- Saturday Morn - August 3, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Field strength:  Mean: 547 MP  Geomean: 403 MP
(based on 15 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Jim Lauderdale - Suzanne Klein 57.64 1st A 1.50
Carol Sendell - Jeannette Stern 54.86 2nd A 1.13
Alan Hedegard - Charles Rauch 53.47 3rd A 0.84
Barbara Callaway - Jeff Weed 50.69 2nd C 0.22
EVENT>Saturday Morning Pairs (None/700/500)   |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 3, 2019     |CLUB NO.>150680    | 08/03/2019 12:43
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/700/500   |CLUB>H & H Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=6/C=4                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Barbara Callaway       Jeff Weed                C    .     .     2     36.50  50.69  0.22(C)
 2 Jeannette Stern        Carol Sendell            C    2     2     1     39.50  54.86  1.13(A)
 3 Janet Hedlund          Donna Jett               A    .     .     .     35.00  48.61
 4 Charles Rauch          Alan Hedegard            A    3     .     .     38.50  53.47  0.84(A)
 5 Patricia Heller        Leon Heller              B    .     .     .     29.50  40.97
 6 Wayne McIntyre         Sally Reed               C    .     .     .     33.00  45.83
 7 Jim Lauderdale         Suzanne Klein            B    1     1     .     41.50  57.64  1.50(A)
 8 Joan Roberts           Keith Hedlund            C    .     .     .     34.50  47.92
                                          Totals                         288.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠QT98
T6
AT982
♣Q3
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J72
J42
QJ5
♣T975
♠A643
K9
K73
♣K864
♠K5
AQ8753
64
♣AJ2
8
513
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 4 3♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣6/5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.00   1.00  3 S +1   ♣5  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O1-Callaway-Weed
  170          2.00   1.00  2 S +2   ♠2  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O5-Heller-Heller
  170          2.00   1.00  1 S +3   ♣5  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
  140          0.00   3.00  1 S +2   ♣T  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O3-Hedlund-Jett

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass11
Pass2Pass2
All pass   

An "advance" is the bid by the partner of an overcaller. Depending on partnership agreements, new suit advances can be agreed as forcing, nonforcing, or constructive. Each choice makes a huge difference in the meaning not only of the new suit bids, but the meaning of related bids, such as jump shifts into new suits and cue bids. The general, "standard," meanings are that new suits are constructive (so not running for advancer's life) but nonforcing, perhaps 8-11'ish HCP and a good suit. The purpose of a constructive bid is to investigate the prospect of bidding and making a game. Of course, also, a constructive, nonforcing, new suit denies primary support for partner's suit, but should also promise a "tolerance" for the overcaller's suit.

North's 2 bid fits the criteria for a nonforcing but constructive advance, which South calmly and definitively declines with the 2 bid, confident that partner will put a couple of hearts on the table as dummy.

The heart contract will result in ten tricks because of the favorable spade, heart, and club fits, the latter being incapable of diagnosis during the auction. Hence, a game contract will be a rarity.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠AQT3
KT63
K9
♣T72
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠976
AQJ75
T87
♣J5
♠8
4
AJ6532
♣AK864
♠KJ542
982
Q4
♣Q93
12
812
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦1 ♥6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 4♣ 5 1  ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -400 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.50   0.50  3 E      ♠4  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
        110    2.50   0.50  3♣ E      Q  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
        130    0.50   2.50  4 E      ♠K  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O1-Callaway-Weed
        130    0.50   2.50  4 E      ♠2  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O5-Heller-Heller

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
1Pass2Pass
2Pass4Pass
5All pass  

4 is invitational, not "Minorwood," because both East (2) and West (2) have made limited bids, capable of being passed by partner. Under those circumstances, asking for aces or key cards is logically inconsistent.

