- Saturday Morn - June 15, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Field strength:  Mean: 367 MP  Geomean: 131 MP
(based on 36 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Janice Flowers-Sonne - Mary Kalinyak 68.65 1st A 0.90
Leon Heller - Patricia Heller 64.68 1st A 0.90
Alan Hedegard - Cord Hedegard 60.32 2nd A 0.63
Joan Roberts - Keith Hedlund 58.73 2nd A 0.63
Larry Mazzei - Susan Mazzei 57.14 1st B 0.48
Gerald Albright - Gerald Williams 56.35 1st B 0.48
Kathy Pfitzer - Mary Block 52.38 2nd B 0.34
James Chibidakis - Sharon Chibidakis 48.81 2nd B 0.34
EVENT>Saturday Morning Pairs   |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>June 15, 2019      |CLUB NO.>150680    | 06/15/2019 12:35
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   63.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>None/300/100   |CLUB>H & H Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=1                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Mary Block             Kathy Pfitzer            B    4     2     .     66.00  52.38  0.34(B)
 2 Janice Flowers-Sonne   Mary Kalinyak            A    1     .     .     86.50  68.65  0.90(A)
 3 Susan Mazzei           Larry Mazzei             B    3     1     .     72.00  57.14  0.48(B)
 4 Shirley Larsen         Wolf Sommer              B    .     .     .     55.50  44.05
 5 Carol Maggipinto       Mark Maggipinto          A    .     .     .     64.50  51.19
 6 Karen Mok              Nancy Green              C    .     .     .     52.00  41.27
 7 Jane Altavilla         Sam Callaway             B    .     .     .     53.00  42.06
 8 Julie Garvin           Joseph Garvin            B    .     .     .     43.50  34.52
 9 Keith Hedlund          Joan Roberts             A    2     .     .     74.00  58.73  0.63(A)
                                          Totals                         567.00

EVENT>Saturday Morning Pairs   |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   63.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>None/300/100   |CLUB>H & H Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=5                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Sharon Chibidakis      James Chibidakis         C    4     2     2     61.50  48.81  0.34(B)
 2 Julie Anongos          Frances Baca             C    .     .     .     58.50  46.43
 3 Leon Heller            Patricia Heller          A    1     .     .     81.50  64.68  0.90(A)
 4 Gerald Williams        Gerald Albright          C    3     1     1     71.00  56.35  0.48(B)
 5 Elizabeth Sebring      Nooria Noor              C    .     .     .     44.50  35.32
 6 John Kneisl            Barbara Moxley           B    .     .     .     60.50  48.02
 7 Joel Reimnitz          Charlene Reimnitz        A    .     .     .     60.50  48.02
 8 George Mills           Sylvia Teixeira          C    .     .     .     53.00  42.06
 9 Cord Hedegard          Alan Hedegard            A    2     .     .     76.00  60.32  0.63(A)
                                          Totals                         567.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠T8765
K65
QJ
♣986
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠QJ43
-
AK973
♣QJ52
♠K
AQT9832
T4
♣KT7
♠A92
J74
8652
♣A43
6
1312
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4 3 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.00   0.00  5 E -2   ♠A  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
   50          4.00   2.00  4 E -1   8  A6-Mok-Green vs A2-Anongos-Baca
   50          4.00   2.00  4 E -1   6  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
   50          4.00   2.00  4 E -1   2  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
        140    2.00   4.00  3 E      5  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        420    0.50   5.50  4 E      4  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        420    0.50   5.50  4 E      5  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A4-Williams-Albright

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
2Pass2Pass
2Pass3Pass
3NTAll pass  

At some point even a seven card suit must defer to insistence and reason. Is this hand the breaking point? When East bids hearts three times and West bids first and second his weakest suits and then 3NT, showing values in the third, is it not time to stop insisting? Yes, the hearts seem good, but are not the bits and pieces outside likely to contribute to a notrump contract? Is not 3NT a level lower? Is the heart suit independent?

The answers to those several questions point to a pass of 3NT. 4 has no prayer, and 3NT makes an overtrick.

