- Saturday Morn - August 5, 2017

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 755 MP  Geomean: 298 MP
(based on 13 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Janet Street - William Putnam 56.25 1st A 0.70
Judith Ritchie - Marion Keyworth 55.00 2nd A 0.49
Peter De Gregorio - Terry Handley 51.25 3rd A 0.35
EVENT>Sat Morning Open Game    |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 5, 2017     |CLUB NO.>150680    | 08/05/2017 14:50
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   24.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/300/100   |CLUB>H & H  Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=7/B=6/C=5                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Doris Jones            Carolyn Taggert          C    .     .     .     23.40  48.75
 3 Judith Ritchie         Marion Keyworth          C    2     2     1     26.40  55.00  0.49(A)
 4 Janet Street           William Putnam           B    1     1     .     27.00  56.25  0.70(A)
 5 Elizabeth Sebring      Debeliah Anthony         C    .     .     .     22.50  46.88
 6 Janet Hedlund          Joan Roberts             C    .     .     .     22.20  46.25
 7 Terry Handley          Peter De Gregorio        C    3     .     2     24.60  51.25  0.35(A)
 8 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A    .     .     .     22.20  46.25
                                          Totals                         168.30

Hands and Results
1 ♠A3
Q82
QJT9
♣Q652
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KJT42
J754
A2
♣A9
♠95
63
K8765
♣JT73
♠Q876
AKT9
43
♣K84
11
134
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ -/1 1/2 2NT
       ♦6/7 ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    1.50   0.50  2N S -1   ♠J  O4-Street-Putnam vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
         50    1.50   0.50  1N N -1   ♠9  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Jones-Taggert
        100    0.00   2.00  3♣ S -2   A  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O5-Sebring-Anthony

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
1DblPass2
PassPassPass 

South might be tempted to bid 1NT because of his spade stopper, but the lack of spade intermediates, the worthless doubleton diamond, poor clubs, and excellent hearts pushes firmly toward the 2 call.

For North's part, the Negative Double seems perfect except for the slight drawback of having just three hearts. The alternative, 2, drives toward the worst-scoring partial. Notrump might work, hearts might work, clubs might work if partner rebids them. Double is the most flexible call.

2 makes because all of West's efforts to defeat the contract fail. A spade lead crashes, a club suit helps resolve issues for declarer, a heart lead resolves trumps, and an attacking diamond lead wins a quick third round ruff, but then West is truly endplayed, and for his trouble has weakened his trump holding so that the declarer can draw all of the trumps followed by leading a club to the queen, felling next the A on an "obligatory finesse," and endplaying West in spades, making three!

How cool! So the bottom line is that with length in trumps, you ought to be leading YOUR long suit, and that means a spade. So what if you give up a trick! It is only one trick given, and it turns out to be an investment. Later on, you can likely lead them to advantage, especially if declarer plays on trumps.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠T985
KQT3
JT8
♣KQ
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠KJ3
98
K9543
♣AJ8
♠Q64
A75
Q72
♣T965
♠A72
J642
A6
♣7432
11
128
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠  ♣5 ♦4 NT5/6
EW: 2♣ 2 1NT  ♥5 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 2NT*-EW/3*-EW/3♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  1N E -1   4  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Jones-Taggert
    PASS       1.00   1.00  Pass Out      O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
         90    0.00   2.00  2 W      ♣K  O4-Street-Putnam vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
1Pass1NTPass
PassDblPass2
PassPassPass 

Where there's a will, there's a way. After NS both pass early on, balancing is the prescribed method of competing against a low-level contract. Often a notrump response to a minor suit will hide a fit, and North risks a club bid by South, expecting a) that one of the majors will produce a fit, and b) that South will prefer to respond in a poor major suit rather than a poor club suit.

Yeppers, that's the ticket!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠987
8763
AT64
♣87
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AQT54
K
K83
♣T632
♠KJ6
J9
QJ75
♣QJ95
♠32
AQT542
92
♣AK4
4
1211
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 2NT  ♣5 ♦6 ♠5
EW: 2♣ 1 2♠  ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  5♠ W -3   A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Jones-Taggert
  100          1.00   1.00  3♠ W -1   8  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
        140    0.00   2.00  2♠ W +1   3  O4-Street-Putnam vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
133Pass
PassPass  

North's 3 bid was preemptive. Should South bid game opposite a preempt? If so, will he pick off the K singleton? There is no reason to do so.