No, 4 is highly invitational, and West, with the A rather than, say, KQJ, has enough prime values to accept the try. The club minor honor and doubleton is a tilt toward acceptance as well.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠JT932
Q874
K52
♣K
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠8
K62
Q96
♣QJ9876
♠A54
AJT5
T743
♣T3
♠KQ76
93
AJ8
♣A542
9
89
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠ 2NT  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6
EW: 2♣ 1 1  ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  2♠ N +2   T  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O5-Heller-Heller
  140          1.50   1.50  2♠ N +1   7  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O1-Callaway-Weed
  140          1.50   1.50  2♠ N +1   ♣T  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
         50    0.00   3.00  4♠ N -1   ♣T  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O3-Hedlund-Jett

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1Pass2
PassPassPass 

When a partnership bids to the two level with a fit and stops bidding, it is very frequently correct to balance or bid directly by the opposing partnership. Here, West would be safe at the three level in clubs, and could bid, but in direct seat over the spade raise, 3 might be misconstrued, and if East were to balance in passout seat over South's 2 raise, then both bidding 3 by West and passing that call by East would take a confident partnership, indeed. Not really a crucial issue, however, for North would push on to 3, and that contract makes rather easily. Declarer counters a diamond attack with a club unblock and discard on the A.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠T9432
J8763
7
♣72
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AQ8765
9
AQJ82
♣9
♠-
Q4
T53
♣AKJT6543
♠KJ
AKT52
K964
♣Q8
1
1310
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣0 ♦2 ♠5 NT0
EW: 6♣ 5 2♠ 2NT  ♥5
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -1100 6*-NS-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  3 S      ♣9  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
        600    2.00   1.00  5♣ E      A  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O5-Heller-Heller
        620    1.00   2.00  5♣ E +1   A  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
        950    0.00   3.00  5♣* E +1  A  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O1-Callaway-Weed

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1Pass22
Pass345
PassPassPass 

12 tricks in clubs are not to be anticipated by EW, requiring both the falling trump lady and a favorable diamond position, along with spade discards.

5 is abundantly aggressive, and may well be all that is necessary for a great matchpoint score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠QT83
974
7653
♣T8
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠J62
T3
KQ
♣AJ7542
♠AK4
KQJ6
JT8
♣K63
♠975
A852
A942
♣Q9
2
1117
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2
EW: 5♣ 3 5 3♠ 5NT
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        400    3.00   0.00  3N E      2  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
        460    1.00   2.00  3N E +2   ♠9  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
        460    1.00   2.00  3N E +2   2  O5-Heller-Heller vs O1-Callaway-Weed
        460    1.00   2.00  3N E +2   2  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Stern-Sendell

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1NTPass
3NTAll pass  

Simple auction, easy play, flat board?



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

6 ♠J97642
QT65
6
♣J7
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠5
7
K98754
♣KQT93
♠KQ83
AKJ3
AJ
♣852
♠AT
9842
QT32
♣A64
4
818
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4 2 1♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  5♣ E -1   ♠A  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
        150    2.00   1.00  2N E +1   ♠A  O5-Heller-Heller vs O1-Callaway-Weed
        630    1.00   2.00  3N E +1   2  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
        660    0.00   3.00  3N E +2   9  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Stern-Sendell

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
21Pass3NTPass
4NTAll pass  
  1. Inverted. Support with support, get that part of the bidding out of the way early. A Splinter bid would be appropriate here, except that it is hard to convince partner you have TWO Splinter suits!

West's 4NT is a difficult choice -- not because of lack of values to justify a slam try, but because of the alternatives available from which to choose. 4NT sounds more balanced, but if the unbalanced nature of the hand were to be disclosed, better that it had been done starting with the first round. But we rather much approved the 2 bid, so are stuck with the consequences.

After the quantitative 4NT (East showed 18-19 balanced), pass looks right -- weak clubs, especially compelling a quiet ending.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

7 ♠QT95
J3
A763
♣865
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠A83
AT96
KQ9
♣T72
♠K762
K52
T842
♣J3
♠J4
Q874
J5
♣AKQ94
7
137
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1 2 1♠ 1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -110 2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   90          2.50   0.50  1N S      6  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
   90          2.50   0.50  1N S      6  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Stern-Sendell
        100    1.00   2.00  2♣ S -1   K  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
        200    0.00   3.00  2♣ S -2   6  O5-Heller-Heller vs O1-Callaway-Weed

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis

West made a borderline takeout double with very imperfect pattern, and East should be discouraged by North's bidding East's best suit.

