- Saturday Morn - February 3, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 814 MP  Geomean: 422 MP
(based on 19 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Keith Hedlund - Peter De Gregorio 61.46 1st A 1.00
Marcia Phelps - Marianne Van Gelder 58.85 2nd A 0.70
Anjalie Kulkarni - Janet Hedlund 53.00 3/4th A 0.43
Jim Lauderdale - Sarah Stern 53.00 3/4th A 0.43
Judith Ritchie - Sharyn Siebert 51.04 2nd C 0.22
EVENT>Sat Morning Open Game    |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>February 3, 2018   |CLUB NO.>150680    | 02/03/2018 14:47
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   48.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/500  |CLUB>H & H  Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=10/B=8/C=4                      ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Sarah Stern            Jim Lauderdale           A   3/4    .     .     50.88  53.00  0.43(A)
 2 Janet Hedlund          Anjalie Kulkarni         B   3/4    3     .     50.88  53.00  0.43(A)
 3 Marcia Phelps          Marianne Van Gelder      B    2     2     .     56.50  58.85  0.70(A)
 4 Richard Papst          Terry Handley            B    .     .     .     46.13  48.05
 5 Elizabeth Sebring      Amy Pofcher              C    .     .     .     45.91  47.82
 6 Peter De Gregorio      Keith Hedlund            C    1     1     1     59.00  61.46  1.00(A)
 7 Sharyn Siebert         Judith Ritchie           C    .     .     2     49.00  51.04  0.22(C)
 8 Patricia Heller        Leon Heller              C    .     .     .     46.50  48.44
 9 Alan Hedegard          Sharon Armbrust          B    .     .     .     34.96  36.42
10 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A    .     .     .     39.63  41.28
                                          Totals                         479.39

Hands and Results
1 ♠AQ32
QT5
52
♣T982
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠96
A7432
AK94
♣KJ
♠754
8
JT8
♣Q76543
♠KJT8
KJ96
Q763
♣A
8
153
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/2 2♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦6
EW: 2♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 3♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          4.00   0.00  4♠ N      A  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O4-Papst-Handley
  170          2.50   1.50  3♠ N +1   8  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
  170          2.50   1.50  2♠ N +2   8  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O8-Heller-Heller
  140          1.00   3.00  2♠ S +1   ♣K  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
  110          0.00   4.00  1♠ S +1   A  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
1DblPass1
PassPassPass 

West has values but lacks the shape or suit texture to compete beyond the 1 overcall. Interestingly, West can almost make 1, and would do so if North failed to put his fingers on a trump lead, trick one or two. Failing the crossruff-killing defense, West could ruff hearts to set up seven total tricks. Cashing the second spade before shifting to a trump only assists West in developing a path to his hand.

However, 2 will be the almost universal contract, and that looks to be making eight tricks whether the defense takes heart ruffs or not. The process of taking heart ruffs and using diamond entries would leave declarer an alternative path to fulfill the contract via his own crossruff.

Plus 110. Next board.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠A5
A93
954
♣AKT76
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠K843
QJ84
T8
♣J92
♠JT92
KT72
KJ
♣854
♠Q76
65
AQ7632
♣Q3
15
78
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 7♣ 7 1 2/3♠ 7NT
EW:  ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠4 NT0
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +2220 7NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  690          4.00   0.00  3N N +3   ♠J  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O4-Papst-Handley
  660          3.00   1.00  3N N +2   ♠J  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
  640          2.00   2.00  5 S +2   Q  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
  630          1.00   3.00  3N N +1   ♠J  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
  170          0.00   4.00  3 S +3   8  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O8-Heller-Heller

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
Pass1NTPass3NT
All pass   

Long suits make up for a lot of missing HCP. This deal is close to an extreme example of that principle, compounded by the favorable position of the diamond honors. With the clubs splitting as well, there are thirteen tricks via two major suit aces, six diamonds, and five clubs! All on 25 HCP and semi-balanced hands!

