the double fit with the diamond control and some sign of life from West, and East's action can be appreciated.

N-S in theory can improve their lot with a vulnerable sacrifice, but since most will not bid the EW game, that won't much improve their standing on the board.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠64
Q85
QT8
♣98762
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J85
K74
432
♣AKT4
♠K9732
2
KJ75
♣QJ5
♠AQT
AJT963
A96
♣3
4
1110
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 1NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♠4
EW: 1♣ 3/2♠  ♦6 ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +200 4♠*-E-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.00   0.00  3 S +1   ♣A  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
  140          1.00   1.00  3 S      ♣A  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O3-Heller-Heller
  100          0.00   2.00  2♠ E -1   ♣3  O7-Jones-Taggert vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
PassPass12
23PassPass
Pass   

The Law is not with EW to push on to 3, nor does either have the wherewithal to push on with power. North was right to bid 3 according to the Law, of course, and most should play a heart part score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠92
AKT654
T73
♣T4
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AT64
Q7
KQ95
♣Q72
♠Q75
J98
J642
♣J95
♠KJ83
32
A8
♣AK863
7
135
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 4 1/2♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.00   0.00  4 N      2  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
  120          1.00   1.00  2N S      5  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O3-Heller-Heller
        100    0.00   2.00  3 N -1   2  O7-Jones-Taggert vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
12PassPass
Pass   

Well? What's YOUR definition of a vulnerable weak jump shift overcall? I'd rather keep the overall hand value up toward the opening bid range for a simple overcall, so North's hand meets the pushy WJO definition. The idea is that North wants to combine preemption with definition both for the actual holding during the preempt along with better definition for the overcall.

South has just too many losers to imagine game, which requires finding a favorable club location and adding a tad of technique. Probably best to duck the opening K lead, to set up a diamond ruff in the South hand, and then use the club suit as transportation to achieve it.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠J97
8643
K53
♣K54
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QT865432
J
92
♣J7
♠A
QT952
AJ76
♣QT6
♠K
AK7
QT84
♣A9832
7
413
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 1 1NT  ♠4
EW: 2♠  ♣4 ♦5/4 ♥6/5 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +100 3♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.00   0.00  3N E -3   ♣3  O7-Jones-Taggert vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
        140    1.00   1.00  3♠ W      ♣K  O3-Heller-Heller vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        200    0.00   2.00  2♣ S -2   J  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Slemmons-Slemmons
6 ♠K72
4
7652
♣AQ982
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠A65
AT972
K8
♣JT3
♠QT94
J5
QT93
♣764
♠J83
KQ863
AJ4
♣K5
9
125
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 1 2NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.00   0.00  3N N      ♠4  O7-Jones-Taggert vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
  120          0.50   1.50  2N S      ♠5  O3-Heller-Heller vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
  120          0.50   1.50  1N N +1   T  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Slemmons-Slemmons
7 ♠QJT98
64
T2
♣AQT6
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K764
AK7532
-
♣J94
♠3
JT9
AKQJ87
♣875
♠A52
Q8
96543
♣K32
9
1111
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/2♣ 1/2♠
       ♣6/8 ♦5 ♥1/2 NT3/5
EW: 2 3 2NT  ♣5 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        650    2.00   0.00  4 W +1   ♠Q  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Slemmons-Slemmons
        680    0.50   1.50  4 W +2   ♠Q  O3-Heller-Heller vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        680    0.50   1.50  4 W +2   ♠8  O7-Jones-Taggert vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
8 ♠J43
T73
A632
♣JT6
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AKQ965
A2
QJT8
♣4
♠8
KQJ854
-
♣AQ9873
♠T72
96
K9754
♣K52
6
1612
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥0 ♠0 NT0
EW: 5♣ 3 7 7♠ 5NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -1510 7♠-EW/7-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.50   0.50  6 E -1   9  O3-Heller-Heller vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
   50          1.50   0.50  6♣ E -1   6  O7-Jones-Taggert vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
        980    0.00   2.00  6 E      7  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Slemmons-Slemmons

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1Pass2Pass
3!Pass4Pass
4Pass7All pass

When two suits each produce six tricks and there are two side first round controls, a grand slam can be made via Route 66!

The bidding is much too optimistic in the above diagram, for the grand slam is only 35.53% to make, depending on 3-3 spades, but the idea behind the exhibited bidding is at least based on some reason: The partnership plays that the 3 jump rebid promises at least AKQxxx and a side ace or king, not just a good hand with a fair suit. Accordingly, the control bidding toward the grand slam actually seems rational, if pushy. East may hope that West might produce the J or T(9) with the jack falling, or have a seven card suit. So the rather poor actual percentage is a worst case scenario as far as conceiving of the odds of making the ambitious grand. Of course, things could be rather horrid, say, on a 5-1 adverse split, but down is down when in a grand slam, and that bad split is already considered in the odds for making.

