- Monday Morn - November 19, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Field strength:  Mean: 236 MP  Geomean: 149 MP
(based on 34 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Karen Mok - Ray Mok 59.12 1st A 0.90
Fran Soskins - Louise Barnard 58.89 1st A 0.90
Barbara Sprenger - Shirley Larsen 58.18 2nd A 0.63
Ed Schrenzel - Neville Kirby 55.01 2nd A 0.63
Floyd Viau - Richard Sheere 54.05 3rd A 0.45
Carol Sendell - Patricia Heller 52.66 3rd A 0.45
David Ow - Glenn Chee 51.38 4th A 0.32
Janet Hedlund - Mary Stange 49.38 4th A 0.32
EVENT>Monday Morning Pairs     |SESSION>Monday Morn  |SECTION> MM N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>November 19, 2018  |CLUB NO.>228684    | 11/19/2018 14:03
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   7 |MP LIMITS>None/300/100   |CLUB>County Public
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=7/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Jane Altavilla         Joseph Howell            A    .     .     .     77.62  46.20
 2 Wayne McIntyre         Sally Reed               B    .     .     .     82.82  49.30
 3 Debeliah Anthony       Richard Vreeland         B    .     .     .     78.63  46.80
 4 Julie Garvin           Joseph Garvin            B    .     .     .     63.54  37.82
 5 Mary Stange            Janet Hedlund            A    4     .     .     82.95  49.38  0.32(A)
 6 Shirley Larsen         Barbara Sprenger         B    2     2     .     97.75  58.18  0.63(A)
 7 Alicia Greenan         Harriet Sundblad         C    .     .     .     81.53  48.53
 8 Fran Soskins           Louise Barnard           C    1     1     1     98.93  58.89  0.90(A)
 9 Richard Sheere         Floyd Viau               C    3     3     .     90.81  54.05  0.45(A)
                                          Totals                         754.58

EVENT>Monday Morning Pairs     |SESSION>Monday Morn  |SECTION> MM E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   7 |MP LIMITS>None/300/100   |CLUB>County Public
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Joe Norton             Stephanie Booth          A    .     .     .     86.26  51.35
 2 Glenn Chee             David Ow                 B    4     .     .     86.31  51.38  0.32(A)
 3 Patricia Heller        Carol Sendell            A    3     .     .     88.47  52.66  0.45(A)
 4 Neville Kirby          Ed Schrenzel             C    2     2     1     92.42  55.01  0.63(A)
 5 Mary Quenette          Wolf Sommer              C    .     .     .     65.00  38.69
 6 Ray Mok                Karen Mok                B    1     1     .     99.32  59.12  0.90(A)
 7 Pamela Lawther         Bob Gore                 B    .     .     .     73.01  43.46
 8 Marian Carapezza       Anjalie Kulkarni         B    .     .     .     80.41  47.86
                                          Totals                         671.20

Hands and Results
1 ♠KQJ8
8654
Q7
♣654
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠6432
KJ9
T654
♣J9
♠T
Q72
AK982
♣AKT8
♠A975
AT3
J3
♣Q732
8
516
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT5
EW: 2/1♣ 5 1 1♠ 2NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -400 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    6.36   0.64  2 E +2   A  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        130    6.36   0.64  1 E +3   ♣2  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        150    2.93   4.07  4 E +1   3  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        150    2.93   4.07  3 E +2   ♠5  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        150    2.93   4.07  1 E +4   ♣Q  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        150    2.93   4.07  1 E +4   ♣2  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        400    0.07   6.93  5 E      A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM2-Chee-Ow

