- Saturday Morn - October 7, 2017

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 1063 MP  Geomean: 473 MP
(based on 14 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Janet Street - William Putnam 62.50 1st OA 2.63
Janet Hedlund - Joan Roberts 53.75 2/3rd OA 1.73
Carol Maggipinto - Mark Maggipinto 53.75 2/3rd OA 1.73
Debeliah Anthony - Peter De Gregorio 51.25 2nd SC 0.41
EVENT>Sat Morning Open Game    |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 7, 2017    |CLUB NO.>150680    | 10/07/2017 14:56
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Appreciation game       |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   24.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/300  |CLUB>H & H  Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=7/B=5/C=4                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Peter De Gregorio      Debeliah Anthony         C   .     .     .   |   .     .     2     24.60  51.25  0.41(SC)
 3 Terry Handley          Richard Papst            C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     18.00  37.50
 4 Carol Maggipinto       Mark Maggipinto          A  2/3    .     .   |  2/3    .     .     25.80  53.75  1.73(OA)
 5 Doris Jones            Elizabeth Sebring        C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     21.00  43.75
 6 Janet Street           William Putnam           B   1     1     .   |   1     1     .     30.00  62.50  2.63(OA)
 7 Joan Roberts           Janet Hedlund            C  2/3    2     .   |  2/3    2     1     25.80  53.75  1.73(OA)
 8 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     23.40  48.75
                                          Totals                                            168.60

Hands and Results
1 ♠QT87
J52
KT7
♣642
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J96
Q763
Q6
♣AK97
♠K542
AK9
9852
♣53
♠A3
T84
AJ43
♣QJT8
6
1210
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1 1 1♠ 1NT
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  4 W -4   ♣6  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
   90          1.00   1.00  1N N      ♣A  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Jones-Sebring
        100    0.00   2.00  2 S -2   3  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
Dbl11NTPass
PassPass  

Who needs a diamond stopper? East has ten HCP and a spade stopper, along with some diamond length. Enough to bid 1NT!

Making 1NT takes a bit of technique plus noticing that the 9 is a third stopper in the suit! After a likely Q lead, declarer can win the lead, test and happily run hearts, on the last of which South will have difficulty discarding. No matter. A diamond exit will create an inescapable endplay for declarer's ninth trick one way or another -- there are too many variations to show them all, but after six tricks in, declarer sits back and awaits a present.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠K5
KJT874
964
♣J7
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AQT98
532
AJT
♣T9
♠43
AQ6
85
♣Q65432
♠J762
9
KQ732
♣AK8
8
118
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1  ♣5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 2NT  ♦5 ♥5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  2 N      ♠4  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Street-Putnam
  100          1.00   1.00  3♠ W -2   ♣J  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
        300    0.00   2.00  3N S -3   ♠Q  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Jones-Sebring

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
1Dbl1NTPass
PassPass  

Who needs a diamond stopper? Part two. East has some values, including likely two heart stoppers, and may offer 1NT in a competitive auction. Thanks to West for the two diamond stoppers, eight tricks come home when the spade suit is properly played for four tricks by finessing twice against the jack. Strangely, the jack is the more important card, for finding it South will ensure that the suit runs, while finding the king is not as productive. Quite novel, but the key to that conclusion is the exceptional spade spots in the West hand.

It is, of course, somewhat possible for North to mess up the works by ducking the K while enticing declarer to expend his heart stoppers for a second entry. That is: Win the diamond lead, hook the Q, finesse the 8, HOLDING! use the A to take a second spade finesse, and the roof caves in!

Well done, North!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠AK74
J8
754
♣K532
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QT982
Q32
T98
♣T9
♠J53
76
Q62
♣J8764
♠6
AKT954
AKJ3
♣AQ
11
44
21
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 6 6 4♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  990          2.00   0.00  6N N      ♠T  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Jones-Sebring
  450          1.00   1.00  4 S +1   ♠T  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
         50    0.00   2.00  6 S -1   ♠8  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   2
Pass2Pass2
Pass3NTPass6NT
All pass   

There is no "right way" to bid this hand. Instead, the system adopted by each partnership will dictate the auctions, but South will evaluated the hand as at least nearly game-forcing and North will have the obligation to reveal approximate hand strength and fit. In the diagrammed auction, the 2 opener is met with a 2 waiting bid and after the 2 natural rebid (not "Kokish"), different partnerships may allocate different hand values to 2NT or 3NT responders' rebids, but 3NT seems to convey valuable cards and distribution without a fit. Then, South might rebid 3 to check on a fit there, but 3NT by North would deny interest in either red suit while confirming black suit values. Then 6NT seems clear enough.