Some will open a weak 2 with the South hand, but the final contract should always be 3NT.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠Q75
A543
J5
♣AKQJ
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠K84
KQ
KT973
♣742
♠A963
J2
AQ84
♣965
♠JT2
T9876
62
♣T83
17
1111
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♦5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2 2♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♥5
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: -100 3*-NS/3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.88   0.13  4 W -2   ♣A  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O4-Papst-Handley
  140          2.00   2.00  3 N      ♣9  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O8-Heller-Heller
  140          2.00   2.00  2 N +1   3  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
         90    0.13   3.88  1 W +1   ♣A  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
Pass1NTPass2
Dbl23Pass
PassPass  

Jacoby Transfers lend themselves to different approaches when opener has a four-card fit. Some never do anything but take the transfer. More enterprising players jump with four trumps and a maximum, and even more ambitious players have developed more complexity: one method is to jump to three of the indicated suit with four trumps and a maximum, another method is to jump to three of that suit with a minimum, bidding 2NT or another suit of interest with four and a maximum. No, there really isn't just one method, and the result is the necessity of close partnership understandings, adopting the method that most closely aligns with the temperament of the partnership. One part of the theory behind the jumps is that close games will be bid more accurately when the nine-card fit is known. Another underpinning is that the LAW of Total Tricks will protect against losses when the opponents have a making part score.

On this hand South has such an awful mitt that 2 is the limit of the hand, and that is actually a tad lucky, requiring 2-2 trumps and avoiding a spade ruff. But the LAW fails to protect NS this time, because the NS and EW partnerships are limited to eight tricks either way, proving that the LAW is not really a law, after all, since it predicts eighteen tricks but yields just sixteen (this number, for the uninitiated, is the number of tricks available to each side in their best suit contract, summed -- and the LAW predicts that the available tricks will equal the number of trumps in aggregate).

So those who cherish the LAW will be disappointed on this hand.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠JT76
AT32
98
♣T76
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A8543
K95
J765
♣9
♠92
J
AK42
♣QJ8432
♠KQ
Q8764
QT3
♣AK5
5
811
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1/-♠ 3NT
       ♣6/5 ♦4 ♠7/6
EW: 1♣ 2  ♥3 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +500 4*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          4.00   0.00  3♣* E -3  ♠K  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
  200          3.00   1.00  2♣ W -2   ♠J  O8-Heller-Heller vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
  100          1.50   2.50  2♠ W -1   A  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
  100          1.50   2.50  3♣ E -1   6  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
        100    0.00   4.00  3N S -1   ♣9  O4-Papst-Handley vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPass11
12PassPass
Pass   

South's hand is just to quacky and disjointed to want to bid any more. Good thing, for most of the time 2 will be too high. On the normal club lead plus later accuracy, the defense against 2 will come to one club, one spade, one heart and two diamonds. Only winning the opening lead of the singleton club and pushing the Q onto the table can legitimately create the required tricks. But that play is unnatural, requiring East to hold specifically the singleton J -- way against the odds, critical here.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠K3
AJ65
K9842
♣Q3
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AQJ95
743
Q
♣T987
♠T8
Q8
AJT763
♣AK6
♠7642
KT92
5
♣J542
13
914
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2♣ 2 2♠ 1NT  ♥5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.50   0.50  3♠ W -1   A  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
   50          3.50   0.50  3♠ W -1   A  O8-Heller-Heller vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
        120    2.00   2.00  1N E +1   5  O4-Papst-Handley vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        170    1.00   3.00  3♠ E +1   5  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
        200    0.00   4.00  3♠ E +2   5  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1PassPass
1PassPassPass

Not many auctions will follow the path in the bidding diagram. Some will overcall 1NT with the East cards after North opens 1 -- double is obviously wrong. Others will pass, as suggested, but then spring to life, punishing West for balancing. The 1 balance should not generate much enthusiasm for East, who remains without a fit or a strategy. 2 will make for East, but it sounds too much like a spade fit invitation, and that will leave making contracts in the rear view mirror.

A 1NT advance by East would find a making contract and against a weak defense could prove rewarding. But all the defense must do is lead hearts and take tricks.

