- Friday Aft - February 2, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Field strength:  Mean: 607 MP  Geomean: 175 MP
(based on 18 players, 2 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Alan Hedegard - Richard Papst 64.00 1st A 0.50
Elizabeth Nasr - Michel Nasr 59.00 1st A 0.50
Cord Hedegard - Terry Handley 55.50 2nd A 0.35
Amy Pofcher - Elizabeth Sebring 49.50 2nd A 0.35
Doris Jones - Ginger Minor 47.50 1st C 0.14
Barbara Callaway - Neville Kirby 47.50 2nd B 0.22
EVENT>Friday Afternoon Pairs   |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> B N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>February 2, 2018   |CLUB NO.>136838    | 02/02/2018 16:16
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Janet Hedlund   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 70% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   50.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200   |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=5/B=3/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Terry Handley          Cord Hedegard            B    2     1     .     55.50  55.50  0.35(A)
 2 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A    1     .     .     59.00  59.00  0.50(A)
 3 Glenn Chee             David Ow                 C    .     .     .     46.00  46.00
 4 Janet Street           William Putnam           A    .     .     .     42.00  42.00
 5 Ginger Minor           Doris Jones              C    .     .     1     47.50  47.50  0.14(C)
                                          Totals                         250.00

EVENT>Friday Afternoon Pairs   |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> B E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   50.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200   |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=5/B=4/C=4                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Neville Kirby          Barbara Callaway         C    .     2     2     47.50  47.50  0.22(B)
 2 Elizabeth Sebring      Amy Pofcher              C    2     1     1     49.50  49.50  0.35(A)
 3 Richard Papst          Alan Hedegard            A    1     .     .     64.00  64.00  0.50(A)
 4 Sylvia Teixera         Marie Louie              C    .     .     .     42.50  42.50
 5 Anjalie Kulkarni       Jan Yaxtheimer           C    .     .     .     46.50  46.50
                                          Totals                         250.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠T962
KT63
Q
♣K762
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AK
J8742
J962
♣A9
♠83
Q9
A74
♣QT8543
♠QJ754
A5
KT853
♣J
8
138
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT5
EW: 2♣ 1 2NT  ♦6 ♠4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +100 3NT*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   1.00  3♠ S      ♣A  B3-Chee-Ow vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  140          3.00   1.00  2♠ S +1   8  B5-Minor-Jones vs B4-Teixera-Louie
  140          3.00   1.00  2♠ S +1   2  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
  100          1.00   3.00  4 W -2   ♠2  B4-Street-Putnam vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        150    0.00   4.00  3 S -3   ♠A  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B3-Papst-Hedegard

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes, as does East (not really very attractive for a 3 bid), and South opens 1 in 3rd seat (or even an aggressive 2 preempt). After a 1 opening, West could try a 2 overcall, but he has a terrible suit. North raises to 2 no matter what West does. East can compete with 3 if West overcalled and now South has to reconsider his hand. His shortness all looks useful now that he's found a fit and the opponents are bidding the other suits, but he also still has only 11 points (not all useful) and partner is a passed hand and only made a simple raise. But 3 is definitely appropriate as a competitive (not encouraging) rebid. It looks like EW will let him have it there.
If North had any Aces, this would have had a shot at game, but this hand has 4 losers in the top 2 , 1, and 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠Q5
QT2
KT9764
♣A2
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠KJT76
J94
-
♣J9763
♠842
A8653
AQ32
♣K
♠A93
K7
J85
♣QT854
11
613
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 1NT  ♥5 ♠5
EW: 1 1♠  ♣6 ♦4 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   1.00  4 E -2   ♣4  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
  100          3.00   1.00  3 E -2   ♠A  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
  100          3.00   1.00  3 E -2   J  B3-Chee-Ow vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
   50          1.00   3.00  4 E -1   ♠A  B4-Street-Putnam vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        110    0.00   4.00  2 E      ♣5  B5-Minor-Jones vs B4-Teixera-Louie

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and South passes - nowhere near good enough to overcall 2 red. West has an interesting choice between showing his and just raising - but with such a minimum hand and really just one bid's worth of input, he should support with support and bid 2 (which also makes life a little harder on North.) Indeed, North might have eked out 2 over 1, but here over 2, 3 seems too dangerous red, so he passes. East and South have nothing else to add, even though South is sure to want to balance in over a bid-and-raised Major by the opponents, but the colors aren't right.
