- Friday Aft - October 4, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Field strength:  Mean: 846 MP  Geomean: 431 MP
(based on 12 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
David Ow - Glenn Chee 62.00 1st A 0.60
Janet Hedlund - Joan Roberts 58.00 2nd A 0.42
EVENT>Steinbeck Friday         |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> FF
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 4, 2019    |CLUB NO.>136838    | 10/04/2019 19:15
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Janet Hedlund   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   25.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/500  |CLUB>Steinbeck Friday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Barbara Moxley         Patricia Heller          C    .     .     .     23.00  46.00
 2 Alan Hedegard          Shelley Sweet            B    .     .     .     22.50  45.00
 3 David Ow               Glenn Chee               C    1     1     1     31.00  62.00  0.60(A)
 4 Joan Roberts           Janet Hedlund            B    2     2     .     29.00  58.00  0.42(A)
 5 Anjalie Kulkarni       Jan Yaxtheimer           C    .     .     .     21.00  42.00
 6 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A    .     .     .     23.50  47.00
                                          Totals                         150.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠T864
AJT84
Q53
♣Q
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠5
KQ97532
8742
♣8
♠AJ
-
KJT96
♣KJ6432
♠KQ9732
6
A
♣AT975
9
513
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 5/4♠ 3NT  ♦4 ♥6
EW: 2  ♣6/5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +450 5♠-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  730          2.00   0.00  3♠* S +2  ♣8  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Ow-Chee
  500          1.00   1.00  6* E -3  ♣A  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
  450          0.00   2.00  4♠ S +1   K  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Moxley-Heller

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North deals and passes, and East opens 1. South overcalls 1, so West has a kind of funny bid, but a weak jump shift to 3 seems about right. North was already leaning to 4 (although doubling for penalty is tempting!), and this solidifies that urge, so he bids 4 (not weak, since West "took" the weak bid for the hand) - and if he only bids 3, South will go to game. East wasn't a fan of that 3 bid to start with, and now the bidding has gotten uncomfortable for a 5 bid, so he passes. (Note that if East had bid 5, which is indeed very tempting, South would likely double, West would correct to 5, and North would double just on principle.)
It is just marginally a bad idea to bid past 4 - South should be fine, even if the defense does lead right away and get East the ruff. Declarer loses 1 and 1 eventually (and maybe that ruff.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠74
AT65
AK98
♣KT3
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J32
82
6542
♣AQ76
♠AQT6
J94
JT
♣J952
♠K985
KQ73
Q73
♣84
14
79
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 5 2♠ 3NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦2/3 ♥2 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +650 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          2.00   0.00  3N N +1   ♣5  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
  620          1.00   1.00  4 S      ♠J  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
  170          0.00   2.00  2 S +2   2  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Ow-Chee

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East passes, South passes, West passes, and North opens 1. South shows his first with 1, and North raises to 2. South can make some kind of game try - maybe 2? - or a "spiral" raise, asking what partner raised on - or he can just bid the game - but it seems like in any case North's maximum hand will be excited and get to game.
With both of the missing outside Aces well-placed for declarer, they also wind up being the only 2 losers!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠Q97
T54
K9753
♣T9
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠64
AQ9732
Q6
♣A63
♠AJ
K86
T842
♣QJ85
♠KT8532
J
AJ
♣K742
5
1211
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT3
EW: 2♣ 2 4 4NT  ♠4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -300 5♠*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.00   0.00  4♠ S -1   A  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
        620    0.50   1.50  4 W      ♠Q  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Ow-Chee
        620    0.50   1.50  4 W      T  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1 and West overcalls 2. North raises to 2, which means East has to decide if his hand is game forcing - and as long as partner's 2-level overcalls can be trusted to be sound and real opening hand strength, he should be in good shape to go ahead with his 3 cuebid (or just 4, which can't be a strictly weak bid here), which South will probably supersede with 4 immediately since his colors are right. West is really left with only a double (or a pass if they're not in a forcing pass situation over a cuebid,) concerned as he is about his 2 little losers, and East is flat enough to agree to defend.
It turns out that EW could have played 4NT here for an outstanding score, but that seems pretty hard to find, so instead they'll have to settle for a measly +100. Declarer loses 1, 1, and 2.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠A2
Q965
AJ2
♣J654
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q753
JT432
3
♣K87
♠T986
K7
Q85
♣AQT3
♠KJ4
A8
KT9764
♣92
12
611
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 3NT  ♥6 ♠5
EW: 1 2♠  ♣6 ♦3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +500 4♠*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          2.00   0.00  3N S +1   J  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
  600          1.00   1.00  3N S      3  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Ow-Chee
  110          0.00   2.00  2 S +1   ♠3  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Moxley-Heller