Gritting one's teeth and passing 1 will yield the best score, Mr. East.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

6 ♠K42
J2
J3
♣QJ9632
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠Q9
A983
Q986
♣AT5
♠J763
KT5
AKT7
♣K8
♠AT85
Q764
542
♣74
8
1214
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT4
EW: 1♣ 5 4 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          4.00   0.00  3N W -3   ♣Q  O4-Papst-Handley vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        170    3.00   1.00  3 W +1   ♣Q  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
        600    2.00   2.00  3N W      ♣6  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
        630    0.50   3.50  3N E +1   2  O8-Heller-Heller vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
        630    0.50   3.50  3N E +1   ♣7  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
1Pass1Pass
2NTPass3NTAll pass

25 combined HCP will most often propel the partnership into game, and absent a faux pas, plus 600 will be the result. Nevertheless, bidding and making what you can make will, as usual, yield a decent score -- about 60%, I'd wager.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

7 ♠QJ76
T9643
9
♣AQ5
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠4
AKQJ5
KQJ63
♣T3
♠K83
7
T842
♣98764
♠AT952
82
A75
♣KJ2
9
163
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 5♠ 3NT  ♦4
EW: 3  ♣5 ♥5 ♠2 NT4
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +650 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          4.00   0.00  4♠ S +1   A  O4-Papst-Handley vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
  200          2.50   1.50  3♠ S +2   A  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
  200          2.50   1.50  5* E -1  ♠Q  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
  170          1.00   3.00  3♠ S +1   A  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O8-Heller-Heller
        200    0.00   4.00  5♠* S -1  A  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
24Pass4
All pass   

Yes, a 4 Splinter bid by North seems appropriate, with some optimism for a perfecto slam. However, South has a rather imperfect small doubleton heart, so that pipe dream is out the window.

Nevertheless, a near slam is available, eleven tricks to NS, justifying in some respect North's aggressive stance.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

8 ♠AKJT753
5
Q
♣JT64
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠Q4
942
K963
♣Q982
♠8
AQT63
AT875
♣73
♠962
KJ87
J42
♣AK5
11
710
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4♠ 1NT  ♦5 ♥5
EW: 2 2  ♣4 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          4.00   0.00  4♠ N +1   7  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
  420          3.00   1.00  4♠ N      ♣7  O4-Papst-Handley vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
  200          2.00   2.00  2♠ N +3   ♣7  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
  170          1.00   3.00  2♠ N +2   ♣7  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O8-Heller-Heller
         50    0.00   4.00  5♠ N -1   A  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass123
Pass3Pass3NT
Pass4All pass 

After the 1 opening and 2 overcall, South has enough room to "discuss" the appropriate contract with North. First a cue bid, guaranteeing trump support and at least limit raise power. No spade length need be specified beyond holding three or more, for later bidding usually can clarify the target.

Whether North bids game directly (six losers) or 3 (lots of losers, few controls), South will be satisfied with game. After a 3 bid, South can offer 3NT, but the idea should repel North -- back to 4.