This is a good decision as 3 would not have been a good contract. Beating 2 is possible on a trump lead and continuation, but that is unlikely from Kx. Without that, declarer likely has only 5 losers: 2, 2 , and 1, by establishing the suit.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠852
JT965
-
♣KT973
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AKQJT
K3
AKJ765
♣-
♠764
Q8
T98
♣A8654
♠93
A742
Q432
♣QJ2
4
216
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 2/3
       ♣6/7 ♦1 ♠2 NT1/2
EW: 6 4/5♠ 5/3NT  ♣6 ♥4
LoTT: 21 - 18 = +3
Par: -500 6*-N-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          4.00   0.00  6♠ W -3   J  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
  100          3.00   1.00  6♠ W -1   ♣3  B4-Street-Putnam vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        600    2.00   2.00  3N W      J  B5-Minor-Jones vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        620    1.00   3.00  4♠ W      J  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        650    0.00   4.00  4♠ W +1   J  B3-Chee-Ow vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South passes and West has an amazing hand. It's 2-suited, which normally makes 2 less attractive, but it's so strong that it could be dangerous to open just 1. So 2 brings a positive game-forcing response from East (usually 2), and now West has to choose what to show first.
If West shows first then finding a 5-3 fit may be difficult. Over West's 2, East raises to 3 to show real support and not a minimum game-forcing hand. Now West can cuebid the void and East may try to sign off in 4 without the A or A. If West slows down and thinks about this carefully, he'll realize that this slam now hinges on partner having either the Q or shortness in (since partner denied the A, that's a definite loser now) and so any form of Blackwood won't help answer that. If he's feeling lucky, he may go ahead and just bid 6; if he's not, he might pass now or bid 5. It's hard to be pessimistic with such a good hand, so it seems like 6 is the likely contract.
Though there is only 1 loser with the Q onside, transportation is a problem. Declarer has a chance to make the hand by cashing 2 rounds of trump and then playing the K (which will be ducked) and another . South does not have the last trump and will not want to give declarer a ruff and sluff (though that does not cost on this hand), so he may play a , putting declarer on the dummy with the Ace. This gives declarer a chance to take a finesse in , which sadly gets ruffed, for down 1.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠K3
A943
KQJ9
♣A52
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q94
872
AT7
♣9643
♠AJ76
K6
843
♣KJ87
♠T852
QJT5
652
♣QT
17
612
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1 3/2  ♣5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +140 3-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          4.00   0.00  2 N +2   ♠6  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
  150          3.00   1.00  1N N +2   ♠6  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
  140          2.00   2.00  2 N +1   ♠7  B3-Chee-Ow vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  130          1.00   3.00  1 N +3   ♣A  B4-Street-Putnam vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
  110          0.00   4.00  2 N      8  B5-Minor-Jones vs B4-Teixera-Louie

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes and North opens 1NT. East has values but not shape, so he passes, and South has to decide what to do: pass or bid Drop Dead Stayman. With 5 HCP, South knows their side has at least half the deck, so passing might not be terrible. The winning action today, as it often is, is to bid Stayman and pass 2, losing at most 5 tricks. But if South passes, 1NT is more of a challenge.