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
PassDbl22
3All pass  

Although 5 by E/W needs only a 2-2 break or a singleton honor in the South hand and some more luck in s, it's hard to see how E/W can even sniff at game. East has a normal 1 opening and South is close to doubling. With a fourth instead of a fourth , it would look pretty normal, but it's always dangerous to double with both limited HCP and imperfect distribution. I expect that most experts would choose the aggressive double here, but even if they don't, North should reopen with a double if West passes. Should West pass if South passes? It's a close call. The backup support is useful if East doesn't have a fit, but it also feels wrong to bid a four card suit headed by the 6!!! with only 5 HCP. E/W have their best chance to keep E/W completely out of the bidding if West bids 1 and then corrects 2 back to 2. East might bid again, but even that won't convince West to think about game. If N/S do get into the bidding, as long as East bids again to show a good hand, West should compete and it's hard to see how N/S can end up outbidding E/W. A contract will lose four minor suit tricks, a ruff and two tricks, so it will actually be a bit of a disaster if N/S compete to 3 and get doubled.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

2 ♠84
KT82
KJ92
♣752
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠K753
9743
Q654
♣J
♠QT962
J
T7
♣AKQ64
♠AJ
AQ65
A83
♣T983
7
612
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3 3NT  ♣4 ♠4
EW: 3♠  ♣5/6 ♦4 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +100 4♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.93   0.07  4♠* E -1  A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM6-Mok-Mok
   50          5.21   1.79  4♠ W -1   2  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
   50          5.21   1.79  4♠ E -1   A  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        100    3.50   3.50  4 N -1   ♣A  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        140    1.79   5.21  3♠ E      2  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        140    1.79   5.21  3♠ E      ♣T  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        170    0.07   6.93  3♠ E +1   ♣3  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM7-Lawther-Gore

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Dbl
31All pass  
  1. Weak

E/W might be able to keep N/S from bidding 4 on this hand by bidding aggressively in s. The vulnerability for N/S is terrible, and even looking at both the North and South hands, you would not want to be in game, as 4 needs the suit to come in for no losers. In fact, it won't even be clear to many declarers what the percentage play is in the suit, if they happen to be allowed to declare 4s. Many years ago, it was considered standard to open 1 when holding 5-5 in the black suits. There are still pairs who might choose to do so on this hand, but the general consensus is to open with 1. Assuming East opens 1, South is good enough to double, although the hand would be much better if the honors were located somewhere else. East has a maximum weak raise, particularly at this vulnerability, and in fact, some might upgrade it a little and call it a "Mixed" raise (a raise with four card trump support and usually 7-9 HCP). Many experts would use a 3 bid on this auction to show a Mixed Raise, but is West strong enough for it? Typically a Mixed Raise has a little defense and is a hand that evaluates to nearly a limit raise when including distribution. I just can't see it on this hand, and would make a preemptive raise even given the favorable vulnerability. If I only had a Mixed Raise available and not a weak raise, then I would choose that, albeit reluctantly. If West does bid 3, then E/W are in a bit of a quandary, given the vulnerability. It's both dangerous to bid, but also temping, since it's likely that the opponents are trying to steal.

If North does decide to bid, they can double 3 if this is a Responsive Double . A Responsive Double usually focuses on the minors when the opponents bidding is in a major suit, but here, with North's second suit in s, it isn't that dangerous. (If North's second suit were instead, then North will be on a guess if South bids 4s. Here, if South bids 4, North can bid 4s showing the red suits and if South bids 4s, North can bid 4, being reasonably confident that if South doesn't have s, that they will surely have a four card suit.) However, on the actual hand, North has only 7 HCP and dreadful low doubleton , and East is still an unlimited hand, so bidding is fraught with danger.

