- Saturday Morn - October 6, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Field strength:  Mean: 110 MP  Geomean: 54 MP
(based on 28 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Kathy Pfitzer - Mary Block 60.71 1st OA 1.59
Sally Reed - Wayne McIntyre 58.33 1st OB 1.28
Cord Hedegard - Mary Seiersen 57.94 1st OC 1.05
Jeff Riehl - Roger Barry 55.56 2nd OC 0.79
Karen Mok - Nancy Green 53.57 3rd OC 0.59
Bob Gore - Joseph Truskot 49.60 3rd SA 0.40
EVENT>Saturday Morning Pairs   |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> F N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 6, 2018    |CLUB NO.>150680    | 10/06/2018 12:32
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club Appreciation game       |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   63.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>500/200/100    |CLUB>H & H Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=7/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Mary Block             Kathy Pfitzer            A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     76.50  60.71  1.59(OA)
 2 Janice Flowers-Sonne   Mary Kalinyak            A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     55.00  43.65
 3 Albert Low             Sam Callaway             C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     51.00  40.48
 4 Norma Riggs            Ginger Minor             B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     66.50  52.78
 5 Karen Mok              Nancy Green              C   5     4     3   |   3     2     .     67.50  53.57  0.59(OC)
 6 Jeff Riehl             Roger Barry              C   4     3     2   |   2     1     1     70.00  55.56  0.79(OC)
 7 Julie Garvin           Joseph Garvin            B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     54.50  43.25
                                          Totals                                            441.00

EVENT>Saturday Morning Pairs   |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> F E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   63.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>500/200/100    |CLUB>H & H Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=7/B=7/C=4                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Suzanne Haley          Paula Cole               B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     62.00  49.21
 2 Mary Seiersen          Cord Hedegard            C   3     2     1   |   2     2     1     73.00  57.94  1.05(OC)
 3 Bob Gore               Joseph Truskot           C   .     .     .   |   3     3     2     62.50  49.60  0.40(SA)
 4 Sally Reed             Wayne McIntyre           B   2     1     .   |   1     1     .     73.50  58.33  1.28(OB)
 5 Fran Soskins           Louise Barnard           C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     61.50  48.81
 6 Ellie Satow            Deane Satow              C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     51.50  40.87
 7 John Kneisl            Barbara Moxley           B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     57.00  45.24
                                          Totals                                            441.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠JT864
KQ6
7
♣9862
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠973
94
AQT943
♣73
♠AKQ
752
J865
♣KQ4
♠52
AJT83
K2
♣AJT5
6
615
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 1♠  ♦3 NT4
EW: 4 1NT  ♣4 ♥4 ♠6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          6.00   0.00  3 S      A  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F3-Gore-Truskot
  110          4.50   1.50  2 S      ♣7  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F1-Haley-Cole
  110          4.50   1.50  2 S      ♣7  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F6-Satow-Satow
  100          3.00   3.00  3N E -2   8  F5-Mok-Green vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
   50          2.00   4.00  2N E -1   5  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        120    1.00   5.00  2N E      8  F3-Low-Callaway vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        130    0.00   6.00  4 E      ♠5  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1NT2
2NTPass3Dbl
334All pass

East should open 1NT despite the 4333 pattern and minimum range values for the bid. The alternative bid of 1 loses credibility because of the extremely poor suit quality.

South will want to compete against 1NT and will make the partnership's system bid showing a major-minor two suiter. If no such pattern description is available, then pass is the better choice! Balanced hands defend. Putting all of one's eggs into a moderate five card suit without significant distributional features is a losing tactic. So I will assume for the sake of this analysis that South's 2 bid shows hearts and a minor, giving a wider, hence safer landing area for NS.

West will bid diamonds, presumably using the Lebensohl convention (starting with 2NT) to show a hand with competitive, not game-forcing, values and a long (at least six card) suit. 2NT in lebensohl FORCES 3 by opener, after which responder passes, bids a new suit a) below the overcaller's suit as a signoff b) cue bids the opponent's suit as Stayman with a stopper, c) bids a new suit at the three level higher than the opponent's suit as invitational to game in that suit, or d) bids 3NT to show a stopper in the opponent's suit with game forcing values. Playing lebensohl, a direct jump to 3NT following the overcall shows game points, but denies a major suit or a stopper in the overcalled suit. 3 directly, rather than using the 2NT relay, would be game forcing.