Systemic variables might arise from strong artificial 1 openers and systemic differences showing different point count balanced hands by responder, but ultimately the same considerations should prevail and result in a small notrump slam.

A spade lead will give South concern in the nature of entries, but they can be overcome with an almost invisible resource: win the lead and make the unfortunate choice of running the J, losing. On the continuation of another spade, declarer must only notice that the 8 is an entry to dummy!! Win the second spade, unblock the A and Q, return to the dummy's 8, pitch a second losing diamond (the first went on the second spade) and claim!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠AQ6
T98
AT9
♣T874
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KJ52
J72
K54
♣653
♠974
K54
J832
♣KQJ
♠T83
AQ63
Q76
♣A92
10
810
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 3 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          1.50   0.50  2N N      8  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Jones-Sebring
  120          1.50   0.50  1N N +1   2  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O6-Street-Putnam
   90          0.00   2.00  2 S      ♣6  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPassPass1
Pass2NTPassPass
Pass   

Look at those luscious tens, nines, and even eights in the North hand! 2NT is a quite reasonable upgraded invitation, but even so, South will surely decline. Despite North's valiant effort, the game will be missed at every table.

Nine tricks are rather difficult and won't always be gathered, but 120 will be easy enough. However, a quick examination:

A spade lead will cost west a trick when ducked around to the T. Three spade tricks for declarer!

A heart lead will cost a trick, thanks to the heart spots. Three heart tricks for declarer.

A diamond lead will cost a trick, and if East covers the 9, another is spent.

A club lead does not cost a trick directly, but it helps establish the "long" club in dummy.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠K93
932
KJ75
♣T64
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJT2
T8
Q9843
♣73
♠A74
AKQ4
AT
♣QJ98
♠865
J765
62
♣AK52
7
520
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3/2 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 2 4♠ 3NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  3N E -1   ♣A  O3-Handley-Papst vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        110    1.00   1.00  3♣ W      9  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-Street-Putnam
        460    0.00   2.00  3N E +2   6  O5-Jones-Sebring vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass2NTPass
3Pass3Pass
3NTAll pass  

Having spades as trumps gives declarer a couple of additional opportunities to avoid losers, which, when coupled with a very favorable trump split and the lucky positioning of the trump king, allows 4 to outscore 3NT in a 4-3 fit. Not a contract that will be reached often. 3NT will be the normal spot, and will make with some regularity, especially on a heart or club lead. A spade lead would prove most difficult for declarer, provided North withholds the king.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

6 ♠9852
9765
3
♣Q983
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠T
KQJ83
964
♣KT72
♠K43
T42
KT8
♣AJ54
♠AQJ76
A
AQJ752
♣6
2
911
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 6♠  ♣4 ♥6 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1  ♦3 ♠1 NT6/5
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +980 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          1.50   0.50  5♠ S      K  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-Street-Putnam
  450          1.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   K  O5-Jones-Sebring vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
         50    0.00   2.00  5♠ S -1   K  O3-Handley-Papst vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
1Pass24
All pass   

South refrained from opening a hard to handle 2 opening despite being tempted to so do, on the theory that with so much distribution and fewer than 2 HCP, the auction would not die. Mission accomplished, and slam still not considered by North despite being happy about the improved contract -- spade support is a lot better than the diamond support!

When the diamond king can be ruffed out and the spade king onside, twelve tricks are in -- not entirely surprising, but not anything that could be counted on during the bidding, either.

East-West will surely subside and not insult South with a double, understanding the power proclaimed in the auction.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

7 ♠AQ7543
T754
AQT
♣-
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠-
Q632
J9543
♣Q974
♠J986
AJ
K872
♣K85
♠KT2
K98
6
♣AJT632
12
512
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/2♣ 4/3 4♠ 3NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣5 ♥4/3 ♠2/3 NT4/3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +620 4♠-NS/4-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          1.50   0.50  4♠ N      A  O5-Jones-Sebring vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
  620          1.50   0.50  4♠ N      2  O3-Handley-Papst vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        300    0.00   2.00  6♠ N -3   A  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-Street-Putnam

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1Pass2
Pass3Pass3
Pass4All pass 

Raising on three trumps two two honors (count the T as an honor!) is very reasonable with a side singleton. North "tried for game" with the 3 call, and when South declined, settled for game, having had slam interest in reality, not merely game.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

8 ♠A842
K
J962
♣QJT8
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠J953
52
KT83
♣543
♠QT6
A986
54
♣AK62
♠K7
QJT743
AQ7
♣97
11
413
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 3 1♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          1.50   0.50  2 S +1   ♣5  O5-Jones-Sebring vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
  140          1.50   0.50  2 S +1   ♣3  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-Street-Putnam
  110          0.00   2.00  2 S      ♣4  O3-Handley-Papst vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPass11
Pass1NTPass2
PassPassPass 

North has a near opener, but the singleton K is downgraded, and pass correct. When South overcalls, North must express values. 2NT is possible, and the K is a good card, but still, it is a singleton and communication between the hands might be difficult, so 1NT is enough.