As already mentioned, 4 happens to make on a good lie of the cards, but will be difficult for declarer to play correctly. Once the bad trump break comes to light, declarer needs West to have four s in order to be able to pitch a loser from the South hand and then ruff a , and given that, the percent play is to finesse West for both the Q and 10, rather than guess to play East for a doubleton Queen or doubleton 10. It would be hard for declarer to get the hand right, but the defense is likely to start with high s, which will either set up a for declarer, or force West to reduce their trump length. This will allow declarer to make the more normal play in s of finessing for the Queen only, as Qxx in the West hand will be sufficient to make. In a contract, declarer appears to have four top losers, but the defense has to be careful. South might well lead a and now when South wins the Ace, the defense must cash their three red tricks. This won't be as easy as it sounds, since North will be encouraging both red suits, rather than giving count. If N/S try to cash two s, or three s, declarer will pitch all of the losers in the other suit on the s and will make at least 10, or possibly 11 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

3 ♠T
972
J87653
♣A73
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠K752
AK5
KQT2
♣65
♠QJ843
8643
A4
♣KT
♠A96
QJT
9
♣QJ9842
5
1510
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 1 3 4♠ 1NT  ♣4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -500 5♣*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.93   0.07  4♠ W -1   8  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        170    5.79   1.21  1♠ E +3   9  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        200    4.64   2.36  2♠ E +3   ♣Q  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        620    2.36   4.64  4♠ W      ♣A  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        620    2.36   4.64  4♠ W      ♣A  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        620    2.36   4.64  4♠ E      ♣J  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        650    0.07   6.93  4♠ W +1   8  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM2-Chee-Ow

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
1NTPass21Pass
2Pass3NTPass
4All pass  
  1. Transfer

Most roads lead to 4 on this hand, no matter what the E/W opening NT range is. I confess that I would be tempted to open the South hand, with a rebiddable six card suit and secondary support for both majors, but most will pass. IF South does open, West should double, and East can drive to the game. Whoever declares 4, N/S will need to get their ruff to maximize their score on defense and to do this, they will need to find an opening lead in s. On any other lead, declarer will no problems making 10 tricks and has play for 11. If West is the declarer and North leads a , the defense must be careful. If South wins the first trump lead, they won't know which suit to lead to get to North's hand for a ruff, and might will switch to a . This will be a disaster, as declarer will win, draw trump, pitch two losers and make 11 tricks. Better for South is to duck the first , win the second and give North a chance to signal which suit to lead. If East is declarer in a 4 contract, the defense is a little easier, as the AK makes it clear which suit South needs to lead to get a ruff. Note that if South is on lead and leads a , declarer must be careful to win the with the Ace and not with one of dummy's honors. The danger with winning with the Ace is that the South has a singleton and North has the Ace. If declarer wins with the King, South can win the trump Ace, lead a to the Ace, ruff declarer's Ace, and declarer still must lose a and will end up going down. If instead, East wins the Ace, then when North leads a for South to ruff, South will not be ruffing a winner and there will still be two s in dummy for South to pitch away their losers. The general principle is that when you think a suit might be getting ruffed later, try to win tricks with the honors in the hand sitting behind (playing before) the hand that you think is going to be ruffing.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

4 ♠K75
K863
A3
♣KJT7
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q642
J742
874
♣84
♠JT
QT9
Q962
♣A962
♠A983
A5
KJT5
♣Q53
14
39
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 5 3 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +1370 6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          5.79   1.21  3N S +1   ♠2  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
  630          5.79   1.21  3N N +1   2  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  630          5.79   1.21  3N N +1   2  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM1-Norton-Booth
  620          3.50   3.50  4♠ S      ♣8  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM2-Chee-Ow
  600          2.36   4.64  3N S      ♠4  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
  150          0.64   6.36  2N S +1   ♠2  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM6-Mok-Mok
  150          0.64   6.36  2N N +1   ♣2  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM3-Heller-Sendell

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1Pass1
Pass1NTPass3NT
All pass   

Thanks to the nice distribution of the opponents suits, 6 can make by ruffing two s in the South hand, or ruffing one and then playing for a double squeeze, but N/S are sure to end up in the much more practical contract of 3NT. Assuming the bidding is as shown, East won't have an easy lead and might choose a , a or a . No matter what East leads, declarer has basically 10 tricks on top assuming that East is finessed for the Queen. On anything but a lead, declarer can easily set up an 11th trick in s against the loss of just one trick in each black suit. At first it looks like a lead will hold declarer to 10 tricks, but by ducking one and giving up the Ace, declarer can set themselves up for the same double squeeze that lets them make 6, and still end up with 11 tricks. So, +660 looks pretty normal to me, though it should still be above average, as 12 tricks are basically impossible and some will misplay on a lead, or might guess s wrong on a lead.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

