- Monday Morn - April 15, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Field strength:  Mean: 326 MP  Geomean: 172 MP
(based on 36 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Sally Reed - Wayne McIntyre 63.57 1st A 0.90
Mary Stange - Richard Papst 61.05 2nd A 0.63
Ed Schrenzel - Neville Kirby 54.89 1st A 0.90
Joe Norton - Stephanie Booth 53.79 2nd A 0.63
Fran Soskins - Louise Barnard 52.08 3rd A 0.45
Anjalie Kulkarni - Marian Carapezza 51.61 3rd A 0.45
Alan Hedegard - Janet Hedlund 51.30 4th A 0.32
Joseph Howell - R.Terry Handley 47.57 4th A 0.32
EVENT>Monday Morning Pairs     |SESSION>Monday Morn  |SECTION> MM N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>April 15, 2019     |CLUB NO.>228684    | 04/15/2019 14:09
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   7 |MP LIMITS>None/300/100   |CLUB>County Public
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=5/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 R.Terry Handley        Joseph Howell            A    4     .     .     79.92  47.57  0.32(A)
 2 Joan Roberts           Barbara Callaway         A    .     .     .     74.43  44.30
 3 Jane Altavilla         Richard Vreeland         A    .     .     .     70.79  42.14
 4 Richard Papst          Mary Stange              A    2     .     .    102.57  61.05  0.63(A)
 5 Wayne McIntyre         Sally Reed               B    1     1     .    106.79  63.57  0.90(A)
 6 Shirley Larsen         Barbara Sprenger         B    .     .     .     79.14  47.11
 7 Debeliah Anthony       Ida Fogle                C    .     .     .     74.73  44.48
 8 Fran Soskins           Louise Barnard           B    3     2     .     87.50  52.08  0.45(A)
 9 Mary Quenette          Wolf Sommer              C    .     .     .     79.36  47.24
                                          Totals                         755.23

EVENT>Monday Morning Pairs     |SESSION>Monday Morn  |SECTION> MM E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   7 |MP LIMITS>None/300/100   |CLUB>County Public
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Pamela Lawther         Bob Gore                 B    .     .     .     81.93  48.77
 2 Ray Mok                Karen Mok                B    .     .     .     80.64  48.00
 3 Neville Kirby          Ed Schrenzel             C    1     1     .     92.21  54.89  0.90(A)
 4 Floyd Viau             Richard Sheere           B    .     .     .     80.58  47.96
 5 Joe Norton             Stephanie Booth          A    2     .     .     90.36  53.79  0.63(A)
 6 Patricia Heller        Carol Sendell            A    .     .     .     75.57  44.98
 7 Alan Hedegard          Janet Hedlund            A    4     .     .     86.18  51.30  0.32(A)
 8 Marian Carapezza       Anjalie Kulkarni         B    3     2     .     86.71  51.61  0.45(A)
 9 Elizabeth Sebring      Judith Perry             C    .     .     .     82.00  48.81
                                          Totals                         756.18

Hands and Results
1 ♠52
K863
KJ83
♣AK6
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AQT
QJ974
Q92
♣52
♠K9863
AT5
6
♣9873
♠J74
2
AT754
♣QJT4
14
117
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4  ♥5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2 2♠  ♣4 ♦3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          7.00   0.00  3 S +1   4  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM5-Norton-Booth
  110          6.00   1.00  3 N      ♠6  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
  100          5.00   2.00  3 W -2   ♣A  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
   90          4.00   3.00  1N S      Q  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
   50          2.50   4.50  3 W -1   ♣A  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
   50          2.50   4.50  2 W -1   K  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM2-Mok-Mok
        100    0.50   6.50  3N N -2   ♠6  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        100    0.50   6.50  5 N -2   A  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM9-Sebring-Perry

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

When North opens 1, South's response will depend on their agreement--2 or 3 will be common. 3 has the virtue of keeping West out of the auction, and is likely to be the final contract. East leads a small spade and is pleasantly surprised to find out how well this works. If he leads a club rather than away from the K one of those spade winners might evaporate. The fact that the opponents aren't in NT and bid no majors should make the spade lead more attractive.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 112
3Pass3All pass

Lynn Berg typically provides analysis for 299ers on boards 1-18. Additionally, analysis for more advanced players is available for boards 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11.

The Bidding: After North opens 1, East's 1 overcall is somewhat obstructive. South has a choice between raising to 2 or cue bidding 2 to show an invitational or better diamond raise. Assuming North isn't 6-5, North will have 4 or less hearts. So East-West likely have a heart fit which they have not found yet. Cue bidding 2 is both constructive and obstructive. West, with 12 Support Points, cue bids 3 to show an invitational or better spade raise. At this point, East-West are committed to 3 or higher. East's 3 bid declines an invitational raise. The Law of Total Tricks advises North-South against competing to the 4-level. It isn't clear who has the majority of the strength. North-South have no reason to compete over 3 or to risk penalizing 3.

