- Friday Aft - October 11, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Field strength:  Mean: 449 MP  Geomean: 255 MP
(based on 12 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
R.Terry Handley - Steve Green 63.02 1st OA 2.44
Betty Prunty - Bill Prunty 58.00 2nd OA 1.83
EVENT>Steinbeck Friday         |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> FF
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 11, 2019   |CLUB NO.>136838    | 10/11/2019 16:06
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Janet Hedlund   |RATING>Club Appreciation game       |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   25.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/900/400   |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Alan Hedegard          Shelley Sweet            A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     21.20  42.40
 2 David Ow               Joan Roberts             B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     17.45  34.90
 3 Betty Prunty           Bill Prunty              B   2     2     .   |   2     2     .     29.00  58.00  1.83(OA)
 4 Anjalie Kulkarni       Jan Yaxtheimer           C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     25.50  51.00
 5 Barbara Moxley         Patricia Heller          C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     25.00  50.00
 6 R.Terry Handley        Steve Green              C   1     1     .   |   1     1     1     31.51  63.02  2.44(OA)
                                          Totals                                            149.66

Hands and Results
1 ♠K65
9842
J5
♣AT95
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q872
A5
KQT64
♣74
♠A943
JT73
A
♣KQJ6
♠JT
KQ6
98732
♣832
8
1115
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT3
EW: 3♣ 4/3 3 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    1.00   1.00  4♠ W      9  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
        420    1.00   1.00  4♠ W      J  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
        420    1.00   1.00  4♠ E      9  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes and East could open 1 or could call this a "balanced" hand and open 1NT. South passes, and over 1NT, West bids Stayman. East shows and West bids the game. (Over a 1 opening, West bids 1, East raises to 3, and West bids game.)
It turns out NT would be even better in terms of scoring, but this works for 10 tricks also. Declarer loses 1, 1, and 1 (unless somehow the defense lets declarer pitch a bunch of things on .)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠A6
5
QJT94
♣Q9764
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠82
KT7
8752
♣JT83
♠KQT543
QJ94
3
♣A5
♠J97
A8632
AK6
♣K2
9
412
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 2/1NT  ♥6 ♠5
EW: 1♠  ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +600 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          1.50   0.50  4 N      ♠K  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
  130          1.50   0.50  4 N      Q  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
   50          0.00   2.00  2♠ E -1   A  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Ow-Roberts

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1, and South overcalls 2. West passes for now, and North needs to bid something, although not much is attractive, so he might compromise and bid 2NT. South is a maximum and has something that might be helpful as a stopper, so he accepts with 3NT.
There is a making game here, but this isn't it - declarer can only get to 7 tricks (5, 1, 1) before the defense gets back in - although even if they duck a and give declarer that trick early, it doesn't really create enough extra tricks (or more to the point, the defense gets 5 or 6 tricks before declarer gets to 9.) (Although if the defense gets the wrong and gives declarer another trick there, they could give him the contract.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠842
KQ32
Q84
♣T96
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KJ9
J985
7653
♣A7
♠QT53
A6
KJT
♣Q542
♠A76
T74
A92
♣KJ83
7
912
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5/4 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 2 2♠ 2/1NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  2♠ E -1   9  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
        110    1.00   1.00  2♠ W      ♣T  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
        150    0.00   2.00  2 N -3   ♠3  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1 and West passes. North responds 1, so East with a decent hand can either double or just stay quiet - the colors here seem to favor staying quiet. South rebids 1NT, West passes, North passes, and East still doesn't have the power or shape to say anything.
So EW will have to try to go positive by defending. West probably leads a top , which is a good call today, and eventually the defense should be able to get 1, 3, 1, and 3 to beat this 2 tricks, although declarer might be able to squeak out 1, 1, 1, and 3 first (but transportation is a problem for all of that and 3 tricks likely won't happen.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠K854
AK75
Q73
♣AK
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AQJ732
8
A52
♣Q43
♠T96
JT
J986
♣T975
♠-
Q96432
KT4
♣J862
19
132
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/3♣ 2 6 1♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥1 ♠6 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: +1430 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          2.00   0.00  4♠* W -3  A  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
  680          1.00   1.00  4 S +2   ♣3  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
  200          0.00   2.00  3 S +2   ♠A  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West opens 1 and North doubles (too good to overcall just 1NT.) East passes and South bids 4 with this really nice shape. North then has to decide how much he likes his hand - South is showing a good hand but not one based on points (he could have cuebid 2 to show 12+ points), so North may suspect that his K isn't that useful and be worried about his , so he might back off because partner would need some very specific things for slam to work, and just pass - but ambitious/optimistic bidders could go on!