5 ♠J43
J87
9762
♣T96
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A862
Q94
AJ3
♣A54
♠Q9
KT652
8
♣KJ873
♠KT75
A3
KQT54
♣Q2
2
159
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1
EW: 6/5♣ 6/5 2♠ 5/4NT  ♦6
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -980 6-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    6.93   0.07  1♠ W +1   9  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        170    5.21   1.79  2 W +2   9  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        170    5.21   1.79  2 E +2   ♣2  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        200    3.50   3.50  3 E +2   K  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        230    2.36   4.64  3 E +3   ♠T  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        430    1.21   5.79  3N W +1   9  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        450    0.07   6.93  4 E +1   2  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM2-Chee-Ow

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
1NTPass21Pass
2Pass22Pass
33Pass4All pass
  1. transfer to s
  2. transfer to s
  3. Guarantees a fit

Given that 6 can make if East declares it, it's a little surprising that even 4 may be in some danger on this hand, particularly if North gets off to a lead. Before even getting to 4, however, E/W will have some bidding challenges. The biggest challenge to E/W might be that South will choose to upgrade their hand and open 1NT. If they do, West won't really have a bid, but East might compete with their two suiter, and West can drive to game. Of course, if South ends up declaring 1NT, this won't work out so well for them. If West leads a , declarer should end up with three tricks for -400, which will be better than E/W bidding game. However, if West leads a or a , careful defense will result in 12!!! tricks for the defense, and N/S will be -600 for an awful score.

At most tables, South will open 1, and West will probably bid 1NT, despite the anemic distribution. East can transfer to s to start with. If South hadn't opened the bidding, then East might just bid 3NT after the transfer, seeing little future in s at matchpoints. Similarly, if East's s and s were switched, 3NT would look good, with help for the stopper. But here, with a singleton , East should show their suit, if only to insure that West chooses s with a fit. For most pairs, East will just bid 3 to show s, but in the bidding diagram, I have shown an agreement that is increasing in popularity among experts. This agreement is known as "transfers over transfers" and allows responder to transfer to a second suit after their first transfer. I won't go into all of the details here, but will only mention that there are some significant bidding advantages. Either way, West should show their fit after East shows s, and the 4 game should be bid.

South's opening bid will help declarer immensely in the play, as declarer will know to play South for most of the HCP. Let's say North leads a . Declarer will want to lead trump from the East hand as South is marked with the A and might have a singleton. Declarer also doesn't want to ruff a , as this exposes declarer to being forced out of trump, allowing South to safely lead s when in with the Ace. One reasonable approach is to play a to the King, eschewing the Jack finesse to lead a to the Queen. When North has the Jack and the Queen falls doubleton, South becomes exposed to a double squeeze even if they don't exit with the Queen, and 12 tricks will come home for declarer. I expect most players to not find this play and to lose a trick to the Queen and possibly to the Jack as well. On a lead, declarer might even go down. +450 should be above average and +480 will be a near top, but will be surpassed by the rare pair who are +600 defending 1NT.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