The Play in Spades: South is likely to lead their singleton heart. North recognizes there is no upside for playing the King. By ducking their King, North prevents declarer from enjoying dummy's long hearts. If declarer delays drawing trump, North-South can navigate defensive ruffs to hold declarer to 8 tricks. If North rises with their King, declarer scores 10 tricks: 5 + 5.

The Play in Diamonds: The "8 Ever, 9 Never" adage suggests declarer attempt to drop the Queen. East;s 1 overcall suggests East has 8 Vacant Spaces . West's spade raise suggests West has 10 Vacant Spaces. The makes finessing against West for the Queen a favorite. Declarer cashes the Ace as a Safety Play against a singleton Queen. When the finesse against the Queen succeeds, declarer has 10 tricks: 1 ruff + 5 + 4.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

2 ♠AT3
5
T965
♣AK865
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J9852
6
Q872
♣Q32
♠Q764
AQJT2
AJ3
♣9
♠K
K98743
K4
♣JT74
11
514
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 2 2NT  ♠5
EW: 2♠  ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          7.00   0.00  5♣ N      ♠2  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
  150          6.00   1.00  4♠ W -3   ♣A  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM5-Norton-Booth
  100          5.00   2.00  4♠ W -2   5  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
   50          2.00   5.00  3♠ W -1   ♣A  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
   50          2.00   5.00  1 E -1   ♠K  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
   50          2.00   5.00  1 E -1   ♠K  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM2-Mok-Mok
   50          2.00   5.00  1 E -1   ♠K  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
   50          2.00   5.00  1 E -1   9  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM6-Heller-Sendell

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and will raise West's 1 to 3 whether or not North gets into the bidding with 2 or even with a double. He has to be careful not to get over ambitious, though: 1 only promised 6 HCP, after all. Down one, undoubled, in 3 should be an excellent result.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

3 ♠QT97
864
875
♣T94
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠6
QJT
AKJ632
♣875
♠AK84
AK9752
-
♣A62
♠J532
3
QT94
♣KQJ3
2
1118
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥0 ♠4 NT2
EW: 3♣ 4 7 2♠ 5NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -2210 7-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          7.00   0.00  7N* E -2  ♣K  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
        210    6.00   1.00  2N E +3   ♣K  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        600    5.00   2.00  3N E      ♣K  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        650    4.00   3.00  4 E +1   ♣K  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        680    2.50   4.50  4 E +2   ♣K  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
        680    2.50   4.50  4 E +2   ♣J  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        710    1.00   6.00  4 E +3   ♣K  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM2-Mok-Mok
       1460    0.00   7.00  6 E +1   ♣K  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM4-Viau-Sheere

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

West may choose to open 2 (rather than 1 with spade shortness). East starts with a forcing 2 and is pleasantly surprised when partner raises to 3. This bidding must mean that West has few black cards, but it will still take a leap of optimism to bid slam when partner has started by bidding your void. Being solid down to the 9 makes it possible to ruff black losers and still be able to draw trump. Still, I don't think 6 will be common, let alone the grand.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
1Pass1Pass
2Pass21Pass
3Pass4NTPass
52Pass53Pass
64Pass6All pass
  1. artificial game force
  2. 1 or 4 key cards
  3. Queen ask
  4. Queen + King, no King

The Bidding: West's hand meets the Rule of 20 and the Suggestion of 22 for a 1st or 2nd seat opener. After West opens 1, East has the values for a strong jump shift. As Karen Walker explains in her "Strong Jump Shifts by Responder (Soloway Style)" article, it isn't advisable to use a strong jump shift with a 2 suited or 3 suited hand. So East begins with a 1 response. It is common to raise responder's major with 3-card support and shortness. As Steve Weinstein discusses in his "1m-1M: Now What?" article, rebidding your minor is preferable when your minor offers a source of tricks, "we are targeting 3NT and want to lead partner in that direction so we would rebid the minor."

After opener rebids their minor, it is important to have solid agreements to differentiate signoffs, invitational hands, and game forcing hands. My "Third Suit Forcing" article presents popular approaches. The easiest of which uses the cheapest new suit as an artificial Game Force . With that agreement, East's 2 bid is artificial and game forcing. West's 3 bid shows 3-card heart support. West has at most 4 cards in the black suits. East would like to learn about Queen. Since East has all the key cards outside of diamonds, there is no need for Exclusion . Would a jump to 4NT be Roman Keycard for hearts? That depends on what a 4NT bid would have been the previous round. Because it can sometimes be difficult for responder to set their suit as trump, some expert partnerships use a 2nd round jump to 4NT by responder to ask for key cards for responder's suit. If so, a 4NT jump now would be Quantitative . So East would need to cue bid and then ask for key cards.