This is a good example of 1NT being a race and a difficult contract to play and defend. So much of this hand will come down to little decisions and timing. But on perfect defense, it can be beat. East leads a small , which looks bad initially but is necessary to set the rest of the suit up. When West gets in with the A, he returns a but very importantly, maintains communication by holding the 9. Now when East gets in with the K, he runs and ends in West's hand. West continues with a small and East has to win the J and the guess to drop North's K. This leads to EW getting 2, 1, 1, and 3. But if declarer is allowed to set up and without the defense getting the and right, he could come to up to 2, 3, and 3 tricks. Expect results all over the place on this one!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠J864
QJ6
T96
♣AT4
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AQT53
K9842
J5
♣5
♠K7
T753
K87
♣KQ96
♠92
A
AQ432
♣J8732
8
1011
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♥5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2 2/1♠ -/1NT
       ♣6/5 ♦5 NT6/7
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: -110 2♠-E/2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          4.00   0.00  2N E -3   ♣3  B5-Minor-Jones vs B4-Teixera-Louie
   50          2.50   1.50  4 W -1   ♣2  B4-Street-Putnam vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
   50          2.50   1.50  3 W -1   T  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        110    0.50   3.50  2 W      T  B3-Chee-Ow vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        110    0.50   3.50  2 E      A  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B3-Papst-Hedegard

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes and East passes, but South can open 1 in the 3rd seat on this Rule of 20 hand (or a preemptive 2). That lets West bid 2 Michaels Cue Bid to show both Majors, and North will likely pass. East knows they have a big fit and is a maximum passed hand, so even if partner has a terrible hand, 3 should be a decent place to play and he bids it. South is done, West shouldn't bid again, and North doesn't really have a desire to compete further, so here we are.
Since East is playing this, there's a small chance the defense may slip up and let him pitch a , but if the defense is on the ball, they should be able to take 1, 2, and 2.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠A9732
QT
A543
♣K2
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠Q
A98742
K2
♣8754
♠KJ65
J5
Q97
♣A963
♠T84
K63
JT86
♣QJT
13
911
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♥5/4
EW: 2♣ 2  ♦5/6 ♠5/6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -100 2NT*-NS/2♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          4.00   0.00  2♠ N      ♣A  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
         50    3.00   1.00  2♠ N -1   J  B4-Street-Putnam vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        100    2.00   2.00  3 S -2   ♠Q  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        140    0.50   3.50  3 W      ♠A  B5-Minor-Jones vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
        140    0.50   3.50  3 W      A  B3-Chee-Ow vs B4-Teixera-Louie

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East passes - close to opening but not quite - and so does South. West may preempt 2 - even though his suit is pretty bad, his hand is pretty good, and it will put maximum pressure on North. Indeed, North overcalls 2, not terribly happily, and East is fine defending that. South isn't going anywhere, so here we are.
Funnily enough, this is a good "sacrifice" against West's 2, which looks like it was making. Here, declarer loses 2, 1, 1, and 1, and then the 4-1 trump break will start causing problems when North gets tapped or overruffed in (although if East leads the J, that makes North's life easier.) So if North goes down 1, that's only -50, and if he happens to make it, so much the better!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠-
QJ9743
K42
♣K432
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K97
T652
A763
♣T6
♠AQJ52
K8
J85
♣975
♠T8643
A
QT9
♣AQJ8
9
711
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 1 4  ♠6 NT6
EW: 1♠  ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 16 = +3
Par: +1370 6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          3.50   0.50  4 N      ♠A  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
  620          3.50   0.50  4 N      ♠A  B3-Chee-Ow vs B4-Teixera-Louie
  170          2.00   2.00  3 N +1   J  B5-Minor-Jones vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
  130          1.00   3.00  3♣ S +1   2  B4-Street-Putnam vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        100    0.00   4.00  2N S -1   2  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1 and West passes. North could make a 3/1 invitational bid of 3, but not having that tool, Responder must start with a (semi-)forcing 1NT, and East has nowhere to go since South opened his suit. South rebids 2, and North has to choose between showing his (non-forcing) and raising . It's not an easy choice - although it would be made easier if 1NT were actually semi-forcing, as that would tend to imply that South has a more real suit and is slightly more likely to be short in . North may go low and bid only 2 leaving both or in play, but if he jumps to 3 that will end the auction as well.