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes and North opens 1. East passes that, so South is faced with introducing his or claiming NT as the declarer, which seems like it might be pretty important for two of his suits. If he does decide to claim NT, he also has to decide how much to claim - it seems like it's hard to evaluate the trick-taking potential of that suit, but it's likely to be a case where either the are useful and there's 9+ tricks or they're not useful at all and maybe even making 7 tricks is a problem. Fortune favors the brave; 3NT it is. (If he does bid 1 instead, North can bid 1NT, and now South can either invite with 3, which North might actually accept, or 2NT, which North probably declines, or just bid 3NT now.)
It so happens that are actually the weakest point for the declarer here - but the defense may not figure that out right away. If the defense leads , they might even give declarer a chance to get the wrong without going down - but on perfect defense, declarer should lose 4, and then has to find the Q for the rest of the tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠AKT
92
874
♣KQJ85
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠9753
AKJ754
6
♣T2
♠Q42
Q863
K9532
♣4
♠J86
T
AQJT
♣A9763
13
87
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 3 2/1♠ 1NT  ♥4
EW: 3  ♣1 ♦4 ♠5/4 NT2
LoTT: 21 - 20 = +1
Par: +500 6*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          1.50   0.50  5♣ N +1   6  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
  620          1.50   0.50  5♣ N +1   ♣4  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
  300          0.00   2.00  5* W -2  8  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF3-Ow-Chee

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North opens 1 and East passes (shape is good, but not enough values for a takeout double) (or maybe overcalls 1.) South answers with an Inverted Minors 2, and West is probably then emboldened to throw in a bid - 3 should work. North passes that (or bids 3), lacking a stopper and having just his solid opening hand of values but more than he's promised, and East adds to the misery by raising - if he's really turning the knife, he'll bid 5 now. This has indeed made South's decision very difficult - he's really only worried about those (and maybe some filling honors). But if he sits back and counts partner's likely points, it seems like he's got nothing really in , can't have much in , and could only fill in 6 more points, so cards are highly likely. South may then take a small leap to 6. And since EW may feel like they pushed them into that, and neither is looking at any kind of defense to that beyond maybe one trick, and the colors are right, one of them should go ahead with 6, and either North or South can double that. OR East could just bid 4, foreseeing no defense to 6 and hoping the opponents might just stop in 5.
This is the best result possible at this point for either side - NS were indeed making 6 (losing just the 1), and EW have found a good sacrifice, losing 2, 1, and 1 for down 3, -500.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠QT865
J53
Q8
♣943
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠3
AT964
K53
♣KQJ7
♠AKJ
Q8
AT9762
♣85
♠9742
K72
J4
♣AT62
5
1314
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT1
EW: 5♣ 6 5 3♠ 6NT
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    2.00   0.00  2 W +2   ♠8  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        620    1.00   1.00  5 E +1   ♣A  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
        660    0.00   2.00  3N W +2   ♠6  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Ow-Chee

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens either 1 or, bumping up the length, 1NT. South passes, and West transfers to . North passes, East accepts the transfer, and West shows the game forcing but unbalanced hand with 3. Now East's next bid probably determines how far this hand goes - if he just bids 3NT because he's got both other suits covered, West will let that go. If instead he bids 3, West could go along with 4 (minorwood hopefully, but forward-going in any case), and that gets us on the right track to 6 - although minorwood will reveal that they are missing a Keycard and the Q (unless East shows his extra length as the Q), and so it's also possible that they stop in 4NT or 5.
But because the are so well-behaved, the only loser declarer has to worry about is the A - although it's most likely that it's just +690!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠J76
K93
J4
♣KQ982
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AKQ832
AJT74
T
♣3
♠T5
852
8765
♣AT74
♠94
Q6
AKQ932
♣J65
10
144
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♥2 ♠2 NT5
EW: 5 5♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♦4
LoTT: 19 - 16 = +3
Par: -650 5♠-EW/5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  3 S      ♠A  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
        140    1.00   1.00  3 W      J  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        200    0.00   2.00  5 S -2   ♠A  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Ow-Chee