If NS defend, a club led or shift ensures one heart, one top diamond, two clubs, and a club ruff, for down one, plus 100 to NS.

Game by North does not rate to make, either in theory or practice. If North had as much as the K and the A, there would have been a normal raise, not a preempt, and the point is to tell partner the difference, have the message understood, and to take the appropriate action.

Not the best result possible for NS, but getting the best possible result over and over should pay.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠J3
KQT9
AT52
♣KT2
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A8
A654
J8
♣97654
♠KQT9
J732
Q973
♣3
♠76542
8
K64
♣AQJ8
13
98
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +110 3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.00   0.00  1N N +1   3  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
   90          0.50   1.50  1N N      ♠9  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-Jones-Taggert
   90          0.50   1.50  2♣ S      J  O4-Street-Putnam vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1Pass1
Pass1NTPassPass
Pass   

South's rebid is not clear. Spades are so weak as to be unattractive for rebidding consideration. The opponents have not bid hearts, so partner probably has that suit under control. Hopefully. 2 might be a useful call, but it is artificial, so not rational. 2 might be a bid, but only out of fear of the heart suit. And only if not conventional!

2 and 2 are logical alternatives to passing 1NT, and today the pass wins.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠JT832
A54
98
♣A83
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠974
T6
AQ743
♣KT7
♠KQ
KQJ98
65
♣QJ52
♠A65
732
KJT2
♣964
9
914
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6
EW: 4♣ 2 4 1NT  ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    2.00   0.00  3♣ E +1   T  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
        170    0.50   1.50  2 E +2   ♠5  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O4-Street-Putnam
        170    0.50   1.50  2 E +2   2  O5-Sebring-Anthony vs O1-Jones-Taggert

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
1NTPass22
PassPass2Pass
PassPass  

A funny thing about bridge is that if you cannot justify a bid on merit, a pass is usually best! North ventured out into No-Man's land with his 2 bid, when considering the vulnerability. The worst thing about his hand is the possession of three hearts! The auction produced by EW suggests that South may well also hold three hearts, thus an extra loser if North declares. Many players fail to heed such warning signals, but they do better to hear and heed.

The point about not acting and benefiting relates, however, to EW. East has no reason at all to bid again with an aceless wonder and only five hearts, not imagining even an eight-card fit. Venturing to the three level is rather too much of a risk. The benefit for such thinking is that defending will produce a really nice profit, for EW can take seven tricks, gaining plus 200, by simply leading hearts, and then shifting to clubs after taking two defensive tricks there. Two heart tricks, two club tricks, two diamond tricks, and a spade will look mighty fine on the score sheet and the matchpoint result tally.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

6 ♠Q8
QT7643
A
♣A965
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠653
J9
T84
♣KT842
♠A7
K852
K762
♣J73
♠KJT942
A
QJ953
♣Q
12
411
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2 5♠ 1NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          2.00   0.00  4♠ S +1   T  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
  420          0.50   1.50  4♠ S      J  O5-Sebring-Anthony vs O1-Jones-Taggert
  420          0.50   1.50  4♠ S      ♣4  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O4-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
Pass2Pass2
Pass3Pass3
Pass3Pass4
All pass   

A totally awkward auction, but the result will be OK for NS. The given auction seems likely to occur with some regularity, North begging for a heart preference with the 3 bid and South for a spade preference with 3! Lo and behold, North begrudgingly accommodates.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

7 ♠AK973
74
Q73
♣J94
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠J654
A98
A
♣AQT62
♠Q2
Q652
K9852
♣73
♠T8
KJT3
JT64
♣K85
10
157
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ -/1 -/1♠
       ♣6/7 ♦5/7 ♥5/6 ♠5/7 NT6
EW: 1 1NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  3♣ W -3   ♠A  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O4-Street-Putnam
  200          1.00   1.00  2♣ W -2   ♠A  O5-Sebring-Anthony vs O1-Jones-Taggert
        110    0.00   2.00  2 W      ♠A  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
11DblPass
1NTPassPassPass

West might choose otherwise over the negative double: 2 seems all right in general, but with only five and a potential spade stop if East will just assist in the matter, 1NT is better on that score, and any club tricks will count in notrump. 2 on a three card suit by West might work, considering the singleton diamond, but it IS just a three-card suit, and later competition might lead East to a wrong decision. Besides, the diamond singleton is the ACE!