6 ♠Q93
AKT7
JT3
♣KQ6
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠854
QJ4
K962
♣753
♠A6
9832
Q75
♣AJ82
♠KJT72
65
A84
♣T94
15
611
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1♣ 1 2/1 4/3♠ 3/2NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥4/5 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          6.83   0.17  3N N +1   9  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM2-Chee-Ow
  210          5.50   1.50  2N N +3   9  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  170          4.17   2.83  2♠ N +2   ♣2  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM1-Norton-Booth
  150          2.83   4.17  2N N +1   ♣2  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM6-Mok-Mok
  140          0.83   6.17  3♠ S      6  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
  140          0.83   6.17  2♠ N +1   ♣A  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
7 ♠KQ65
J86
642
♣542
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠T842
K73
-
♣AKQT97
♠9
QT54
AKT73
♣J83
♠AJ73
A92
QJ985
♣6
6
1210
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT5
EW: 5♣ 1 3 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -600 5♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          6.93   0.07  4 E -3   ♣6  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
  100          5.79   1.21  4♣ W -1   6  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        100    4.64   2.36  3♠ N -1   A  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        130    3.50   3.50  3♣ W +1   ♠K  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        150    1.79   5.21  4♣ W +1   2  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        150    1.79   5.21  2♣ W +3   ♠K  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        600    0.07   6.93  5♣ W      ♠K  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
8 ♠974
AQ
Q743
♣Q764
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KQT8
K74
JT962
♣2
♠J
98532
A
♣KJT985
♠A6532
JT6
K85
♣A3
10
99
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♥5
EW: 1♣ 2  ♦6 ♠4/5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 3*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          6.93   0.07  3♣ E -3   ♠A  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM2-Chee-Ow
  140          5.79   1.21  3♠ S      K  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
  110          4.64   2.36  2♠ S      ♣2  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM6-Mok-Mok
  100          2.36   4.64  2N W -2   3  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  100          2.36   4.64  3 E -2   ♣A  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
  100          2.36   4.64  3♣ E -2   ♠A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
         50    0.07   6.93  3♠ S -1   ♣2  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM1-Norton-Booth
9 ♠65
976542
T8
♣T43
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠K83
AQT3
3
♣98752
♠T742
J8
KJ65
♣AKQ
♠AQJ9
K
AQ9742
♣J6
0
914
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 3/2♠ 3NT  ♦6/5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -500 4*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          6.93   0.07  3 S      ♠K  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
   90          5.79   1.21  1 S +1   ♣T  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        100    4.64   2.36  3 S -2   A  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        150    2.36   4.64  2N E +1   ♠9  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        150    2.36   4.64  1N E +2   7  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        150    2.36   4.64  3♣ W +2   ♠5  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        180    0.07   6.93  2N E +2   7  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM1-Norton-Booth
10 ♠8
AQ872
T542
♣Q95
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠JT64
KT4
KQ6
♣742
♠93
965
98
♣AJT863
♠AKQ752
J3
AJ73
♣K
8
95
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 3/4 3/4♠ 1NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥2/3 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +620 4♠-N/4-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          6.93   0.07  4♠ S      ♣7  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  170          5.21   1.79  3♠ S +1   ♣7  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
  170          5.21   1.79  3♠ S +1   ♣2  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM2-Chee-Ow
  140          2.36   4.64  3♠ S      ♣2  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
  140          2.36   4.64  2♠ S +1   K  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
  140          2.36   4.64  1♠ S +2   K  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        100    0.07   6.93  4♠ S -1   K  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
11 ♠AKQ964
K3
Q98
♣K8
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠3
T842
JT743
♣T54
♠JT852
AQJ765
A
♣A
♠7
9
K652
♣QJ97632
17
116
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2 2/-♠
       ♥2 ♠8/6 NT6/5
