- Friday Aft - August 2, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 643 MP  Geomean: 250 MP
(based on 16 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
David Ow - Glenn Chee 66.43 1st A 0.80
Alan Hedegard - Shelley Sweet 60.61 2nd A 0.56
Keith Hedlund - Neville Kirby 49.78 3rd A 0.40
EVENT>Steinbeck Friday         |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> FF
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 2, 2019     |CLUB NO.>136838    | 08/02/2019 19:53
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Cord Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 70% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/200  |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=7/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Janet Street           Jan Yaxtheimer           C    .     .     .     29.33  40.74
 2 Glenn Chee             David Ow                 B    1     1     .     47.83  66.43  0.80(A)
 3 Alan Hedegard          Shelley Sweet            B    2     2     .     43.64  60.61  0.56(A)
 4 Joan Roberts           Janet Hedlund            B    .     .     .     35.33  49.07
 5 Sam Callaway           Barbara Callaway         C    .     .     .     34.34  47.69
 6 Keith Hedlund          Neville Kirby            C    3     3     1     35.84  49.78  0.40(A)
 7 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A    .     .     .     27.65  38.40
 8 Steve Green            R.Terry Handley          B    .     .     .     34.26  47.58
                                          Totals                         288.22

Hands and Results
1 ♠T94
KJ9
J9852
♣K2
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AKQJ865
432
3
♣53
♠72
876
64
♣QJ9876
♠3
AQT5
AKQT7
♣AT4
8
103
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 6 6  ♠6 NT6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 NT2
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +980 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.50   0.50  5 S +1   ♠A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
  420          2.50   0.50  5 S +1   ♠A  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
  300          1.00   2.00  3♠* W -2  9  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
  170          0.00   3.00  4 S +2   ♠A  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes, East passes, and South opens 1. West could really put the pressure on the opponents and just bid 4, although he might be concerned (rightly so) that this could go down 3, doubled, and be a bigger negative than letting the opponents make their game. However, partner would have to have absolutely no help for that to be the case, and then the opponents might have a slam, so 4 will make it the hardest for them to know what is right. Indeed, North just passes* over 4, as does East, but South reopens with a double. North takes that out to 5, and then it's up to South whether to take the plunge to 6 or not. He really has very few losers, so he might - but West's preempt has made this more difficult no matter what. (*North could also bid 5 immediately over 4 - safer as a passed hand, and then South has a much easier 6 bid!)
Indeed, in 6, all declarer has to lose is that one , and then all is well!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠85
42
852
♣AQJ854
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠A643
T986
AT7
♣K9
♠KQJ2
Q75
K6
♣T732
♠T97
AKJ3
QJ943
♣6
7
1111
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 1NT  ♥6 ♠5
EW: 1/- 2♠  ♣4 ♦4 ♥7/6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  3 S      6  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
   90          1.50   1.50  1N N      ♠K  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
   90          1.50   1.50  1N N      ♠J  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
   50          0.00   3.00  2♠ E -1   A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East passes, South passes (closer to opening than East, but probably good to pass, 2nd seat red), and now West can open 1. North can come in with 3, and East makes a Negative Double . South passes, happy to sit quietly now, and how far this fails will depend on which Major West chooses!
In 3, declarer loses 3 and 2, without a whole lot of hope of avoiding or getting rid of any of those losers. In 3, however, it's a lot worse as the are another loser when West gets tapped in , and has to deal with the little to lose if he can't ruff it.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠J4
K9853
7
♣AK542
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠T6
64
QJ854
♣T983
♠AKQ8
72
A962
♣QJ7
♠97532
AQJT
KT3
♣6
11
316
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 2♠ 2NT  ♦5
EW: 1  ♣5 ♥3 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  690          3.00   0.00  4* N +1  ♠A  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
  590          2.00   1.00  4* N     ♠A  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
  420          1.00   2.00  4 N      ♠A  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
  200          0.00   3.00  3 N +2   ♠A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South passes, West passes, and North opens 1. East makes a takeout double, which South either redoubles, or bids Drury (or something else conventional like Jordan) if it's on over competition. West bids 2 if he has to over the redouble, and North passes (or bids 2 if he knows South has support - or even makes a 3 game try once/if he knows partner has 4-card support.) East bids 3, and South has to bid again here, especially if North doesn't know he has a fit, so he bids either 3 or 4 - and it seems like with such good trump and the outside singleton (and enough and to make it very likely partner is short there), he probably goes for the game.