East, having heard about West's hand and the NS fit, should complete the auction by bidding 4 in the known ten-card fit. If any excuse or principle is needed to do so, pull out the LAW of Total Tricks to justify the bid.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠J2
K73
KJ
♣AT7654
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AQ976
952
A64
♣Q9
♠K83
AQJ4
QT87
♣J3
♠T54
T86
9532
♣K82
12
1213
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT3
EW: 3 4 4♠ 1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW/4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          6.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   3  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        110    5.00   1.00  2 E +1   ♣2  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F6-Satow-Satow
        140    3.50   2.50  2♠ E +1   ♣A  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        140    3.50   2.50  1♠ E +2   ♣A  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F1-Haley-Cole
        170    2.00   4.00  2 E +2   ♣K  F5-Mok-Green vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
        420    0.50   5.50  4♠ W      ♣A  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        420    0.50   5.50  4♠ W      ♣A  F3-Low-Callaway vs F5-Soskins-Barnard

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
12Dbl1Rdbl2
4All pass  
  1. Support double, showing three spades
  2. Rosenkranz redouble, showing the A or K of clubs!

When partner overcalls a suit, there are often opportunities to show a top honor in partner's suit by doubling or redoubling. Without going into a lot of theory, I do advocate the simplest of these honor-showing bids, and advocate your consideration of the idea. In particular, what is suggested is that your partnership agree what when the opening side makes a Negative Double of your side's overcall, a redouble by "ADVANCER" (the partner of the overcaller) shows specifically the ace or king of the overcalled suit. Nothing more to it than that. The idea is primarily to help the opening lead problem partner would otherwise face, but secondarily the bid can be helpful to competitive or constructive bidding as well. The bid does NOT promise support, and might be better used to show specifically Ax or Kx, so that partner can underlead the suit to the known honor and a ruff might be obtained in defense.

With real support it might be better to preempt or bid more constructively by cue bidding or the like.

On this deal, the Rosenkranz redouble helps north with his opening lead problem. Underlead the A to South's known K, and then South can lead a diamond back.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠QT4
QT6
A76
♣QJ63
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AK75
K832
942
♣AK
♠J98
AJ
KQT853
♣T5
♠632
9754
J
♣98742
11
1711
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1
EW: 2♣ 6 3 4♠ 6NT
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.00   0.00  3N W -2   ♣3  F3-Low-Callaway vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        170    5.00   1.00  3 E +3   9  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        620    3.50   2.50  5 W +1   ♠4  F5-Mok-Green vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
        620    3.50   2.50  5 W +1   ♣Q  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        690    1.00   5.00  3N W +3   ♣3  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        690    1.00   5.00  3N W +3   ♣3  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F6-Satow-Satow
        690    1.00   5.00  3N E +3   ♣3  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F1-Haley-Cole

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
1NTPass3NTAll pass

Easy auction, easy game. Now play it correctly. Assume what North plays the Q on opening lead. Win, perforce, and play a diamond. When it holds, play a spade to the ace and than another club. North will win and play another club, South having encouraged. West wins and should first cash the other top spade and then four more diamond winners. North, having the duty to protect all three of the other suits, will crumble into a thousand tiny pieces. the discards will tell all, and declarer will pick up the remaining tricks.

Be sure to cash that second spade before running the diamonds, or else the West hand will be squeezed before North. Cashing the second spade honor is a Vienna Coup.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠A96
KQ865
KT6
♣K9
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T732
J432
Q94
♣T7
♠Q5
A9
AJ7532
♣Q82
♠KJ84
T7
8
♣AJ6543
15
313
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 1/- 5/4 4♠ 4NT
       ♦7/6
EW:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +650 5-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          6.00   0.00  3N N      ♣2  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
  170          5.00   1.00  3 N +1   A  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F6-Satow-Satow
  150          4.00   2.00  4♣ S +1   4  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
  130          3.00   3.00  3♣ S +1   4  F5-Mok-Green vs F1-Haley-Cole
        100    1.50   4.50  3♠ S -1   4  F3-Low-Callaway vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        100    1.50   4.50  4 N -1   ♠5  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        200    0.00   6.00  2N N -2   A  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F5-Soskins-Barnard

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass12Dbl
33NTAll pass 

3NT might technically be described as an overbid, but South will not accuse North of overbidding when 3NT makes! North is justified in his second bid by the fact that South's hand is not well defined, promising some playing values and probably four spades, but without a concrete point-count. Passing by North is a worse offense than relying on partner for values.

Whatever finesse North decides to take is destined for success, and after trying one (probably clubs first), then the second one will be icing on the cake. If West is not careful to preserve all of his spades, declarer might take an embarrassing number of tricks. Ten tricks are North's due, but eleven are there when West tosses a spade.