Three tricks for the defense: one trick in every suit except spades.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠QT65
J83
K
♣AKT32
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠K
AK9752
AQ852
♣5
♠98743
Q6
JT9
♣Q97
♠AJ2
T4
7643
♣J864
13
165
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1♠  ♦2 ♥2 NT2
EW: 5 5 1NT  ♣3 ♠6
LoTT: 20 - 17 = +3
Par: -500 6♣*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    4.00   0.00  4♣ N -1   Q  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O8-Heller-Heller
        110    3.00   1.00  3 W      ♣A  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        150    2.00   2.00  5♣ N -3   Q  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
        230    1.00   3.00  3 E +3   K  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
       1190    0.00   4.00  4* W +2  K  O4-Papst-Handley vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
10 ♠632
A9853
874
♣T8
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠A9854
KJ2
2
♣AKQ2
♠QT7
T6
KQT63
♣654
♠KJ
Q74
AJ95
♣J973
4
177
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦5/6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3♣ 1 3♠ 3/1NT  ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -600 3NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   A  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Papst-Handley
  100          3.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   8  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
        140    2.00   2.00  2♠ W +1   A  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O8-Heller-Heller
        170    1.00   3.00  2♠ W +2   7  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
        620    0.00   4.00  4♠ W      A  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
11 ♠Q654
A642
9832
♣3
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AT72
J98
QT65
♣K9
♠K8
QT5
4
♣QT87654
♠J93
K73
AKJ7
♣AJ2
6
107
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2 2♠ -/1NT
       ♣4 NT6/7
EW: 3♣  ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -100 3♠*-NS/3*-NS/3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   90          4.00   0.00  2 S      ♣K  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
   50          3.00   1.00  3♣ E -1   A  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Papst-Handley
         90    2.00   2.00  2♣ E      A  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        150    1.00   3.00  3N S -3   5  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
        200    0.00   4.00  4 S -4   8  O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O8-Heller-Heller
12 ♠T74
KT4
AKT8
♣Q98
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠A9532
AQ9
764
♣63
♠KJ
763
QJ3
♣JT542
♠Q86
J852
952
♣AK7
12
108
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 1 1♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥5/6 ♠6 NT4/5
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          4.00   0.00  3N N      ♣4  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Papst-Handley
    PASS       3.00   1.00  Pass Out      O9-Hedegard-Armbrust vs O8-Heller-Heller
        100    1.50   2.50  2N S -1   ♠2  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
        100    1.50   2.50  3 S -1   ♣6  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        500    0.00   4.00  3N N -5   ♠K  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
13 ♠AJ84
KQJ62
-
♣KT72
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠K72
83
AKQJ7
♣Q43
♠T96
T974
T86542
♣-
♠Q53
A5
93
♣AJ9865
14
150
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 7♣ 7/6 5♠ 1NT  ♦4
EW: 3  ♣0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0
LoTT: 22 - 21 = +1
Par: +2210 7-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          4.00   0.00  5* W -3  K  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
  620          3.00   1.00  5♣ S +1   A  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O8-Heller-Heller
  600          2.00   2.00  5♣ S      A  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O4-Papst-Handley
  170          1.00   3.00  4♣ S +2   A  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
  100          0.00   4.00  4 W -1   K  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 2!Pass2NT?
34!Pass6
All pass   

OK, you will just have to bear with me. If there is a Flannery hand about, I'm analyzing the Flannery auction as the primary focus. Period. So North has four spades, five hearts, and an opening bid with less than reversing values -- 14 HCP. This is the sort of hand that North would bid again if South were to sign off in a major and the opponents remained silent.

South has some interest in game, however, and 3 is inadequate, so 2NT, the catch-all inquiry, is the solution for one round. West wants to interfere, but even his 3 bid won't matter. In the absence of West's overcall, a jump to 4 by the 2 opener would show a maximum range opening (check!), four clubs (check!), and a goodish club suit (check). The 3 bid did not interfere with that destination, so I suggest 4 regardless with the same meaning.

South's eyes should light up! From a "maybe" game, slam is almost certain! The diamond void in partner's hand is clear, the club suit seems impregnable (it isn't), and the major suit honors are golden. Bidding the club slam in the ten card fit is clear.

To make all thirteen tricks not much is required beyond playing the club suit for no losers. Good luck. West's overcall could just as easily contain a club void as three clubs. So guess away.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch -- If North opens a pedestrian 1, South might bid 1NT forcing, and over a 2 response, employ the "impossible spade" convention, bidding 2 to show a forcing club raise. Nevertheless, good luck with finding the diamond void without Flannery!

In outer space, there is also the possibility that East might take a save in diamonds. If below the slam level, that will actually reap rewards. At 6 doubled or higher, it will be a theoretical game but a practical loss.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