If you insisted beyond 3NT on playing hearts, here is a hand to make you think more in terms of partnership assets than just one good suit.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠AJ3
532
J
♣K87652
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠Q752
Q86
AK432
♣J
♠K86
JT74
976
♣A94
♠T94
AK9
QT85
♣QT3
9
128
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 2NT  ♦6 ♠6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          6.00   0.00  3N S +1   A  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
  120          5.00   1.00  2N S      ♠2  A6-Mok-Green vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  100          4.00   2.00  2 W -2   ♣2  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
         90    2.00   4.00  2 W      ♠A  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
         90    2.00   4.00  2 W      ♠A  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
         90    2.00   4.00  2 W      ♣8  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A4-Williams-Albright
        110    0.00   6.00  1 E +1   ♠T  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
1Pass1Pass
Pass2PassPass
2PassPassPass

South might be a tad more aggressive, but opening the bidding is repugnant, bidding 3 after partner merely balances is far from clear, and doubling 2 depends on North's holding the J! So South will likely be no more than an observer, at least until 2 is passed back around. At that point, the defensive prospects seem good, and the offensive prospects seem at least within reason.

Who knew that the T94 would work so well with the North hand to make any action by South other than pass a winning decision?

Sometimes bridge is not so clear cut.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠KQT9
J82
A6
♣A762
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J742
A965
542
♣84
♠85
KQT7
KQJ97
♣KT
♠A63
43
T83
♣QJ953
14
514
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2♠  ♦4 ♥4 NT6
EW: 3 2  ♣4 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -100 3♠*-NS/4♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          6.00   0.00  2N S +1   ♠2  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  130          5.00   1.00  2♣ N +2   K  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
        100    4.00   2.00  2N N -2   J  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        110    3.00   3.00  2 E +1   ♣3  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A4-Williams-Albright
        130    2.00   4.00  1 E +3   ♣Q  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
        140    0.50   5.50  3 W      ♠K  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        140    0.50   5.50  3 W      6  A6-Mok-Green vs A2-Anongos-Baca

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
Pass113
PassPass3All pass

East wishes that he had brought hearts into the picture, but the diamond suit seems adequate to rebid, while doubling might fetch a spade bid.

With the A onside and diamonds breaking 3-2, nothing can stop 3 from making. 4 seems a stretch for NS, so plus 110 in diamonds or somehow 2 seems a likely score. Allowing NS to score 110 in a club partial will not provide many matchpoints to EW.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠KQT97
873
972
♣J7
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A82
AQT6
K86
♣Q84
♠J43
J942
AQ
♣9653
♠65
K5
JT543
♣AKT2
6
158
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 2♠ 3NT  ♦6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.00   0.00  3 W -2   ♠K  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
  100          4.50   1.50  3N W -1   ♠9  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  100          4.50   1.50  4 E -1   ♣J  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        150    3.00   3.00  2N W +1   ♠9  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A3-Heller-Heller
        170    1.00   5.00  3 W +1   ♠K  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A2-Anongos-Baca
        170    1.00   5.00  3 W +1   ♠K  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
        170    1.00   5.00  2 W +2   ♠K  A6-Mok-Green vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1NTPassPassPass

8 HCP is not often enough to induce a response to 1NT when that opening bid shows 15-17, but many are tempted to do so. Despite having a 4-4 major fit, the East hand, devalued by stumpy diamond honors and unappealing distribution, does not contribute more to partnership assets by making hearts trump.

Notice the typical frustration of North, who will naturally lead the Q, asking for an unblock of the J by partner. Declarer will not cooperate, simply winning the A and later taking a trick with the J. Isn't it always, always, the way, that when we, as defender, lead from the KQx(x) in a suit, the jack appears in dummy?

Always.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠76
KQ632
T83
♣T96
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KT53
7
KJ96
♣AQ52
♠AQJ9
T94
542
♣KJ7
♠842
AJ85
AQ7
♣843
5
1311
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT5
EW: 5♣ 4 1 5♠ 1NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   80          6.00   0.00  1 N      ♠Q  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
        170    4.00   2.00  3♠ W +1   K  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A2-Anongos-Baca
        170    4.00   2.00  2♠ E +2   ♣8  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
        170    4.00   2.00  2♠ E +2   ♣4  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A3-Heller-Heller
        200    1.50   4.50  3♠ E +2   A  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A5-Sebring-Noor
        200    1.50   4.50  3♠ E +2   ♣3  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        420    0.00   6.00  4♠ E      5  A6-Mok-Green vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPassPass
11Dbl2!
3Pass4All pass

South, having passed the 4333 hand that a few would open, decides to cue bid in support of North's heart overcall, but perhaps that is too optimistic opposite a passed hand.