Why should West defend correctly? Well, for one simple reason, it is a well-known and established principle that a defender should retain parity with a long suit in dummy on the right. West can turn his head 45 degrees to the right and see a spade suit with four cards. Then the head turns left and downward and there are four spades also in hand. Save them!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠-
J984
8762
♣J8432
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AJ7
AQ6
AJT5
♣AQ6
♠8532
T72
K94
♣975
♠KQT964
K53
Q3
♣KT
2
223
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT3
EW: 3♣ 3 2 2♠ 4NT
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          6.00   0.00  3N E -3   ♠K  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
  100          5.00   1.00  3N W -2   2  F3-Low-Callaway vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        120    4.00   2.00  2N W      ♣2  F5-Mok-Green vs F1-Haley-Cole
        200    3.00   3.00  3♠ S -2   5  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F6-Satow-Satow
        400    1.50   4.50  3N W      ♣3  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
        400    1.50   4.50  3N E      ♣2  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        430    0.00   6.00  3N W +1   ♣5  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F3-Gore-Truskot
6 ♠QJ54
Q9863
Q72
♣J
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠962
AJ54
A4
♣AT54
♠AKT87
T2
J9
♣K763
♠3
K7
KT8653
♣Q982
8
1311
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 4♠ 4NT  ♦5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -500 5*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          5.50   0.50  3N W -2   6  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
  200          5.50   0.50  4♠ E -2   8  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
  100          3.00   3.00  4♠ E -1   ♣2  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F3-Gore-Truskot
  100          3.00   3.00  3♠ E -1   6  F5-Mok-Green vs F1-Haley-Cole
  100          3.00   3.00  3♠ E -1   5  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F6-Satow-Satow
         50    1.00   5.00  2 N -1   ♠A  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        140    0.00   6.00  2♠ E +1   7  F3-Low-Callaway vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
7 ♠Q
97654
QT96
♣T75
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠T43
T3
K8432
♣Q62
♠AJ975
KJ2
J75
♣A9
♠K862
AQ8
A
♣KJ843
4
514
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 2  ♠5 NT6
EW: 2/1♠  ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.00   0.00  3♠ E -1   ♣3  F5-Mok-Green vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
         80    5.00   1.00  1♠ E      A  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F6-Satow-Satow
        100    3.00   3.00  3 N -1   5  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F1-Haley-Cole
        100    3.00   3.00  3 N -1   ♣A  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        100    3.00   3.00  2 N -1   ♣A  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        140    0.50   5.50  3♠ E      A  F3-Low-Callaway vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        140    0.50   5.50  2♠ E +1   A  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
8 ♠K975
K2
QJ5
♣JT85
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AJ8
9743
43
♣AK74
♠T642
AQJ85
K86
♣2
♠Q3
T6
AT972
♣Q963
10
1210
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1/-  ♦7/6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5
EW: 4 2♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♦6/5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.00   0.00  4 E -2   ♣3  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
        140    5.00   1.00  2 E +1   7  F5-Mok-Green vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        170    3.50   2.50  3 E +1   7  F3-Low-Callaway vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        170    3.50   2.50  2 E +2   A  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F6-Satow-Satow
        200    2.00   4.00  3 E +2   A  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F1-Haley-Cole
        450    0.50   5.50  4 E +1   A  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        450    0.50   5.50  4 E +1   A  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
9 ♠AK96
J93
73
♣J963
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠T872
AKQT7
T62
♣K
♠Q5
8652
54
♣QT852
♠J43
4
AKQJ98
♣A74
9
124
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 3♠ 2NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          6.00   0.00  2 S +3   ♣K  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F6-Satow-Satow
  130          4.00   2.00  4 S      A  F3-Low-Callaway vs F3-Gore-Truskot
  130          4.00   2.00  4 S      A  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
  130          4.00   2.00  4 S      A  F5-Mok-Green vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
  110          2.00   4.00  3 S      A  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F1-Haley-Cole
         50    0.50   5.50  4 S -1   A  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
         50    0.50   5.50  4 S -1   A  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
10 ♠A74
763
K762
♣Q32
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠8653
KT54
AJ943
♣-
♠JT
QJ982
Q5
♣AK76
♠KQ92
A
T8
♣JT9854
9
813
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT6
EW: 2 3 1NT  ♣3 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          6.00   0.00  3N W -3   ♣Q  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