1NT seems the best choice under the circumstances, and it turns out to be the only contract that can be made!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

8 ♠A73
AT73
Q765
♣J5
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T864
KQJ
AK4
♣T96
♠KQJ2
54
93
♣AK742
♠95
9862
JT82
♣Q83
11
1313
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 4♣ 1 1 4♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        400    2.00   0.00  3N W      Q  O5-Sebring-Anthony vs O1-Jones-Taggert
        420    1.00   1.00  4♠ E      T  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
        570    0.00   2.00  3♣* W +1  ♠A  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O4-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1Dbl1Pass
2Pass4All pass

The opponents don't ALWAYS have four cards in each major, and EW brush North's takeout double aside with superior cards.

Making 4 is rather much a breeze when the suit breaks 3-2.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠K2
AK86
QJ873
♣43
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q7
Q973
T4
♣KT872
♠J9864
J54
AK5
♣J6
♠AT53
T2
962
♣AQ95
13
710
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 1/2 1♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.00   0.00  3N S      ♣2  O4-Street-Putnam vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
        100    1.00   1.00  3N N -2   ♠9  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O1-Jones-Taggert
        150    0.00   2.00  3N S -3   ♠Q  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Ritchie-Keyworth

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass1
Pass1NTPassPass
Pass   

Bland hand. No competition is feasible with the assets available at this vulnerability, so East will be on lead against 1NT and the 6 will hit the felt table (are your tables felt? More likely some hard surface, but the lead will be the 6 nevertheless). When declarer calls for a small spade from dummy, West must play the 7! While I knighted the play with an exclamation point, it really is rather routine, isn't it? West must leave the queen in the quiver for fear of finessing East's jack later. And if East has the Jack, then the Rule of Eleven will tell West that the seven is correct.. If East has lead from KJ964, then the queen would hold the first trick, but the declarer's nine would provide a second stopper. So the seven is again the right card.

It will take some doing for North to come to eight tricks, and it is the fact that the T falls doubleton that gets the job done. Playing on the long diamond suit is clearly the right way to play, and the danger might be that the club suit will be a distraction.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

10 ♠K643
974
AKT64
♣9
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠A7
AKQT
J952
♣853
♠QJ
6532
Q83
♣KQ62
♠T9852
J8
7
♣AJT74
10
1410
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥5
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  730          2.00   0.00  3♠* S     A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Ritchie-Keyworth
  200          1.00   1.00  4 W -2   A  O4-Street-Putnam vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
  110          0.00   2.00  1♠ S +1   A  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O1-Jones-Taggert

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
1Pass11NT
22PassPass
Pass   

South's passed-hand 1NT bid is clearly Unusual for the black suits, typically 5-5, perhaps 5-4, in the unbid suits, and North will not fail to bid in the partnership's nine-card fit! Game seems a long way off, but aggressive pairs might think of it.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

11 ♠965
AJ74
JT32
♣Q3
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠743
83
AQ64
♣AKJ2
♠K2
Q92
K975
♣T964
♠AQJT8
KT65
8
♣875
8
148
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠  ♣5 ♦5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 2  ♥4/3 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.00   0.00  2♠ S +2   ♣A  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O1-Jones-Taggert
  140          1.00   1.00  3 S      ♣A  O4-Street-Putnam vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
         50    0.00   2.00  3 S -1   ♣A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Ritchie-Keyworth

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
1Pass1NTDbl
PassPassPass 

In your dreams, South leads a heart, the defense rattles off four heart tricks, being careful to win the last in the North hand, and then five spades, taking the first nine tricks! Down three, plus 500 to NS!

Dream on. First, South might open the bidding, as the requirements for an opening bid are disintegrating before our eyes, and the bid is not that bad, with strong spades and both majors -- some would look at the T and justify the bid on that slender reed, saying that tipped the balance! Second, South might bid 2 instead of doubling. Third, South might lead a spade to set up the tricks, rather than a risky heart lead. Or maybe he would.