For most partnerships, a 2nd round jump to 4NT would be Quantitative. So East can jump to 4NT now to ask for key cards for hearts. Playing 1430 responses, West's 4 bid shows 1 or 4 key cards. East knows it shows the Ace. East's 5 bid is a Queen Ask . West's 6 response shows the Queen and the King. It denies the the King and the King. With a reasonable trump break, East can count 11 quick winners: 2 + 6 + 2 + 1. East knows they can score at least 1 ruff in the short hand for their 12th trick. There are many ways 13 tricks might be available, but there is no room left to explore. 13 tricks is likely to be a favorite. A making slam in a club tends to score well. Bidding a grand risks the Matchpoints a small slam would earn for a few extra Matchpoints. So you would like a grand slam to be a strong favorite. Unless you need a top board, settling for 6 seems prudent.

The Play: Declarer has 5 quick winners in the side suits. Declarer has great heart texture. Declarer needs just 2 ruffs in the short hand to score all tricks. Even with a trump lead, the defense cannot prevent declarer from scoring all the tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

4 ♠JT32
Q5
K
♣AQT754
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AK876
A843
43
♣63
♠Q4
J92
QT765
♣KJ2
♠95
KT76
AJ982
♣98
12
119
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1♣ 1  ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1 1♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +90 2♣-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          7.00   0.00  3 W -2   K  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  100          6.00   1.00  3 W -1   K  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
   90          4.00   3.00  2♣ N      ♠Q  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
   90          4.00   3.00  2♣ N      ♠Q  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
   90          4.00   3.00  2♣ N      ♠4  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        100    1.50   5.50  3♣ N -1   ♠Q  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM2-Mok-Mok
        100    1.50   5.50  3♣ N -1   ♠4  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        300    0.00   7.00  3N N -3   ♠Q  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM9-Sebring-Perry

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

With three quick tricks and the majors, West opens 1. North overcalls 2 and will be surprised when the auction dies. East's club winners were off-side anyway, so having East ruff spades instead will be no problem. The difficulty will be getting to the dummy at all. This time, leading a low heart and putting in the 10 will work.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

5 ♠AT
Q98
AQ6
♣AKQ54
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJ9
AJ3
KJ9
♣J932
♠7643
KT7652
T8
♣6
♠K852
4
75432
♣T87
21
133
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 5 1♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦1 ♠5/6 NT4/6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +600 5-NS/5♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          7.00   0.00  4* E -4  ♣T  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
  130          6.00   1.00  3 N +1   6  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  120          4.50   2.50  2N N      6  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
  120          4.50   2.50  2N N      6  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM5-Norton-Booth
   90          3.00   4.00  1N N      6  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        100    2.00   5.00  4 N -1   ♣6  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        200    0.50   6.50  3N N -2   6  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
        200    0.50   6.50  5♣ N -2   T  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM2-Mok-Mok

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

North opens 2NT. South may well just pass--and a heart lead will kill even eight tricks. With only three HCP there's not much South can do. My advice? Play it fast and get on to the next hand.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 2NTAll pass 

The Bidding: After North opens 2NT, East isn't eager to over with poor heart texture. South has a choice between looking for a major suit fit and passing. South's hand has potential. If a spade fit is available, 4 should have play. Lacking a spade fit, South's weak hand, poor texture, and lack of entries makes it likely a 3NT contract will fail. Using IMPs scoring the possibility of a vulnerable game makes a Stayman response attractive. In Matchpoints , the goal is to beat the score at other tables. Looking for a spade fit risks landing in a 3NT contract with poor prospects. Passing seems prudent at Matchpoints.

The Play: East has a choice between a spade lead which may be passive or an aggressive heart lead. At Matchpoints overtricks can be expensive. The downside of a heart lead is the risk of giving declarer a trick. The upside is the potential of running hearts. East's lack of entries decreases the likelihood of running East's long hearts. Many will reasonably choose a passive lead. Here, with clubs break 3-2, declarer has 8 quick winners on a spade lead. A 9th trick is available if declarer risks a finesse against the King. An aggressive lead is the winner here. A heart lead allows the defense to take the first 6 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