That's a great idea! Declarer loses 2 and 1, largely as expected, to make the game.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠K53
954
KT73
♣KQ3
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠92
QT2
Q64
♣T6542
♠Q874
A8
AJ92
♣J97
♠AJT6
KJ763
85
♣A8
11
412
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4/3 3♠ 3/2NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +620 4-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.50   0.50  3 S +1   4  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
  170          2.50   0.50  3 S +1   4  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
  140          1.00   2.00  3 S      4  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
        200    0.00   3.00  4 S -2   Q  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes, North passes, and East opens 1. South overcalls 1, and West keeps quiet. North makes a limit raise with a 2 cuebid, but South just signs off in 2. (If South chooses to make an aggressive game try in , North has to decide how much he likes his hand - he probably isn't happy about the K in a contract, but 3NT is a very real possibility.)
However, in 3 - West likely leads partner's suit, and that's enough to hold South to making just 3 as he loses 2 right away and then 2 as the hand goes on. (Notice that if North were playing this and East on lead, the K is protected and declarer can pitch a on a .) (And 3NT works!)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠KJ4
986
A9
♣76543
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠-
AKQ53
Q8532
♣AJ8
♠T98532
JT2
T
♣KQ2
♠AQ76
74
KJ764
♣T9
8
166
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 4 1♠ -/1NT
       NT6/7
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    3.00   0.00  3 W      A  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
        200    2.00   1.00  2 W +3   A  FF5-Callaway-Callaway vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
        400    1.00   2.00  3N W      ♣4  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF2-Chee-Ow
        450    0.00   3.00  4 W +1   A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North passes, East passes, and South passes (probably - could consider opening 1 or 1), so West opens 1. East responds 1, West rebids 2, and East bids 2. West rebids 3 to show almost a jump-shift, and so East can take that to 4.
It's a good thing that all those in East don't have any wasted values, and so declarer only loses the 1 and as many more as he can't ruff - which may not be many if the defense doesn't lead trump right away.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠74
983
9654
♣A542
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠T653
54
T73
♣8763
♠A8
KQ7
AKQ82
♣JT9
♠KQJ92
AJT62
J
♣KQ
4
019
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2♠  ♣5 ♦5 NT6
EW: 2/1♣ 2  ♥3 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  3 S +1   T  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
  140          2.00   1.00  3♠ S      T  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
        120    0.50   2.50  2N E      ♠K  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF2-Chee-Ow
        120    0.50   2.50  1N E +1   ♠9  FF5-Callaway-Callaway vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 2NT, bumping this 19 HCP up for the length of the really nice suit, and so South has a harder time bidding, but is still very strong, so he has to consider whether bidding or defending is a better idea. At these colors, it really seems like defending is better as a game is really, really unlikely when the opponent opens 2NT. So South passes, as do West and North, and here we are.
This is a little tricky for South to defend to not give up an extra trick. It seems like the K is a natural lead, but then South will have to abandon that for a while (East should win that one, though, to make sure that T is a second stopper.) Then when declarer goes after the , South can pitch his little to not get endplayed there, and then North will need to switch to the when he gets in. That should hold declarer to 1, 1, and 5 tricks to not quite make. (The defense can actually hold declarer to only 6 tricks by leading the K, having North overtake, and return right away - but that's not a logical defense to find at the table!)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠A8
A2
KT764
♣QJ93
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KT5
QT53
J982
♣KT
♠Q432
76
A3
♣87542
♠J976
KJ984
Q5
♣A6
14
96
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 2/3 1/2♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +140 3-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          2.00   1.00  3N N +1   ♣8  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF2-Chee-Ow
  630          2.00   1.00  3N N +1   ♣4  FF5-Callaway-Callaway vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
  630          2.00   1.00  3N N +1   ♣4  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
        100    0.00   3.00  2 S -1   9  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South passes, West passes, and North opens 1. East passes, South bids 1, and North rebids 1NT. South could still be interested in a game, though, so he bids 2 New Minor Forcing , and North rebids 2 (or 3, to show this exact shape and probably a minimum), so South corrects to 2 over 2 (maybe 2NT, but this seems a little better), but 3NT over 3.