EW: 4  ♣3 ♦5 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -100 5♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          6.93   0.07  2♠ N      ♣A  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        100    5.79   1.21  3♠* N -1  A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        200    4.64   2.36  4N N -4   7  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        230    3.50   3.50  3 E +3   ♠7  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        300    1.79   5.21  4♠* N -2  ♣A  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        300    1.79   5.21  4♠* N -2  ♣A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
       1100    0.07   6.93  6♠* N -5  ♣A  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
12 ♠AJ7
QT53
87
♣T976
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠9843
987
JT9
♣Q54
♠KQ52
AJ
AQ632
♣J2
♠T6
K642
K54
♣AK83
7
317
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 1NT  ♦6 ♠6/5
EW: 1 1♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          5.21   1.79  1N E -1   ♣A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
   50          5.21   1.79  1N E -1   ♣4  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
   50          5.21   1.79  2♠ E -1   ♣K  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM1-Norton-Booth
   50          5.21   1.79  3 E -1   ♣A  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
         70    2.36   4.64  1 E      ♠T  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
         90    1.21   5.79  1N E      ♣3  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        100    0.07   6.93  4 N -1   ♠K  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
13 ♠4
AT952
QT9
♣7642
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AKQT8
3
75
♣AT853
♠J97
QJ84
J43
♣KQ9
♠6532
K76
AK862
♣J
6
1310
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3  ♣3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 16 = +3
Par: -500 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.93   0.07  4♠ W -2   2  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM6-Mok-Mok
  100          4.64   2.36  4♠ W -1   A  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM1-Norton-Booth
  100          4.64   2.36  4♠ W -1   2  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
  100          4.64   2.36  4♠ W -1   Q  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        110    2.36   4.64  1♠ W +1   9  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        130    1.21   5.79  3♣ E +1   A  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        620    0.07   6.93  4♠ E      Q  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
14 ♠T83
82
AT62
♣KQ65
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AK96
Q97
K74
♣T93
♠J542
JT3
983
♣842
♠Q7
AK654
QJ5
♣AJ7
9
122
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 5 4 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          5.79   1.21  3N N      ♠2  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
  400          5.79   1.21  3N N      ♠2  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM2-Chee-Ow
  400          5.79   1.21  5♣ N      ♠2  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM1-Norton-Booth
  230          3.50   3.50  2 S +4   ♣T  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
  180          2.36   4.64  1N N +3   J  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  140          1.21   5.79  2 S +1   ♠A  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
   90          0.07   6.93  1N N      ♠2  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM6-Mok-Mok
15 ♠K8762
A2
98542
♣J
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠53
T983
A3
♣A9632
♠AJT
K75
KJ6
♣KQ84
♠Q94
QJ64
QT7
♣T75
8
817
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-
       ♣3/2 ♦7/6 ♥4 ♠6 NT3
EW: 4♣ 3 1♠ 4NT  ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    6.93   0.07  3♣ E      4  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        130    5.79   1.21  3♣ W +1   ♠2  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        180    4.64   2.36  2N E +2   4  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        200    3.50   3.50  2♠ N -2   ♣K  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        400    2.36   4.64  3N E      4  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        430    0.64   6.36  3N E +1   4  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        430    0.64   6.36  3N E +1   7  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
16 ♠KQ7542
AJT65
-
♣Q6
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AJ
4
KT987
♣J9743
♠93
K9832
A53
♣K85
♠T86
Q7
QJ642
♣AT2
12
910
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♦5
EW: 2♣ 2  ♥4 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          6.36   0.64  4♠ N +1   2  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
  450          6.36   0.64  4♠ N +1   ♣5  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
  200          4.64   2.36  2♠ N +3   ♣5  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
  170          2.36   4.64  3♠ N +1   ♠3  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM2-Chee-Ow
  170          2.36   4.64  3♠ N +1   3  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
  170          2.36   4.64  3♠ N +1   ♣6  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM6-Mok-Mok
  140          0.07   6.93  3♠ N      2  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM1-Norton-Booth
17 ♠J742
T75
852
♣J97
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A65
K8
T
♣KQT8532
♠Q8
QJ643
AQJ
♣A64
♠KT93
A92
K97643
♣-
2
1216
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠6 NT1