14 ♠3
A98753
T865
♣Q2
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AT95
J4
J
♣KT9764
♠KJ74
KQ62
K973
♣A
♠Q862
T
AQ42
♣J853
6
916
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4
EW: 2♣ 1 4♠ 3NT  ♦5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.50   0.50  4♠ W -2   A  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O8-Heller-Heller
  100          3.50   0.50  4♠ E -2   T  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
   50          1.50   2.50  4♠ W -1   A  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
   50          1.50   2.50  4♠ E -1   T  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
        420    0.00   4.00  4♠ W      A  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O4-Papst-Handley
15 ♠AT7
AQT4
32
♣AQT2
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠KJ862
9875
984
♣J
♠94
K6
KQT75
♣9764
♠Q53
J32
AJ6
♣K853
16
58
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 3 2♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  660          4.00   0.00  3N S +2   ♠6  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
  630          2.50   1.50  3N N +1   K  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
  630          2.50   1.50  3N N +1   7  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O8-Heller-Heller
  600          1.00   3.00  3N N      ♠2  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
        100    0.00   4.00  3N N -1   7  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O4-Papst-Handley
16 ♠T97
AQ4
AJ3
♣A984
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠K84
KT
T965
♣QJ32
♠Q653
73
Q742
♣K75
♠AJ2
J98652
K8
♣T6
15
97
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 5 3/2♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          4.00   0.00  4 N +2   4  O4-Papst-Handley vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
  450          3.00   1.00  4 N +1   7  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
  420          2.00   2.00  4 N      ♠5  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
  400          1.00   3.00  3N N      2  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
         50    0.00   4.00  4 N -1   ♣5  O8-Heller-Heller vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
17 ♠A6543
53
9
♣T6432
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KQ92
KT
AQ6
♣AJ98
♠J8
A842
KT75
♣KQ5
♠T7
QJ976
J8432
♣7
4
1913
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT1
EW: 5♣ 4 3 4♠ 6NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -990 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        240    4.00   0.00  2N E +4   Q  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
        490    3.00   1.00  3N E +3   Q  O4-Papst-Handley vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
        990    1.00   3.00  6N E      Q  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
        990    1.00   3.00  6N E      7  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
        990    1.00   3.00  6N E      7  O8-Heller-Heller vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
1Pass1NTPass
6NTAll pass  

Some 19 HCP hands don't deserve more than a slam try after some of the modern openings you see, but this one seems sufficiently robust, so a direct slam bid after a major suit probe seems good enough. How awful if East had the A and the opponents could lead hearts through the KT! What is the solution? No particular notrump bid is generally forcing these days (some cling to 1 - 2NT as forcing. That would generate enough information to discern whether East has the rest of the cookies for a grand slam.

Here 1 was employed in part to hear the range of the opener's hand. A 2NT rebid would have generated 7NT by responder: the 1NT rebid removed a grand slam from consideration.

So, at the tiny risk of misplacing the declaration, the auction should routinely reach the notrump slam.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

18 ♠AQJ3
K85
K5
♣QJT7
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T75
Q93
QJ2
♣AK93
♠92
AJ642
A83
♣852
♠K864
T7
T9764
♣64
16
129
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 NT4
EW: 2♣ -/1 3 2NT  ♦6/7 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   90          4.00   0.00  1N N      4  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
        110    2.50   1.50  2 E      ♠5  O7-Siebert-Ritchie vs O1-Stern-Lauderdale
        110    2.50   1.50  2 E      6  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
        140    1.00   3.00  2 E +1   ♠4  O8-Heller-Heller vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
        530    0.00   4.00  3* E     T  O4-Papst-Handley vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
19 ♠5
KQT6543
T5
♣Q52
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠A843
J92
Q2
♣KT87
♠KQJT92
A7
AKJ96
♣-
♠76
8
8743
♣AJ9643
7
1018
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♦1 ♠0 NT1
EW: 6 7♠ 6NT  ♣6 ♥6
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -2210 7♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        680    4.00   0.00  4♠ E +2   8  O8-Heller-Heller vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
        710    2.00   2.00  5♠ E +2   ♣A  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        710    2.00   2.00  4♠ E +3   8  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
        710    2.00   2.00  4♠ E +3   2  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O4-Papst-Handley
       1460    0.00   4.00  6♠ W +1   ♣Q  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
Pass23Pass
4Pass6Pass
PassPass  

Some will play 3 as Michaels Cue Bid , showing spades, a minor, and a good hand. That is the method shown in the diagram. West likes either minor, so jumps to game in spades, holding four to the ace. Remember, East shows a GOOD hand!

An alternative method is for East to jump to 4 over 2, showing spades and diamonds specifically. This convention was invented by Meyer Schleifer, a Hall of Fame player from the past. My goal is to achieve naming the convention after him, rather than borrowing the Michaels name -- I consider "Leaping Michaels" a misnomer, although arguably based on parallel thinking.

Nor is the 4 "Roman." Roman jumps show specifically the suit bid plus the next higher, so after a 2 opening, 3 would show spades and clubs, 4 clubs and diamonds, and only 4 would be the equivalent to "Schleifer."