But this is the day that partner does have the perfect hand! Declarer only has to lose the 1 trick (on guessing the J properly.) Largely unbiddable, +680 should be a fine score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠A98
75
T54
♣T9743
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJ652
QT3
A6
♣KJ6
♠T73
KJ92
Q732
♣85
♠K4
A864
KJ98
♣AQ2
4
136
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2  ♥5/6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1/- 1♠ 1/-NT
       ♣4 ♦5 ♥7/6 NT7/6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    1.75   0.25  2♠ W      5  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
        200    0.25   1.75  1N N -2   ♠6  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes, East passes, and South opens 1NT. West overcalls 2, so North just lets it go (which he also would have done over just 1NT.) East is OK with that, and South is a maximum but vulnerable with no particular shape and what looks like a poorly placed K, so he lets it go.
Turns out that 3 would be OK, but this is hopefully at least a positive score (which 1NT probably would not have been.) Here in 2, West should lose 2, 1, 1, and 1, and then potentially have to deal with a ruff in North if the defense goes after those.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠A654
7
AQT93
♣J32
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠Q97
KT96543
J8
♣9
♠J3
AQJ2
K764
♣Q65
♠KT82
8
52
♣AKT874
11
613
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 5 4♠  ♥4 NT6
EW: 3  ♣2 ♦2 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 20 - 20 = 0
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   0.00  5♠* S -1  ♣9  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
        140    0.50   1.50  3 W      ♣J  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
        140    0.50   1.50  3 W      ♣2  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Moxley-Heller

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and South overcalls 2 (not always the best idea to overcall at the 2-level with less than an opening hand's solid values, but 2 eats up the Majors from the opponents, has extra shape this time, and the colors are right here.) West starts with a Negative Double , and North is a weird place - way too many points are being advertised around the table, so he may suspect West of having a long suit for his double, and partner to maybe be a little light with . But he can always run back to , so he redoubles to let partner know there's some stuff up here (he could also definitely cuebid to show the good hand with support, and then work on finding later - this auction could get quite wild.) East passes, South bids 2, and West probably still interjects with 3 with so much length! North bids 3, and it's going to be hard for East not to bid 4 with such support. South has the shape for 4, and so now it will be up to EW to take the vulnerable vs. non-vulnerable sacrifice or not.
If they let NS play 4, the defense will just get 1, 1, and 1. If they press on to 5 (which might not even get doubled) they'll lose 2, 1, and 1. Best option would of course be to get EW to press on to 5 and go down!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠Q9
Q864
62
♣AT832
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠T6432
T53
8
♣KQJ9
♠AJ85
AJ2
A743
♣76
♠K7
K97
KQJT95
♣54
8
614
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2  ♥6 ♠3 NT5
EW: 4♠  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   0.00  3 S -1   ♣K  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
        140    1.00   1.00  3♠ E      2  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
        200    0.00   2.00  4* S -1  ♣K  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF2-Ow-Roberts

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1 and West passes. North responds 1, and so East probable passes. South rebids 2, and that passes over to East who really likely just lets it go!
We can see that EW have a ton of tricks available in , but that's really hard to diagnose at the table with the opponents bidding. And to add insult to injury, South makes his 2 bid as well, losing 1, 2, 1, and 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠AQT65
2
A98
♣K954
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠J8
KQJ987
JT7
♣63
♠K97432
AT43
K42
♣-
♠-
65
Q653
♣AQJT872
13
810
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 4/3 1NT  ♥3 ♠6
EW: 4/3 1♠  ♣1 ♦3 NT4
LoTT: 21 - 21 = 0
Par: +100 5*-E-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.00   0.00  5♣ S +1   K  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
        200    1.00   1.00  3♠ N -4   7  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
        420    0.00   2.00  4 W      ♣K  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF2-Ow-Roberts

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West opens 2, and North overcalls 2. East has a weird hand for this to be the auction that has happened in front of him, but he bids 4 both in the hopes that he might make it OR that somehow NS will try to play 4. South probably bids 5 now, and then who knows where this goes - EW might bid more , North might be tempted to bid 6. It certainly doesn't seem like East will let them play , so probably some large number of , possibly doubled, by West.