When South rebids 2, the auction should fizzle and 140 will be a normal score when the diamond finesse loses.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠AK72
Q5
A863
♣J93
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠T98
J92
KQJ
♣8762
♠Q654
843
95
♣AK54
♠J3
AKT76
T742
♣QT
14
79
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 3 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 13 - 16 = -3
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.00   0.00  4 S      ♠T  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Jones-Sebring
  120          1.00   1.00  1N S +1   K  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Handley-Papst
        100    0.00   2.00  4 S -2   K  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
10 ♠53
A
QJT97
♣AQ965
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AK82
T64
AK5
♣KT4
♠T97
Q98752
62
♣32
♠QJ64
KJ3
843
♣J87
13
172
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 2NT  ♥4/5 ♠6
EW: 2 1♠  ♣5 ♦4 NT4/5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.00   0.00  3N W -4   ♣6  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
  100          0.50   1.50  2 W -1   Q  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Handley-Papst
  100          0.50   1.50  2 E -1   4  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Jones-Sebring
11 ♠8654
J52
95
♣QJ94
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠T3
Q9743
T7
♣AT76
♠-
AKT86
AQJ43
♣K52
♠AKQJ972
-
K862
♣83
4
617
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♠  ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 NT5
EW: 4/3♣ 4 6  ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 22 - 21 = +1
Par: -300 6♠*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          2.00   0.00  4♠ S +1   Q  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Jones-Sebring
        100    1.00   1.00  5♠* S -1  3  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Handley-Papst
        300    0.00   2.00  6♠* S -2  T  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
12 ♠J62
AKQT42
T83
♣8
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠874
98
A975
♣KJ92
♠AK953
J763
KJ4
♣T
♠QT
5
Q62
♣AQ76543
10
812
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2 3♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♥6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    2.00   0.00  3♠ E +1   5  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Handley-Papst
        300    1.00   1.00  4 N -3   ♠A  O7-Roberts-Hedlund vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
        400    0.00   2.00  5♣ S -4   A  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O5-Jones-Sebring
13 ♠AK8
A73
Q3
♣KT942
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠93
96
AJT954
♣A76
♠QJ642
854
K62
♣J5
♠T75
KQJT2
87
♣Q83
16
97
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4  ♦5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 2 1♠  ♣3 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          2.00   0.00  4 N +1   2  O1-De Gregorio-Anthony vs O3-Handley-Papst
  140          1.00   1.00  3 S      ♠9  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        200    0.00   2.00  4 N -2   ♣J  O5-Jones-Sebring vs O6-Street-Putnam
14 ♠KT963
K96
87
♣J82
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠874
8743
T9
♣AQ63
♠J2
AQJT2
Q42
♣975
♠AQ5
5
AKJ653
♣KT4
7
610
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠  ♣6 ♥5 NT6
EW: 1  ♣6 ♦2 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          2.00   0.00  4♠ N +1   T  O1-De Gregorio-Anthony vs O3-Handley-Papst
         50    0.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   ♠J  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
         50    0.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   A  O5-Jones-Sebring vs O6-Street-Putnam
15 ♠965
43
A8
♣KJT743
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠KT
JT2
KJ94
♣AQ52
♠AQJ732
96
Q63
♣86
♠84
AKQ875
T752
♣9
8
149
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♦4/3 ♠3 NT6
EW: 2 3♠  ♣6 ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  3♠ E -1   ♣9  O1-De Gregorio-Anthony vs O3-Handley-Papst
        100    0.50   1.50  3 S -1   4  O5-Jones-Sebring vs O6-Street-Putnam
        100    0.50   1.50  3 S -1   4  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
16 ♠Q873
4
J742
♣Q974
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠A9
Q865
Q9
♣A8632
♠T542
AT92
T63
♣KT
♠KJ6
KJ73
AK85
♣J5
5
127
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♥5
EW: 1♣ 2  ♦4 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          1.50   0.50  2 E -1   A  O5-Jones-Sebring vs O6-Street-Putnam