Schleifer does well on this hand. Intended as essentially game forcing strength, West will again make a forward going bid. This time after [2] 4, West may advance with 4, showing strength, not necessarily a heart control in the bargain. That cue bid (not a control bid) will ensure getting to 6, but the challenge of bidding the grand slam might be too much -- East needs to find specifically the Q and the Axx(x). 4NT with a void is problematical in defining the specific ace held by West, and the Q remains elusive.

Science seems lost. Perhaps it is better to give more weight to the cue bid and infer the A is the ace held and that there is a fitting diamond honor to justify the cue bid.

Just do it. Schleifer seems to provide a basis for better evaluation.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

20 ♠J4
A6
KJ75
♣KQ876
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T3
JT532
Q9842
♣A
♠AKQ5
K8
T6
♣JT432
♠98762
Q974
A3
♣95
14
713
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1NT  ♦6 ♥6 ♠6
EW: 1 1  ♣6 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.50   0.50  1♠ E -1   ♣9  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
  100          3.50   0.50  3 E -1   ♠9  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
   90          2.00   2.00  1N N      ♠A  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O4-Papst-Handley
        200    1.00   3.00  3♠ N -2   K  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        800    0.00   4.00  3* N -3  K  O8-Heller-Heller vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
21 ♠K63
KJ9863
JT4
♣2
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠J75
A75
A63
♣KQ93
♠94
4
K9752
♣AJT65
♠AQT82
QT2
Q8
♣874
8
148
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT5
EW: 4♣ 4 2NT  ♥4 ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW/4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          4.00   0.00  6♣* E -3  ♠A  O8-Heller-Heller vs O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni
  140          2.50   1.50  3♠ S      A  O5-Sebring-Pofcher vs O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund
  140          2.50   1.50  2♠ S +1   ♠5  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O4-Papst-Handley
   50          1.00   3.00  5♣ W -1   8  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        170    0.00   4.00  4♣ E +2   2  O3-Phelps-Van Gelder vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
22 ♠QT87
-
942
♣AQ9632
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K952
AQJ9864
Q
♣8
♠J6
K732
K87
♣K754
♠A43
T5
AJT653
♣JT
8
1210
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4/5 1♠  ♥3 NT5
EW: 4 2NT  ♣3/2 ♦2 ♠5
LoTT: 21 - 20 = +1
Par: +200 5*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.50   0.50  5 W -1   ♣A  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O8-Heller-Heller
  100          3.50   0.50  4 W -1   9  O4-Papst-Handley vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
        650    2.00   2.00  5 W      9  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
        790    1.00   3.00  4* W     3  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
        850    0.00   4.00  5* W     4  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
23 ♠T8752
J96
AT
♣KQ3
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠QJ9
Q54
J32
♣T754
♠K43
872
K964
♣J92
♠A6
AKT3
Q875
♣A86
10
67
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 4 4♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +620 4♠-NS/4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          3.50   0.50  3N S +1   ♠9  O4-Papst-Handley vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
  630          3.50   0.50  3N S +1   ♣4  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
  600          1.50   2.50  3N S      ♠9  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O8-Heller-Heller
  600          1.50   2.50  3N S      ♣3  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder
        500    0.00   4.00  6* N -2  2  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
24 ♠852
KT7
AKQ7
♣874
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KT764
Q965
T82
♣5
♠A93
A8
9653
♣AJT2
♠QJ
J432
J4
♣KQ963
12
513
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♦6 ♠4 NT6
EW: 1 3♠ 1NT  ♣5/4 ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          4.00   0.00  1N N +1   2  O2-Hedlund-Kulkarni vs O5-Sebring-Pofcher
   90          3.00   1.00  1N N      ♣J  O6-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O7-Siebert-Ritchie
   50          2.00   2.00  3♠ E -1   ♣K  O4-Papst-Handley vs O9-Hedegard-Armbrust
         50    1.00   3.00  2♣ S -1   ♠6  O10-Nasr-Nasr vs O8-Heller-Heller
        170    0.00   4.00  3 W +1   7  O1-Stern-Lauderdale vs O3-Phelps-Van Gelder