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South opens 1 and West has an amazing hand, so even with "only" 14 HCP, he probably starts with a double (or a min-max Michaels Cue Bid .) North would bid 1N T over a double, and East passes, so South probably also passes, and now West can bid 2. North might try 3 now, East passes again, South corrects to 3, and West can bid 3. North passes (or maybe even doubles!), and now East needs to be careful to not blindly pass again - partner is showing an incredible hand by doubling and then bidding twice, red! - and he has an Ace, so it seems like a 4 bid is in order. Now it's going to be up to NS to keep themselves out of trouble - both bidding on to 5 or 5 or doubling 4 will all turn into very sad scores, but it's also very difficult to just pass 4 with either of those hands. (Or in the Michaels auction: 1 - 2 - 3? - P - 3 - 3 - P - 4?)
So results may be all over the place on this board - but if West does get to play 4 (or 4), he only has to lose 1 and 1!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠KQT4
52
T987
♣KJ6
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠985
K63
AJ642
♣92
♠J73
QJ984
K5
♣Q53
♠A62
AT7
Q3
♣AT874
9
89
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 4♠ 4NT  ♥6
EW:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          2.00   0.00  5* W -4  ♣K  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  200          1.00   1.00  1♠ N +4   ♠3  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
  130          0.00   2.00  3♣ S +1   3  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Ow-Chee