East leads a on that auction where North showed 2254, but declarer still has a really hard time finding tricks. He's got 1, 2, 2, and 3, all pretty hard-fought, and still not enough.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠J7652
-
A3
♣AK7432
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠3
KQT953
J6542
♣5
♠AT84
J864
7
♣T986
♠KQ9
A72
KQT98
♣QJ
12
65
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 4 6♠ 4NT  ♥5
EW: 1/2  ♣1 ♦3 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +980 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          3.00   0.00  3N S +1   5  FF5-Callaway-Callaway vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
  420          1.50   1.50  4♠ N      J  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
  420          1.50   1.50  5♣ N +1   6  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
  100          0.00   3.00  4* W -1  ♣A  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF2-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West opens 3, and so North has to decide how much he likes this hand - the void is awfully attractive, so 3 seems like a possibility. East goes ahead with 5 (possibly only 4 if he's going to let them play 4), hoping a little bit that the opponents will bid 5, and then South does bid 5! (At least - very maybe 6; South might even bid 6, fishing for 7!) That passes out, as East doesn't need to double, hoping the preempt has done its job.
But when the dust settles, the only trick declarer has to lose is the A - although there's likely to be a second loser as declarer doesn't play to the 9 on the dummy on the first round.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠A7632
AQ96
Q
♣J93
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠T
KJ82
AJT9832
♣6
♠KJ98
T7
764
♣AQ87
♠Q54
543
K5
♣KT542
13
910
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 2♠  ♦4 NT6
EW: 3 1NT  ♣5/4 ♥6/5 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -100 3♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  2♠ N      T  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
         50    2.00   1.00  1N S -1   9  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
        100    1.00   2.00  4♠ N -2   6  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
        300    0.00   3.00  4♠* N -2  6  FF6-Hedlund-Kirby vs FF2-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North opens 1 and East passes. South raises to 2, and East is in a weird place. He could bid 3 (most likely), double (and correct to without showing extras if he can), or bid 2NT as two places to play. North passes over a double but probably bids 3 over 3 (not making a game try), and that seems like enough for everyone.
Declarer loses 2, 1, 1, and 1 as long as he just keeps leading towards the dummy, so doesn't quite make this one.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

10 ♠4
T876
A98
♣AT642
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AK9865
J93
J
♣Q73
♠QJ
A
QT765432
♣KJ
♠T732
KQ542
K
♣985
8
1113
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3  ♦3 ♠3 NT6
EW: 3 3♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♥4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.83   0.17  4♠ W -1   T  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
        200    1.50   1.50  4 S -2   ♠A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
        620    0.17   2.83  4♠ W      T  FF6-Hedlund-Kirby vs FF2-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1 (would be much stronger if those short honors were in his long suit, but this has easy rebids, so it's fine), and South passes. West bids 1 and North passes. East rebids 2 and West jumps to 3 to invite partner - and that's actually interesting to East, who may well accept and bid 4.
If the defense gets their act together to lead trump before declarer can ruff 2 in the dummy, they should defeat this with 1, 1, and 2 tricks - and they should get that chance a couple of times as declarer tries to get back to hand (although even if declarer only gets to ruff one , that probably leads to a loser as well and sets the contract.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

11 ♠74
QJ4
K92
♣98764
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AKJ2
K72
QT73
♣Q3
♠Q9865
93
J864
♣A5
♠T3
AT865
A5
♣KJT2
6
157
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3  ♦4 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3 2♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: +100 3♠*-EW/4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  5♠ E -2   A  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
         90    2.00   1.00  2 W      Q  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
        170    0.50   2.50  3♠ W +1   Q  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
        170    0.50   2.50  2♠ W +2   Q  FF6-Hedlund-Kirby vs FF2-Chee-Ow

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1, and West overcalls 1NT since he's the wrong shape to double and too good to pass and does have a stopper. North bumps to 2 and East bids 2. South passes and West wants to bump, but partner is showing a less-than-invitational hand, so he passes for now and plans to raise if necessary. But it's not necessary, as NS are done.