There isn't anything clear about any of this, but that means that the dream auction and play for NS is very unlikely to occur.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

12 ♠6
Q
KQ642
♣QJT653
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠JT3
AK985
93
♣AK8
♠AQ9542
J643
AT5
♣-
♠K87
T72
J87
♣9742
10
1511
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♥1 ♠1 NT1
EW: 6 6♠ 4NT  ♣6 ♦6
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -980 6♠-EW/6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        450    2.00   0.00  4 E +1   ♣2  O4-Street-Putnam vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
        480    0.50   1.50  5 W +1   ♠6  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Ritchie-Keyworth
        480    0.50   1.50  4 W +2   ♣Q  O7-Handley-De Gregorio vs O1-Jones-Taggert

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
12NT3Pass
4Pass4Pass
4Pass5Pass
6All pass  

Lots to talk about here. 1 is routine, but North's 2NT Unusual for the minor suits is risky even with the 5-6 pattern, perhaps just enough intermediate strength for safety, and perhaps not terribly misleading to partner. But it is not North's partner who needs information. East has a monster hand in support of hearts, and must communicate that fact to partner. There are several products on the market to combat the Unusual notrump -- "Lower, Lower," so that clubs relates to hearts and diamonds relates to spades, is one. 3 and 3 are used interchangeably in one system or another as providing support for partner and the other minor relating to the other major in some respect.
Let's work on the best way. Lower, Lower does not strike me as best. The solution suggested here is lifted directly from a suggestion decades ago in The Bridge World, but I cannot recall the author to give proper credit.

If the auction starts 1 [2NT] 3, I cannot for the life of me understand why that can be non-forcing, because of the potential for a misfit disaster, lacking sufficient strength to overcome partner's need to convert to 4. So let's start with the agreement that bidding three of the other major is strong and game forcing to overcome that particular objection. Everyone agrees that three of opener's major is just competitive, and not forcing, showing some values without being invitational. Opener can go to game with extras.

The crux of the matter is the choice of minors for the support bid, leaving the other minor to suggest playing in the other major, something resembling a weak two bid. Here's the argument for 3 being the other major bid and 3 being the limit raise invitational bid in partner's major: If 3 is chosen as the "other major," then opener has the option of bidding 3 with only five cards in his opening bid suit without a clear preference for the other major, while 3 of the major suit will show a six card suit or better by elimination of the five-card definition! 3, the limit raise, needs no such definition, and opener can use his length to determine whether to accept!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

13 ♠AKQT3
KJ964
-
♣752
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠J975
-
JT975
♣J983
♠4
AQT85
Q32
♣AT64
♠862
732
AK864
♣KQ
13
312
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♦5
EW: 2♣ -/1  ♦6/7 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   0.00  2♠ N +1   2  O5-Sebring-Anthony vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
        100    0.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Street-Putnam
        100    0.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   ♣4  O1-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Ritchie-Keyworth

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis

With a distributional opening bid opposite an opening bid and a fit, expect most of the field to play 4. If North has bid hearts, perhaps a speculative double by East might be ventured. Nothing ventured, nothing gained, they say. This venture will surely gain a top!

The most likely defense is for East to lead the A and another club, followed by two top diamonds, North discarding two hearts, followed by a heart. Oops!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

14 ♠T5
JT765
KJ632
♣4
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AQ764
9
QT84
♣KT2
♠J
AK4
A75
♣A97653
♠K9832
Q832
9
♣QJ8
5
1116
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT2
EW: 5♣ 4 3♠ 4NT  ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  6♣ E -1   9  O1-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Ritchie-Keyworth
        150    1.00   1.00  3♣ E +2   2  O5-Sebring-Anthony vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
        400    0.00   2.00  5♣ E      9  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
1Pass2Pass
2Pass3NTAll pass

2 might be employed as a variant of New Minor Forcing , but it doesn't matter to East, who must show a maximum and red suit stoppers, regardless of the meaning. Everything works, and even the diamond spots have position.