So at whatever level West declares , he should lose 1, 1 ruff, and 2. (If East were somehow to play this, he can make 10 tricks in because South can't get the ruff and his trick.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠8652
8
K3
♣AQ7652
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠T
QT97532
84
♣KJ4
♠A74
AK
QT9652
♣T8
♠KQJ93
J64
AJ7
♣93
9
613
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5♠ 3NT  ♦6 ♥4
EW: 2  ♣2/3 ♦6 ♠2 NT4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  4 W -2   ♠8  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
  170          1.00   1.00  3♠ S +1   4  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
         50    0.00   2.00  3♠ S -1   8  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
10 ♠Q
T8542
KQ754
♣Q6
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AJ97643
A93
JT
♣8
♠K
Q
A83
♣AJT97532
♠T852
KJ76
962
♣K4
9
1014
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦6 ♥6 ♠1 NT1
EW: 5♣ 1 4♠ 2NT  ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  4♠ W -2   K  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
  100          1.00   1.00  4♠ W -1   K  FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
        600    0.00   2.00  5♣ E      6  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
11 ♠QT4
3
KJT4
♣AQ652
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AJ9
AT42
A763
♣T3
♠K7653
QJ9865
-
♣J9
♠82
K7
Q9852
♣K874
12
137
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3  ♥2 ♠2 NT4
EW: 4 4♠ 2NT  ♣4 ♦4
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -300 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   0.00  4♣ N -2   Q  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        170    1.00   1.00  3 E +1   ♣8  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
        420    0.00   2.00  4 W      3  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
12 ♠K9
KT8732
Q6
♣QT8
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠53
A9
KT97543
♣K4
♠AQ864
QJ4
AJ8
♣76
♠JT72
65
2
♣AJ9532
10
1014
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦1 ♥6 ♠4 NT2
EW: 6 1 3♠ 5NT  ♣5
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -920 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        150    2.00   0.00  3 W +2   7  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        200    1.00   1.00  3* N -1  ♠A  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
        420    0.00   2.00  5 W +1   7  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
13 ♠A52
K4
JT8762
♣K9
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠KQ3
AQJ963
9
♣Q54
♠T874
87
AQ3
♣AT82
♠J96
T52
K54
♣J763
11
1410
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3♣ 4 3/2♠ 3/-NT
       ♦6/5 NT9/6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  3 W -1   8  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
        140    1.00   1.00  2 W +1   J  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        630    0.00   2.00  3N E +1   K  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
14 ♠A97
T6
K96532
♣K7
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K
KQ9542
84
♣Q654
♠J853
AJ87
T7
♣983
♠QT642
3
AQJ
♣AJT2
10
106
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 6 6♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦0 ♠0 NT0
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +980 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          2.00   0.00  4♠ S +2   K  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
  450          1.00   1.00  4♠ S +1   K  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
  170          0.00   2.00  3♠ S +1   8  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
15 ♠T94
32
T974
♣6432
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠K63
K6
AQ862
♣T87
♠A852
AJ4
K53
♣AK9
♠QJ7
QT9875
J
♣QJ5
0
1219
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT2
EW: 4♣ 5 3/2 5♠ 5NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        460    1.75   0.25  3N E +2   T  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF3-Prunty-Prunty
        490    0.25   1.75  3N E +3   7  FF5-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
16 ♠3
A63
KJ874
♣J963
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠75
KT97
Q93
♣KQ84
♠QJT96
J542
AT65
♣-
♠AK842
Q8
2
♣AT752
9
108
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/4♣ 1  ♥5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 2 -/1♠ 1NT  ♣3 ♦6 ♠6/7
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +130 4♣-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  3 W -3   ♠3  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
  110          0.50   1.50  3♣ S      ♠7  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  110          0.50   1.50  3♣ S      7  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
17 ♠QT75
KT96
T
♣KJ73
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AK642
J7
A73
♣AQ9
♠J9
-
QJ9842
♣T8654
♠83
AQ85432
K65
♣2
9
184
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1/2NT  ♣3 ♦2 ♠5