West counters with a significant upgrade, counting the hand at 16 or 17 with all honors working. East agrees, and that's that.

Declarer in spades cannot misguess anything of significance, and just has to lead diamonds toward the honors before drawing trumps.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

6 ♠AK765
5
A953
♣A72
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠QT2
KJ42
KJ864
♣9
♠J943
AT93
T2
♣KJ4
♠8
Q876
Q7
♣QT8653
15
109
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/3♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
EW: 1 1 2/1NT  ♣3 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +130 4♣-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          6.00   0.00  3 W -3   ♠A  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  140          5.00   1.00  2♠ N +1   T  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
  130          3.00   3.00  4♣ S      ♠2  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A3-Heller-Heller
  130          3.00   3.00  3♣ S +1   ♠T  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  130          3.00   3.00  3♣ S +1   ♠2  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
         50    1.00   5.00  2N N -1   ♠8  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        100    0.00   6.00  1N S -2   4  A6-Mok-Green vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
Pass1Pass1NT
Pass2Pass3
All pass   

South should feel very lucky to have caught such a fine dummy -- one that did not hang partner for fishing at the three level for a fit. South's auction shows a long suit and a weak hand, of course, so North should not project a better hand than possessed. The problem with the hand is what to do with South's hearts. A trump lead is best, as can be inferred by the computer's analysis of the makeable contracts. Notice that North can make 4 while South can make only three. If you analyze the various leads, you will notice that only a club lead from West would make any difference (diamonds would be a losing choice, and hearts would help declarer toward ruffing heart losers).



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

7 ♠A6
JT75
Q532
♣985
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠Q9875
3
KJ974
♣KQ
♠K2
AK842
A
♣JT643
♠JT43
Q96
T86
♣A72
7
1115
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4
EW: 3♣ 4 3 4♠ 3NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.00   0.00  3N E -2   ♠3  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
  100          5.00   1.00  3N E -1   ♠3  A6-Mok-Green vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        600    3.00   3.00  3N W      2  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
        600    3.00   3.00  3N W      2  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        600    3.00   3.00  3N E      ♠4  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A2-Anongos-Baca
        630    1.00   5.00  3N E +1   ♠3  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A3-Heller-Heller
        660    0.00   6.00  3N W +2   5  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A4-Williams-Albright

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
PassPass1Pass
1Pass2Pass
21Pass3Pass
3NTAll pass  
  1. 4SF

It is not necessary to open aceless minimums like West's to get to proper contracts. 1 by West on a bad suit, compressed clubs, and devoid of aces would lead to a nauseating choice of rebids after a 2 response. 3 should be reserved for good hands, while both 2 and 2NT have their own special flaws (2NT should be a balanced hand with at least two hearts).

Passing is not a crime with flawed minimum values. Partner will trust you to have values when it matters.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

8 ♠8762
A5
AJT
♣AKT5
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KT95
73
KQ63
♣874
♠A3
JT92
9742
♣J96
♠QJ4
KQ864
85
♣Q32
16
86
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 3 3♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          6.00   0.00  3N N +2   J  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
  430          5.00   1.00  3N N +1   2  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A3-Heller-Heller
  170          4.00   2.00  2 S +2   K  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
  150          3.00   3.00  2N N +1   2  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  140          1.50   4.50  3 N      ♠A  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  140          1.50   4.50  2 S +1   K  A6-Mok-Green vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
   90          0.00   6.00  2♣ N      ♠A  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A4-Williams-Albright

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1NTPass2
Pass2NPass3NT
All pass   