6 ♠A8
KJT8632
-
♣AQJ3
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠763
75
K8762
♣T98
♠KQT5
A
QJ953
♣K42
♠J942
Q94
AT4
♣765
15
315
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 2NT  ♦4 ♠6/5
EW: 3  ♣3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          7.00   0.00  4* E -2  Q  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
  450          4.00   3.00  4 N +1   ♠K  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
  450          4.00   3.00  4 N +1   Q  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  450          4.00   3.00  4 N +1   Q  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
  450          4.00   3.00  4 N +1   Q  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM5-Norton-Booth
  450          4.00   3.00  4 N +1   T  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  420          1.00   6.00  4 N      ♠K  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
  200          0.00   7.00  3 N +2   ♠6  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East's 1 may be passed around to North; few will choose to raise diamonds even preemptively with the flat West hand. North reopens with 3, which definitely is NOT weak. Even that may not be enough to get South to raise to game. It does well with a diamond lead--gets rid of the spade loser and allows the club finesse early.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

7 ♠KT82
K42
K97
♣942
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠J753
AJ963
Q85
♣3
♠AQ4
Q7
T6
♣AKJT85
♠96
T85
AJ432
♣Q76
9
816
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3♣ 3 2♠ 1NT  ♦6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.00   1.00  3N E -1   3  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
  100          6.00   1.00  4 W -1   ♣2  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  100          6.00   1.00  4♣ E -1   A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
         90    3.50   3.50  1N E      3  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
         90    3.50   3.50  2♣ E      ♠9  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        110    1.50   5.50  3♣ W      A  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM2-Mok-Mok
        110    1.50   5.50  2♣ E +1   ♠9  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        620    0.00   7.00  4 W      7  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East might open 3 in fourth seat--a decent opening hand and a good 6-7 card suit. The alternative is to open 1 and jump rebid them--but what if the opponents have found a spade fit by now? It won't happen this time, but is a legitimate worry. 3NT doesn't work because the Q is off-side.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

8 ♠K5
AJT985
J92
♣Q3
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠74
643
AQT73
♣A82
♠QJT962
Q2
K6
♣974
♠A83
K7
854
♣KJT65
11
108
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 3 1NT  ♠5
EW: 1♠  ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          7.00   0.00  4 N      ♠Q  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
  140          4.50   2.50  3 S      K  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  140          4.50   2.50  3 N      K  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  140          4.50   2.50  3 N      K  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
  140          4.50   2.50  2 N +1   ♠Q  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
         50    1.50   5.50  3 N -1   K  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
         50    1.50   5.50  3 N -1   6  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        140    0.00   7.00  2♠ E +1   K  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM6-Heller-Sendell

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

I think North is a bit strong for 2, but an argument can certainly be made in favor of the more preemptive choice. That should stop West from bidding spades with only 8 HCP: once the opponents preempt, our bids show values. If West should balance, though, East might then try spades--and will be sorry if he were to be doubled. Truth to tell, though, doubles are unlikely, and -100 would be fine in a pair game.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass2All pass 

The Bidding: After West passes as dealer, North has a choice between passing, opening 1, and opening a Weak Two Hearts . North's hand falls short of the Rule of 20 and the Suggestion of 22 for a 1st or 2nd seat opener. North's doubleton honors merit a downgrade. North's heart texture merits a bit of an upgrade. As Andrew Gumperz discusses in his "Better Preempts IV: Preempts by Seat Position (part 1)" article, a 2nd seat preempt should be more constructive because dealer's pass decreases the likelihood the opponents have a game. Opening a constructive weak 2 seems best.

In his Takeout Doubles over a Preempt lecture, Roger Lee advises "when we both have length, it is better to be a little conservative since we have losers in their suit." Here, East-West have mediocre hands with trump length. Neither is eager to compete. South doesn't expect a game to be available. The auction ends at 2.

The Play: The defense has 4 quick winners in the minors. Declarer has a potential heart loser. Cashing the King and finessing against West for the Queen offers almost a 40% chance of avoiding a heart loser. This line is preferable to a first round finesse against East for the Queen because it guards against losing to a singleton Queen. Declarer may try to increase chances by leading the Jack from their hand in hopes East will cover. East should have contemplated this play at trick 1 and planned to duck smoothly. Here, the book line loses to East's Queen and declarer scores just 8 tricks: 2 + 5 + 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

9 ♠J62
932
76542
♣J7
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KQ97
T7
AKQ
♣Q643
♠85
KJ84
83
♣AKT52
♠AT43
AQ65
JT9
♣98
2
1611
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 3 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.50   0.50  5♣ E -1   J  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
  100          6.50   0.50  5♣ E -1   T  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        600    5.00   2.00  3N W      7  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
        630    2.50   4.50  3N W +1   7  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        630    2.50   4.50  3N W +1   7  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        630    2.50   4.50  3N W +1   2  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        630    2.50   4.50  3N W +1   2  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        660    0.00   7.00  3N W +2   4  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM2-Mok-Mok