EW: 4♣ 5 2♠  ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 20 - 20 = 0
Par: -300 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  590          2.00   0.00  4* S     ♠A  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  420          1.00   1.00  4 S      ♠A  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
  100          0.00   2.00  3♠ W -2   9  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
18 ♠QT76542
65
K6
♣83
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠KJ
AKT
QT873
♣JT6
♠3
J87
AJ942
♣Q742
♠A98
Q9432
5
♣AK95
5
148
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠  ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 NT4
EW: 3♣ 2 3NT  ♥6 ♠4
LoTT: 17 - 20 = -3
Par: -200 4♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   0.00  3♠ N      A  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
   50          1.00   1.00  5 W -1   6  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
        100    0.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   8  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
19 ♠KQT983
-
843
♣KQ98
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AJ4
KQ97
AKQ92
♣T
♠65
T8652
JT
♣AJ64
♠72
AJ43
765
♣7532
10
196
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT2
EW: 1♣ 3 5 -/1♠ 4NT  ♠6/7
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.00   0.00  2 W +1   ♠K  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        500    0.50   1.50  4♠* N -3  J  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
        500    0.50   1.50  3♠* N -3  5  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
20 ♠9764
QJT2
982
♣K8
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A85
54
A763
♣AT94
♠K3
K976
T4
♣QJ765
♠QJT2
A83
KQJ5
♣32
6
129
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1 2♠  ♣4 NT6
EW: 3♣  ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -110 3♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    2.00   0.00  1N W      ♠7  FF2-Ow-Roberts vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
        120    1.00   1.00  1N W +1   ♠K  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        300    0.00   2.00  3 S -3   5  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF1-Hedegard-Sweet
21 ♠T976
AK7
K6
♣AKJ4
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AQ43
QJ642
3
♣962
♠85
T9
AJ8542
♣Q87
♠KJ2
853
QT97
♣T53
18
97
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          2.00   0.00  3N S      3  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
  150          1.00   1.00  2N S +1   ♠3  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
        300    0.00   2.00  3N N -3   8  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
22 ♠A5
T942
J75
♣8542
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KJ6
K87
T9864
♣K9
♠Q432
A653
K2
♣AJT
♠T987
QJ
AQ3
♣Q763
5
1014
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2 2 2♠ 1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -110 2♠-EW/2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          1.50   0.50  1N W -1   2  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
  100          1.50   0.50  2 W -1   2  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
        150    0.00   2.00  1N W +2   2  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
23 ♠K95
QT93
A96
♣J32
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AQ732
74
T5
♣AKQ9
♠T8
AK862
K874
♣T8
♠J64
J5
QJ32
♣7654
10
1510
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 3 4♠ 3NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   3  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
        150    1.00   1.00  2N W +1   3  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
        600    0.00   2.00  3N W      ♣2  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
24 ♠AJ
A874
K872
♣KT2
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠764
KJ63
AJ96
♣AQ
♠KQT2
-
QT53
♣96543
♠9853
QT952
4
♣J87
15
157
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2/3♣ 3 1/2♠ 1/2NT
       ♥4/5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -100 3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.00   0.00  2♠ N -1   ♠2  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF5-Moxley-Heller
        100    1.00   1.00  2♠ N -2   5  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        110    0.00   2.00  3♣ W      2  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
25 ♠KT73
83
T94
♣9652
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠J62
AT9654
K7
♣A8
♠A54
KQ72
6
♣JT743
♠Q98
J
AQJ8532
♣KQ
3
1210
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2
EW: 3♣ 3 1♠ 3NT  ♦4
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: -100 4*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   0.00  5 S -2   A  FF3-Prunty-Prunty vs FF2-Ow-Roberts
        170    1.00   1.00  3 W +1   T  FF1-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        620    0.00   2.00  4 W      T  FF6-Handley-Green vs FF5-Moxley-Heller