A straightforward and non-controversial hand. Hearts can be played for four tricks while EW work on spades or diamonds, but not both, and nine tricks are soon in the bank.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠KJT3
Q9742
3
♣Q72
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A642
K86
7
♣T6543
♠Q5
A
QJ9842
♣AKJ8
♠987
JT53
AKT65
♣9
8
717
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣2 ♦4 ♠6/5 NT5/4
EW: 4♣ 2 1♠ 2NT  ♥5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.00   0.00  4♣ E -2   A  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
  140          5.00   1.00  3 N      ♣A  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A3-Heller-Heller
  100          3.00   3.00  3 E -1   ♣9  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
  100          3.00   3.00  2 E -1   3  A6-Mok-Green vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
  100          3.00   3.00  2 E -1   ♣9  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
        110    1.00   5.00  2♣ E +1   A  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A2-Anongos-Baca
        150    0.00   6.00  3♣ E +2   A  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A4-Williams-Albright

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
1Pass2Pass
3Pass3Pass
5All pass  

Can South avoid leading the A on this auction? Had West erred with a 3 bid, North could have doubled for the lead, dooming the contract because of the diamond overruff and the set up spade trick. A heart lead also defeats the contract because the innate threats remain intact and drawing trumps before tackling diamonds fails on the disastrous diamond distribution.

But the squandering of a diamond control and defense-friendly diamond position relinquishes that advantage without compensation. Yes, the first two tricks go to the defense, but at the dual cost of the diamonds noted above and the trump queen's demise.

On this hand, either major suit lead defeats the contract while either minor suit lead allows it to slip through.

"Lead OUR suit, not THEIR suit."



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

10 ♠Q94
J865
64
♣AQ54
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠86
AK9
Q73
♣JT632
♠732
T7432
J52
♣87
♠AKJT5
Q
AKT98
♣K9
9
101
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 2 6♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠0 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +1430 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          5.00   1.00  5♠ S      A  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  650          5.00   1.00  4♠ S +1   A  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
  650          5.00   1.00  4♠ S +1   ♣J  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  630          3.00   3.00  3N N +1   ♣7  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A4-Williams-Albright
  620          2.00   4.00  4♠ S      A  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
  150          1.00   5.00  2N S +1   ♣3  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A3-Heller-Heller
        200    0.00   6.00  6♠ S -2   A  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
Pass2Pass31
Pass4Pass4NT
Pass5Pass5
Pass6All pass 
  1. SSGT

Short suit game tries are well-known, but infrequently seen. Consider adopting them, and regret only that not every hand contains a singleton or void. There is no better evaluation technique than showing short suits along with fits for partner's suit. North should accept the game invitation by showing club strength -- not length, not for the purpose of finding a new suit, bur simply to show a control or concentration of strength.

Enough for South, who can employ "ole Black" with much confidence. After 5, 1430 , showing one key card, South can obtain complete confidence by asking for the Q with 4.

"Yes, but no side king."

"Enough, and thank you!"

Of course South's hand is very pleasant to hold, but it is clearly NOT a 2 opening bid. Please note the nice flow of the bridge conversation when the auction begins with one of a suit. 2 often preempts such conversations, leading to guesswork. When the guesswork works, the 2 openers do not see the weakness of their approach, and when it fails, they blame bad luck.

After 2 - 2; 2 - 3, the informational bid of 4 made by North in the SSGT auction is lost. Perhaps after 4 (Italian-style control bidding), North's failure to show a red control can imply a positive club control, so that South might usefully employ 1430 Roman Keycard Blackwood . However, a blast to 4NT might find North with Qxx Axxx x xxxx, a far less happy contract

Make your own luck.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

11 ♠Q2
AJ64
AT3
♣A983
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AJ9
97
K742
♣T642
♠KT7543
832
5
♣J75
♠86
KQT5
QJ986
♣KQ
15
84
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 5 1NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  510          4.50   1.50  4 N +3   5  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
  510          4.50   1.50  4 N +3   5  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
  510          4.50   1.50  4 N +3   5  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A4-Williams-Albright
  510          4.50   1.50  4 N +3   5  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  450          2.00   4.00  4 N +1   ♠5  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  420          1.00   5.00  4 N      5  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
  100          0.00   6.00  2♠* E -1  ♣Q  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A3-Heller-Heller