  100          1.50   0.50  2 E -1   A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto
        110    0.00   2.00  2 E      A  O1-De Gregorio-Anthony vs O3-Handley-Papst
17 ♠T8
Q987
KT874
♣AJ
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A9532
J43
Q2
♣T83
♠76
KT6
AJ63
♣7654
♠KQJ4
A52
95
♣KQ92
10
78
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2♣ 3 2 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.00   0.00  3N S      3  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Jones-Sebring
         50    1.00   1.00  2 N -1   ♠7  O6-Street-Putnam vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
       1100    0.00   2.00  3 S -1   ♠3  O3-Handley-Papst vs O7-Roberts-Hedlund
18 ♠A85
T765
96
♣J973
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T96
842
AK
♣AT854
♠K3
AKQJ9
Q852
♣K2
♠QJ742
3
JT743
♣Q6
5
1118
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2
EW: 4♣ 3 5 1♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        450    1.50   0.50  4 E +1   ♠Q  O3-Handley-Papst vs O7-Roberts-Hedlund
        450    1.50   0.50  4 E +1   ♠4  O6-Street-Putnam vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
        480    0.00   2.00  4 E +2   ♠7  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Jones-Sebring
19 ♠J
KQ87643
T32
♣43
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AQ6
5
QJ
♣AQJ9865
♠K754
J9
AK9854
♣K
♠T9832
AT2
76
♣T72
6
1614
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣0 ♦0 ♠2 NT0
EW: 6♣ 6 4♠  ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: -800 6*-NS-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  6♣ W -1   ♠J  O6-Street-Putnam vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
        600    1.00   1.00  5♣ W      ♠J  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Jones-Sebring
       1100    0.00   2.00  6* N -5  ♣K  O3-Handley-Papst vs O7-Roberts-Hedlund
20 ♠T653
A53
KT
♣KJ94
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q4
QJ942
A82
♣AT7
♠J82
K86
QJ7643
♣Q
♠AK97
T7
95
♣86532
11
139
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦4 ♥4
EW: 3 3  ♣4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          1.50   0.50  4 W -1   K  O6-Street-Putnam vs O1-De Gregorio-Anthony
  100          1.50   0.50  3 W -1   ♠T  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Jones-Sebring
        140    0.00   2.00  2 W +1   ♠3  O3-Handley-Papst vs O7-Roberts-Hedlund
21 ♠Q6
K976
8543
♣AJ6
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A72
QT8542
AJ
♣Q8
♠T953
A3
96
♣T9432
♠KJ84
J
KQT72
♣K75
10
134
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 1 3/2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.00   0.00  4♠ S      A  O3-Handley-Papst vs O5-Jones-Sebring
  600          1.00   1.00  3N N      A  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-Street-Putnam
   50          0.00   2.00  2 W -1   8  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O7-Roberts-Hedlund
22 ♠643
6543
AK8
♣A76
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KQ
QJ7
J2
♣QJT942
♠AJ9852
AK
943
♣K5
♠T7
T982
QT765
♣83
11
1215
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          1.00   1.00  4♠ E -1   T  O3-Handley-Papst vs O5-Jones-Sebring
  100          1.00   1.00  4♠ E -1   T  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-Street-Putnam
  100          1.00   1.00  4♠ E -1   4  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O7-Roberts-Hedlund
23 ♠KT93
KJT32
983
♣T
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠764
Q
J754
♣QJ962
♠QJ85
A9654
2
♣754
♠A2
87
AKQT6
♣AK83
7
67
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/3♣ 5 4 3♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  660          2.00   0.00  3N N +2   ♠Q  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O7-Roberts-Hedlund
  630          1.00   1.00  3N S +1   ♣6  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-Street-Putnam
  600          0.00   2.00  3N S      ♣J  O3-Handley-Papst vs O5-Jones-Sebring
24 ♠AKQ732
AT4
7
♣872
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T964
K982
-
♣KQ965
♠J5
653
A96543
♣T3
♠8
QJ7
KQJT82
♣AJ4
13
85
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 5 2 3/4♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: +460 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          1.50   0.50  3N S +2   ♣6  O4-Maggipinto-Maggipinto vs O7-Roberts-Hedlund
  460          1.50   0.50  3N N +2   3  O3-Handley-Papst vs O5-Jones-Sebring
         50    0.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   5  O8-Nasr-Nasr vs O6-Street-Putnam