So -- East would be on very much better footing with a doubleton spade and a club fewer, when the odds of making the grand would be improved to 67.83%, when based on a 6-2 fit.

THEN the ideas based on the solid suit plus imaginative bidding would be more impressive.

And yet there will be pairs languishing in mere games, so bidding a solid small slam in either major will produce more than an average board -- maybe above 60%?



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠96
AQ875
J98
♣Q76
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AK53
T3
654
♣8532
♠QJT872
2
AKT2
♣JT
♠4
KJ964
Q73
♣AK94
9
711
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4  ♦4 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1 3♠  ♣4 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +200 4♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.00   0.00  3 S +1   ♠A  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
         50    0.50   1.50  5 S -1   ♠A  O6-Sebring-Hedegard vs O2-Slemmons-Slemmons
         50    0.50   1.50  5 S -1   ♠A  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Heller-Heller
10 ♠Q963
JT
A97542
♣6
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠8
AK98432
J
♣QT32
♠AJ52
76
63
♣A9874
♠KT74
Q5
KQT8
♣KJ5
7
109
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2♠  ♣2 ♥2 NT4
EW: 5♣ 5 1NT  ♦4 ♠4
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        200    1.50   0.50  3 W +2   ♣6  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
        200    1.50   0.50  4 S -2   A  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Heller-Heller
        800    0.00   2.00  5* S -3  A  O6-Sebring-Hedegard vs O2-Slemmons-Slemmons
11 ♠AQJ42
J8
Q4
♣9753
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠K85
Q3
JT973
♣JT6
♠63
AT2
K852
♣Q842
♠T97
K97654
A6
♣AK
10
79
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2♣ 1/- 4 6/5♠ 3/2NT
       ♦7/6
EW:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +980 6♠-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          2.00   0.00  4♠ N +1   2  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Heller-Heller
  420          1.00   1.00  4 S      J  O6-Sebring-Hedegard vs O2-Slemmons-Slemmons
        150    0.00   2.00  4 S -3   3  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
12 ♠QT
AJ754
3
♣KT942
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠J765432
93
74
♣A6
♠A8
Q8
KQJ862
♣Q83
♠K9
KT62
AT95
♣J75
10
514
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 1NT  ♦6 ♠5
EW: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +500 4♠*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.00   0.00  4♠ W -3   3  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
  140          1.00   1.00  3 N      K  O6-Sebring-Hedegard vs O2-Slemmons-Slemmons
        100    0.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♠A  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Heller-Heller
13 ♠72
A93
AJT32
♣J63
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠QT
T754
K6
♣98754
♠AKJ4
KQ862
Q5
♣AK
♠98653
J
9874
♣QT2
10
522
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2
EW: 2♣ 5 3♠ 2NT  ♦5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  3N E -1   ♠8  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O7-Jones-Taggert
        620    1.00   1.00  4 EW      ♠A  O5-Donaldson-Siebert vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
        650    0.00   2.00  4 E +1   ♠9  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
14 ♠T952
J4
J98
♣7654
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K4
AK97
A752
♣QJT
♠AQ863
T63
Q
♣AK93
♠J7
Q852
KT643
♣82
2
1715
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT2
EW: 6♣ 3 6 6♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -980 6♠-EW/6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        430    2.00   0.00  3N W +1   ♣7  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O7-Jones-Taggert
        490    1.00   1.00  3N W +3   ♠T  O5-Donaldson-Siebert vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
        990    0.00   2.00  6N W      J  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
15 ♠T
K852
KQ8753
♣87
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠K83
Q73
A4
♣AKT93
♠J65
AJT9
962
♣Q65
♠AQ9742
64
JT
♣J42
8
168
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT2
EW: 5♣ 1 4 2/1♠ 5NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.00   0.00  3♣ W      ♠T  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O7-Jones-Taggert
        430    0.50   1.50  3N W +1   ♠T  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        430    0.50   1.50  3N W +1   K  O5-Donaldson-Siebert vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
16 ♠KJ542
KJT8
Q
♣842
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠T973
AQ94
4
♣AKT9
♠Q8
632
AT652
♣QJ5
♠A6
75
KJ9873
♣763
10
139
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1/2♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♦6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  2N W -1   ♠4  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O7-Jones-Taggert