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis

East will need to insert a (weak jump shift) spade overcall to elicit a spade lead from West. Failing to lead a spade will lead to twelve tricks for NS.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

12 ♠Q9
7
KQJ976
♣J632
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠74
AK642
AT84
♣A8
♠AKT63
83
32
♣KQT7
♠J852
QJT95
5
♣954
9
1512
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 4 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          6.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   K  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A5-Sebring-Noor
        400    4.50   1.50  3N W      K  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        400    4.50   1.50  3N W      J  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
        420    3.00   3.00  4♠ E      5  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A4-Williams-Albright
        430    2.00   4.00  3N W +1   K  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A2-Anongos-Baca
        460    1.00   5.00  3N E +2   Q  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
       1400    0.00   6.00  3* N -5  8  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A3-Heller-Heller
13 ♠T63
2
QJ72
♣AQ962
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠A98
J875
AK9
♣K87
♠KQJ72
KT64
T4
♣53
♠54
AQ93
8653
♣JT4
9
159
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3  ♥4 ♠4 NT6
EW: 2 2♠  ♣4/5 ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          5.50   0.50  4 W -3   Q  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  300          5.50   0.50  4 W -3   Q  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A4-Williams-Albright
  200          3.50   2.50  4 E -2   8  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
  200          3.50   2.50  4 E -2   ♣J  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  100          1.50   4.50  3N W -1   2  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
  100          1.50   4.50  3 W -1   Q  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
        620    0.00   6.00  4 W      2  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A3-Heller-Heller

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis

Unlucky not to make 4 -- FOUR cards well-placed for the defense, terribly for offense: AQ, AQ. We tend to thrive on bidding such games, but occasionally the odds will catch up with us.

If you are defending, be sure to take your tricks in the proper order.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