Declarer loses 1, 2, and 1, and if the defense gets South his ruff, then they hold it to 2.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

12 ♠T2
AKJ75
7
♣A9874
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠J9743
QT
KJ5
♣T52
♠Q
98632
QT642
♣63
♠AK865
4
A983
♣KQJ
12
74
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 2 5 4♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +1370 6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  720          3.00   0.00  3N S +4   ♣2  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
  660          1.50   1.50  3N S +2   ♠4  FF6-Hedlund-Kirby vs FF2-Chee-Ow
  660          1.50   1.50  3N S +2   ♠4  FF7-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
        100    0.00   3.00  6N S -1   ♣5  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes and North opens 1. East passes and South bids 1. North rebids 2 and South bids 2 as 4th Suit Forcing to game, so North rebids 3. That gives South a good picture of North's shape, and since he has covers for North's 3 off-suit ( and ) cards, he can go slam shopping with 4 (hopefully as minorwood.) North cooperates with either showing Keycards or continuing to cuebid, and so South bids 6.
This works out very well - declarer gets 2, 3, 1, and 5, and then as long as he ruffs at least 1 in the short side before he pulls trump, he can come to an extra trick there.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

13 ♠J543
T8643
Q6
♣K7
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠KT87
Q972
A
♣T842
♠Q6
J5
KJ8732
♣J95
♠A92
AK
T954
♣AQ63
6
98
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 3/2 3/2♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-S/3-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  3 S +1   A  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  110          2.00   1.00  2 N      J  FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
        100    1.00   2.00  3N S -1   ♠7  FF5-Callaway-Callaway vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
        300    0.00   3.00  2N S -3   ♠7  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
14 ♠K75
32
4
♣AQT7432
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠JT843
K74
83
♣K86
♠A6
AQT986
KQ95
♣J
♠Q92
J5
AJT762
♣95
9
716
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1  ♥4 ♠6 NT5
EW: 3 1♠ -/1NT
       ♣3 ♦5 NT5/7
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +100 4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   1.00  5 E -1   A  FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
   50          2.00   1.00  4 E -1   ♣9  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
   50          2.00   1.00  4 E -1   ♣9  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
        500    0.00   3.00  5♣* N -3  K  FF5-Callaway-Callaway vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
15 ♠86
T95
JT42
♣9863
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠J3
AKQ7632
A
♣KJ2
♠A952
J84
K75
♣Q75
♠KQT74
-
Q9863
♣AT4
1
1810
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣5 ♥1 ♠5 NT1
EW: 2♣ 6 1♠ 4NT  ♦5
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -980 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        450    3.00   0.00  4 W +1   ♠8  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        480    1.00   2.00  4 W +2   ♠8  FF5-Callaway-Callaway vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
        480    1.00   2.00  4 W +2   ♠8  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
        480    1.00   2.00  4 W +2   2  FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
16 ♠A8732
4
643
♣A876
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠Q94
JT3
KJ72
♣J32
♠K
KQ952
A985
♣T94
♠JT65
A876
QT
♣KQ5
8
812
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4♠  ♦5 ♥5 NT6
EW: 2  ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  2♠ N +3   K  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
  170          2.00   1.00  2♠ N +2   A  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  100          0.50   2.50  2 E -1   ♠J  FF5-Callaway-Callaway vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
  100          0.50   2.50  2 E -1   ♠5  FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Hedegard-Sweet
17 ♠T852
AT92
K53
♣J2
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q764
KQ63
2
♣AT63
♠KJ93
J4
AQ6
♣K854
♠A
875
JT9874
♣Q97
8
1114
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♥3 ♠3 NT4
EW: 4♣ 3 4♠ 3NT  ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  5♠ E -1   J  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
   50          2.50   0.50  4♠ E -1   J  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        400    1.00   2.00  3N E      J  FF6-Hedlund-Kirby vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
        420    0.00   3.00  4♠ E      J  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