If North plays from the top, there are 2 losers and 1 or 2 losers - likely making either 3 or 4!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠K97
JT9542
AKJ
♣7
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AT
K8
T532
♣AKT98
♠Q854
A7
Q97
♣QJ53
♠J632
Q63
864
♣642
12
1411
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♦3 ♠4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4 2♠ 3NT  ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    3.00   1.00  4♣ W      A  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        130    3.00   1.00  3♣ W +1   J  B3-Chee-Ow vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        130    3.00   1.00  3♣ W +1   A  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        430    0.50   3.50  3N E +1   Q  B4-Street-Putnam vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        430    0.50   3.50  3N E +1   Q  B5-Minor-Jones vs B3-Papst-Hedegard

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West opens either 1 or 1 or 1NT, so let's proceed with the 1NT auction. North overcalls with his single-suited option - maybe just a DONT double - and that doesn't stop East from bidding Stayman. South keeps quiet and West shows no 4-card Major, so North still has room to bid 2. East isn't scared off by that and does have a stopper, so 3NT is it.
North does have a powerful hand with lots of entries, but West still makes this as long as he leads up to the Q while he still has a stopper. Then he comes to 2, 2, and 5 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠K975
3
AQJ7
♣A875
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠T64
Q874
3
♣KQJ43
♠Q832
AT9
96542
♣9
♠AJ
KJ652
KT8
♣T62
14
86
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 2 3♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥5/4 ♠3 NT4/3
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          4.00   0.00  3N S +2   ♣K  B3-Chee-Ow vs B4-Teixera-Louie
  400          3.00   1.00  3N N      ♣9  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  120          1.50   2.50  2N N      ♠2  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
  120          1.50   2.50  2N N      4  B4-Street-Putnam vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
         50    0.00   4.00  3N S -1   ♣K  B5-Minor-Jones vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
10 ♠AKQJ7
AQ76
42
♣93
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠53
KT
J9875
♣AKT4
♠T964
543
K6
♣J852
♠82
J982
AQT3
♣Q76
16
114
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 5 5♠ 3/5NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +660 5NT-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          4.00   0.00  4 N      ♣2  B3-Chee-Ow vs B4-Teixera-Louie
  200          2.50   1.50  3 S +2   ♣A  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  200          2.50   1.50  3 N +2   3  B5-Minor-Jones vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
  170          0.50   3.50  2♠ N +2   6  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
  170          0.50   3.50  1 N +3   ♣K  B4-Street-Putnam vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
11 ♠J87
74
9754
♣AQT2
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AT5
A83
Q82
♣KJ43
♠K93
KQJ652
-
♣9876
♠Q642
T9
AKJT63
♣5
7
149
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 2NT  ♦5 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          4.00   0.00  5 E -2   A  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
   50          3.00   1.00  4 E -1   A  B4-Street-Putnam vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
         50    2.00   2.00  3 S -1   3  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        150    1.00   3.00  5 S -3   A  B5-Minor-Jones vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        500    0.00   4.00  5* S -3  A  B3-Chee-Ow vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
12 ♠KJ7
J75432
Q95
♣T
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠A632
96
4
♣J87653
♠85
AK
AT762
♣Q942
♠QT94
QT8
KJ83
♣AK
7
513
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2 1♠  ♣3 NT5
EW: 4♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          4.00   0.00  2 N      A  B5-Minor-Jones vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        100    3.00   1.00  3 S -1   4  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        150    2.00   2.00  3♣ W +2   2  B4-Street-Putnam vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        200    0.50   3.50  3N S -2   ♣6  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        200    0.50   3.50  4♠ S -2   4  B3-Chee-Ow vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
13 ♠87
KJ9653
6
♣QT86
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠952
42
KJT5
♣AKJ9
♠KT43
AT87
32
♣732
♠AQJ6
Q
AQ9874
♣54
6
127
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ -/1 3 1♠ -/1NT
       ♦6/7 NT6/7
EW:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.50   0.50  3N S      5  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B4-Teixera-Louie