14 ♠A864
AQ8
K87
♣652
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠953
T653
J93
♣AQT
♠Q
K942
AT6
♣K9873
♠KJT72
J7
Q542
♣J4
13
712
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 3  ♦5 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -100 3♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          4.50   1.50  3♠ S      3  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
  140          4.50   1.50  3♠ S      ♣Q  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  140          4.50   1.50  2♠ S +1   3  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  140          4.50   1.50  2♠ S +1   ♣A  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A4-Williams-Albright
  100          2.00   4.00  3 W -2   ♠A  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
   50          1.00   5.00  2 W -1   ♣6  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A3-Heller-Heller
         50    0.00   6.00  2♠ S -1   5  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A2-Anongos-Baca
15 ♠QJT
AJ743
J2
♣KT7
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠9653
KT86
9854
♣Q
♠A72
2
T63
♣A98642
♠K84
Q95
AKQ7
♣J53
12
58
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 3 2♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥3/4 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  660          6.00   0.00  3N S +2   6  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
  620          5.00   1.00  4 S      ♣Q  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  600          4.00   2.00  3N S      ♠3  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  180          3.00   3.00  2N S +2   ♠3  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A2-Anongos-Baca
        100    2.00   4.00  4 S -1   ♣Q  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A4-Williams-Albright
        200    0.50   5.50  3N S -2   6  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
        200    0.50   5.50  4 S -2   ♠9  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A3-Heller-Heller
16 ♠A
T753
A984
♣T763
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠Q863
KJ86
3
♣K984
♠KJ954
AQ94
7
♣AQ2
♠T72
2
KQJT652
♣J5
8
916
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4  ♣3 ♥2 ♠2 NT6
EW: 3♣ 4 3♠  ♦3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: -100 5*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.00   0.00  5♠ E -1   2  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        100    5.00   1.00  5* S -1  ♠Q  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A4-Williams-Albright
        620    3.50   2.50  4♠ E      2  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A5-Sebring-Noor
        620    3.50   2.50  4♠ E      K  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
        650    1.50   4.50  4♠ E +1   2  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A2-Anongos-Baca
        650    1.50   4.50  4♠ E +1   K  A6-Mok-Green vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        850    0.00   6.00  5♠* E     K  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A3-Heller-Heller
17 ♠AT5
T7
KJ642
♣AK5
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KJ9
AQ2
QT985
♣94
♠642
J63
A3
♣Q8632
♠Q873
K9854
7
♣JT7
15
127
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2♠  ♣6 ♦6 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1 1NT  ♥5 ♠5
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +100 2NT*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          6.00   0.00  4 E -3   T  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  110          5.00   1.00  2 N      ♣3  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
  100          4.00   2.00  3* W -1  ♣A  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A4-Williams-Albright
         50    2.00   4.00  1N N -1   ♣3  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A3-Heller-Heller
         50    2.00   4.00  2 N -1   A  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A5-Sebring-Noor
         50    2.00   4.00  2 N -1   ♣6  A6-Mok-Green vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        150    0.00   6.00  2 N -3   ♣3  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
18 ♠J9
KQ74
Q92
♣K752
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AT76
A86
KJ
♣AJ93
♠K8432
J5
T83
♣T86
♠Q5
T932
A7654
♣Q4
11
174
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1  ♣4 ♠2 NT4
EW: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT  ♦5 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    4.50   1.50  3♠ W +1   K  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
        170    4.50   1.50  3♠ W +1   K  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A3-Heller-Heller
        170    4.50   1.50  2♠ W +2   K  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        170    4.50   1.50  2♠ W +2   ♣2  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A5-Sebring-Noor
        200    1.50   4.50  3♠ W +2   ♣2  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A2-Anongos-Baca
        200    1.50   4.50  2♠ W +3   4  A6-Mok-Green vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        420    0.00   6.00  4♠ W      ♠J  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A4-Williams-Albright
19 ♠KT9543
53
T87
♣KQ
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠87
K4
KQ654
♣J876
♠AQJ
A762
A93
♣AT5
♠62
QJT98
J2
♣9432
8
919
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT1
EW: 6♣ 6 3 3♠ 6NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.00   0.00  3N E -1   ♠6  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
        130    5.00   1.00  3 W +1   ♣K  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        630    4.00   2.00  3N E +1   Q  A6-Mok-Green vs A5-Sebring-Noor
        660    2.50   3.50  3N E +2   9  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
        660    2.50   3.50  3N E +2   9  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
        690    1.00   5.00  3N E +3   Q  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A4-Williams-Albright
        800    0.00   6.00  3♠* N -4  A  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A3-Heller-Heller
20 ♠963
AT942
AT
♣KT4
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KQ72
KQ
KQ7643
♣5
♠A85
865
J
♣AQ8732
♠JT4
J73
9852
♣J96
11
1511
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3
EW: 3♣ 4 1 5♠ 2NT
LoTT: 17 - 15 = +2
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.00   0.00  3N W -2   4  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A4-Williams-Albright
  100          4.50   1.50  2N W -1   T  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A3-Heller-Heller
  100          4.50   1.50  4♣ E -1   ♠J  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