EW: 6/5♣ 1/- 6/5 1♠ 6/4NT
       ♦7/6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -990 6NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    6.93   0.07  4♣ E +2   3  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        400    4.64   2.36  5♣ W      ♠2  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        400    4.64   2.36  5♣ W      ♠2  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        400    4.64   2.36  5♣ W      8  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        420    2.36   4.64  5♣ W +1   ♣7  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        490    0.64   6.36  3N E +3   6  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        490    0.64   6.36  3N E +3   6  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM1-Norton-Booth
18 ♠JT82
A852
Q6
♣AT2
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠94
K4
9873
♣KQ653
♠753
Q9
AK54
♣9874
♠AKQ6
JT763
JT2
♣J
11
89
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 3NT  ♣6 ♦6
EW: 1♣ 1  ♥3 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +620 4♠-NS/4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          4.64   2.36  4 S      ♠9  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
  620          4.64   2.36  4 S      9  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
  620          4.64   2.36  4 S      ♣K  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
  620          4.64   2.36  4 S      ♣K  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM6-Mok-Mok
  620          4.64   2.36  4 S      ♣K  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        100    0.64   6.36  5 S -1   9  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        100    0.64   6.36  4 S -1   ♣K  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM2-Chee-Ow
19 ♠J543
T76
KT94
♣42
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AT6
AJ52
QJ6
♣KQJ
♠K7
KQ83
83
♣A9853
♠Q982
94
A752
♣T76
4
1812
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 ♠6 NT2
EW: 5♣ 1 5 1♠ 5NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.50   0.50  6N W -1   4  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM2-Chee-Ow
  100          6.50   0.50  6 E -1   A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        650    4.00   3.00  5 E      4  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        650    4.00   3.00  4 E +1   ♠2  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        650    4.00   3.00  4 E +1   2  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        660    1.50   5.50  3N W +2   4  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        660    1.50   5.50  3N E +2   ♠2  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        680    0.00   7.00  4 W +2   T  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
20 ♠AKQJ98
874
A5
♣Q6
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T654
A2
QJ94
♣A84
♠3
KQJT93
T7
♣KJT5
♠72
65
K8632
♣9732
16
1110
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT3
EW: 3♣ 4  ♦5 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -500 4♠*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          7.00   0.00  3N W -3   ♠A  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
  100          6.00   1.00  4 E -1   ♠7  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        100    4.50   2.50  3♠ N -1   K  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        100    4.50   2.50  3♠ N -1   K  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        200    3.00   4.00  3♠* N -1  T  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        620    1.00   6.00  4 W      ♠7  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        620    1.00   6.00  4 E      ♠7  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        620    1.00   6.00  4 E      ♠2  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM2-Chee-Ow
21 ♠5
QJ32
AT872
♣T52
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KJ98
KT86
KQ43
♣Q
♠AQT763
A94
J
♣873
♠42
75
965
♣AKJ964
7
1411
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♥4 ♠2 NT5
EW: 3 5♠  ♣5 ♦6 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    6.50   0.50  4♠ E      ♣A  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        420    6.50   0.50  4♠ E      ♣A  MM9-Sheere-Viau vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        450    2.50   4.50  4♠ W +1   ♣A  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        450    2.50   4.50  4♠ E +1   ♣A  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        450    2.50   4.50  4♠ E +1   ♣A  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        450    2.50   4.50  4♠ E +1   ♣A  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        450    2.50   4.50  4♠ E +1   ♣A  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        450    2.50   4.50  4♠ E +1   ♣A  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
22 ♠QJ2
A8632
KQ
♣964
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠864
T4
AJ98
♣AQT3
♠AK97
J9
5432
♣872
♠T53
KQ75
T76
♣KJ5
12
118
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦4 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 3 3♠ 1NT  ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.93   0.07  2N E -2   5  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
  110          5.79   1.21  2 N      ♠A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