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

South may open 1 in third seat, happy to pass if partner bids a major. Not this time: West overcalls 1NT, East tries Stayman, and E-W end up in 3NT. No one could blame North for leading a diamond, especially if South has opened in that suit. But diamonds and the black suits will being home plenty of tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

10 ♠98762
AT83
T8
♣K3
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠J3
K752
QJ9642
♣4
♠KQ4
J96
A753
♣QJ5
♠AT5
Q4
K
♣AT98762
7
713
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1♠  ♦4 ♥5 NT5
EW: 3 1 1NT  ♣4 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -110 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          7.00   0.00  5* E -3  ♣A  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
  400          6.00   1.00  3 W -4   ♠9  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  200          5.00   2.00  4 E -2   ♣A  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM5-Norton-Booth
  100          3.00   4.00  3N E -1   ♠A  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
  100          3.00   4.00  3 E -1   ♣A  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
  100          3.00   4.00  1 W -1   ♣K  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM2-Mok-Mok
        110    0.50   6.50  3 E      ♣A  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        110    0.50   6.50  3 E      ♣A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East opens 1. South overcalls 2. West is light for a Negative Double bit has plenty for a preemptive diamond raise. Partnership agreements will make a huge difference in the various auctions on this one. With ten trumps, East is likely to lose to that singleton K, however.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

11 ♠JT42
KQ842
8
♣KJ9
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠Q953
-
QJT765
♣Q86
♠A876
AJ95
43
♣752
♠K
T763
AK92
♣AT43
10
79
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 -/1♠ 2NT  ♦6 ♠6/7
EW:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          7.00   0.00  4 N      ♠6  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
  140          5.50   1.50  3 N      4  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  140          5.50   1.50  2 N +1   3  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
         50    3.50   3.50  4 N -1   ♠A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
         50    3.50   3.50  4 N -1   4  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
        100    1.50   5.50  4 N -2   4  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
        100    1.50   5.50  4 N -2   4  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        300    0.00   7.00  4* N -2  ♠A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

South opens 1 and raises North's hearts. If North makes a game try, South will surely cooperate. Play takes a little care: lots of spades to ruff. Possibly it will be to get rid of the club loser on the K, ruff a club, and enjoy the fruits of the 3-3 split. What will East lead against a heart contract. Usually one want to lead a long suit rather than a short one when holding a trump stack, but the spades sure don't look promising. And East would have to lead the A if he chose that suit, not wanting to lead away from an Ace when not in NT.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

David Loeb Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1Pass2
Pass4All pass 

The Bidding: South opens 1 to ensure a comfortable rebid over a 1 response. Some partnerships use a 3-level cue bid overcall to show a hand with an unspecified long running suit and ask for a stopper in opener's suits. Over a minor suit opening, it is often preferable to use a jump cue bid as a natural preempt. Here, West's diamonds aren't good enough to preempt at the 3-level. West's hand has nice spade support. Passing is clear. North responds 1. South's 17 Support Points suggest jumping to 3. South's Losing Trick Count of 7 suggests a raise to 2. South's Support Points are inflated by their singleton King. A simple raise seems best.

North has a choice between bidding game and inviting game. North's 13 Support Points and LTC of 7 suggest bidding game. Ruffs in the long hand don't typically provide extra tricks. It isn't clear whether North's diamond shortness is valuable. North has good texture and 5th heart. North's hand is too good to go low. North's 4 bid ends the auction.

The Play: Declarer has 4 quick winners in the side suits. Declarer has a quick loser in spades and in hearts. Declarer wants to ruff spades in the short hand. When declarer leads a spade, East wins their Ace. If East leads their Ace to reduce ruffing power, declarer will have no trouble scoring 10 tricks. If East exits a low heart, declarer doesn't need to guess the Queen, they can score 10 tricks by cashing their quick winners, ruffing 2 spades, and forcing East to ruff the 13th club.