  200          4.50   1.50  4 E -2   ♣J  F5-Mok-Green vs F6-Satow-Satow
  200          4.50   1.50  4 E -2   ♣8  F3-Low-Callaway vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
  100          2.00   4.00  4 E -1   ♠K  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F1-Haley-Cole
  100          2.00   4.00  4 E -1   ♠Q  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F3-Gore-Truskot
  100          2.00   4.00  4 E -1   ♣T  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
    PASS       0.00   6.00  Pass Out      F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
11 ♠Q
A632
A7432
♣T62
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AJT2
K95
JT6
♣954
♠98643
Q8
K98
♣J73
♠K75
JT74
Q5
♣AKQ8
10
96
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 4 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4/3
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          6.00   0.00  4 S +1   ♠T  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
  420          5.00   1.00  4 S      J  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
  170          4.00   2.00  2 N +2   ♠8  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F1-Haley-Cole
  140          3.00   3.00  3 N      ♠9  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F3-Gore-Truskot
         50    1.00   5.00  2N S -1   ♠2  F5-Mok-Green vs F6-Satow-Satow
         50    1.00   5.00  4 S -1   J  F3-Low-Callaway vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
         50    1.00   5.00  4 S -1   ♣9  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
12 ♠732
T952
T932
♣97
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠KJ9
AJ7643
QJ5
♣5
♠-
KQ8
A876
♣KQJ842
♠AQT8654
-
K4
♣AT63
0
1215
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠  ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 NT3
EW: 5/4♣ 4 5 4NT  ♠4
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          6.00   0.00  6 W -3   ♣9  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F1-Haley-Cole
  100          5.00   1.00  6 W -2   ♣9  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
   50          3.00   3.00  5 W -1   ♠2  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F3-Gore-Truskot
   50          3.00   3.00  5 E -1   ♠3  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
   50          3.00   3.00  4 W -1   ♠7  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        450    0.50   5.50  5 W      ♠7  F5-Mok-Green vs F6-Satow-Satow
        450    0.50   5.50  5 W      ♠2  F3-Low-Callaway vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
13 ♠9765
K54
954
♣742
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠T32
9863
AQT
♣965
♠AQJ8
QJT
63
♣AKQJ
♠K4
A72
KJ872
♣T83
3
620
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 4/3 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          6.00   0.00  3N E -1   7  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
        120    5.00   1.00  1N E +1   ♣T  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        130    4.00   2.00  3♣ E +1   7  F5-Mok-Green vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        140    3.00   3.00  2 W +1   4  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        150    2.00   4.00  2N W +1   ♠5  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F6-Satow-Satow
        630    1.00   5.00  3N E +1   7  F3-Low-Callaway vs F1-Haley-Cole
        660    0.00   6.00  3N W +2   2  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
14 ♠Q87532
KJ63
86
♣Q
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AKT
42
AQJ932
♣K6
♠964
AT8
K5
♣T9873
♠J
Q975
T74
♣AJ542
8
177
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3
EW: 3♣ 3 1♠ 3NT  ♥5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    6.00   0.00  3 N -2   K  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        110    4.00   2.00  2 W +1   ♣Q  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F6-Satow-Satow
        110    4.00   2.00  2 W +1   ♣Q  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        110    4.00   2.00  2 W +1   ♣Q  F5-Mok-Green vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        130    2.00   4.00  3 W +1   ♣Q  F3-Low-Callaway vs F1-Haley-Cole
        430    1.00   5.00  3N E +1   ♣4  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        460    0.00   6.00  3N W +2   ♣Q  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
15 ♠A82
73
A9743
♣AK3
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠T643
9
82
♣JT9854
♠KJ975
KQ2
KQT
♣Q2
♠Q
AJT8654
J65
♣76
15
116
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4 1NT  ♣6 ♠5
EW: 1♠  ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +500 4♠*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          5.50   0.50  4 S      ♠3  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
  620          5.50   0.50  4 S      ♠3  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
  170          4.00   2.00  3 S +1   ♣J  F5-Mok-Green vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
  140          3.00   3.00  2 S +1   ♠3  F3-Low-Callaway vs F1-Haley-Cole
   50          2.00   4.00  2♠ E -1   A  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        100    0.50   5.50  4 S -1   ♠3  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        100    0.50   5.50  4 S -1   ♣J  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F6-Satow-Satow
16 ♠K83
T842
J63
♣763
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠752
AQJ95
KT8
♣AK
♠AQ96
73
AQ97
♣942
♠JT4
K6
542
♣QJT85
4
1712
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠1 NT1