         50    1.00   1.00  2 S -1   ♣A  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
         90    0.00   2.00  1N E      9  O5-Donaldson-Siebert vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
17 ♠-
QJ8
542
♣AK87542
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠QJT862
KT95
K8
♣Q
♠A7543
743
JT3
♣J3
♠K9
A62
AQ976
♣T96
10
116
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5/6♣ 5/6 1 4NT  ♠5
EW: 2♠  ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 NT2
LoTT: 20 - 21 = -1
Par: +800 6♠*-EW-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.00   0.00  4♣ N +2   J  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
  150          1.00   1.00  5♠ W -3   ♣A  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
   50          0.00   2.00  5 E -1   ♣Q  O3-Heller-Heller vs O7-Jones-Taggert
18 ♠86
QJ
A95
♣K98642
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠7
KT7632
KQJ743
♣-
♠AQ5
85
T86
♣AQJT3
♠KJT9432
A94
2
♣75
10
913
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3♠  ♦2 ♥3 NT6
EW: 4 4 1/-NT
       ♣6/5 ♠4 NT7/5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -200 4♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  3N E -1   ♠J  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        100    1.00   1.00  3♠ S -1   K  O3-Heller-Heller vs O7-Jones-Taggert
        400    0.00   2.00  5 W      ♠8  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
19 ♠974
72
Q8
♣KQJT92
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠Q62
KQJT
KT964
♣7
♠AKJT5
A86
752
♣A3
♠83
9543
AJ3
♣8654
8
1116
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2 ♥2 ♠1 NT2
EW: 5 5 6♠ 4NT  ♣6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -1400 7♣*-NS-6
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        150    2.00   0.00  1 W +4   ♣K  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
        620    1.00   1.00  4♠ E      ♣4  O3-Heller-Heller vs O7-Jones-Taggert
        650    0.00   2.00  5♠ E      ♣8  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
20 ♠QJT4
865
AQ832
♣7
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AK965
J
6
♣QT8653
♠83
AT92
T9
♣AJ942
♠72
KQ743
KJ754
♣K
9
109
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2  ♣1 ♠3 NT4
EW: 6♣ 4♠ 2NT  ♦4 ♥5
LoTT: 20 - 21 = -1
Par: -1100 6*-NS/6*-NS-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   0.00  4 S -1   ♠A  O2-Slemmons-Slemmons vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        620    0.50   1.50  5♣ W +1   6  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
        620    0.50   1.50  5♣ W +1   A  O3-Heller-Heller vs O7-Jones-Taggert
21 ♠92
KT942
4
♣AT742
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠J753
Q8
Q765
♣J86
♠AKQ4
AJ75
AT983
♣-
♠T86
63
KJ2
♣KQ953
7
618
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦1 ♥6 ♠2/1 NT6
EW: 6 -/1 5♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♥6/7
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -920 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  4♠ E -2   ♣K  O3-Heller-Heller vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
        130    1.00   1.00  3 E +1   ♣K  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O7-Jones-Taggert
        420    0.00   2.00  4♠ W      4  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
22 ♠75
Q43
AQJ
♣KT963
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K43
A92
K97
♣J754
♠J2
JT876
86543
♣2
♠AQT986
K5
T2
♣AQ8
12
112
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 1 1 5♠ 4/5NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +460 5NT-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          1.00   1.00  4♠ S      A  O3-Heller-Heller vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
  420          1.00   1.00  4♠ S      ♣4  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O7-Jones-Taggert
  420          1.00   1.00  4♠ S      ♣4  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
23 ♠T6
7532
AKT952
♣Q
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K853
QT9
7643
♣K3
♠AJ
AK8
Q8
♣AT9864
♠Q9742
J64
J
♣J752
9
818
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT6
EW: 4♣ 1 2♠ 1NT  ♦6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    1.50   0.50  3♣ E      J  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O7-Jones-Taggert
        110    1.50   0.50  2♣ E +1   J  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard
        200    0.00   2.00  3 N -2   K  O3-Heller-Heller vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
24 ♠KT64
Q7
K765
♣AK9
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠QJ8532
2
92
♣QT65
♠A9
AJ864
843
♣J84
♠7
KT953
AQJT
♣732
15
510
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 3 3NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  590          2.00   0.00  4* S     ♣6  O3-Heller-Heller vs O5-Donaldson-Siebert
  430          1.00   1.00  3N N +1   8  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O7-Jones-Taggert
  300          0.00   2.00  3♠* W -2  Q  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-Sebring-Hedegard