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West passes, North passes, East passes, and finally South gets to open 1 (or maybe stretches to 1NT.) East can try 1 just for a lead, North bids 1, and East probably passes since West was a passed hand already. South rebids 1NT, and no one really has much more to say over that. (If South did open 1NT, North would Stayman and invite, and South would decline.)
Now, it happens that NS could come to 10 tricks if declarer guesses the Q right (4 and 5 and 1), and he should - but also very possible to get that wrong (especially if West bids) and lose 4 and 1 and maybe even some if the defense attacked there (but they probably stuck to .)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠AT7654
2
K543
♣J5
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KQ932
97
QJ8
♣Q74
♠J
AQ8654
AT97
♣K6
♠8
KJT3
62
♣AT9832
8
1014
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠5/4 NT5/4
EW: 2 2 2♠ 2NT  ♣5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          1.50   0.50  4 E -2   ♠8  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  200          1.50   0.50  4 E -2   ♠8  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Ow-Chee
        500    0.00   2.00  5♣* S -3  ♠K  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
10 ♠QT7
952
QT5
♣QJT4
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠865
AJ4
96
♣K6532
♠KJ2
KT87
J872
♣97
♠A943
Q63
AK43
♣A8
7
88
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 2♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.00   0.00  1N S +1   ♣3  FF4-Roberts-Hedlund vs FF3-Ow-Chee
        100    1.00   1.00  1N S -1   ♣3  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
        200    0.00   2.00  3N S -2   ♣2  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
11 ♠532
AQJ9
87
♣KQ63
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AQJ987
2
KQ93
♣J8
♠T6
K8753
A652
♣A7
♠K4
T64
JT4
♣T9542
12
1311
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1
EW: 6 2 5♠ 5NT  ♣6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -920 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    2.00   0.00  3♠ W +1   8  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
        450    1.00   1.00  4♠ W +1   ♣K  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
        460    0.00   2.00  3N E +2   ♣4  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF3-Ow-Chee
12 ♠A65
T84
K62
♣QT84
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠JT43
AKQ952
4
♣A6
♠982
J7
AJT875
♣J5
♠KQ7
63
Q93
♣K9732
9
147
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1 3 2♠ 2NT  ♣5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        120    2.00   0.00  2N W      ♣4  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
        140    0.50   1.50  3 W      ♠A  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF3-Ow-Chee
        140    0.50   1.50  2 W +1   4  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
13 ♠JT875
62
764
♣754
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AQ32
87
K83
♣KT63
♠K
KQT95
QJ95
♣AQ8
♠964
AJ43
AT2
♣J92
1
1217
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2
EW: 5♣ 5 4 3♠ 5NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  6N W -2   ♠J  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF3-Ow-Chee
        630    0.50   1.50  3N E +1   2  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
        630    0.50   1.50  3N E +1   ♣J  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
14 ♠KQ64
AJ643
K
♣JT4
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AT9
Q85
AJT3
♣K52
♠52
K97
862
♣A9763
♠J873
T2
Q9754
♣Q8
14
147
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT6
EW: 3♣ 1 1NT  ♥6 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  2 N      2  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF3-Ow-Chee
   50          1.00   1.00  1N E -1   2  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
         50    0.00   2.00  3♠ S -1   J  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
15 ♠QT863
A52
T94
♣96
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠A97
KQ964
K5
♣J87
♠4
873
Q62
♣AQT543
♠KJ52
JT
AJ873
♣K2
6
138
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠  ♣3 ♥3 NT6
EW: 4♣ 4  ♦4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -200 4♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  2 W -2   T  FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
        100    1.00   1.00  3♠ N -1   3  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF3-Ow-Chee
        170    0.00   2.00  3 W +1   T  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
16 ♠T95
AKJ6
QJ76
♣A9
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠K874
93
95
♣T8652
♠AQJ62
84
T82
♣KJ3
♠3
QT752
AK43
♣Q74
15
311
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 6/5 5 2NT
       ♣7/6 ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +920 6-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          1.50   0.50  4 S +2   9  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
  480          1.50   0.50  4 N +2   ♠A  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  450          0.00   2.00  4 S +1   ♠K  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
17 ♠J7
983
KQ74
♣9654
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A83
42
T932
♣AJ32
♠62
AKT65
J6
♣KT87
♠KQT954
QJ7
A85
♣Q
6
911
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 NT4
EW: 4♣ 3 1NT  ♦6 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          1.50   0.50  2♠ S      4  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  110          1.50   0.50  2♠ S      4  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
   80          0.00   2.00  1♠ S      7  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
18 ♠8
AJ95
KQJ7
♣AK82
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AQ764
874
T54
♣J9
♠T9532
Q3
82
♣Q653
♠KJ
KT62
A963
♣T74
18
74
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 5 2/4NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +650 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          2.00   0.00  4 S +1   T  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
  170          1.00   1.00  3 S +1   ♠A  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        100    0.00   2.00  3N N -1   ♠3  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
19 ♠QT8
JT7
KQJ7
♣954
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AJ963
65
A632
♣Q6
♠K75
AKQ9832
-
♣AT2
♠42
4
T9854
♣KJ873
9
1116
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6/5 ♥1 ♠1 NT1
EW: 1/-♣ 6 6♠ 5NT  ♣7/6 ♦6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -1400 7*-NS-6
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  7* W -1  K  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        200    1.00   1.00  3 E +2   T  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
        710    0.00   2.00  4 E +3   ♣7  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
20 ♠K43
J6542
J8
♣732
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠86
KQT
AT762
♣984
♠J72
3
Q95
♣KQJT65
♠AQT95
A987
K43
♣A
5
99
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 3♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♦6
EW: 3♣ 1  ♥3 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +500 5♣*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.00   0.00  4♠ S      ♣9  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF1-Moxley-Heller
  170          1.00   1.00  2♠ S +2   ♣9  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
  110          0.00   2.00  2 S      ♠8  FF2-Hedegard-Sweet vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
21 ♠AQT
AKQ8
K8
♣J652
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠85
J9742
Q965
♣43
♠J4
653
AJ742
♣KT9
♠K97632
T
T3
♣AQ87
19
39
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5/4♣ 2/1 2 6/5♠ 6/2NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +1440 6NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          1.50   0.50  4♠ S +2   4  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
  680          1.50   0.50  4♠ N +2   A  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  650          0.00   2.00  4♠ N +1   A  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
22 ♠KJ4
Q
AJT52
♣A542
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠-
98432
KQ97
♣KT97
♠Q932
AJT6
86
♣J86
♠AT8765
K75
43
♣Q3
15
88
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 4♠ 3NT  ♥4
EW: 3  ♣6 ♦4 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.00   0.00  4♠ N      8  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
  140          1.00   1.00  3♠ S      8  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
         50    0.00   2.00  4♠ S -1   4  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
23 ♠QT732
63
K9
♣8654
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AJ954
A
AT3
♣AKQ7
♠K
T9742
J76
♣JT93
♠86
KQJ85
Q8542
♣2
5
225
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 5♣ 1 2 4♠ 3NT
LoTT: 17 - 15 = +2
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  4♠* W -1  6  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
        630    1.00   1.00  3N W +1   ♠3  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
        660    0.00   2.00  3N W +2   ♣8  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
24 ♠KT4
QJ
QT93
♣K853
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠Q63
K9432
K65
♣T7
♠92
AT85
J74
♣J962
♠AJ875
76
A82
♣AQ4
11
86
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 4♠ 2NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   0.00  3♠ S      ♣T  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer
         50    0.50   1.50  3N S -1   3  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
         50    0.50   1.50  4♠ S -1   ♣T  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
25 ♠98
A852
Q652
♣Q42
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠K3
KQT7
KJ3
♣9873
♠T542
J9
94
♣KJT65
♠AQJ76
643
AT87
♣A
8
125
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1 2/3♠ 1NT  ♣4
EW: 2♣  ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          1.50   0.50  2♠ S      ♣9  FF1-Moxley-Heller vs FF4-Roberts-Hedlund
  110          1.50   0.50  2 S +1   K  FF3-Ow-Chee vs FF2-Hedegard-Sweet
         50    0.00   2.00  2♠ S -1   K  FF6-Nasr-Nasr vs FF5-Kulkarni-Yaxtheimer