        110    3.00   3.00  2 W +1   A  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        130    1.50   4.50  2 E +2   ♠9  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
        130    1.50   4.50  4♣ E      ♠4  A6-Mok-Green vs A5-Sebring-Noor
        170    0.00   6.00  2 W +4   2  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
21 ♠6
AQT732
J853
♣K6
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJ732
8
QT4
♣Q987
♠K54
J964
K6
♣AJ54
♠AT98
K5
A972
♣T32
10
712
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2  ♣5/4 ♠4 NT6
EW: 2♣ 3♠ 1NT  ♦4 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          6.00   0.00  4 N      ♣J  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
  600          5.00   1.00  3N S      ♠2  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
  170          4.00   2.00  2 N +2   ♣4  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  140          3.00   3.00  2 N +1   ♣A  A6-Mok-Green vs A5-Sebring-Noor
   50          2.00   4.00  2♣ E -1   5  A1-Block-Pfitzer vs A4-Williams-Albright
        100    0.50   5.50  4 N -1   ♣A  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A3-Heller-Heller
        100    0.50   5.50  2 N -1   K  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
22 ♠K
AJ87652
A985
♣4
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠-
T93
T642
♣AK8765
♠Q976532
Q
QJ3
♣T2
♠AJT84
K4
K7
♣QJ93
12
77
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 5/6 2♠ 5NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +980 6-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          6.00   0.00  3N S +2   ♣A  A6-Mok-Green vs A4-Williams-Albright
  450          4.50   1.50  4 N +1   ♠3  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  450          4.50   1.50  4 N +1   Q  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  200          2.50   3.50  3 N +2   ♠7  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  200          2.50   3.50  3 N +2   Q  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
  170          1.00   5.00  2 N +2   ♣2  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
         50    0.00   6.00  5 N -1   Q  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
23 ♠K95
KT
AJ984
♣JT6
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠8743
A93
5
♣K8752
♠AT6
J852
T763
♣Q9
♠QJ2
Q764
KQ2
♣A43
12
77
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 2 1♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          5.00   1.00  3N S +1   ♠8  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A2-Anongos-Baca
  630          5.00   1.00  3N N +1   2  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
  630          5.00   1.00  3N N +1   3  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  600          2.50   3.50  3N N      2  A6-Mok-Green vs A4-Williams-Albright
  600          2.50   3.50  3N N      2  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  200          1.00   5.00  2♠ W -2   ♣J  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
  130          0.00   6.00  2 N +2   ♣J  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
24 ♠AJ
AJ42
AKJ6
♣QT9
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠Q83
T98
QT542
♣KJ
♠K962
53
973
♣A865
♠T754
KQ76
8
♣7432
20
87
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 3 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    4.00   2.00  3N N -1   ♠2  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
         50    4.00   2.00  3N N -1   ♣5  A2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs A5-Sebring-Noor
         50    4.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♠3  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A2-Anongos-Baca
         50    4.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♠2  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
         50    4.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♣A  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
        100    0.50   5.50  4 S -2   ♠3  A6-Mok-Green vs A4-Williams-Albright
        100    0.50   5.50  4 N -2   ♠2  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
25 ♠AK54
J83
K54
♣Q95
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠32
AT65
AJT
♣JT74
♠QJT7
Q42
Q97
♣AK2
♠986
K97
8632
♣863
13
1014
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3♣ 2/3 2/3 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.00   0.00  3N W -1   ♣5  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
         90    5.00   1.00  2♣ E      2  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
        100    3.50   2.50  1♠ N -2   ♣A  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A5-Sebring-Noor
        100    3.50   2.50  1♣ N -2   ♠Q  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
        120    2.00   4.00  1N E +1   7  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        180    1.00   5.00  1N E +3   7  A6-Mok-Green vs A3-Heller-Heller
        600    0.00   6.00  3N E      ♣3  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
26 ♠QT873
AKQT63
4
♣7
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠9642
J8
KQ32
♣AK5
♠AKJ5
5
AJT96
♣Q93
♠-
9742
875
♣JT8642
11
1315
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣6 ♦2 ♠3 NT2
EW: 1♣ 4 4♠ 1NT  ♥3
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -500 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1400          6.00   0.00  4♠* W -5  ♣7  A6-Mok-Green vs A3-Heller-Heller
  800          5.00   1.00  4♠* W -3  A  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  100          4.00   2.00  4♠ W -1   A  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
        150    3.00   3.00  4 E +1   4  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A5-Sebring-Noor
        200    2.00   4.00  5* N -1  A  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
        620    1.00   5.00  4♠ W      A  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
        790    0.00   6.00  4♠* W     A  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard
27 ♠J82
AJ94
K85
♣KJ9
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠K974
752
T64
♣763
♠AQ5
63
QJ93
♣A854
♠T63
KQT8
A72
♣QT2
13
313
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♦6
EW: 1  ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          5.50   0.50  3 S      4  A7-Altavilla-Callaway vs A5-Sebring-Noor
  140          5.50   0.50  2 S +1   4  A3-Mazzei-Mazzei vs A6-Kneisl-Moxley
  110          2.50   3.50  2 S      ♠4  A6-Mok-Green vs A3-Heller-Heller
  110          2.50   3.50  2 S      ♣7  A8-Garvin-Garvin vs A7-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
  110          2.50   3.50  1 S +1   ♠4  A4-Larsen-Sommer vs A8-Mills-Teixeira
  110          2.50   3.50  1 S +1   ♠4  A5-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs A1-Chibidakis-Chibidakis
         50    0.00   6.00  3 S -1   2  A9-Hedlund-Roberts vs A9-Hedegard-Hedegard