At tables where East chooses not to lead a trump when in with the Ace, declarer will wonder why. Even if declarer guesses East has all the hearts, they must still guess how to engineer an end play. Declarer must shorten their heart holding for the end play. Ruffing the 3rd round of diamonds allows East to score 3 heart tricks to set 4. Here, declarer must discard a club on a diamond winner and ruff the 3rd round of clubs to engineer the end play to make 4.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at davidjloeb@gmail.com

12 ♠AJ9
QT6
J654
♣J93
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠K8
KJ87
9873
♣A74
♠QT7653
94
QT2
♣K5
♠42
A532
AK
♣QT862
9
117
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1  ♦6 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1 2♠  ♣4 ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +100 3♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          7.00   0.00  1N N +1   ♠T  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
   50          4.50   2.50  2N W -1   ♣J  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
   50          4.50   2.50  2♠ E -1   A  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
   50          4.50   2.50  1 W -1   ♣3  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
   50          4.50   2.50  2 W -1   ♣3  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        100    2.00   5.00  1N N -1   9  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        110    1.00   6.00  2♠ E      A  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        140    0.00   7.00  2♠ E +1   A  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM2-Mok-Mok

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

Unless East decides that his hand can make a third seat spade preempt, South will open 1. North answers 1NT rather than 2 with such a flat hand. Will East come in now? Maybe. But it's still a lousy suit. Knowing that E-W have at least an eight card spade fit, South may choose to rebid 2--much safer.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

13 ♠Q74
J9
A95
♣KJT54
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠J8
Q7542
KJ763
♣9
♠9632
AKT63
T
♣A76
♠AKT5
8
Q842
♣Q832
11
711
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/4♣ 1♠  ♦5 ♥3 NT6
EW: 4  ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -200 5♣*-N-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          7.00   0.00  2♣ N +1   T  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  100          5.00   2.00  4 E -1   ♠A  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
  100          5.00   2.00  4 E -1   ♠A  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
  100          5.00   2.00  4 E -1   ♠4  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
    PASS       3.00   4.00  Pass Out      MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        170    2.00   5.00  2 E +2   ♠A  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        620    0.50   6.50  4 E      ♠A  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        620    0.50   6.50  4 E      ♣2  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM4-Viau-Sheere

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

With the points 11-11-11-7 around the table, will anyone open? An occasional East will open 1. An occasional South will open 1 if East passes. If East does open, West can justify 4 with his great shape, though he lacks a quick trick.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

14 ♠T4
AT5
AKQ862
♣Q5
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠Q972
Q
J9
♣AKJ763
♠AK83
K982
43
♣982
♠J65
J7643
T75
♣T4
15
1310
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1  ♣3 ♠1 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4♠  ♦5 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    6.50   0.50  4♣ W      A  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        130    6.50   0.50  4♣ W      K  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        140    5.00   2.00  2♠ E +1   T  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        170    3.50   3.50  3♠ W +1   A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM2-Mok-Mok
        170    3.50   3.50  3♠ E +1   T  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        420    1.00   6.00  4♠ E      J  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        420    1.00   6.00  4♠ E      T  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        420    1.00   6.00  4♠ E      T  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM9-Sebring-Perry

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

West will end up in the spade game, no matter how vigorously North competes with these great diamonds. It's hard to fly on one wing, though, and South won't be any help. North must be careful, if E-W seem to be faltering short of game, not to shove them into it.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

15 ♠T3
AT8752
A632
♣A
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AK8
96
J94
♣98753
♠QJ2
K
KQ87
♣KQJT6
♠97654
QJ43
T5
♣42
12
817
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 1♠ 2NT  ♣3 ♦5
EW: 3♣ 1  ♥3 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +300 5♣*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  870          7.00   0.00  2* N +1  ♣K  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  300          6.00   1.00  5♣* E -2  J  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
  100          5.00   2.00  5♣* E -1  Q  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
   50          4.00   3.00  4♣ E -1   Q  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        130    1.50   5.50  4♣ W      A  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        130    1.50   5.50  4♣ E      Q  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        130    1.50   5.50  3♣ E +1   Q  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        130    1.50   5.50  2♣ E +2   A  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM9-Sebring-Perry

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

North opens 1. East doubles. If their agreement allows, South can now make a preemptive raise--a mighty pushy bid with so few points. West reluctantly bids clubs. How will it go from there? North has only 12 HCP, after all, and knows there's an opening hand or better over his left shoulder. Maybe the better part of valor is to let the opponents play their minor suit partial.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

16 ♠962
K8
T765
♣AQ85
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠A54
JT9654
K
♣K72
♠QT87
Q73
983
♣JT6
♠KJ3
A2
AQJ42
♣943
9
115
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/5♣ 4/5 2♠ 4NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦2 ♠5 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          7.00   0.00  3N S      6  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  120          6.00   1.00  2N S      6  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
  110          5.00   2.00  3 S      J  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
  100          2.50   4.50  3 W -1   T  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
  100          2.50   4.50  2 W -1   T  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
  100          2.50   4.50  2 W -1   5  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
  100          2.50   4.50  2 W -1   ♣5  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
         50    0.00   7.00  3N N -1   3  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM5-Norton-Booth

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

At most tables, South will open 1NT in fourth seat--and should end up in the NT game. Nine tricks are more likely than 10: most will lose to the singleton K. The finesse is usual with only nine trumps. Get a spade trick by playing East for the Q.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