  600          3.50   0.50  3N S      ♣9  B5-Minor-Jones vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        200    1.50   2.50  3 S -2   ♠2  B3-Chee-Ow vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
        200    1.50   2.50  3 S -2   ♣A  B4-Street-Putnam vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        500    0.00   4.00  4* N -2  ♣7  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
14 ♠8432
32
Q84
♣7432
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AQT7
J4
KT95
♣T85
♠KJ9
AKT97
762
♣AQ
♠65
Q865
AJ3
♣KJ96
2
1017
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 2/1♣ 4 4 4♠ 4/2NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    4.00   0.00  1N W      ♣2  B4-Street-Putnam vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        110    3.00   1.00  2♠ W      3  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        150    2.00   2.00  2N E +1   ♣6  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        400    1.00   3.00  3N E      ♣9  B5-Minor-Jones vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        430    0.00   4.00  3N E +1   ♣6  B3-Chee-Ow vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
15 ♠A432
J8
T982
♣875
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠KQJ9
9543
73
♣QT6
♠T876
AQT7
A5
♣K43
♠5
K62
KQJ64
♣AJ92
5
813
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3  ♥5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2 2♠  ♣6 ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +100 3♠*-EW/3*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          4.00   0.00  4 E -3   ♠5  B3-Chee-Ow vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
  130          3.00   1.00  3 S +1   ♠K  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B4-Teixera-Louie
   50          1.50   2.50  3♠ W -1   8  B4-Street-Putnam vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
   50          1.50   2.50  3 E -1   ♠5  B5-Minor-Jones vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        100    0.00   4.00  4 S -1   ♠K  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
16 ♠762
T952
A5
♣T953
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠QJ9
A8
973
♣AQ872
♠854
Q763
KT6
♣KJ6
♠AKT3
KJ4
QJ842
♣4
4
139
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2 2♠  ♣5 NT5
EW: 2♣ 2/1NT  ♦5 ♥5 ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -100 3♠*-NS/3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          4.00   0.00  3♣ W -2   A  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  110          3.00   1.00  2 S +1   A  B3-Chee-Ow vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
  100          1.50   2.50  3♣ W -1   ♠7  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
  100          1.50   2.50  3♣ W -1   A  B5-Minor-Jones vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        110    0.00   4.00  3 E      A  B4-Street-Putnam vs B4-Teixera-Louie
17 ♠K63
Q7643
96
♣973
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J8742
8
A52
♣AKQ6
♠QT
J9
KQT73
♣JT52
♠A95
AKT52
J84
♣84
5
149
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♦3 ♠3 NT4
EW: 4♣ 4 2♠  ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -130 4-EW/4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.50   0.50  2 S      ♣A  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  110          3.50   0.50  2 S      ♣K  B4-Street-Putnam vs B4-Teixera-Louie
         50    2.00   2.00  3 S -1   ♣A  B3-Chee-Ow vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        100    1.00   3.00  4 S -2   ♣A  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
        110    0.00   4.00  2 E +1   ♣8  B5-Minor-Jones vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
18 ♠4
KJ9864
Q98532
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠Q87652
A7
4
♣Q842
♠KJ93
Q
AK7
♣AK763
♠AT
T532
JT6
♣JT95
6
820
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3  ♣2 ♠1 NT2
EW: 5♣ 5/6♠ 1NT  ♦4 ♥4
LoTT: 21 - 20 = +1
Par: -980 6♠-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        450    3.50   0.50  5♠ W      9  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
        450    3.50   0.50  5♠ W      9  B5-Minor-Jones vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        480    1.50   2.50  4♠ W +2   9  B3-Chee-Ow vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        480    1.50   2.50  4♠ E +2   6  B4-Street-Putnam vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        980    0.00   4.00  6♠ W      8  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
19 ♠Q9
AJ82
A95
♣9542
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J73
Q3
K843
♣AT73
♠AK852
96
Q76
♣KQ6
♠T64
KT754
JT2
♣J8
11
1014
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣4 ♦4 ♠3 NT4
EW: 2/3♣ 3 4♠ 1NT  ♥5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -500 5*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.50   0.50  4♠ E -1   ♠4  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  100          3.50   0.50  4♠ E -1   ♣J  B5-Minor-Jones vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        170    1.50   2.50  2♠ E +2   5  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