EW: 3♣ 6 6 6♠ 6NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        240    6.00   0.00  1N E +5   ♣Q  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        630    4.50   1.50  3N W +1   2  F3-Low-Callaway vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        630    4.50   1.50  3N W +1   ♣3  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F6-Satow-Satow
        660    2.50   3.50  3N W +2   2  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        660    2.50   3.50  3N W +2   ♣3  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F1-Haley-Cole
        690    0.50   5.50  3N W +3   3  F5-Mok-Green vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        690    0.50   5.50  3N W +3   ♣3  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
17 ♠97643
AJ4
42
♣KQ2
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A82
K93
Q6
♣JT765
♠QT5
T765
T73
♣A93
♠KJ
Q82
AKJ985
♣84
10
106
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 2 3♠ 4NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦3/2 ♥5 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          6.00   0.00  3N N      5  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F6-Satow-Satow
  200          5.00   1.00  3 W -4   2  F5-Mok-Green vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
  150          4.00   2.00  3 S +2   ♣J  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F3-Gore-Truskot
  130          2.00   4.00  3 S +1   ♣J  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F1-Haley-Cole
  130          2.00   4.00  2 S +2   ♣J  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
  130          2.00   4.00  2 S +2   ♣5  F3-Low-Callaway vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
  110          0.00   6.00  2 S +1   3  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
18 ♠AK74
KQ986
K2
♣T5
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠Q95
7432
AQ
♣AK87
♠J32
J5
JT76543
♣J
♠T86
AT
98
♣Q96432
15
154
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 2♠ 3NT  ♦4
EW: 2  ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +300 4*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          6.00   0.00  3N N +1   6  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F1-Haley-Cole
  250          5.00   1.00  3♣ E -5   A  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F6-Satow-Satow
  150          3.50   2.50  2N W -3   8  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F3-Gore-Truskot
  150          3.50   2.50  4 E -3   A  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
  110          2.00   4.00  2♠ N      ♣J  F5-Mok-Green vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
   50          1.00   5.00  4 E -1   ♣6  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
        100    0.00   6.00  4 N -1   3  F3-Low-Callaway vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
19 ♠QT6
KQ53
K9642
♣6
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J5
JT6
T83
♣AQJ98
♠K92
A8
AQ7
♣T5432
♠A8743
9742
J5
♣K7
10
913
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♦6 NT4
EW: 4♣ 1 3NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -500 4♠*-NS/4*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    6.00   0.00  2 N -1   ♣5  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F1-Haley-Cole
        110    4.50   1.50  3♣ W      K  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        110    4.50   1.50  2♣ E +1   ♠3  F3-Low-Callaway vs F6-Satow-Satow
        130    2.00   4.00  4♣ E      ♠A  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        130    2.00   4.00  3♣ E +1   J  F5-Mok-Green vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        130    2.00   4.00  2♣ E +2   ♠A  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
        150    0.00   6.00  3♣ E +2   ♠A  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
20 ♠8654
AQ75
975
♣J7
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A72
J92
Q
♣QT8532
♠KQ93
T63
KJ86
♣A6
♠JT
K84
AT432
♣K94
7
913
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♦5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          6.00   0.00  3N W -2   5  F5-Mok-Green vs F3-Gore-Truskot
  100          5.00   1.00  1N W -1   5  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        100    4.00   2.00  2 N -1   ♣A  F3-Low-Callaway vs F6-Satow-Satow
        110    3.00   3.00  3♣ W      5  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        120    2.00   4.00  2N E      4  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        170    1.00   5.00  3♣ W +3   5  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard
        210    0.00   6.00  1N W +4   ♠8  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F1-Haley-Cole
21 ♠AJ72
Q7
AKQ92
♣A6
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠95
K985432
-
♣J732
♠KQT
AT
JT876
♣KQ4
♠8643
J6
543
♣T985
20
415
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♠
       ♣5/4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6/7 NT5
EW: 2♣ 1 5 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    5.50   0.50  3 W +1   Q  F6-Riehl-Barry vs F5-Soskins-Barnard
        170    5.50   0.50  2 W +2   A  F7-Garvin-Garvin vs F7-Kneisl-Moxley
        200    3.50   2.50  3 E +2   3  F2-Flowers-Sonne-Kalinyak vs F4-Reed-McIntyre
        200    3.50   2.50  2 E +3   ♣T  F4-Riggs-Minor vs F1-Haley-Cole
        300    2.00   4.00  4 N -3   A  F3-Low-Callaway vs F6-Satow-Satow
        450    0.50   5.50  4 W +1   A  F5-Mok-Green vs F3-Gore-Truskot
        450    0.50   5.50  4 W +1   ♣A  F1-Block-Pfitzer vs F2-Seiersen-Hedegard