If there is any justice, NS will fail in 2, for 2 and 1NT make. But 2 might make if the defense fails to thwart declarer's source of fulfilling tricks -- ruffs. So best defense seems to be to lead trumps often.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

8 ♠KT7
J95
J965
♣J92
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AQ43
Q8
Q43
♣K765
♠9865
AKT643
K8
♣8
♠J2
72
AT72
♣AQT43
6
1310
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♥3/4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3 3♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♦6/5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW/3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   5  O5-Heller-Heller vs O1-Callaway-Weed
   50          2.50   0.50  4 E -1   ♠J  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Stern-Sendell
        140    1.00   2.00  3♠ W      5  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
        400    0.00   3.00  3N W      ♣J  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O6-McIntyre-Reed

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1Pass1Pass
1Pass3Pass
PassPass  

3 is invitational, of course, game forcing auctions expected to incorporate a Fourth Suit game forcing 2 call by East after West rebids 1. With three queens (quacky values), West will decline the invitation, hoping for a plus score, rather than a miraculous result. Matchpoints is often a game of practicality. Here's a good example.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠65
KQJ96
62
♣8654
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AT974
A72
QJ7
♣K2
♠Q8
T85
K98
♣AQJT7
♠KJ32
43
AT543
♣93
6
1412
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2/3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 3 1 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          3.00   0.00  3N S      4  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O5-Heller-Heller
        170    2.00   1.00  2♠ W +2   6  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O1-Callaway-Weed
        600    0.50   2.50  3N E      4  O6-McIntyre-Reed vs O2-Stern-Sendell
        600    0.50   2.50  3N E      4  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Hedlund-Jett

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
1Pass1NTPass
21Pass3Pass
3NTAll pass  
  1. New Minor Forcing.

If NS lead hearts against 3NT, it will be necessary to duck once (Rule of Seven -- subtract the number of cards in the suit led -- duck that many times), and then play on diamonds. So long as the hand with heart length lacks the A, all is well.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

10 ♠72
AJ6
AKQT73
♣92
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AK965
Q8753
84
♣6
♠T84
KT2
J952
♣KT3
♠QJ3
94
6
♣AQJ8754
14
97
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 4 5NT  ♥4 ♠5
EW: 3 2♠  ♣2 ♦3 NT2
LoTT: 20 - 17 = +3
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  690          3.00   0.00  3N S +3   ♠A  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O5-Heller-Heller
  500          2.00   1.00  3 E -5   ♣A  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O1-Callaway-Weed
        100    0.50   2.50  3 N -1   ♠8  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
        100    0.50   2.50  3 N -1   2  O6-McIntyre-Reed vs O2-Stern-Sendell

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
1223
PassPassPass 

If EW bid more, there are two ways to lose -- being doubled, vulnerable, down 200 in 3 or more if higher, or by pushing the opponents into 3NT or 5. So the contested auction ending in 3 seems likely to occur. But will South always open 1? Surely passing is too timid, and 3 is a poor description of a constructive hand, so 1 seems best. However, the field will be peppered with 3 opening bids, enticing some Wests to enter the fray with inadequate resources, but they may get away with it. Mayhem may ensue in any direction after a preempt, so no predictions from here.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