17 ♠AT4
QT53
5
♣KT642
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KJ3
A74
KQT76
♣83
♠Q986
K982
A9432
♣-
♠752
J6
J8
♣AQJ975
9
139
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦1 ♥4 ♠3 NT6
EW: 6 3 4♠  ♣5 NT6
LoTT: 20 - 21 = -1
Par: -920 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          7.00   0.00  4 E -3   ♣A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        110    6.00   1.00  1 E +1   ♣A  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        150    5.00   2.00  4 W +1   ♣2  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM2-Mok-Mok
        170    3.50   3.50  4 W +2   ♣2  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        170    3.50   3.50  3 W +3   ♣K  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
        420    2.00   5.00  5 E +1   ♣K  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        550    1.00   6.00  5* W     ♣4  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        710    0.00   7.00  4* W +2  ♣K  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

In third seat, South has an irksome 3 opener. West almost surely will double and most Easts will prefer the four card heart suit to the five card diamond suit in response to the double. Alas, the hearts are very uncooperative. If West happens just to overcall the diamonds, E-W will easily get to their diamond game. But I wouldn't fault any West who doubled.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

18 ♠K76
9
9654
♣JT832
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠QJ9
QJT3
AQJ8
♣54
♠AT842
K52
T
♣KQ96
♠53
A8764
K732
♣A7
4
1312
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2
EW: 2♣ 1 4 3♠ 5NT
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.50   0.50  4♠ E -2   ♣A  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
  100          6.50   0.50  3 W -2   9  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM2-Mok-Mok
   50          5.00   2.00  4♠ E -1   ♣A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        140    4.00   3.00  2♠ E +1   A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        420    2.50   4.50  4♠ E      ♣A  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        420    2.50   4.50  4♠ E      ♣A  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        450    0.50   6.50  5♠ E      ♣A  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
        450    0.50   6.50  4♠ E +1   2  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM5-Norton-Booth

Lynn Berg Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and will end up in the spade game. If South were to lead the A, 4 would go down, but how likely is that defense? Leading unsupported Aces just isn't often wise--though it would work spectacularly well this time. In fact, I suspect 4 will make fairly often.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at DeLandbridge@cfl.rr.com