Good game, good score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

15 ♠K975
T742
652
♣98
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AJT62
KQ83
J7
♣73
♠83
A9
KQ943
♣AKT5
♠Q4
J65
AT8
♣QJ642
3
1116
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2
EW: 3♣ 5 4 4♠ 5NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        460    1.50   0.50  3N W +2   7  O1-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Ritchie-Keyworth
        460    1.50   0.50  3N E +2   ♣6  O5-Sebring-Anthony vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
        490    0.00   2.00  3N E +3   ♣6  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Street-Putnam
16 ♠KT42
K63
Q92
♣KQT
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠J65
A854
A853
♣J2
♠Q73
QJT97
7
♣A873
♠A98
2
KJT64
♣9654
13
109
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 2♠ 1NT  ♥5
EW: 2  ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    1.50   0.50  4 S -2   A  O5-Sebring-Anthony vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
        100    1.50   0.50  4 S -2   A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Street-Putnam
        110    0.00   2.00  2 E      T  O1-Jones-Taggert vs O3-Ritchie-Keyworth
17 ♠A52
965
KJ83
♣K97
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠QT9
AJ43
A76
♣QJ2
♠KJ764
K
Q942
♣863
♠83
QT872
T5
♣AT54
11
149
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 2♠ 2NT  ♥6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  2N W -1   3  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
        140    0.50   1.50  2♠ E +1   T  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O7-Handley-De Gregorio
        140    0.50   1.50  2♠ E +1   T  O6-Hedlund-Roberts vs O1-Jones-Taggert
18 ♠QT
AKQ962
62
♣K52
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠32
854
AKQ873
♣J7
♠KJ964
JT
T54
♣T43
♠A875
73
J9
♣AQ986
14
105
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 5 1♠ 1NT  ♦5
EW: 1  ♣1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +650 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  710          2.00   0.00  4 N +3   ♠6  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O7-Handley-De Gregorio
  650          0.50   1.50  4♠ N +1   4  O6-Hedlund-Roberts vs O1-Jones-Taggert
  650          0.50   1.50  5 N      4  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
19 ♠AJ3
KJ9
KT42
♣KT9
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QT9
6
98763
♣QJ43
♠K5
A85432
Q
♣A752
♠87642
QT7
AJ5
♣86
15
513
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/- 1♠ 2NT  ♣3 ♦7/6 ♥5
EW: 3♣ 2  ♦6 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -100 3NT*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   0.00  3♠ N      A  O6-Hedlund-Roberts vs O1-Jones-Taggert
         50    1.00   1.00  2♠ S -1   6  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O7-Handley-De Gregorio
        100    0.00   2.00  3♠ N -2   A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
20 ♠543
QT9
KQJ3
♣J72
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AQ9876
8
765
♣AT5
♠KJT
KJ74
A42
♣K84
♠2
A6532
T98
♣Q963
9
1015
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT2
EW: 1♣ 2 4♠ 4NT  ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   K  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
        170    1.00   1.00  2♠ W +2   K  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O7-Handley-De Gregorio
        650    0.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   K  O6-Hedlund-Roberts vs O1-Jones-Taggert
21 ♠K943
KJ85
64
♣AQ7
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QT865
T7
KT
♣J842
♠AJ2
A9
AJ983
♣K95
♠7
Q6432
Q752
♣T63
13
617
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♦4 ♠3 NT5
EW: 3♣ 2 4♠ 2NT  ♥5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  4♠ E -2   2  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
   50          0.50   1.50  4♠ W -1   6  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
   50          0.50   1.50  3♠ W -1   5  O4-Street-Putnam vs O7-Handley-De Gregorio
22 ♠QJT972
AT753
-
♣J3
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠-
Q9
QJ976
♣K98764
♠A843
J864
K3
♣QT2
♠K65
K2
AT8542
♣A5
8
810
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 3/4 5/6♠ 1NT  ♣4/5
EW: 2♣  ♦6 ♥3 ♠1 NT4
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +980 6♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          2.00   0.00  5♠ N +1   ♠A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
         50    0.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   ♣Q  O4-Street-Putnam vs O7-Handley-De Gregorio
         50    0.50   1.50  4 N -1   ♠A  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
23 ♠-
A9874
T
♣KQ95432
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠4
K65
AJ542
♣AT86
♠QJT9853
Q
Q973
♣J
♠AK762
JT32
K86
♣7
9
128
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 -/1NT
       ♦2/3 ♠3 NT6/7
EW: 4 3♠  ♣4/5 ♥2/3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          2.00   0.00  4 N +1   ♠Q  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O5-Sebring-Anthony
        200    0.50   1.50  4 S -2   A  O4-Street-Putnam vs O7-Handley-De Gregorio
        200    0.50   1.50  5♣* N -1  Q  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
24 ♠AKJ9
K8
953
♣Q965
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠Q43
Q5
AQ8742
♣A3
♠8765
J63
KT
♣J872
♠T2
AT9742
J6
♣KT4
13
145
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 2♠  ♦6 NT6
EW: 1 1NT  ♣3 ♥2 ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.00   0.00  4 W -3   K  O4-Street-Putnam vs O7-Handley-De Gregorio
         50    0.50   1.50  4 S -1   ♠Q  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-Hedlund-Roberts
         50    0.50   1.50  3 S -1   A  O3-Ritchie-Keyworth vs O5-Sebring-Anthony