11 ♠6
9852
QJT86
♣AQ9
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠QJ532
KQ
K43
♣864
♠AKT987
T43
-
♣KJ72
♠4
AJ76
A9752
♣T53
9
1111
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2/1  ♣3 ♠2 NT3
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 1NT  ♦5 ♥5
LoTT: 19 - 21 = -2
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  5♠ E -1   A  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O1-Callaway-Weed
        170    2.00   1.00  3♠ E +1   ♣T  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O5-Heller-Heller
        420    1.00   2.00  4♠ E      ♣T  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
        450    0.00   3.00  4♠ E +1   A  O6-McIntyre-Reed vs O2-Stern-Sendell
12 ♠A76
J8643
T762
♣J
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠JT94
K7
KQ9
♣8654
♠KQ82
QT9
854
♣K97
♠53
A52
AJ3
♣AQT32
6
910
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 3 1NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  2 S +1   ♣8  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
  110          1.50   1.50  2 S      ♠J  O6-McIntyre-Reed vs O2-Stern-Sendell
  110          1.50   1.50  2 S      ♠J  O7-Lauderdale-Klein vs O1-Callaway-Weed
   90          0.00   3.00  1N S      ♠J  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O5-Heller-Heller
13 ♠K43
JT43
K82
♣Q75
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AT85
A8652
Q6
♣J2
♠62
KQ7
973
♣AKT86
♠QJ97
9
AJT54
♣943
9
1112
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4/3 ♥3 ♠6/5 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 1♠ 2NT  ♦6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          3.00   0.00  3* W -2  K  O1-Callaway-Weed vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
  200          2.00   1.00  4 W -2   2  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
  100          1.00   2.00  4 W -1   2  O5-Heller-Heller vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
        140    0.00   3.00  3 W      8  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
14 ♠63
Q7
KQJT82
♣K96
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠KQT8
J85
A943
♣82
♠AJ2
AK92
76
♣Q543
♠9754
T643
5
♣AJT7
11
1014
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 3♠ 2NT  ♦5
LoTT: 17 - 14 = +3
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    3.00   0.00  2 N -1   ♠A  O1-Callaway-Weed vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
        140    1.50   1.50  3♠ W      K  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
        140    1.50   1.50  3 E      5  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
        400    0.00   3.00  3N E      3  O5-Heller-Heller vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
15 ♠T53
QJT962
A7
♣QT
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠A8762
AK53
Q8
♣A9
♠QJ4
7
KJ6542
♣J84
♠K9
84
T93
♣K76532
9
178
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♦2 ♠2 NT2
EW: 1♣ 4/5 4♠ 4NT  ♥6
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    2.00   1.00  4♠ W      A  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
        420    2.00   1.00  4♠ W      A  O5-Heller-Heller vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
        420    2.00   1.00  4♠ W      A  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
        450    0.00   3.00  4♠ W +1   Q  O1-Callaway-Weed vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
16 ♠Q73
Q3
KJ4
♣KJT96
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠K96
82
AT2
♣A8543
♠AJT8
AKJ5
Q73
♣72
♠542
T9764
9865
♣Q
12
1115
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT3
EW: 2/3♣ 3 3 5♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         70    3.00   0.00  1 W      ♠3  O1-Callaway-Weed vs O3-Hedlund-Jett
        170    2.00   1.00  2♠ E +2   ♣Q  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
        600    1.00   2.00  3N W      6  O5-Heller-Heller vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
        630    0.00   3.00  3N W +1   ♣J  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
17 ♠Q862
JT3
985
♣QJ9
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KJT4
4
Q43
♣AT532
♠A973
AQ865
AKJ
♣K
♠5
K972
T762
♣8764
6
1021
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠0 NT1
EW: 5♣ 5 4 7♠ 6/4NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -1510 7♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  6♠ E -1   7  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
        170    2.00   1.00  3♠ W +1   ♣Q  O6-McIntyre-Reed vs O1-Callaway-Weed
        450    0.50   2.50  4♠ W +1   ♣Q  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Heller-Heller
        450    0.50   2.50  4♠ E +1   8  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