18 ♠-
A43
Q96543
♣9743
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠QJ53
T762
AT
♣AKT
♠T9862
KQJ8
87
♣J8
♠AK74
95
KJ2
♣Q652
6
147
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♥3 ♠4 NT6
EW: 1/2 3♠  ♣5 ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  4♠* W -2  ♣4  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  120          2.00   1.00  1N N +1   8  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
  100          1.00   2.00  3♠* E -1  9  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
   90          0.00   3.00  1 N +1   K  FF6-Hedlund-Kirby vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
19 ♠7
A7543
9832
♣K86
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠JT65432
QT
K
♣AQT
♠AKQ
K2
QJT754
♣J3
♠98
J986
A6
♣97542
7
1216
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2  ♦3 ♠2 NT3
EW: 3/4 4/5♠ 3NT  ♣6 ♥5
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -650 5♠-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    3.00   0.00  3♠ W +1   9  FF6-Hedlund-Kirby vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
        200    2.00   1.00  3♠ W +2   A  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
        650    1.00   2.00  5♠ W      9  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        680    0.00   3.00  4♠ W +2   3  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
20 ♠KQ65
T7
85
♣98763
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠42
2
KQT7642
♣T54
♠JT3
QJ63
J93
♣KQ2
♠A987
AK9854
A
♣AJ
5
510
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 6♠ 3NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣3/2 ♥2 ♠1 NT2
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +1400 7*-EW-5
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          2.83   0.17  4♠ N +2   3  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
  620          1.50   1.50  4 S      K  FF2-Chee-Ow vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
  170          0.17   2.83  1 S +3   K  FF6-Hedlund-Kirby vs FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer
21 ♠AQJT42
K873
63
♣9
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠K987
92
Q987
♣Q73
♠63
Q5
AK542
♣T542
♠5
AJT64
JT
♣AKJ86
10
79
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 4♠ 2NT  ♦6
EW:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥0 ♠2 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +650 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          3.00   0.00  4 S +2   ♣3  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
  650          2.00   1.00  5 N      A  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
  170          1.00   2.00  3 S +1   Q  FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Chee-Ow
        200    0.00   3.00  6 S -2   ♠8  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
22 ♠T98
87543
52
♣853
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AQ5
AJ2
J98
♣JT97
♠K76432
-
QT76
♣KQ4
♠J
KQT96
AK43
♣A62
0
1310
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣4 ♦4 ♠3 NT3
EW: 2♣ 3 3♠ 3NT  ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: -300 4*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   80          3.00   0.00  1 N      ♣J  FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Chee-Ow
        100    2.00   1.00  4 S -2   ♣J  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
        170    1.00   2.00  3♠ E +1   K  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
        650    0.00   3.00  4♠ E +1   9  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
23 ♠K96
AK5
KQ5
♣K853
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AJ5
T642
4
♣AJT42
♠32
Q3
JT9872
♣Q96
♠QT874
J987
A63
♣7
18
105
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 3 5♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +650 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          3.00   0.00  4♠ N      8  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
  600          2.00   1.00  3N N      J  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  170          1.00   2.00  3♠ N +1   J  FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Chee-Ow
  120          0.00   3.00  2N N      J  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
24 ♠Q6
AKQ96
AJ8
♣A53
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠JT5
83
Q7652
♣J74
♠A943
J72
K93
♣Q98
♠K872
T54
T4
♣KT62
20
410
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 4 2♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          3.00   0.00  3N N +3   ♣8  FF3-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Callaway-Callaway
  460          2.00   1.00  3N N +2   ♠3  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF7-Nasr-Nasr
  180          1.00   2.00  2N N +2   ♠3  FF8-Green-Handley vs FF6-Hedlund-Kirby
         50    0.00   3.00  4 N -1   2  FF1-Street-Yaxtheimer vs FF2-Chee-Ow