        170    1.50   2.50  2♠ E +2   ♣J  B4-Street-Putnam vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        620    0.00   4.00  4♠ E      ♣J  B3-Chee-Ow vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
20 ♠K5432
Q864
82
♣QT
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠J976
KT72
Q6
♣J95
♠AQ8
9
AT43
♣A8742
♠T
AJ53
KJ975
♣K63
7
714
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1/2  ♣4 ♠5/6 NT6/5
EW: 3♣ 1♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -110 3♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          4.00   0.00  2 S      T  B5-Minor-Jones vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
  100          3.00   1.00  3♣ E -1   ♠T  B4-Street-Putnam vs B4-Teixera-Louie
         90    2.00   2.00  2♣ E      ♠T  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        200    1.00   3.00  3 S -2   ♣5  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
        400    0.00   4.00  2N S -4   ♣5  B3-Chee-Ow vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
21 ♠AJT62
A963
AT2
♣4
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠Q7
KJ874
KQJ3
♣62
♠K985
QT5
95
♣AKQ7
♠43
2
8764
♣JT9853
13
1214
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6/5 NT3
EW: 4 2NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    3.00   1.00  3 W      ♣4  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        140    3.00   1.00  3 W      ♣4  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        140    3.00   1.00  2 W +1   ♣4  B3-Chee-Ow vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        200    1.00   3.00  2♠ N -2   9  B4-Street-Putnam vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
        430    0.00   4.00  3N E +1   ♣8  B5-Minor-Jones vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
22 ♠AJ72
A73
K64
♣KQ8
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K63
J62
T753
♣742
♠T85
KQT85
J2
♣JT5
♠Q94
94
AQ98
♣A963
17
47
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 5 3 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +460 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          4.00   0.00  3N N +3   8  B3-Chee-Ow vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
  460          3.00   1.00  3N N +2   K  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B4-Teixera-Louie
  430          1.50   2.50  3N S +1   3  B5-Minor-Jones vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  430          1.50   2.50  3N N +1   K  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
  140          0.00   4.00  3♠ N      J  B4-Street-Putnam vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
23 ♠J62
J5
KQJ7
♣QT62
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AKQT97
KT
53
♣A95
♠-
AQ76
A9842
♣KJ84
♠8543
98432
T6
♣73
10
1614
0
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1/0 ♦3 ♥2 ♠0 NT0
EW: 6♣ 4 5 7♠ 7NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -2220 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        690    4.00   0.00  3N W +3   7  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        710    3.00   1.00  4♠ W +3   7  B5-Minor-Jones vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        720    2.00   2.00  3N E +4   7  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B4-Teixera-Louie
       1460    0.50   3.50  6♠ W +1   5  B4-Street-Putnam vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
       1460    0.50   3.50  6♠ W +1   K  B3-Chee-Ow vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
24 ♠J876
54
Q2
♣KQJ73
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠93
AKT
AKJT74
♣98
♠Q54
932
985
♣AT62
♠AKT2
QJ876
63
♣54
9
156
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 2♠  ♦3 NT3
EW: 4 4/3NT  ♣6 ♥6 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -430 4NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          4.00   0.00  2 S +1   ♠9  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        110    2.50   1.50  3 W      ♣K  B3-Chee-Ow vs B1-Kirby-Callaway
        110    2.50   1.50  3 W      ♣3  B5-Minor-Jones vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        130    1.00   3.00  3 W +1   5  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
        150    0.00   4.00  2N E +1   7  B4-Street-Putnam vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
25 ♠AK
7642
KT762
♣K3
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠742
9
QJ93
♣AJT72
♠QT53
QT83
A54
♣Q9
♠J986
AKJ5
8
♣8654
13
810
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 3 1♠ 1NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          4.00   0.00  3N E -3   8  B4-Street-Putnam vs B3-Papst-Hedegard
  140          2.50   1.50  2 S +1   Q  B1-Handley-Hedegard vs B2-Sebring-Pofcher
  140          2.50   1.50  2 S +1   Q  B5-Minor-Jones vs B5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
         50    1.00   3.00  3N N -1   3  B2-Nasr-Nasr vs B4-Teixera-Louie
        100    0.00   4.00  2 S -2   Q  B3-Chee-Ow vs B1-Kirby-Callaway