18 ♠AKJ9
AK93
QT962
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠83
JT54
853
♣AJ86
♠765
Q876
AJ7
♣932
♠QT42
2
K4
♣KQT754
17
67
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 3 6♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT3/2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +1430 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          3.00   0.00  4♠ S +2   8  O6-McIntyre-Reed vs O1-Callaway-Weed
  650          1.00   2.00  4♠ S +1   J  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
  650          1.00   2.00  4♠ S +1   J  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
  650          1.00   2.00  4♠ S +1   8  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Heller-Heller
19 ♠9
KT8
QT3
♣AT9764
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠743
6432
A9762
♣3
♠AKQ
Q97
K85
♣KQ82
♠JT8652
AJ5
J4
♣J5
9
419
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠  ♦5 ♥6 NT5
EW: 2 1 2NT  ♣5 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -100 3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          3.00   0.00  3N E -5   ♣J  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Heller-Heller
        300    2.00   1.00  2N* N -2  9  O6-McIntyre-Reed vs O1-Callaway-Weed
        600    0.50   2.50  3N E      ♠J  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
        600    0.50   2.50  3N E      ♠6  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
20 ♠AT953
Q94
5
♣KT87
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K7
T862
T9864
♣95
♠Q642
AJ3
A32
♣AJ6
♠J8
K75
KQJ7
♣Q432
9
316
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 3/2NT  ♦6 ♥6
EW: 1 1/-
       ♣4 ♥7/6 ♠4/5 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +600 3NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  1N E -2   K  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
  140          2.00   1.00  2♠ N +1   ♠4  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O5-Heller-Heller
  100          1.00   2.00  1N E -1   K  O6-McIntyre-Reed vs O1-Callaway-Weed
         90    0.00   3.00  1N E      K  O2-Stern-Sendell vs O4-Rauch-Hedegard
21 ♠AJ9
96
K64
♣AJT32
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠Q2
A752
JT753
♣KQ
♠K7
QJ43
82
♣98764
♠T86543
KT8
AQ9
♣5
13
126
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 4♠ 3NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦6 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.50   0.50  4♠ S      ♣K  O1-Callaway-Weed vs O2-Stern-Sendell
  620          2.50   0.50  4♠ S      ♣K  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
  180          1.00   2.00  1N N +3   ♣9  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O5-Heller-Heller
  140          0.00   3.00  2♠ S +1   J  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
22 ♠K962
JT4
J75
♣874
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠T87
Q92
983
♣T965
♠Q53
AK76
Q4
♣KQJ3
♠AJ4
853
AKT62
♣A2
5
217
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 3NT  ♣6 ♥6
EW: 1♣  ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  1N S +2   ♣5  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
  140          2.00   1.00  2♠ S +1   A  O1-Callaway-Weed vs O2-Stern-Sendell
  110          1.00   2.00  2 S +1   ♣T  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O5-Heller-Heller
  100          0.00   3.00  1N E -1   6  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
23 ♠K
Q9652
J962
♣954
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠J765
AKT43
T5
♣87
♠Q2
J87
KQ73
♣KQJ6
♠AT9843
-
A84
♣AT32
6
814
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 2♠ 1/-NT
       ♥5 NT7/6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  3 W -3   ♠K  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O5-Heller-Heller
  110          2.00   1.00  2♠ S      A  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
  100          1.00   2.00  3 W -1   ♠K  O1-Callaway-Weed vs O2-Stern-Sendell
        300    0.00   3.00  4♣ S -3   A  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
24 ♠Q965
QJ7
K9
♣KJ96
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠3
84
AQ832
♣T8752
♠T8742
A65
T64
♣Q3
♠AKJ
KT932
J75
♣A4
12
66
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 4 4♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +420 4♠-NS/4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          3.00   0.00  3N S +2   ♣7  O4-Rauch-Hedegard vs O7-Lauderdale-Klein
  420          2.00   1.00  4 S      ♠3  O8-Roberts-Hedlund vs O6-McIntyre-Reed
  120          1.00   2.00  2N S      3  O3-Hedlund-Jett vs O5-Heller-Heller
         50    0.00   3.00  3N S -1   8  O1-Callaway-Weed vs O2-Stern-Sendell