19 ♠A764
KT85
A
♣AT75
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J52
764
QT74
♣J42
♠KT8
Q2
K98652
♣K9
♠Q93
AJ93
J3
♣Q863
15
411
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 5 5♠ 2NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♥2 ♠2 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +450 5♠-NS/5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          7.00   0.00  4* E -3  ♣Q  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
  450          5.50   1.50  4 S +1   Q  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
  450          5.50   1.50  4 S +1   7  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
  420          3.50   3.50  4 S      4  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
  420          3.50   3.50  4 N      4  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
  200          2.00   5.00  3 S +2   7  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  170          1.00   6.00  2 S +2   Q  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM5-Norton-Booth
  130          0.00   7.00  3♣ N +1   6  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
20 ♠JT65
AQ65
A63
♣J4
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K82
KJT4
Q985
♣97
♠943
7
T72
♣QT8653
♠AQ7
9832
KJ4
♣AK2
12
92
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 5 3♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +650 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          6.93   0.07  3N S +1   5  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
  600          5.79   1.21  3N S      ♠2  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM2-Mok-Mok
        100    3.50   3.50  5 S -1   9  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        100    3.50   3.50  4 S -1   ♣9  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        100    3.50   3.50  3 N -1   7  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        200    1.21   5.79  4 S -2   ♣7  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        300    0.07   6.93  6 S -3   ♠2  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM5-Norton-Booth
21 ♠Q642
Q872
9
♣9872
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AJ93
T5
T84
♣QJ65
♠KT85
KJ96
K75
♣43
♠7
A43
AQJ632
♣AKT
4
810
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1♣ 2 2/1 1NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +100 2♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  660          6.93   0.07  3N N +2   9  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
  130          5.79   1.21  2 S +2   ♣Q  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
   90          4.07   2.93  1 S +1   ♣Q  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
   90          4.07   2.93  1 S +1   ♣Q  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        100    2.36   4.64  3 S -1   T  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        200    1.21   5.79  4 N -2   ♠K  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        500    0.07   6.93  4* S -2  ♠A  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM2-Mok-Mok
22 ♠AJ964
AJ63
J87
♣7
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠Q87
KT52
A5
♣QT32
♠K52
9
KT943
♣K964
♠T3
Q874
Q62
♣AJ85
11
119
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠ -/1NT
       ♣4 ♦5 NT6/7
EW: 2/3♣ 1/2  ♥5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          7.00   0.00  4♣ W -2   3  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  150          6.00   1.00  1N S +2   ♣2  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
         50    4.50   2.50  1♠ N -1   ♣4  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM5-Norton-Booth
         50    4.50   2.50  2 S -1   A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        100    2.50   4.50  3 N -2   4  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        100    2.50   4.50  3 N -2   ♣K  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        110    0.50   6.50  2 E +1   ♠T  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
        110    0.50   6.50  3♣ W      ♣7  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
23 ♠94
765
K963
♣Q874
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AT86
A4
AQT
♣AKJ3
♠J52
KQJ93
742
♣T6
♠KQ73
T82
J85
♣952
5
227
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2
EW: 4♣ 4 5 5♠ 5NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        630    5.00   2.00  3N W +1   3  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM2-Mok-Mok
        630    5.00   2.00  3N W +1   3  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        630    5.00   2.00  3N W +1   3  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        630    5.00   2.00  3N W +1   ♣4  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        630    5.00   2.00  3N W +1   ♣4  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        660    1.00   6.00  3N W +2   3  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
        660    1.00   6.00  3N W +2   ♣4  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
        660    1.00   6.00  3N W +2   ♣4  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
24 ♠86
AKQ2
QJ7
♣K852
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠JT93
T86
A32
♣AJ7
♠A542
753
965
♣Q63
♠KQ7
J94
KT84
♣T94
15
106
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 3 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          7.00   0.00  3N N      ♠4  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
  180          5.50   1.50  2N N +2   ♠4  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
  180          5.50   1.50  2N N +2   ♠2  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM2-Mok-Mok
  150          4.00   3.00  2N N +1   ♣3  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  140          3.00   4.00  1 N +2   ♠A  MM1-Handley-Howell vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
  120          2.00   5.00  2N N      ♠2  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
         50    1.00   6.00  3N N -1   ♠2  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
        150    0.00   7.00  3N N -3   ♠2  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM5-Norton-Booth
25 ♠54
KT6
T9763
♣965
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A97
94
A52
♣AKT32
♠86
AQJ873
KJ84
♣7
♠KQJT32
52
Q
♣QJ84
3
1511
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦2/1 ♥0 ♠5 NT0
EW: 4♣ 5 7 2♠ 7NT
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -2220 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        600    7.00   0.00  3N W      ♠5  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        630    6.00   1.00  3N W +1   ♠5  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
        650    4.50   2.50  4 E +1   ♠K  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
        650    4.50   2.50  4 E +1   Q  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        660    3.00   4.00  3N W +2   ♠5  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        680    1.50   5.50  4 E +2   ♠K  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM5-Norton-Booth
        680    1.50   5.50  4 E +2   Q  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
       1800    0.00   7.00  3N** W +2 ♠5  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
26 ♠QJ932
-
KQ
♣KT9754
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠6
K9874
T842
♣832
♠T87
J532
J97
♣AQ6
♠AK54
AQT6
A653
♣J
11
38
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3/4 2 6♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +1430 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          5.00   2.00  4♠ N +2   ♠7  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
  680          5.00   2.00  4♠ N +2   3  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM5-Norton-Booth
  680          5.00   2.00  4♠ N +2   7  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
  680          5.00   2.00  4♠ N +2   ♣A  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
  680          5.00   2.00  4♠ N +2   ♣A  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM9-Sebring-Perry
  650          1.50   5.50  4♠ N +1   2  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  650          1.50   5.50  4♠ N +1   2  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
  620          0.00   7.00  4♠ N      ♠7  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
27 ♠953
3
AQ9753
♣K98
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠42
AQJ842
6
♣T732
♠QJ87
T95
K8
♣AJ64
♠AKT6
K76
JT42
♣Q5
9
711
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 2♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT4
EW: 2♣ 3 2NT  ♦3 ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +100 4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          7.00   0.00  4 S      ♠4  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM7-Hedegard-Hedlund
  100          6.00   1.00  3 W -2   A  MM7-Anthony-Fogle vs MM5-Norton-Booth
         50    4.00   3.00  5 S -1   A  MM4-Papst-Stange vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
         50    4.00   3.00  5 S -1   A  MM5-McIntyre-Reed vs MM1-Lawther-Gore
         50    4.00   3.00  4 S -1   ♠3  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM3-Kirby-Schrenzel
        100    2.00   5.00  5 S -2   A  MM2-Roberts-Callaway vs MM4-Viau-Sheere
        140    1.00   6.00  2 W +1   9  MM3-Altavilla-Vreeland vs MM6-Heller-Sendell
        420    0.00   7.00  4 W      A  MM9-Quenette-Sommer vs MM9-Sebring-Perry