         50    3.50   3.50  3 N -1   ♠A  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
         50    3.50   3.50  2 N -1   ♠A  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
         50    3.50   3.50  2 N -1   ♠A  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        100    1.21   5.79  3 N -2   ♠A  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM2-Chee-Ow
        140    0.07   6.93  1♠ E +2   5  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM6-Mok-Mok
23 ♠J952
KJ86
Q742
♣7
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠74
T54
J6
♣KJ9843
♠K3
AQ972
KT85
♣65
♠AQT86
3
A93
♣AQT2
7
512
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2 4♠ 2/1NT  ♣4 ♥6
EW: 3/1♣ 1  ♦4 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +500 5♣*-E-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          6.93   0.07  4♠ S +1   ♣9  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
  620          5.79   1.21  4♠ S      ♠4  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM2-Chee-Ow
  170          4.64   2.36  3♠ S +1   T  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
  100          3.50   3.50  2 E -1   A  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        100    1.79   5.21  4♠ S -1   4  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        100    1.79   5.21  4♠ S -1   6  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        200    0.07   6.93  4♠ S -2   J  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
24 ♠QJ42
6
KJ73
♣T962
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T7
Q983
A54
♣AKJ5
♠AK983
AT7
QT96
♣4
♠65
KJ542
82
♣Q873
7
1413
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2
EW: 4♣ 5 5/4 5♠ 5NT
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.93   0.07  4♠ E -2   8  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
   50          5.79   1.21  3N W -1   3  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        400    4.64   2.36  3N W      ♠Q  MM1-Altavilla-Howell vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        430    2.36   4.64  3N W +1   3  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        430    2.36   4.64  3N W +1   3  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        430    2.36   4.64  3N E +1   ♣3  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        460    0.07   6.93  3N W +2   4  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM2-Chee-Ow
25 ♠QT54
K84
9543
♣KJ
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A63
92
K6
♣AQ8742
♠KJ9
J75
AQJ82
♣96
♠872
AQT63
T7
♣T53
9
1312
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 4♣ 4 1 2♠ 2NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -130 4-EW/4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.93   0.07  3N E -2   6  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        110    4.64   2.36  3 E      ♠8  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        110    4.64   2.36  3♣ W      3  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        110    4.64   2.36  3♣ W      3  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        150    2.36   4.64  3♣ W +2   ♠4  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM1-Norton-Booth
        600    1.21   5.79  3N W      ♠4  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        660    0.07   6.93  3N W +2   ♠4  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
26 ♠KT9
932
75
♣KJT54
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠J
KT764
K643
♣983
♠Q65
QJ85
T82
♣Q62
♠A87432
A
AQJ9
♣A7
7
77
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 4 1 6♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣1/0 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1/0
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +1430 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          4.07   2.93  4♠ S +1   ♠4  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM1-Norton-Booth
  650          4.07   2.93  4♠ S +1   5  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
  650          4.07   2.93  4♠ S +1   ♣9  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
  650          4.07   2.93  4♠ S +1   ♣9  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
  650          4.07   2.93  4♠ S +1   ♣9  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
  650          4.07   2.93  4♠ S +1   ♣9  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
  200          0.07   6.93  3♠ S +2   7  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM6-Mok-Mok
27 ♠T63
QT82
93
♣8654
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AKQ7542
6
42
♣KQ3
♠-
AK43
AJT765
♣T92
♠J98
J975
KQ8
♣AJ7
2
1412
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦2/1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1
EW: 3♣ 5/4 2 6♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -980 6♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        230    6.93   0.07  3♠ W +3   2  MM7-Greenan-Sundblad vs MM5-Quenette-Sommer
        400    5.79   1.21  5 E      K  MM8-Soskins-Barnard vs MM7-Lawther-Gore
        450    4.07   2.93  4♠ W +1   T  MM6-Larsen-Sprenger vs MM3-Heller-Sendell
        450    4.07   2.93  4♠ W +1   9  MM2-McIntyre-Reed vs MM4-Kirby-Schrenzel
        460    2.36   4.64  3N E +2   5  MM3-Anthony-Vreeland vs MM6-Mok-Mok
        480    0.64   6.36  4♠ W +2   ♣8  MM4-Garvin-Garvin vs MM8-Carapezza-Kulkarni
        480    0.64   6.36  4♠ W +2   ♣6  MM5-Stange-Hedlund vs MM1-Norton-Booth